Chinese Unrest Over Lockdown Upends Global
Economic Outlook
Growing protests in the world’s biggest manufacturing
nation add a new element of uncertainty atop the Ukraine war, an energy crisis
and inflation.
Patricia
Cohen
By Patricia
Cohen
Reporting
from London
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/28/business/economy/china-unrest-global-economy.html
Nov. 28,
2022
阅读简体中文版閱讀繁體中文版
The
swelling protests against severe pandemic restrictions in China — the world’s
second-largest economy — are injecting a new element of uncertainty and
instability into the global economy when nations are already struggling to
manage the fallout from a war in Ukraine, an energy crisis and painful
inflation.
For years,
China has served as the world’s factory and a vital engine of global growth,
and turmoil there cannot help but ripple elsewhere. Analysts warn that more
unrest could further slow the production and distribution of integrated
circuits, machine parts, household appliances and more. It may also encourage
companies in the United States and Europe to disengage from China and more
quickly diversify their supply chains.
Millions of
China’s citizens have chafed under a tight lockdown for months as the Communist
Party seeks to overcome the spread of the Covid-19 virus, three years after its
emergence. Anger turned to widespread protest after an apartment fire last week
killed 10 people and comments on social media questioned whether the lockdown
had prevented their escape.
It is
unclear whether the demonstrations flaring across the country will be quickly
snuffed out or erupt into broader resistance to the iron rule of its top
leader, Xi Jinping, but so far the most significant economic damage stems from
the lockdown.
“The
biggest economic hit is coming from the zero-Covid policies,” said Carl
Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, a research firm. “I
don’t see the protests themselves being a game changer.”
“The world
will still turn to China for what it makes best and cheapest,” he added.
Asked how
the Biden administration assessed the economic fallout from the latest unrest,
John Kirby, coordinator for strategic communications at the National Security
Council, said Monday, “We don’t see any particular impact right now to the
supply chain.”
Concerns
about the economic impact of the spreading unrest in China, nonetheless,
appeared to be partly responsible for a decline in world markets. The S&P
500 index closed 1.5 percent lower, while the dollar, often a haven in turbulent
times, moved higher. Oil prices began the day with a sharp drop before
rebounding.
The sheer
magnitude of China’s economy and resources makes it a critical player in world
commerce. “It’s extremely central to the global economy,” said Kerry Brown, an
associate fellow in the Asia-Pacific program at Chatham House, an international
affairs institute in London. That uncertainty “will have a massive impact on
the rest on the world.”
China now
surpasses all countries as the biggest importer of petroleum. It manufactured
nearly 30 percent of the world’s goods in 2021. “There is simply no alternative
to what China offers in terms of scale and capacities,” Mr. Brown said.
Delays and
shortages related to the pandemic prompted many industries to re-evaluate the
resilience of their supply chains and consider additional sources of raw
materials and workers. Apple, which recently announced that it expected sales
to decline because of stoppages at its Chinese plants, is one of several tech
companies that have shifted a small portion of their production to other
countries, like Vietnam or India.
The tilt by
some companies away from China predates the pandemic, reaching back to former
President Donald J. Trump’s determination to start a trade war with China, a
move that resulted in a spiral of punishing tariffs.
Yet even if
business and political leaders want to be less reliant on China, Mr. Brown
said, “the brute reality is that’s not going to happen soon, if at all.”
“We
shouldn’t kid ourselves that we can quickly decouple,” he added.
China’s
size is a lure for American, European and other companies looking not only to
make products quickly and cheaply, but also to sell them in great numbers.
There is simply no other market as big.
Tesla, John
Deere and Volkswagen are among the companies that have bet on China for future
growth, but they are likely to suffer some setbacks at least in the short run.
Volkswagen announced last week that its sales in China had stagnated this year,
running 14 percent below expectations.
The
protests highlight the political risks associated with investing in China, but
analysts say the recent wave doesn’t reveal anything that investors didn’t
already know.
“Many
investors will be looking ahead and positioning their portfolios now for the
reopening,” said Nigel Green, chief executive of deVere Group, a financial
advisory firm. They will be “seeking to take advantage of the country’s
transition from an export economy to a consumption one,” he added.
Luxury
brands continue to stake their future on growth in China.
As
interconnected as the global economy is, one way in which China’s slowdown may
be helping other nations is by keeping down the price of energy. Over the last
20 years, the growth of the Chinese economy has been a primary driver of global
demand for oil and hydrocarbons in general.
Energy
experts say rising numbers of Covid infections and growing doubts that China
will ease restrictions in major cities are a major reason that oil prices have
dropped over the last three weeks to levels last seen before the Russian
invasion of Ukraine in late February.
“Chinese
demand is the largest single factor in world oil demand,” said David Goldwyn, a
senior energy diplomat in the Obama administration. “China is the swing
demander.”
As the
Chinese economy has softened in the grip of the Covid lockdown, fewer oil
tankers have sailed into Chinese ports in recent weeks, forcing the major
Middle Eastern and Russian oil producers to lower their prices. Now spreading
protests create another uncertainty about future demand.
Chinese oil
demand is expected to average 15.1 million barrels a day this quarter, down
from 15.8 million a year ago, according to Kpler, an analytics firm.
As for
supply chain disruptions, Neil Shearing, chief economist at Capital Economics,
a research firm, said he thought excessive blame had been heaped on China.
“Everything has been framed around supply shortages,” he said, but in China,
industrial production increased during the pandemic. The problem was that
global demand surged more.
For now,
the biggest economic impact will be within China, rather than on the global
economy. Sectors that depend on face-to-face contact — retail, hospitality,
entertainment — will take the biggest hit. Over the past three days, measures
of people’s movements have drastically fallen, Mr. Shearing said.
He added
that more people were quarantined now than at the height of the Omicron
epidemic last winter. The wave of infections and the government’s response to
it — not the protests — are what’s having “the biggest impact on China’s
economy,” he said.
Clifford
Krauss contributed reporting from Houston, and Michael D. Shear from
Washington.
Patricia
Cohen is the global economics correspondent based in London. Since joining The
Times in 1997, she has also written about theater, books and ideas. She is the
author of “In Our Prime: The Fascinating History and Promising Future of Middle
Age.” @PatcohenNYT • Facebook
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário