PM’s first major foreign policy speech warns of the
creeping authoritarianism of Xi Jinping’s regime
Aubrey Allegretti
@breeallegretti
Mon 28 Nov
2022 21.19 GMT
Rishi Sunak
has signalled the end of the “golden era” of relations between Britain and
China, using his first major foreign policy speech to warn of the creeping
authoritarianism of Xi Jinping’s regime.
As police
in China launched a show of force in an attempt to contain the highest levels
of civil disobedience seen in decades, the prime minister threw his support
behind protesters by condemning Beijing’s crackdown, as well as the assault on
a BBC journalist.
Sunak
suggested a hardening of diplomatic relations and called China a “systemic
challenge to our values and interests”, while also confirming the UK’s defence
and security strategy for the next decade, known as the Integrated Review,
would be updated in the new year.
However, he
stopped short of calling China a threat, admitting western countries could not
ignore its influence over world affairs and ability to help with shared
challenges such as economic stability and climate change.
The move
marked an abrupt change from his more hardline stance while running for the
Conservative leadership over the summer, sparking criticism it was “thin as
gruel” and similar to the “appeasement” strategy initially adopted by Britain
toward the Nazis in the 1930s.
Sunak used
tough language to rebuke previous UK governments’ approach to China, saying he
would reject “short-termism or wishful thinking”.
Recalling a
term coined by David Cameron in 2015, the prime minister told dignitaries at
the Lord Mayor’s Banquet on Monday night: “The so-called ‘golden era’ is over,
along with the naive idea that trade would lead to social and political
reform.”
Sunak
cautioned that Britain’s adversaries were planning for the “long-term”, and the
UK needed to take a “longer-term view on China”.
He said:
“We recognise China poses a systemic challenge to our values and interests, a
challenge that grows more acute as it moves towards even greater
authoritarianism.
“Instead of
listening to their people’s protests, the Chinese government has chosen to
crack down further, including by assaulting a BBC journalist.
“The media
– and our parliamentarians – must be able to highlight these issues without
sanction, including calling out abuses in Xinjiang – and the curtailment of
freedom in Hong Kong.”
Sunak was
referring to China sanctioning some Tory MPs last year for raising concerns
about what the UN has called “serious human rights violations” against Uyghur
Muslims in the Xinjiang province. It was the clearest indication in his speech
that it partly aimed to reassure some in his party who fear he is soft on
standing up to Beijing.
However,
one sanctioned MP, former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, said Sunak should go
further than calling China a “systemic challenge”, and instead classify the
country as a “threat” in the updated Integrated Review.
“China
understands strength, they also recognise weakness and they’ll see this as a
weakness,” he told the Guardian, adding Sunak’s vow to show “robust pragmatism”
was “tautological nonsense” and amounted to “appeasement”.
He told
Channel 4 News: “I just feel the road to appeasement we went through in the
1930s, if we’ve learned any lesson at all it is the more you appease dictatorships,
that impose authority on their people and strip away human rights, the more you
drift into dangerous waters.”
In the
summer Tory leadership race, Sunak said China was “the biggest-long term threat
to Britain and the world’s economic and national security”.
His
predecessor, Liz Truss, had been preparing to recast China formally as a threat
in an updated version of the Integrated Review.
While
Sunak’s language matched the finding of last month’s US national security
strategy, which said China posed “systemic challenges”, his refusal to use the
word “threat” threatens to exacerbate another rift in the Conservative party.
Senior
Tories have been growing increasingly concerned at reports of so-called
“Chinese police stations” being set up in the UK and across Europe, as well as
the suppression of protests in Hong Kong and, more recently, in mainland China
amid anger over the rigid zero-Covid policy.
Sunak
stressed the UK would deepen its ties with Indo-Pacific nations, given he said
the region would deliver more than half of global growth compared with just a
quarter from Europe and North America combined by 2050.
He added:
“By deepening these ties we’ll help protect the arteries and ventricles of the
global economy, supporting security and prosperity – both at home in our
European neighbourhood and in the Indo-Pacific.”
After
visiting Ukraine this month, Sunak condemned Russia for “challenging the fundamental
principles” of the UN charter. On the trip, which took place days before the
start of the World Cup, Sunak said he witnessed seen a child’s football turned
into a “booby trap” containing an explosive device.
“It defies
belief, so be in no doubt we will stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes,”
the prime minister said. “We will maintain or increase our military aid next
year. And we will provide new support for air defence, to protect the Ukrainian
people and the critical infrastructure they rely on.”
Sunak did
admit the botched withdrawal of western forces from Afghanistan – as well as
recent economic strife and the handling of the Covid pandemic – had led some to
claim “the west was weak”.
However, he
said the collective rallying against Russia – including Sweden and Finland’s
moves to join Nato – had “shown the depth of our collective resolve”.
Sunak
quoted Henry Kissinger and philosopher Edmund Burke in his observations on
global affairs. But he could not avoid addressing a domestic problem: the
pressure from hardline Brexiters jittery about any plans to seek a closer
relationship with the EU to help boost growth.
Sunak
insisted that, while cooperation with close allies was important, there would
never be any relationship with Brussels that relied on alignment under EU law.
“Instead,
we’ll foster respectful, mature relationships with our European neighbours on
shared issues like energy and illegal migration to strengthen our resilience
against strategic vulnerabilities,” he said.
David Lammy,
Labour’s shadow foreign secretary, called the speech “thin as gruel”. He said:
“All it shows is that once again the Conservative government is flip-flopping
its rhetoric on China.
“Instead of
talk, we need policy. The government urgently needs to publish its
long-promised China strategy as well as its update to the Integrated Review
that is already out of date.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário