As France
burns, the far right sees an opening
Marine Le
Pen’s National Rally is casting the wildfire crisis as evidence the French
state can no longer protect its citizens.
July 29,
2026 4:01 am CET
By Marion
Solletty
PARIS —
Out-of-control wildfires fueled by extreme heat and drought might seem unlikely
electoral fodder for France’s far right.
Marine Le
Pen’s National Rally has spent years opposing green regulations. Yet the party
is seizing on the country’s worst blazes in years to argue that President
Emmanuel Macron’s government is failing in one of its most basic duties:
protecting people and their homes.
Edwige
Diaz, a National Rally MP and close Le Pen ally from the fire-hit Gironde
region, says the blazes are the latest in a series of crises — from extreme
weather to concerns over crime and child safety — that expose the government’s
broader inability to protect the public.
“All the
proposals that we have been putting forward for years with Marine and Jordan
[Bardella] … today we realize that those are the only ones that could have
spared us these situations, from protecting us from wildfires to saving our
children,” she said. “Current events, alas, prove us right.”
Whether
that argument will gain traction remains uncertain. But National Rally may not
need voters to see it as an authority on climate change; its opening lies
instead in the declining credibility of the parties that have governed France —
and a sense among some voters that the state is no longer capable of protecting
them.
Recent
research shared with POLITICO — based on four focus groups with former center
and center-left voters who appeared unlikely to support those parties again —
found repeated references to a country that was falling apart. Participants
cited a series of recent crises, including the murder of an 11-year-old girl by
a suspect previously known to police, as evidence that the government was
failing to act.
That
frustration extends to climate preparedness. In a YouGov poll published this
month, 74 percent of respondents said they were dissatisfied with Macron’s
climate-adaptation policies.
“The
National Rally mechanically benefits from its anti-system positioning whenever
there is a news event that gives the impression, right or wrong, that
successive governments have not taken effective action to address the
difficulties faced by the French people,” said Mathieu Gallard, research
director at Ipsos France, a polling firm.
The fires
have burned more than 1,000 square kilometers across southwestern France since
the start of the summer — an area roughly 10 times the size of Paris — and
forced more than 200,000 people from their homes. Coming after an extreme
heatwave left the countryside tinder-dry, they have already scorched nearly
twice as much land as during the last devastating fire season in 2022.
Images of
the Bordeaux region, home to a large population and many popular vacation
spots, engulfed by flames have deepened an already grim mood in the political
class and among ordinary citizens alike. Macron made an impromptu visit to the
area on Monday to meet with local firefighters and appealed for national unity
as his government sought to contain criticism of its response.
Le Pen
herself struck a more restrained tone. In a post on X, she said the images had
filled the country with horror, offered support to victims and evacuated
families, and praised firefighters and civil-protection forces for their
“exceptional self-sacrifice.” She did not directly criticize the government.
As France
has sweltered through record heat, the National Rally has so far paid little
political price for its lack of credibility on climate and environmental
policy.
Instead,
the party has sought to focus attention on adaptation — how the government
protects people from the consequences of a warming climate — rather than on
measures to reduce emissions. During a heatwave in June, it proposed financial
assistance to install air conditioning in homes and public buildings, casting
the plan as an immediate response to voters’ concerns about their health and
safety.
The
proposal drew attention, Gallard said, but he questioned whether the wildfires
would offer the National Rally the same political opening. “I’m not sure they
will benefit hugely in this case because they have very limited credibility on
environmental issues,” he said.
The
National Rally struggled to explain how its air-conditioning proposal would be
funded. Opponents dismissed it as political window-dressing from a party that
has repeatedly opposed measures intended to limit climate change.
Still,
the pitch exposed a vulnerability among mainstream parties. As voters become
more concerned about the immediate effects of heat, fires and other extreme
weather, the political debate is shifting from long-term climate targets toward
whether governments can protect people now.
Left-wing
rivals who have long advocated for stronger measures to address climate change
counter that the party has been consistently voting against plans meant to
address its root causes, both at the EU and national level.
“At some
point, everyone will have to answer for their positions before the public and
before history,” center-left MEP and presidential hopeful Raphaël Glucksmann
posted on Facebook.
“For
months and years now, the right and the far right have been engaged in a
relentless battle against the European climate agenda,” he added.
National
Rally’s Diaz turned that argument on its head, blaming environmental rules
themselves for hampering the response. She pointed to EU-mandated
anti-pollution rules on firefighting equipment as an example of policies she
said were poorly adapted to conditions on the ground.
“Those
who claim to be at the forefront of environmental issues have imposed policies
that are now responsible for the current situation,” said Diaz. “If there is a
party today that can save the environment, it’s ours.”
Alexander
Burns contributed reporting to this story.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário