Analysis
EU asylum and migration pact has passed despite
far right and left’s objections
Jon Henley
Europe
correspondent
Long-awaited package of measures marks victory for
Europe’s centre albeit with ‘doubts and concerns’ over implementation
Wed 10 Apr
2024 20.04 CEST
Almost a
decade in the making, the EU’s new migration and asylum pact suffered so many
setbacks, stalemates and rewrites that when member states finally announced a
deal last year, its passage through parliament seemed assured.
That was,
however, to ignore the objections of Europe’s resurgent far-right parties, who
felt it was not tough enough (and, perhaps, hoped to profit at the ballot box
from allowing the current chaos around migration to continue).
The far
left objected too, on the grounds that the package of 10 different bills was
too tough, marking the abandonment of European values of compassion and human
dignity, a surrender to the far right, and a major blow to human rights.
More than
160 rights organisations, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch
and the International Rescue Committee, also denounced the pact, arguing it
would lead to greater suffering, less protection and more rights violations.
Devised
after Europe’s 2015 migration crisis which saw 1.3 million people – mostly
Syrian refugees – cross into the bloc, the pact establishes border centres to
hold people while asylum requests are vetted and speed up any deportations. In
the name of European solidarity, it also requires EU member states to either
take in thousands of asylum seekers from frontline states such as Italy and
Greece, or provide money or other resources to the most under-pressure nations.
Particularly
controversial measures include sending asylum seekers to countries outside the
EU that are deemed “safe”, if a person has some ties to that country, and
taking facial images and fingerprints from children as young as six.
Politics
also got in the way: even though the parliament’s three main groups – the
centre-right EPP, centre-left S&D and liberal Renew – backed the deal, some
national party delegations, unwilling to vote with domestic political
opponents, pledged to block it.
Less than
two months before the European parliament elections in June that are widely
forecast to produce a surge in support for radical-right parties, the pro-EU
political centre portrayed the pact as proof of its viability against the far
right. But by the time the package came to the vote on Wednesday, there were
mounting concerns in Brussels and many other EU capitals that opposition was so
strong MEPs would reject at least some parts of it, resulting in the failure of
the whole.
In the end,
every element passed, to the undisguised relief of the mainstream groups – many
of whose MEPs had confessed to personal misgivings about some of the harsher
measures in the pact, but backed it as an overall improvement.
With more
than 46,000 people entering the EU via irregular migration routes so far this
year alone, and an estimated 400 dying while doing so, some kind of new
collective plan was desperately needed to replace a decade of go-it-alone
responses.
Whether
this one will work is another matter. Hungary and Poland were swift to say they
would not accept relocations under the new solidarity rules, while far-right,
far-left and Green parties, and NGOs, have pledged – for different reasons – to
fight on.
For the
time being, though, Europe’s centre can savour a victory – of sorts. “We have
an obligation to the citizens of Europe to show that Europe can actually work,
that it can deliver,” the veteran Dutch MEP Sophie in ’t Veld said before the
vote.
There were
clearly “very justified doubts and concerns about this package”, she said,
adding: “Everything will hinge on implementation.”
As if to
underline her words, on Wednesday rescuers recovered the bodies of three girls
off the Greek island of Chios. The trio died after a boat carrying migrants
from nearby Turkey ran into rocks. Fourteen people, including eight other
children, were rescued. Coastguard officials said three patrol vessels were
looking for other possible survivors.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário