In
Denmark’s Election, How Will the Woman Who Took On Trump Fare?
Prime
Minister Mette Frederiksen is the biggest force this country has seen in
decades. The crisis in Greenland has energized her, but are voters itching for
change?
By
Jeffrey Gettleman and Maya Tekeli
Jeffrey
Gettleman and Maya Tekeli reported from Aalborg, the prime minister’s hometown.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/world/asia/denmark-elections-frederiksen-hometown.html
March 23,
2026
Flemming
Frederiksen, a retired typesetter and union leader, remembers coming home from
work years ago, exhausted and ready for a break, only to find his daughter
standing on the front steps of their red-roofed cottage with her arms crossed.
“I have
four questions for you today,” the middle-schooler announced.
“Can I
first just get inside, take off my jacket and have a slice of rye bread and
cheese?” he asked.
She
peppered him with inquiries on politics. She pressed him to sign petitions to
stop animal testing and save the whales. Only grudgingly did she accept
compromises, he said.
That
little girl is now running for her third term as prime minister of Denmark in
an election set for Tuesday.
When
asked if he could have predicted this back then, Mr. Frederiksen smiled and
said, “I don’t want to sound like a smartass, but I’m not surprised.”
Mette
Frederiksen, Denmark’s leader, has become the biggest political force this
little country has seen in decades. When she took office in 2019, she etched
herself into Danish history by becoming the youngest prime minister. Now 48, if
she wins and serves out her term, she will be the longest-serving Danish
premier since World War II.
Most
Danes don’t call her prime minister or even “P.M.” They simply call her
“Mette.” She’s become an almost Thatcherite presence in Scandinavia, with the
same words used to describe her as the legendary Iron Lady: “strong-willed,”
“tough,” “a force of nature.”
President
Trump got a taste of her grit when he tried to push around Denmark and take
over Greenland, a gigantic island in the Arctic that has been part of the
Danish kingdom for more than 300 years. Ms. Frederiksen pushed back. Mr. Trump
got angry. For the time being at least, he seems to have moved on.
Many
voters in this country of six million credit her with protecting Greenland and
keeping the kingdom intact. Her party has leaned into this. A recent social
media post said, “We live in uncertain times and Denmark needs a steady hand.”
Want to
stay updated on what’s happening in Denmark and Greenland? Sign up for Your
Places: Global Update, and we’ll send our latest coverage to your inbox.
But some
Danes are also itching for change.
“She has
done a good, good job but, we are getting tired of Mette,” said Lars-Peter
Boel, a chicken farmer. “When she speaks, she is talking like a mom, like she
is talking down to people.”
Her
party, the Social Democrats, is No. 1 in the polls, but Denmark’s political
scene is so fragmented, with more than 10 parties represented in Parliament,
that it’s unlikely the Social Democrats will win more than a quarter of the
vote. The most likely outcome, many political analysts believe, is a reshuffled
coalition government with her at the head.
Another
possibility is an upset, with Ms. Frederiksen out and a new government run by
Troels Lund Poulsen, the defense minister and head of one of Denmark’s
strongest conservative parties.
Ms.
Frederiksen has molded herself into an exemplar of Europe’s new left.
Historically, her party has been a workers’ party. But in recent years it has
shifted to the right on immigration — Denmark has imposed some of the strictest
asylum rules in Europe. She’s also a serious hawk in foreign policy, thrusting
Denmark front and center into Europe’s efforts to back Ukraine against the
encroachments of an increasingly acquisitive Russia.
Recently,
though, Ms. Frederiksen seems to be tacking left again, and embracing a
potential wealth tax. Critics wonder if she’s doing this purely to cozy up to
the left-wing parties that are polling well and whose votes she may need to
build a coalition. The wealth tax, which many Danes call “the jealousy tax,”
has upset some of her moderate supporters and the titans of Danish industry,
like the heads of Maersk shipping and Lego.
From the
start, Ms. Frederiksen has moved through the world with elbows out. Her father,
who offered to give a little tour of the street she lived on, her old school
and her old house, remembered how she was socked in the face by a skinhead in
high school for standing up for immigrant children. It was an ordeal she shared
with him only many years later and which has been chronicled in a political
biography.
“She
wasn’t very old before she figured out where she stood,” he said.
He and
others credit her upbringing with shaping her values. She grew up in Aalborg, a
working-class city in the Jutland region near Denmark’s northern tip.
Smokestacks from a cement factory smudge out the sun. There used to be even
more industry, like big shipyards employing thousands of people.
Today
Aalborg hums with Scandinavian efficiency. Parents ride their kids to school in
dedicated bike lanes. No garbage blows on the streets. A gleaming public pool
offers an ice bath and several saunas. In a two-day visit, we didn’t hear a
single raised voice or the honk of a horn.
Maiken
Hedegaard Brondum, a human resources consultant in Aalborg, said she leans left
politically but doesn’t like Ms. Frederiksen’s party because of its hardening
position on immigrants.
“They are
too strict with immigration,” Ms. Brondum said. “We need to help the people
that need it.”
Ms.
Brondum, 48, met Ms. Frederiksen when they were 6. As children, they ran a
small “detective agency” and later an amateur environmental club. Though they
remained close into their teenage years, Ms. Frederiksen’s growing focus on
politics eventually pulled them in different directions — and today, Ms.
Brondum no longer feels politically aligned with her childhood friend.
“The
Social Democrats are too much on the right for me,” she said. “But I still hope
she wins. Simply because I cannot see the other side doing anything I would
agree with.”
The other
night, Ms. Frederiksen returned to Aalborg for a campaign event at a high
school, at home and casual in jeans, a green sweater and pointy gold shoes. She
strode onstage, taking a seat between a journalist and a former prime minister.
She was the only woman onstage, a familiar position.
She spoke
about a potential social media ban for children and the perils of too much
screen time. She discussed a hot local issue: nitrates from fertilizer leaching
into the water supply.
She
lamented the ideological challenges of leading a hydra-headed coalition and how
the compromises necessary to keep the government together inevitably watered
down some of her party’s more forceful policies.
But it
was when the subject turned to geopolitics that her eyes really lit up.
“This is
the 10th election campaign I’ve been part of,” she told the audience. “In all
those years, I have never experienced global affairs and foreign policy filling
so many of my conversations with Danes.”
After
applause, she stepped down from the stage, hugged some old friends, posed for
some selfies and signed the leg of one young admirer’s jeans.
She even
squeezed in a quick interview as the crowd filtered out, leaving the auditorium
big and empty. It was nearly 10 p.m.
When
asked how she felt about Mr. Trump’s backing down on Greenland, she said, “I
feel better.”
“Right
now we are quite happy that we succeeded in bringing this discussion into a
more traditional political diplomatic atmosphere.” she said.
She was
referring to negotiations involving the White House, Denmark and Greenland, and
she uttered a line that could have come from Mr. Trump himself.
“Hopefully,
we will be able to reach a deal,” she said.
Then she
walked out into the brisk night air, stepped into a sleek van and roared away.
Jeffrey
Gettleman is an international correspondent based in London covering global
events. He has worked for The Times for more than 20 years.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário