‘Full-blown
meltdown’ at Pentagon after Hegseth’s second Signal chat revealed
Existence of
group chat including Hegseth, his wife and others prompt calls for defense
secretary to step down
Edward
Helmore
Mon 21 Apr
2025 17.28 CEST
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/21/hegseth-second-signal-chat-pentagon
Pressure was
mounting on the US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, on Monday following reports
of a second Signal chatroom used to discuss sensitive military operations,
while a former top Pentagon spokesperson slammed the US’s top military
official’s leadership of the Department of Defense.
John Ullyot,
who resigned last week after initially serving as Pentagon spokesperson, said
in a opinion essay published by Politico on Sunday that the Pentagon has been
overwhelmed by staff drama and turnover in the initial months of the second
Trump administration.
Ullyot
called the situation a “full-blown meltdown” that could cost Hegseth, a
44-year-old former Fox News host and national guard officer, his job as defense
secretary.
“It’s been a
month of total chaos at the Pentagon. From leaks of sensitive operational plans
to mass firings, the dysfunction is now a major distraction for the president –
who deserves better from his senior leadership,” Ullyot wrote.
Donald Trump
Jr pushed back on the opinion piece, saying the author is “officially exiled”
from Trump’s political movement. “This guy is not America First,” Trump Jr
wrote on X. “I’ve been hearing for years that he works his ass off to subvert
my father’s agenda. That ends today.”
The warning
came as the New York Times reported that Hegseth shared details of a US attack
on Yemeni Houthi rebels last month in a second Signal chat that he created
himself and included his wife, his brother and about a dozen other people.
The Guardian
has independently confirmed the existence of Hegseth’s own private group chat.
According to
unnamed sources familiar with the chat who spoke to the Times, Hegseth sent the
private group of his personal associates some of the same information,
including the flight schedules for the F/A-18 Hornets that would strike Houthi
rebel targets in Yemen, that he also shared with another Signal group of top
officials that was created by Mike Waltz, the national security adviser.
The
existence of the Signal group chat created by Waltz, in which detailed attack
plans were divulged by Hegseth to other Trump administration officials on the
private messaging app, were made public by the Atlantic magazine’s Jeffrey
Goldberg, who had been accidentally added to the group.
The
existence of a second Signal chat, coupled with Ullyot’s devastating portrait
of the Pentagon under Hegseth, is likely to increase pressure on the White
House to take action.
Trump
defended Hegseth at the annual Easter Egg roll at the White House.
“Pete’s
doing a great job,” the president said. “Just ask the Houthis how he’s doing.
It’s just fake news. They just bring up stories. It sounds like disgruntled
employees. He was put there to get rid of a lot of bad people and that’s what
he’s doing. You don’t always have friends when you do that.”
Hegseth
himself blamed “disgruntled former employees” in remarks to reporters at the
same event.
“What a big
surprise that a few leakers get fired and suddenly a bunch of hit pieces come
out from the same media that peddled the Russia hoax,” Hegseth said. “This is
what the media does. They take anonymous sources from disgruntled former
employees, and then they try to slash and burn people and ruin their
reputations.”
He
continued: “Not going to work with me, because we’re changing the defense
department, putting the Pentagon back in the hands of war-fighters. And
anonymous smears from disgruntled former employees on old news doesn’t matter.”
The
Pentagon’s chief spokesperson, Sean Parnell, issued a statement in a post on X
on Sunday night following the New York Times report.
“Another
day, another old story – back from the dead,” Parnell said. “The Trump-hating
media continues to be obsessed with destroying anyone committed to President
Trump’s agenda. This time, the New York Times – and all other Fake News that
repeat their garbage – are enthusiastically taking the grievances of
disgruntled former employees as the sole sources for their article.
“There was
no classified information in any Signal chat, no matter how many ways they try
to write the story. What is true is that the Office of the Secretary of Defense
is continuing to become stronger and more efficient in executing President
Trump’s agenda. We’ve already achieved so much for the American warfighter, and
will never back down.”
Tammy
Duckworth, a Democratic senator from Illinois and combat veteran, said in a
statement that the second Signal chat put the lives of US men and women in
uniform at greater risk:
“How many
times does Pete Hegseth need to leak classified intelligence before Donald
Trump and Republicans understand that he isn’t only a f*cking liar, he is a
threat to our national security?
“Every day
he stays in his job is another day our troops’ lives are endangered by his
singular stupidity,” Duckworth said. “He must resign in disgrace.”
Jack Reed, a
Democratic senator from Rhode Island and a senior member of the Senate armed
services committee, said the report, if true, “is another troubling example of
Secretary Hegseth’s reckless disregard for the laws and protocols that every
other military service member is required to follow”.
Reed called
on Hegseth to “immediately explain why he reportedly texted classified
information that could endanger American service members’ lives on a commercial
app that included his wife, brother, and personal lawyer”.
Reed said he
had “warned that Mr Hegseth lacks the experience, competence, and character to
run the Department of Defense. In light of the ongoing chaos, dysfunction, and
mass firings under Mr Hegseth’s leadership, it seems that those objections were
well-founded.”
Ullyot
warned that under Hegseth “the Pentagon focus is no longer on warfighting, but
on endless drama” and said “the president deserves better than the current
mishegoss at the Pentagon.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário