Trump’s
Ultimatum to Iran Was Almost Up. Then He Found an Offramp.
President
Trump postponed his threat to strike power plants in Iran, citing “productive
conversations” with the Iranians. But officials said the talks were in an early
stage and not substantive.
Tyler
Pager David E.
SangerFarnaz Fassihi
By Tyler
PagerDavid E. Sanger and Farnaz Fassihi
Tyler
Pager and David E. Sanger reported from Washington and Farnaz Fassihi from New
York.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/23/us/politics/trump-iran-gas-oil-strait.html
March 23,
2026
President
Trump seized on initial contacts between Iranian and American officials to back
away on Monday from his threat to strike power plants in Iran, declaring that
the countries had begun “productive conversations” for the first time since the
war began more than three weeks ago.
Iranian
officials publicly denied that any negotiations about terms to end the war were
underway, and American officials said the contacts were in a very early stage
and not substantive.
But Mr.
Trump used the opening of even an early dialogue as an offramp from the threat
he issued Saturday to attack Iran’s power plants in retribution for the closure
of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran had vowed not to capitulate, and the 48-hour
deadline Mr. Trump had set would have expired on Monday.
Mr. Trump
said he would now extend his deadline to Friday to give the talks time to
proceed, setting off a flurry of diplomacy by a number of nations seeking to
nurture the talks. It remained unclear, though, how seriously the White House
was taking the potential for a breakthrough in a conflict that has seen both
sides escalate for weeks.
“We’re
doing a five-day period,” Mr. Trump told reporters on Monday about his pause on
hitting Iranian power plants, targets that are forbidden under most
circumstances under the Geneva Conventions. “We’ll see how that goes, and if it
goes well, we’re going to end up with settling this. Otherwise, we’ll just keep
bombing our little hearts out.”
Even as
Mr. Trump retreated from one military option, U.S. and Israeli officials said
they were continuing to carry out other strikes against Iran and more American
military assets were headed to the region. Officials said Mr. Trump was still
weighing more aggressive operations, including one to seize Kharg Island,
Iran’s main oil export hub, and another to send ground forces into Iran to
secure highly enriched uranium.
Mr. Trump
on Monday provided few details of the conversations with Iran beyond saying
Jared Kushner, his son-in-law, and Steve Witkoff, his special envoy, were
leading the negotiations. He said they were communicating directly with one of
Iran’s leaders, without naming the person. American and Iranian officials
familiar with the conversations, speaking on the condition of anonymity to
discuss the sensitive talks, said Mr. Witkoff has had direct communication with
Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in recent days.
The
president said the United States was still demanding an end to Iranian nuclear
enrichment and elimination of all of the country’s uranium stockpiles that
could be used to one day make a bomb, terms that Iran had previously rejected.
It was the breakdown of diplomatic negotiations between Mr. Kushner, Mr.
Witkoff and Mr. Araghchi that led to the United States and Israel launching
strikes against Iran at the end of February.
Iranian
officials denied Monday that they were negotiating with the United States, and
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s Parliament, wrote on social
media that Mr. Trump’s comments were an attempt to “escape the quagmire in
which the US and Israel are trapped.”
In
interviews, four Iranian officials said that the messages passed in the past
few days through intermediaries and in direct conversations with the Americans
were essentially probes on how to de-escalate the conflict, with the goal of
averting a spiraling escalation, including attacks on critical energy
infrastructure.
The
officials said that Mr. Araghchi told Mr. Witkoff that Iran was not interested
in a temporary cease-fire and wanted a sustainable peace deal, with guarantees
that the United States and Israel would not attack it again. The officials said
the Iranians also sought specific economic sanctions relief from Washington, a
topic that, in negotiations before the war, American officials said would only
happen after Iran delivered on its nuclear and other commitments in any
agreement.
But Mr.
Trump’s characterization of these as “productive conversations” seemed to
overstate the current state of the talks.
Ali Vaez,
the Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, said the Iranians
would not engage in a high-level meeting before knowing that the United States
was stepping away from its “maximalist” demands.
“Not
attacking energy infrastructure is a low bar,” he said. “The terms of a
cease-fire, or an agreement that would resolve the longer-term problems
including the fate of the stockpile or reopening of the strait — none of those
things are anywhere close to the finish line right now.”
Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel said that he spoke with Mr. Trump on
Monday and that Mr. Trump believed it was possible to “leverage” their military
achievements against Iran to “realize the objectives of the war in an
agreement.”
But Mr.
Netanyahu, whose strategy has sometimes been at odds with Mr. Trump’s in recent
weeks, made it clear he had no intention of letting up. “We are smashing the
missile program and the nuclear program, and we continue to deal severe blows
to Hezbollah.” He revealed that Israel recently “eliminated two more nuclear
scientists” in Iran.
Arab
countries in the Persian Gulf decided they did not want to act as mediators as
long as Iran continued to attack their countries, but several other countries
including Pakistan, Turkey and Egypt have offered assistance, though it remains
unclear if there are any mediating partners involved.
Turkey
and Pakistan have floated ideas for in-person meetings between U.S. and Iranian
officials. One proposal calls for a meeting between Mr. Araghchi, Mr. Witkoff
and Mr. Kushner while another suggests Vice President JD Vance meets with Mr.
Ghalibaf. Officials said none of the meetings have been scheduled.
“These
are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the U.S. will not negotiate through
the press,” Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a
statement. “This is a fluid situation, and speculation about meetings should
not be deemed as final until they are formally announced by the White House.”
For Mr.
Trump, the prospect of negotiations allows him to buy time to try reopen the
Strait of Hormuz and to extract himself from a box of his own construction. On
Saturday night, Mr. Trump said if Iran did not open the strait within 48 hours,
the United States would “obliterate” Iran’s power plants.
After he
issued his threat, it became clear that if he attacked Iran’s electrical
infrastructure, the retaliation would take place against Gulf allies who are
already trying to keep the war from spreading. But if he backed away from his
threat, some officials around him feared he would be conveying weakness to the
Iranians.
Already
on Monday, Iranian officials said Mr. Trump’s announcement was evidence of the
United States giving in. “Trump, out of fear of Iran’s response, backed down
from his 48-hour ultimatum,” the Iranian state broadcaster, IRIB, said.
Mr. Trump
is facing increasing domestic and economic pressure to reopen the Strait of
Hormuz. The war’s global fallout has seen the price of oil and gas shoot up as
much as 40 percent since late February, a crisis that is now worse than the oil
shocks in 1973 and 1979 combined, according to the head of the International
Energy Agency.
Mr.
Trump’s statement about talks with Iran immediately reduced energy prices
somewhat, but it was unclear how long that could last without tangible progress
toward ending the war. The president has repeatedly given optimistic
assessments that temporarily eased market jitters, only for prices to rise
again.
Mr. Trump
on Monday promised the Strait of Hormuz would be open “very soon” and would be
“jointly controlled.”
“Maybe
me? Maybe me,” he said when asked who would control the key waterway. “Me and
the ayatollah. Whoever the ayatollah is.”
Ronen
Bergman contributed reporting from Tel Aviv.
Tyler
Pager is a White House correspondent for The Times, covering President Trump
and his administration.
David E.
Sanger covers the Trump administration and a range of national security issues.
He has been a Times journalist for more than four decades and has written four
books on foreign policy and national security challenges.
Farnaz
Fassihi is the United Nations bureau chief for The Times, leading coverage of
the organization. She also covers Iran and has written about conflict in the
Middle East for 15 years.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário