Bondi Faces Anger From Lawmakers Over Handling of Epstein Files

Bondi Faces Anger From Lawmakers Over Handling of Epstein Files

 

Her appearance came as the Justice Department was under scrutiny over the Epstein files, its approach toward the shootings in Minneapolis and its move to prosecute six lawmakers.

 

Glenn Thrush

By Glenn Thrush

Reporting from Washington

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/us/politics/bondi-testimony-epstein-files.html

Published Feb. 11, 2026

Updated Feb. 12, 2026, 12:53 a.m. ET

 

Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to apologize to survivors of the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein who were seated in the House Judiciary Committee room on Wednesday — and instead demanded that Democrats apologize to President Trump.

 

Ms. Bondi, imitating Mr. Trump’s tactic of going on the attack when facing tough questions, offered few detailed answers, no admissions of fault but many expressions of fealty and admiration for a president who has exercised direct control over the Justice Department’s actions.

 

The bitter back-and-forth, during a four-hour hearing before lawmakers, demonstrated the extent to which the Epstein files, once relegated to the conspiratorial outskirts of American politics, have become a defining issue for Ms. Bondi. The topic at times overshadowed her role in subordinating her department into an extension of Mr. Trump’s will and retribution agenda.

 

While Ms. Bondi fielded questions on an array of controversies — including about the department’s unsuccessful effort a day earlier to prosecute six Democrats lawmakers who posted a video that enraged Mr. Trump — the focus almost always snapped back to the Epstein scandal.

 

Representative Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the panel, delivered a salvo of disgust in his opening statement. He started by criticizing Ms. Bondi’s handling of the release of the investigative files involving Mr. Epstein.

 

“You’re siding with the perpetrators, and you’re ignoring the victims,” said Mr. Raskin, a Maryland Democrat. “That will be your legacy, unless you act quickly to change course. You’re running a massive Epstein cover-up right out of the Department of Justice.”

 

Ms. Bondi seemed unmoved. But she had a harder time evading the visuals in the hearing room, embodied by Epstein survivors who sat solemnly behind her in the gallery. She declined to apologize to them and only briefly cast eyes in their direction.

 

A particularly uncomfortable moment came when Representative Pramila Jayapal, a Washington Democrat, made an emotional appeal for Ms. Bondi to tell the women she was sorry for the slapdash, sluggish release of the Epstein documents, which inadvertently included the disclosure of victims’ names that were supposed to be redacted.

 

Ms. Bondi appeared momentarily at a loss for words. Then something clicked, and she began to counterattack, her voice swelling to a near shout, accusing Ms. Jayapal of “theatrics” and of dragging the hearing “into the gutter.”

 

She fiercely defended her actions in the Epstein case from the start, and placed blame for missed opportunities in the investigation on her Biden-era predecessors.

 

“I’m a career prosecutor,” she said during her opening remarks, adding, “I have spent my entire career fighting for victims, and will continue to do so.”

 

But she did not linger long on defense. Ms. Bondi taunted several of the committee’s Democrats, including Mr. Raskin and Representative Jerrold Nadler of New York, for spearheading Mr. Trump’s impeachments.

 

“Have you apologized to President Trump?” asked Ms. Bondi, who has been eager to ingratiate herself to a White House that has been less than impressed by some of her actions, particularly on the Epstein matter.

 

“You sit here and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it,” added Ms. Bondi, who then pointed to the state of the stock market, eliciting derisive laughter from Democrats.

 

“You don’t tell me anything, you washed-up, loser lawyer. You’re not even a lawyer,” she said in one exchange with Mr. Raskin, a Harvard-trained lawyer.

 

The last time Ms. Bondi appeared before a congressional panel was in October, when she stonewalled Democrats for four hours and read from a list of scripted insults in response to their questioning of her conduct.

 

But Democrats, led by Mr. Raskin, prepared to counter that stall-and-brawl strategy, much to Ms. Bondi’s annoyance.

 

“We saw your performance in the Senate, and we’re not going to accept that,” Mr. Raskin said.

 

And he seemed to have an ally, at least procedurally, in the committee’s Republican chairman, Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, who gingerly but firmly directed the agitated witness not to shout at or interrupt her questioners.

 

The Epstein case, once an obsessive focus of the right, has now become a powerful political weapon wielded by Democrats in attacking President Trump and his appointees in the Justice Department and the F.B.I.

 

For Republicans, the never-ending Epstein fiasco has defined Ms. Bondi’s tenure in much the same way that her willingness to execute Mr. Trump’s commands has tarnished her in the eyes of Democrats.

 

The atmosphere was different — and chillier — than the one during her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last fall, when Republicans rallied to Ms. Bondi’s defense in the face of withering questioning from Democrats.

 

Their defense of her on Wednesday was notably muted, and instead of engaging directly with Democrats, many sought to steer the discussion away from Mr. Epstein and onto safer ground: the department’s efforts to combat street crime. Many of them simply ceded time reserved for questions to Ms. Bondi, allowing her to extend her criticisms of Democratic questioners.

 

One Republican critic of the Trump administration joined Democrats on the attack. Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, has frequently criticized Ms. Bondi and her top deputy, Todd Blanche, over the handling of the files, accusing them of slow-walking or blocking the release of some material.

 

On Wednesday, Mr. Massie and Ms. Bondi clashed over the Justice Department’s inadvertent release of victims’ identities and the redactions of a purported co-conspirator’s identity.

 

“Who is responsible?” asked Mr. Massie, who helped write the law requiring the department to release the Epstein files. “Who in your organization made this massive failure?”

 

Ms. Bondi responded by accusing Mr. Massie of “Trump derangement syndrome,” and called him “a failed politician.”

 

Oversight hearings have always had elements of political theater. But the approach taken by Ms. Bondi and the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, has been different from that taken by their predecessors. It has been characterized by a refusal to even cursorily address questions they might view as inconvenient, and by the use of prepared attacks against Democrats to change the subject and drown out criticism.

 

That approach did not work as well on Wednesday, and Democrats appeared to be prepared to offer a few ambushes of their own.

 

Representative Becca Balint, Democrat of Vermont, questioned Ms. Bondi intensely about the relationship between three senior Trump administration officials and Jeffrey Epstein.

 

At one point, she asked Ms. Bondi if she planned to scrutinize Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, over his relationship with Mr. Epstein.

 

Ms. Bondi icily replied that Mr. Lutnick had “addressed those ties himself.”

 

When Ms. Balint mistakenly referred to Ms. Bondi as “secretary,” Ms. Bondi cut in to say, “I am attorney general.”

 

Without missing a beat, Ms. Balint shot back: “My apologies, I couldn’t tell.”

 

There was, at least, one unexpected moment of bipartisan comity.

 

Representative Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California — a frequent Trump critic — appealed to Ms. Bondi to investigate people who had made threats against him and his family.

 

“I’m just asking for your help to protect life, because life is at risk with the environment we’re in right now,” he said.

 

“They are being looked into,” Ms. Bondi replied. “None of you should be threatened, ever. None of your children should be threatened. None of your families should be threatened, and I will work with you.”

 

Glenn Thrush covers the Department of Justice for The Times and has also written about gun violence, civil rights and conditions in the country’s jails and prisons.