Starmer’s
growth plan ‘doomed’ without access to EU markets, warn economists
Labour
leader told if elected he will have to rejoin the customs union to meet party’s
manifesto pledges, while 56% of voters say Brexit was bad for economy
Toby Helm
and Phillip Inman
Sat 22 Jun
2024 19.00 BST
A Labour
government under Keir Starmer will fail to maximise the UK’s economic growth
unless it takes the country back into the European Union’s single market and
customs union, leading economists and diplomats have said.
The warnings
come as an Opinium poll for the Observer finds that 56% of voters now believe
Brexit has been bad for the UK economy as a whole, compared with just 12% who
believe it has been economically beneficial.
Some 62% of
people questioned also believe Brexit has contributed to higher prices in
shops, against 8% who think that it has had the opposite effect.
With less
than two weeks to go until polling day Labour has increased its overall lead to
20 points over the Conservatives and is firmly on course for a large Commons
majority.
But there is
increasing pressure on Starmer and the shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves, to
spell out how they plan to deliver on their manifesto pledge of securing the
highest sustained economic growth of any G7 country while keeping within tight
fiscal rules, and while post-Brexit barriers to trade remain in place between
the UK and EU.
The Office
for Budget Responsibility says UK GDP will be around 4% lower every year than
it would have been had we remained inside the EU.
Starmer
insisted while campaigning in south London that On Saturday he would not rejoin
the bloc either in the short or longer term. “We are not rejoining the EU, we
are not rejoining the single market or the customs union,” the Labour leader
said.
Asked if he
would ever reconsider this, he added: “No. It isn’t our plan, it never has
been. I’ve never said that as leader of the Labour party and it is not in our
manifesto.”
While EU
leaders are said to be determined not to allow a Starmer government to “cherry
pick” its way to a preferential economic relationship without paying into the
EU budget and accepting freedom of movement, Starmer said he still believed he
could “get a better deal with the EU, and if we are elected to government that
is what we will endeavour to do”.
Economists
are clear, however, that without access to the single market, which allows
goods to cross into the EU without extra costs and paperwork, and vice versa,
the UK’s economic progress will be seriously impeded.
Dimitri
Zenghelis, an economist and Brexit expert at the London School of Economics
(LSE), said extra barriers since 2020 had cut trade with the EU and stifled
investment.
He said
Labour’s plans to talk to Brussels in a less combative way would “change the
mood music for foreign investors”, but that only by rejoining the single market
and customs union “could the UK shift the dial in a meaningful way”.
A report
last week by the LSE found that the trade and cooperation agreement signed on
30 December 2020 by then prime minister Boris Johnson had “reduced exports to
the EU by around 30% for small firms” and “perhaps around 20,000 small firms
have stopped exporting goods to the EU entirely”.
It warned
the next government that any trade deals with countries outside the EU would
make little impact on trade flows.
Prof Stephen
Millard of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, who worked
for 26 years at the Bank of England, said it was clear that single market
membership would boost trade and competition. “The closer we are able to get to
where we were [as full members of the EU] then the higher growth we will get
out of it. We could certainly enjoy higher growth if we were to have a closer
relationship with Europe.”
Former EU
permanent representative to Brussels Kim Darroch described Brexit as an act of
economic “self-harm” while another very senior EU diplomat said: “We used to be
a far more effective trading nation than we are now. The cause of that is
Brexit. There is no getting away from that.”
Opinium
found that a total of 56% of voters now want a closer relationship with the EU,
with 32% wanting to completely rejoin the bloc.
With Brexit
more of an issue in the election north of the border, the SNP yesterday
highlighted comments by Tory candidate for Aberdeen South, John Wheeler, who
said at a hustings that Brexit “is not working for multiple businesses across
Aberdeen and the north east”.
Writing in
the Observer Labour’s national campaign co-ordinator Pat McFadden cautioned
against the idea that the party has a massive election victory in the bag.
Although the
Tories are in ever increasing despair on the campaign trail, after recent
revelations about senior figures putting bets on a 4 July election before it
was called by Rishi Sunak, McFadden says the result is anything but decided.
Clearly
worried that complacency will set in he writes: “It is one thing for polls to
take a snapshot of public opinion. It’s another entirely for them to influence
voting behaviour. Particularly when it is reinforced by a cynical voter
suppression strategy from the Tory party telling people the outcome is known so
they don’t have to bother to vote.
“No way is
this election a done deal. The headlines about the clutch of MRP polls disguise
a huge level of uncertainty.
“ Up to 20%
of voters taking part in these polls say they have yet to make their minds up
or are uncertain how to vote. This could easily be 4-5,000 people per
constituency. No wonder one poll said there are 175 seats which are too close
to call.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário