terça-feira, 25 de junho de 2024

Far-right National Rally ready to govern France, Jordan Bardella says at manifesto launch

 


Far-right National Rally ready to govern France, Jordan Bardella says at manifesto launch

 

Officials of Marine Le Pen’s party say support in towns and village signals a clear rejection of Emmanuel Macron

 


Angelique Chrisafis in Paris

Mon 24 Jun 2024 17.21 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/24/far-right-national-rally-ready-to-govern-france-jordan-bardella-says-at-manifesto-launch

 

The French far-right leader Jordan Bardella has said his party is ready to govern as he unveiled manifesto pledges to limit immigration and scrap nationality rights for children born and raised in France by foreign parents.

 

“In three words: we are ready,” the 28-year-old president of the anti-immigration National Rally (Rassemblement – RN) said on Monday as he promised to “restore faith in France and its greatness”.

 

In a wide-ranging policy platform, Bardella said he would cut energy taxes to help people make ends meet, ban mobile phones from all schools, and prevent dual nationals from taking certain strategic jobs in the security or defence sector, which would be reserved for French citizens.

 

The mood was buoyant as Bardella gathered top party officials and journalists in a plush venue with pink marble walls and gold cornicing in the smart 8th arrondissement of Paris. Many of the officials had spent the weekend canvassing in constituencies across France after the centrist president, Emmanuel Macron, called a snap election when his centrists were trounced by the RN in European elections.

 

Several senior RN figures said that in towns and villages they were seeing support for the far right that exceeded their expectations and signalled a clear rejection of the president.

 

“We are the only alternative. We are credible, responsible and respect French institutions,” Bardella said as he sought to convince voters that his party, once attacked by its political opponents as untested and incompetent on the economy, was now the only one to be trusted with the budget. “Seven long years of Macronism has weakened the country,” he added, blaming the current government for France’s public debt.

 

Bardella once again called for voters to give him an absolute majority in parliament in order to form a far-right government which he said would “restore order”, crack down on misbehaviour in schools, and change the law to make it easier to deport people from abroad convicted of crimes.

 

He said that in the short term, he would reduce VAT on fuel, tax and electricity.

 

In the longer term, he said, a priority was to “put France back on its feet” by introducing what he called “a necessary law against Islamist ideologies”. The details of this project were not spelled out.

 

In her 2022 presidential election campaign, Marine Le Pen said she wanted to ban the Muslim headscarf from all public places, including the streets, calling it a “uniform of totalitarian ideology”. A party official said on Monday there were no immediate plans to act on the headscarf.

 

Bardella also announced a “big bang” in education, which he said would restore authority in schools. Children would have to use the formal “vous” form of address to teachers, tests of school uniforms would be rolled out (already put in place by Macron’s government) and there would be tougher sanctions on misbehaviour. These would include welfare benefits being scrapped for the families of children who were repeatedly disruptive. Special centres would be created for “disruptive students or bullies”, he said.

 

On foreign policy, the RN would continue to provide logistical and material support to Ukraine, but opposed troops on the ground and long-range weapons. Bardella said his party, which had close ties to Russia before its invasion of Ukraine, would be “extremely vigilant” in the face of Moscow’s attempts to interfere in French affairs.

 

The result of the snap two-round parliament vote, on 30 June and 7 July, is hard to accurately predict. Current polling shows the RN would take the biggest share of the vote at about 35%–36%, with a leftwing alliance at about 27%–29.5% and Macron’s centrists on 19.5%–22%. For the National Rally to win an absolute majority it would have to make a large leap from its current 88 seats to 289. If no party wins a majority, there could be gridlock in parliament.

 

Le Pen, who one party official said hopes to use this election as a “stepping stone” to winning the presidency for the far right in 2027, sat in the front row of Bardella’s manifesto launch, next to Éric Ciotti, the leader of France’s mainstream rightwing party, who recently announced a crucial alliance with the far right, a move that was greeted with fury and rebellion by key members of his party.

 

Macron reiterated this weekend in a letter to French people published in regional newspapers that he would stay on as head of state whatever the parliamentary result. In calling an election in just three weeks, Macron hoped to trip up his opponents and catch them unprepared. But if another party wins a majority, he would be forced to share power with a prime minister from the opposition, a phenomenon known in French as cohabitation.

 

“The goal cannot be to just continue as things were,” Macron said in his letter on Monday. He urged French people not to make the election a referendum on his leadership, saying it is not “a vote of confidence in the president of the republic”.

 

segunda-feira, 24 de junho de 2024

Why France’s allies worry about prospect of far-right victory in French ...

France’s Far-Right Leader Says the National Rally Is Ready to Govern

 



France’s Far-Right Leader Says the National Rally Is Ready to Govern

 

If he becomes prime minister after snap elections, Jordan Bardella, the party’s president, said he would represent all. But he also said dual citizens should not hold some “sensitive” jobs.

 


Aurelien Breeden

By Aurelien Breeden

Reporting from Paris

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/24/world/europe/frances-far-right-leader-says-the-national-rally-is-ready-to-govern.html

June 24, 2024

 

Jordan Bardella, the president of France’s far-right National Rally, insisted at a news conference on Monday that he would be a prime minister for all French people if his party won the country’s upcoming snap elections, even as he defended his party’s proposal to bar French citizens with dual nationalities from certain “sensitive” jobs.

 

Mr. Bardella spent much of the event focusing on his priorities should he become prime minister — drastically reducing immigration, toughening sentences for those convicted of certain crimes and lowering energy prices — if his nationalist party won a snap election for France’s lower house of Parliament. The election was called this month by President Emmanuel Macron and is being held in two rounds, on June 30 and July 7.

 

“We are ready,” Mr. Bardella told journalists at a marble-adorned venue in a plush neighborhood of Paris, as he sought to dispel criticism from Mr. Macron and from a new alliance of left-wing parties that the National Rally is unfit and unworthy to govern.

 

While the National Rally is leading in the latest polls, ahead of the left-wing alliance and of Mr. Macron’s centrist alliance, it is unclear if the party will win enough of the lower house’s 577 seats to secure an absolute majority and form a government.

 

Mr. Macron, who has three years left in office, has the power to appoint the prime minister. But the lower house could override his choice — making it all but certain he would have to appoint Mr. Bardella if the National Rally won the elections. That, in turn, would enable Mr. Bardella to form a cabinet and to govern France, blocking Mr. Macron’s domestic agenda and potentially disrupting his defense and foreign policies, which are traditionally but not exclusively presidential prerogatives.

 

But a hung Parliament with no clear majority could lead to months of instability or gridlock, as Mr. Macron cannot call new legislative elections for another year and has ruled out resigning.

 

Mr. Bardella dismissed the centrist coalition’s chances of mustering a majority. But he also said he would agree to become prime minister only if his party and its allies had an absolute majority.

 

“I won’t go to Matignon for personal glory, to say I spent 15 days there, and then be toppled by a no-confidence vote,” Mr. Bardella said, referring to the prime minister’s residence. “I want power that I can exercise.”

 

But his acknowledgment that his government would single out people with dual citizenship and bar them from certain jobs — even if only in niche situations — raised worries. Critics are concerned that a nationalist government could potentially target some citizens and restrict their rights based on their origins, breaking with France’s universalist promise to treat all equally.

 

In a letter published by France’s regional press on Sunday, Mr. Macron said the far right “divides the nation” by making a distinction between “those it calls real French people” and those it deems French only because of their “papers.”

 

In 2022, Marine Le Pen, the National Rally’s perennial presidential candidate, dropped a pledge to make it illegal for French people to hold another citizenship. But the concept of “national preference” — giving French citizens favored treatment over foreigners for certain government jobs, benefits or subsidies — is still central to the party’s platform.

 

Mr. Bardella, who insisted that “not a single French person will see their rights removed,” argued that the latest proposal would apply only to a very small number of jobs in “strategic” defense or security, although he did not say which ones. He called it a common-sense measure to prevent foreign interference and noted that a similar rule already applies to foreigners.

 

In the current climate, he asked, “Could you imagine a Franco-Russian working at the defense ministry?”

 

Under Ms. Le Pen, who was president of the National Rally from 2011 to 2021, the party was close to the Russia of President Vladimir V. Putin. It has since condemned Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, but has repeatedly opposed sanctions on some Russian imports and rejected the possibility of Ukraine’s joining the European Union or NATO.

 

On Monday, Mr. Bardella called Russia a “multidimensional” threat for France and said he would be “extremely vigilant” about Russian interference.

 

“I have no intention of calling into question France’s commitments, which would be likely to weaken France’s voice and the credibility of our country on the international stage,” he said when asked about support for Ukraine.

 

But he also staked out “red lines” — sending Western troops to Ukraine and giving Ukraine weapons with the ability to strike inside Russia — that set him apart from Mr. Macron. Mr. Bardella’s stance might herald a foreign policy clash with Mr. Macron if he becomes prime minister. Mr. Bardella has said he would be “respectful” but “uncompromising” in his attitude toward the president.

 

Mr. Bardella also rejected accusations that he had backtracked on key campaign pledges, although he acknowledged that emergencies would take precedence and other promises would be postponed.

 

He promised to lower a sales tax on energy, like fuel and gas, and to negotiate a French exemption from rules governing the European Union’s joint electricity market. He vowed to reinstate minimum sentencing for offenses, eliminate hurdles to deporting illegal immigrants and abolish the right for children born in France to foreign parents to automatically become French citizens when they turn 18.

 

Mr. Bardella said he would work on overhauling Mr. Macron’s pension reform, which last year raised the legal age of retirement to 64, from 62. That, he cautioned, would take time, but he said that those who started working before they turned 20 would under certain conditions be able to retire with a full pension at 60 as soon as next fall.

 

How he would accomplish his plans was sometimes murky. Asked repeatedly how he would make up for a shortfall of seven billion euros ($7.5 billion) in revenue created by lowering energy sales taxes, he mentioned possibilities, like renegotiating France’s contribution to the European Union budget, but did not say how much any of them would yield.

 

Whether voters will worry about those details is unclear, after a frantic campaign that has rocked French politics. After seven years in office, Mr. Macron is a polarizing figure whose centrist coalition is fraying, as major politicians who have been close to him suggest that they need to chart a new, more independent course for the 2027 presidential election, in which Mr. Macron cannot run.

 

Gérald Darmanin, Mr. Macron’s longtime interior minister, has already said that he would resign if the National Rally or the New Popular Front won. Édouard Philippe, Mr. Macron’s former prime minister, said bluntly last week that the French president had “killed” their existing majority — a significant but not absolute one — by dissolving the lower house.

 

“I’ve known Édouard Philippe for an extremely long time, and we said to each other that we needed to build something else tomorrow,” Mr. Darmanin told LCI television on Sunday when asked about a recent meeting between the two. “We need to build what will undoubtedly enable us to win in 2027.”

 

Aurelien Breeden is a reporter for The Times in Paris, covering news from France. More about Aurelien Breeden

Far-right Israeli minister given more powers over Palestinians | Al Jaze...

Israeli far-right minister speaks of effort to annex West Bank

 


Israeli far-right minister speaks of effort to annex West Bank

 

Bezalel Smotrich says he aims to establish sovereignty over occupied territory and thwart a Palestinian state

 

Peter Beaumont in Jerusalem

Mon 24 Jun 2024 16.17 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jun/24/israeli-far-right-minister-bezalel-smotrich-annex-west-bank

 

Israel’s far-right finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, has described in explicit terms his active effort to annex the West Bank to Israel, days after the Guardian revealed how the pro-settlement politician and his allies had quietly gained significant new legal powers to that end.

 

Speaking at a meeting of his Religious Zionism party, Smotrich told colleagues that he was “establish[ing] facts on the ground in order to make Judea and Samaria [an Israeli term for the occupied West Bank] an integral part of the state of Israel”.

 

“We will establish sovereignty … first on the ground and then through legislation. I intend to legalise the young settlements [illegal outposts],” Smotrich said in comments reported by Haaretz. “My life’s mission is to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state.”

 

Annexation and the acquisition of territory by military conquest is forbidden as one of the founding principles of international law including the UN charter.

 

The comments by Smotrich echoed recorded remarks he made at a gathering of supporters in the West Bank, first disclosed by the New York Times, in which he appeared to refer to the administrative changes as “mega-dramatic”. He was quoted as saying: “Such changes change a system’s DNA.”

 

Speaking about his acquisition of new legal powers, he said “[we] created a separate civilian system,” adding that to avoid international criticism the government had kept the defence ministry involved in the process, making it seem as if the military was still the main player in governing the West Bank.

 

“It will be easier to swallow in the international and legal context,” he said.

 

As well as serving as finance minister, Smotrich serves as a minister at Israel’s defence ministry, including with responsibility for the Civil Administration, which oversees Israel’s occupation of the West Bank.

 

As the Guardian revealed last week, the Israeli military recently quietly handed over significant legal powers in the occupied West Bank to pro-settler civil servants working for Smotrich.

 

An order posted by the Israel Defense Forces on its website on 29 May transferred responsibility for dozens of bylaws at the Civil Administration from the military to officials led by Smotrich at the defence ministry.

 

Smotrich and his allies have long seen control of the Civil Administration, or significant parts of it, as a means of extending Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank. Their ultimate goal is direct control by central government and its ministries. The transfer reduces the likelihood of legal checks on settlement expansion and development.

 

Israeli politicians have long sought to find ways to permanently seize, or annex, the occupied West Bank​, which it captured in 1967 and where millions of Palestinians live.

 

Speaking after the transfer of powers was disclosed, Michael Sfard, an Israeli human rights lawyer, said: “The bottom line is that [for] anyone who thought the question of annexation was foggy, this order should end any doubts.”

 

It is the latest coup for Smotrich, who became finance minister and a minister in the defence ministry after a coalition agreement between his far-right political party and the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party.

 

The Civil Administration is principally responsible for planning and construction in area C of the West Bank – the 60% of the occupied Palestinian territories under full Israeli administrative and security control – as well as enforcement against unauthorised construction, whether by Israeli settlers or by Palestinians.

 

The transfer of laws, which was largely unremarked upon in Israel, follows a years-long campaign by pro-settlement politicians to accrue many of the legal powers previously wielded by the military chain of command.

 

The laws cover everything from building regulations to the administration of agriculture, forestry, parks and bathing locations. Lawyers have long warned that transferring them from military to political control would risk bringing Israel into conflict with its responsibilities under international law.

 

After entering government, Smotrich moved quickly to approve thousands of new settlement homes, “legalise” previously unauthorised wildcat outposts, and make it more difficult for Palestinians to build homes and move around.

 

Reports in the Israeli media say US officials have privately discussed the possibility of imposing sanctions on Smotrich over his destabilising impact on the West Bank, where he lives in a settlement that is illegal under international law.

 

Netanyahu has become more reliant on the support of Smotrich and other far-right elements of his coalition government since the former defence minister Benny Gantz quit Israel’s emergency war cabinet in a row over strategy in the Gaza war and how to bring home Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

Marine Le Pen estime qu'"il ne restera à Macron que la démission" pour s...

Climate change: French scientists concerned about a far-right election v...

Législatives : que contient le programme du Rassemblement national ?

Jordan Bardella veut exclure les « binationaux » des postes sensibles de l’État

Pouvoir d'achat, éducation, binationaux: le programme du RN dévoilé par ...

Législatives 2024 : Jordan Bardella présente le programme du RN • FRANCE 24

Législatives 2024 : Emmanuel Macron écrit une lettre aux Français • FRAN...

France faces political paralysis: Four scenarios for the French election...

Countdown begins to French snap elections, with discouraging headlines f...

Dagestan attacks: Fears over Islamist violence in Russia's restive North...

Russie : 19 personnes tuées dans les attaques au Daguestan, dont quatre ...

Zelenskiy orders purge of state guard after alleged assassination plots

 


From 1h ago

13.02 BST

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2024/jun/24/russia-ukraine-war-live-russia-claims-us-responsible-for-ukrainian-attack-on-crimean-peninsula

 

Zelenskiy orders purge of state guard after alleged assassination plots

 

Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, told the new chief of Ukraine’s state guard service to clear its ranks of people discrediting it after two of its officers were accused of plotting to assassinate senior officials.

 

The state Security Service (SBU) said last month that it had caught two guard service colonels accused of cooperating with Russia to plot the assassination of Zelenskiy and other officials, including military intelligence chief Kyrylo Budanov. The guard service provides security for various governement officials.

 

Zelenskiy’s murder was intended as a “gift” for Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, who was inaugurated at the Kremlin last month for a fifth time, the SBU said.

 

Introducing Col Oleksiy Morozov to the staff on Monday, Zelenskiy said his main objective was to ensure that only those who see their future tied with Ukraine join the agency.

 

“And, of course, the agency must be cleared of anyone who chooses not Ukraine for themselves or discredits the state guard service,” he wrote on Telegram.

 

Zelenskiy dismissed Morozov’s predecessor Serhiy Rud in May, two days after the SBU detained agency employees who it said worked for Russia’s Federal Security Service and leaked classified information.

REMEMBERING: Can António Costa be EU Council president despite his legal woes?

 


IMAGES BY OVOODOCORVO

Can António Costa be EU Council president despite his legal woes?

 

The ex-prime minister of Portugal is the frontrunner for the presidency of the European Council, but he’s still under investigation in Lisbon.

 

JUNE 13, 2024 4:01 AM CET

BY AITOR HERNÁNDEZ-MORALES

https://www.politico.eu/article/antonio-costa-eu-council-president-legal-frontrunner-probe-portugal-prime-minister-resignation-government/

 

António Costa is the clear frontrunner to be the next president of the European Council. But the former Portuguese prime minister has one major obstacle standing in his way: he remains the subject of an ongoing legal probe back home.

 

Costa has not been formally charged with any crime, but is under investigation as part of the far-reaching influence-peddling probe that prompted his resignation last November.

 

Prosecutors allege that members of Costa’s government tailored legislation to benefit the backers of a state-of-the-art data center in Sines, in the south of the county. The then-prime minister’s name was mentioned by suspects in several wiretaps, leading prosecutors to suspect he may have been in on the scheme. He denies any wrongdoing.

 

Costa’s legal issues do not seem to have deterred EU leaders, many of whom want to see him succeed Charles Michel as Council president, leading meetings of the bloc’s 27 heads of state and government.

 

The Portuguese politician certainly appears like an ideal candidate. He is a member of the socialists, who came second in the EU election and want one of their own leading the Council. He is well-liked by European presidents and prime ministers of all stripes, and is viewed as a pleasant, fair-dealing negotiator with the skills needed to forge complex consensus decisions.

 

But he hasn’t got the job yet, and the ongoing legal probe could be brought up by Nordic countries seeking to boost the candidacy of Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who is considered to be more aligned with their positions on defense and migration.

 

In the past, EU leaders managed to overlook domestic problems when choosing people for top jobs. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was tapped for the post while an investigative committee of the German parliament was examining whether lucrative contracts had been awarded without proper oversight during her time as defense minister.

 

But the Qatargate cash-for-influence scandal, which mainly involved socialists from southern Europe, raised the bar in Brussels. In the wake of European Parliament elections in which far-right groups made major advances by campaigning against the rot within Europe’s mainstream parties, Costa’s legal woes could be problematic.

 

An ongoing investigation

The details of the investigation into Costa remain classified, but a constant trickle of embarrassing leaks over the past eight months has damaged the credibility of the prosecutors handling the case.

 

Perhaps the biggest was the revelation that prosecutors made an error when transcribing a wiretap in which “António Costa” was mentioned by suspects. During a court hearing, investigators admitted that the voices in the recording had not been discussing the prime minister, but rather his economy minister, António Costa Silva.

 

In April, the case was further undermined when Lisbon’s Court of Appeals struck down the coercive measures — among others, a ban on leaving the country — that the investigating judge had imposed on some of the other defendants charged as part of the probe.

 

In their report, the appeals court judges wrote that while figures like Costa’s chief of staff, Vítor Escária, and his personal adviser, Diogo Lacerda Machado, had engaged in interactions that generated “a perception of opacity, promiscuity and illegality of procedures,” the coercive measures were not justified because, technically speaking, their actions could not be considered criminal offenses.

 

The appeals court judges dismissed the suspicions involving Costa as “speculations,” but because the ruling only concerned the coercive measures imposed on other defendants, prosecutors were able to press on with their investigation.

 

After he stepped down as prime minister last April, Costa’s file was transferred from the Supreme Court — the only body with the power to punish crimes committed by Portugal’s head of government — to the Central Department of Investigation and Criminal Action (DCIAP), which deals with civilians.

 

At his request, in late May the socialist politician attended a closed-door hearing in which he answered questions posed by the public prosecutor. The ex-prime minister’s lawyer, João Lima Cluny, told POLITICO that no charges had been filed against Costa during the hearing, “which suggests that the Public Ministry, at least at this moment, has not found evidence that substantiates that any crime has been committed.”

 

Lima Cluny acknowledged that the case was ongoing. “We are waiting to hear if the case will be archived,” he said, but admitted that there was no firm timeline for that.

 

Outgoing European Parliament Vice President Pedro Silva Perreira, a Portuguese socialist, said there were no longer any suspicions against Costa that would complicate his appointment to the top job.

 

“This situation has been absolutely clarified,” he said. “He’s been heard by the justice [system] and he’s not even considered a suspect or a person of interest.”

 

But Rui Gustavo, a veteran judicial reporter with Portuguese weekly Expresso, disputed that framing, pointing out that Costa has not been cleared.

 

“Costa remains a suspect,” Gustavo said. “There hasn’t been any official statement to the contrary.”

 

“Other than the fact that he’s been heard by prosecutors, his situation remains the same as before: He hasn’t been charged, but he hasn’t been cleared, either,” he stressed.

 

Gustavo added that even if prosecutors ultimately conclude there is no case against Costa, they could take a long time to say as much. “The justice system is slow in Portugal.”

 

Eddy Wax contributed reporting.

REMEMBERING MARCH 7, 2024: Has Portugal's António Costa struck his last deal?

 


Has Portugal's António Costa struck his last deal?

 

A problem-solving prime minister faces his greatest challenge ever: Clearing his name in time to become president of the European Council.

 


By AITOR HERNÁNDEZ-MORALES

in Lisbon

MARCH 7, 2024 4:00 AM CET

https://www.politico.eu/article/antonio-costa-portugal-election-2024-european-council-last-deal/

 

On a bright sunny morning last November, the spectacular political career of Portuguese Prime Minister António Costa came to an abrupt halt as police officers launched a dramatic raid on his official residence in Lisbon’s Palacete de São Bento.

 

As investigators began to comb through the elegant neoclassical mansion overlooking the country’s parliament, authorities descended on ministries throughout the capital, the private homes of several officials, and the headquarters of the Portuguese Socialist Party.

 

Within hours, both Costa’s Chief of Staff Vítor Escária and his personal adviser Diogo Lacerda Machado were under arrest. Shortly thereafter, Minister of Infrastructure João Galamba and the head of the country’s environment agency, Nuno Lacasta, were indicted for suspected acts of corruption, embezzlement and influence-peddling in connection to lithium mining and hydrogen-production schemes, as well as the creation of a new state-of-the-art data center in Sines.

 

If there were initial doubts as to whether Costa had been caught up in the probe, by mid-morning the Portuguese Public Prosecution Service put those to rest with an explosive statement that turned the socialist leader’s world upside down.

 

Prosecutors had evidence that the prime minister’s name had been invoked by suspects in the course of their shady dealings, which meant Costa was now the subject of an official investigation in the hands of the Supreme Court of Justice — the only body with the power to punish crimes committed by Portugal’s head of government.

 

By lunchtime that day, Nov. 7, Costa was out.

 

In a televised speech, he announced that he was resigning after eight years as prime minister. Although he proclaimed his innocence, Costa said the gravity of the charges driving the investigation were “incompatible with the dignity of the office.”

 

The news landed like a bombshell not only in Lisbon but in capitals across Europe, where many of Costa’s peers saw him as the ideal successor to European Council President Charles Michel, whose term ends next fall.

 

Well-liked by EU leaders as diverse as French President Emmanuel Macron and Hungarian strongman Viktor Orbán, Costa was trumpeted as an able administrator and a skillful negotiator — the perfect qualities to fill that top job.

 

But the prime minister’s fall highlighted flaws that had long been an open secret in Lisbon. Costa’s governance style may have allowed him to claim big victories, but these were achieved with tactics that ultimately undermined his rule — and anyone looking beyond the dazzling Portuguese tiles would have noticed serious cracks in his seemingly solid executive.

 

Costa has yet to be formally charged with any crime, and many of his peers still hold out hope that he will be cleared in time to bring his undeniable talents to the office at the top of the Europa building.

 

But as Portugal heads to the polls this weekend in a national election triggered by Costa’s resignation, doubts are growing as to whether the man famed for the deals he struck in Lisbon is truly suited to make new ones in Brussels.

 

Costa’s path to prime minister

During an interview with POLITICO in a sitting room within the same official residence that was raided in November, Costa emphasized the central role that deal-making has played in his approach to governance.

 

“In democracy, politics has to be based on compromise,” he insisted. “One goes into politics to make deals.”

 

Costa first displayed a talent for negotiation in the 1980s, when he got his start in politics serving in Lisbon’s municipal assembly.

 

The young assembly member, who joined the Socialist Party’s youth wing shortly after the Carnation Revolution brought down the dictatorial Estado Novo regime in 1974, had grown up in a progressive household in central Lisbon. His father, Orlando da Costa, was a prolific writer of Goan descent who was persecuted for his communist ideology; his mother was one of Portugal’s first female journalists, and led the charge to decriminalize abortion.

 

Whereas his parents used the written word to make their living, Costa employed dialogue to interact with constituents of all classes and backgrounds and hammer out agreements. In time, he cemented his reputation as a problem-solver skilled at finding pragmatic solutions to everyday dilemmas.

 

His talents eventually caught the attention of national leaders like then-Prime Minister — and current U.N. Secretary-General — António Guterres, who drafted Costa to serve first as secretary of state and then minister of parliamentary affairs.

 

Political commentator Luís Marques Mendes, who spent years working with Costa while occupying different roles within the center-right Social Democratic Party, said the politician took to the post with gusto, easily interacting with the opposition.

 

“Costa has always had an incredible talent for dialogue and for reaching agreements,” Marques Mendes said. “Ideology isn’t an issue for him; he can sit down and talk with just about anyone in order to get things done.”

 

In 2015, Costa’s ability to build bridges with others won him control of Portugal.

 

Though he didn’t score the most votes in that year’s national election, Costa managed to unseat the center-right incumbent by forging an unprecedented parliamentary alliance with the far-left Portuguese Communist Party and the Left Bloc group.

 

“Between 1975 and 2015 there was barely any dialogue within the left,” Costa recalled. Topics like NATO membership and the adoption of the euro had become insurmountable “dividing walls” between parties at the time.

 

“We tore down those walls by acknowledging that there were some topics on which we would never see eye to eye … and instead asking, ‘okay, well, what can we all agree on?’” he said.

 

“We reached a deal to work together to end economic austerity and restore the rights that were taken away by the troika,” he added, referring to Portugal’s international creditors represented by the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, which had bailed the country out but imposed strict economic conditions in return.

 

The delicacy of the coalition talks was underscored by the fact that a single common agreement wasn’t on the table. Instead, Costa drew up individual pacts with each of his partners over the course of several weeks, securing the needed parliamentary support to take office.

 

According to a high-ranking Portuguese official who spent years working with Costa, and who was granted anonymity to speak freely, the socialist politician’s ability to make deals is directly related to his delight in “solving problems.”

 

“António Costa is driven by objectives,” the official said. “He’s always looking for creative solutions … Including some that are sometimes perhaps too creative.”

 

How Costa turned around the Portuguese economy

When Costa became prime minister in November 2015, Portugal was still under the thumb of the troika, which had bailed the country out of its sovereign debt crisis in 2011.

 

To gain power, the socialist leader had promised to reverse the cost-cutting measures imposed by Portugal’s creditors — a plan that elicited a mix of skepticism and open hostility in EU capitals.

 

“A lot of people thought I was another [Yanis] Varoufakis,” Costa said, referring to the fiery left-wing economist who had a brief but tumultuous stint as Greek finance minister earlier that year.

 

Costa, a master of realpolitik, understood that if his government was to avoid the chaos that befell Greece, it would need to adhere to the EU’s fiscal rules and assuage the doubts of the international economic establishment. He did so by appointing technocrat Mário Centeno, a veteran of the European Union’s Economic and Financial Committee, as his finance minister, and by striking a conciliatory tone with his counterparts in the European Council.

 

“It was a double negotiation that involved dialoguing with partners within our left-wing parliament, like the Communist Party, and at the same time, parlaying with Brussels,” Costa said. “It wasn’t always easy to reach agreements which broke with austerity at home but also guaranteed the sustained consolidation of our public finances in Brussels.”

 

Costa considers this balancing act, which allowed his government to “turn the page on austerity,” as the greatest achievement of his eight years in office.

 

He also delights in recalling how he won over skeptics like the late German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble — nicknamed “the ayatollah of austerity” — who initially viewed Centeno with unease but came to refer to him as “the Ronaldo of the ECOFIN,” the gathering of the eurozone’s economic and finance ministers.

.

Pedro Nuno Santos, the socialist candidate in Sunday’s national election, said Costa showed Europe that austerity wasn’t the answer. “When it came time to formulate the Covid economic recovery plan, the EU copied what we did in Portugal,” he said, stressing that the bloc’s Next Generation EU recovery package reflected the “spirit and philosophy” of Costa’s financial strategies.

 

Under Costa’s leadership, Portugal’s public debt has steadily declined — as has its deficit. In 2017 the country was able to exit an EU scheme in which the Commission monitored its spending, while in 2019, it registered its first budget surplus since the end of the Salazar dictatorship. Meanwhile, the minimum wage has increased more than 60 percent since 2015, and average salaries have grown by 27.7 percent.

 

While Portugal is undoubtedly in better financial shape now than when Costa arrived, the “Portuguese miracle” and “end of austerity” narrative that his supporters push garners mixed reviews.

 

Nova Business School public economist Susana Peralta said the country’s economy had already begun to recover under Costa’s predecessor, and that it was turbocharged by a tourism boom driven by the country’s viral popularity with influencers and celebrities like Madonna.

 

“It’s true that Costa did things like get rid of the cuts to civil servant salaries imposed by the troika — which is no small thing — but austerity continued in other ways: To pay off the public debt, the government limited public spending dramatically,” she said.

 

 

“To this day, teachers, police officers and courts complain about poor working conditions and lack of funding,” Peralta added. “Our public services are a disaster, with people obliged to get up at dawn and stand in line for hours to get an appointment at their local health center.”

 

However, she did concede that Costa’s austerity was at least accompanied by a hopeful smile.

 

Unlike the previous government’s “hurtful, moralizing tone,” Peralta said, “Costa spoke to people with empathy and gave them the idea of hope, of positive energy that we had turned the corner. And by negotiating the support of the wider left wing — especially the Portuguese Communist Party — he got the unions to stop going on strike and holding protests, which helped reinforce the idea that things were getting better.”

 

Portuguese voters were certainly convinced that life was better with Costa than without him. During his eight years in office, support for his Socialist Party grew with each successive election.

 

Those advances irritated Costa’s far-left allies, who complained the prime minister was failing to enact sufficiently progressive policies. Refusing to back his budget, they triggered a snap election in 2022 — but instead of punishing Costa, electors rewarded his party with majority control of parliament.

 

Costa as president of the European Council?

Costa’s apparent success in Lisbon and popularity in Brussels made him a front-runner in the race for the bloc’s top jobs, which are expected to be allocated shortly after June’s European Parliament election.

 

That’s why news of the Nov. 7 raid and Costa’s resignation felt like a sucker punch for Europe’s socialists. Set once again to be the second-largest group in the European Parliament, the socialists had pinned their hopes on the Portuguese PM taking the Council presidency.

 

In the past, EU leaders have managed to overlook domestic problems that shadowed their picks for key positions. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after all, was tapped for the post even while an investigative committee of the German parliament was examining whether lucrative contracts had been awarded without proper oversight during her time as defense minister.

 

But after two successive terms with controversial European Council President Charles Michel, there’s an appetite for a successor who isn’t a constant source of headaches. The ideal candidate is now someone who won’t use the job as a springboard for their personal ambitions, but will instead stick to the agenda and focus on forging compromises — all things Portugal’s prime minister is known to do well.

 

Few in Brussels would argue that Costa doesn’t have the chops for the job, but a realization is dawning that he would come with a truckload of baggage.

 

EU diplomats told POLITICO that while Costa remains the favored pick of French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, other leaders have cooled on his prospective candidacy. The Portuguese socialist’s links to corruption scandals are seen as a liability in the context of bloc-wide elections in which the far right is expected to make inroads by campaigning on the rot within Europe’s mainstream parties.

 

The Qatargate cash-for-influence scandal, which mainly involved socialists from southern Europe, may have raised the bar even further. “Especially in the North, there are leaders who have very strict requirements for the job” said an EU official familiar with the discussions. “Some of them say that Costa’s acquittal will not be enough: The people around him must also be cleared in order to dispel any kind of suspicion.”

 

Just how much legal trouble Costa is in remains unclear, in part because the Portuguese Prosecutor’s Office has not commented on the case since December.

 

“I don’t even know what I am suspected of because that’s never been explicitly stated,” Costa said in his interview with POLITICO. “No one has spoken to me about this matter; the only things I know are what everybody else knows.”

 

Most updates come from Portuguese press reports based on court transcripts and leaks from police sources; those suggest that the handling of the case has been flawed.

 

Among the various incidents that have damaged confidence in the prosecution is an error in the transcription of a wiretap in which “António Costa” was mentioned by suspects. During a court hearing, investigators were obliged to admit that the voices in the recording had not been discussing the prime minister, but rather his economy minister, António Costa Silva.

 

Costa is confident he will eventually be cleared of suspicion, but he also acknowledged it may be a while before Portugal’s notoriously slow judicial system makes any such announcement.

 

“I don’t know how many chapters this particular story will have,” he said. “But I’m sure that the last one will involve the recognition that I have done nothing illegal, that I did not witness anything illegal, and that there was nothing objectionable regarding my involvement in any of these processes.”

 

 

Costa’s fall highlighted flaws that had long been an open secret in Lisbon | Patricia de Melo Moreira/AFP via Getty Images

Rui Gustavo, a veteran judicial reporter with Portuguese weekly Expresso, said that what is known about the allegations against Costa suggests they are “very, very weak;” however, he dismissed the notion that this was a “nonsense case.”

 

“If the prime minister interfered to favor a company, if he’s been involved in influence-peddling, it’s tremendously serious and it has to be investigated,” he said.

 

If Costa isn’t cleared, socialist support will likely coalesce around Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen to preside over the Council. But Frederiksen isn’t an ideal choice: Her country’s tough immigration policies are disliked by other European socialists, and there’s a desire to have a southern European occupying at least one of the EU’s top jobs.

 

Advertisement

“Having Costa as European Council president would be an honor for Portugal, and having such an obvious Europhile in the post would be good for Europe,” said commentator Marques Mendes. “Everyone knows he wants the job, and he definitely has the negotiating skills to strike deals between left and right.”

 

“This case is a shame,” he added. “I don’t think he’ll ultimately be indicted, but if this investigation is ongoing when it comes time to make the choice, I don’t think he’ll be able to occupy that post.”

 

Costa government’s long list of scandals

Costa’s reputation in Brussels was dealt a major blow by the Nov. 7 raid, but in Portugal his governance style has aroused doubts for years.

 

Indeed, it’s unclear how long Costa’s current government would have lasted even without the probe. His Socialist Party held an absolute majority of seats in the parliament, but the executive was falling apart: Over a dozen senior officials had resigned in the two years since the last election, some with indictments for corruption or malfeasance.

 

Few in Lisbon believe Costa himself is corrupt: The socialist leader’s personal reputation has remained untarnished during three decades in executive roles within the Portuguese government. But it is broadly perceived that questionable deeds were committed within his inner circle by less pristine “problem solvers” whom the prime minister tapped to get things done.

 

One of the most notorious figures in Costa’s clique was his self-proclaimed “best friend”, attorney Lacerda Machado, who was drafted by the prime minister to represent his executive in extremely sensitive talks — including on the future of state-owned airline TAP.

 

These mediations were initially done on a pro-bono basis, freeing Lacerda Machado of the oversight to which a bureaucrat or government official would be subject. It was only after the opposition complained that Costa grudgingly signed a service contract with his friend, insisting there was “no reason to call into question the collaboration as it has been provided.”

 

Lacherda Machado was among those arrested in last November’s raids and is suspected of attempting to use his influence within the government to favor a company that had hired him as a consultant.

 

Commentator Marques Mendes said while it was normal for a politician driven by goals to become frustrated with Portugal’s slow bureaucracy, Costa’s desire to achieve his objectives had led him to tolerate “informal structures that turned out badly.”

 

“Pragmatism can be a good thing, but it can be problematic when you try to solve matters of State the way you would some problem at home,” he said.

 

Costa was additionally handicapped, Marques Mendes observed, by his tendency to surround himself with people with whom he has a personal relationship — even if there are public doubts about their suitability for a given post.

 

One such example is economist Escária, a former adviser to disgraced Prime Minister José Sócrates, the former socialist leader who has been the subject of a corruption, money laundering and tax fraud case for the past decade.

 

Escária was tapped by Costa to serve in his first government but resigned in 2017 after he was accused of accepting undisclosed gifts in the form of trips to the UEFA Euro football final paid for by a Portuguese oil company.

 

Costa unexpectedly re-hired him in 2020 and elevated him to the post of chief of staff; Escária was the reason the prime minister’s official residence was raided on Nov. 7. When the police came to arrest him for alleged influence-peddling, they discovered €75,800 in undeclared cash stashed in his office.

 

Costa’s decision to rehire Escária underscores his almost irrational loyalty to his inner circle, whom he has relied on and defended even when they’ve become a liability to his government.

 

In 2017 the prime minister insisted on standing by Internal Administration Minister Constança Urbano de Sousa, who oversaw the country’s crisis management structure as scores died in catastrophic forest fires that overwhelmed Portugal’s emergency services. Although she attempted to resign, Costa only let her go after the country’s president gave a speech suggesting he would dissolve parliament if the government didn’t do a better job of protecting its citizens.

 

The prime minister similarly stood by a defense minister indicted in connection with an arms-theft scandal; an internal administration minister implicated in a grisly car accident; and an infrastructure minister suspected of lying to a parliamentary commission.

 

Costa rejected the criticisms of his team, saying he had to respect the presumption of innocence and couldn’t drop members of his government based on media rumors. “I note with satisfaction that all the members of my governments who have been investigated have subsequently had their cases dismissed, or ultimately been acquitted,” he added.

 

Presidency Minister Mariana Vieira da Silva also disputed the idea that Costa had made poor choices when assembling his inner circle, or had turned a blind eye to shady dealings within his administration.

 

“Our decision process has always followed the government’s normal timings and procedures,” she said. “I have not seen anything out of the ordinary when it comes to making decisions and solving problems; the process is transparent and known to everyone.”

 

In his interview, Costa — whose term as caretaker prime minister could end as early as next week, when Portugal’s president is expected to ask the winner of Sunday’s national election to form a new government — said he was confident citizens would remember him for his successes in office, and not for the scandals that forced him out.

 

“A case like this is obviously frustrating for someone who has dedicated the past 30 years of their life to public service,” he said. “But where there’s doubt, there has to be an investigation … And I have absolute peace of mind about what it will conclude.”

 

Unfortunately for Costa, those set to decide his political future may not feel the same way.

 

Jacopo Barigazzi contributed reporting.