Analysis
Trump’s
‘very good’ talks with Iran buy him time with oil and energy markets
Andrew
Roth
in
Washington
Tehran
denied negotiations that delayed US strikes and Trump was vague on the details,
but talks signal renewed push for peace from regional powers
Tue 24
Mar 2026 00.01 GMT
There
have been so many abortive rounds of diplomacy between the US and Iran – the
latest appearing to be led by Pakistan after Washington has burned through many
other regional mediators – that it was hardly a surprise that President Trump’s
claims of “very good” talks with Tehran initially provoked disbelief –
especially after Iran denied that any negotiations were taking place at all.
Nonetheless,
standing beside Air Force One, Trump did his best to sell the sudden detente
with little detail as a US ultimatum to bomb Iran’s power plants loomed unless
Tehran opened up the strait of Hormuz. It was lost on few that the sudden
about-face came just hours before US markets were to open for what promised to
be another punishing round of trading on Monday.
Asked who
the US was negotiating with in Iran, Trump said: “We are dealing with a man
that I believe is the most respected, not the supreme leader, we have not heard
from him.” Asked to name the person, Trump suggested he could be targeted if he
did so: “I can’t. I don’t want them to be killed.”
His
description of the terms of a deal was similarly shaky. Iran would not have a
nuclear weapon, he said, but control over the strait of Hormuz would be held by
“maybe me, me and the Ayatollah … whoever the next Ayatollah is. And there will
also be some form of regime change, very serious regime change.” Once again,
envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, were leading the talks.
The
reported interlocutor of the United States is Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the
speaker of the parliament of Iran, who previously served as an Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps commander and has steadily baited and mocked Trump
on social media since the outbreak of hostilities.
Ghalibaf
has already denied that he or anyone in Iran’s government is speaking with the
United States and claimed that Trump was seeking to mitigate the financial
damage done by Iran’s closure of the strait of Hormuz. “No negotiations have
been held with the US, and fake news is used to manipulate the financial and
oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped,”
said Ghalibaf.
While any
negotiations face an uphill battle, it is clear that they are moving with a
renewed push from Pakistan, an ally of the United States, with which Iran has
close ties, as well as other regional powers outside the Gulf, including Egypt
and Turkey.
Iran’s
foreign ministry has said that in recent days it received messages from “some
friendly countries indicating a US request for negotiations aimed at ending the
war,” according to spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei, but denied there were ongoing
talks directly between Iran and the United States.
The talks
have been met with a tentative welcome by international leaders, including Keir
Starmer, who made the point that the United Kingdom was aware of the talks in
the first place.
Benjamin
Netanyahu, the Israeli leader who has sought to manoeuvre Trump into providing
Israel further support for the conflict, said on Monday that he had spoken with
Trump and sought to present a potential deal as one that could safeguard
Israel’s interests.
Trump
“believes that there is a chance to leverage the massive achievements of the
IDF and the US military in order to achieve the goals of the war through an
agreement – an agreement that protects our vital interests”, Netanyahu said in
the statement.
Yet
Israel, which has taken the lead in assassinating successive levels of Iran’s
leadership since 28 February, may not be ready to cut a deal just yet. Israel
is “continuing to strike, in Iran and in Lebanon”, he said.
The
latest negotiations may also be another way for Trump to buy time, especially
with oil and energy markets. The Pentagon is still moving marines and airborne
soldiers into position, and the coming days will see the US poised for a strike
or potential occupation of Iran’s islands or coastline that would allow the
reopening of the strait of Hormuz – a likely contingency plan for Trump if he
cannot produce a diplomatic triumph at this late hour.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário