As
Ukraine and U.S. Cease-Fire Talks Near, Gulfs Remain
American and
Ukrainian representatives will meet in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday, but the United
States, Ukraine and Russia envisage very different paths to peace.
Andrew E.
KramerAlan Rappeport
By Andrew E.
Kramer and Alan Rappeport
Reporting
from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/11/world/europe/ukraine-us-saudi-cease-fire-talks.html
March 11,
2025, 12:00 a.m. ET
When
Ukrainian and American officials sit down in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday for their
first high-level meeting since an Oval Office shouting match between their
presidents last month, the goal will be finding a way to halt the bloodiest
European war in generations.
But the
United States, Ukraine and Russia appear to have very different ideas about
what a cease-fire should look like.
Ukraine has
proposed an immediate cessation of air and sea strikes, but wants security
guarantees before its infantry lays down its arms. The United States is
pressing for an immediate, comprehensive cease-fire. And Russia, which will not
be at the talks, has signaled that it wants concessions of its own before
halting the war it started.
If the
Ukrainian proposal to halt the air and sea strikes is agreed to, it would bring
about the first negotiated reduction in the fighting in three years of war, but
the Trump administration has made clear it is looking for more. Ukraine has
offered the unconditional truce on long-range strikes as a confidence building
measure while continuing talks on a more comprehensive cease-fire.
Secretary of
State Marco Rubio, en route to the meetings in the seaside city of Jeddah, said
Monday that Ukraine would have to make concessions over land that Russia has
taken since 2014 as part of any peace agreement.
“The most
important thing that we have to leave here with is a strong sense that Ukraine
is prepared to do difficult things, like the Russians are going to have to do
difficult things, to end this conflict or at last pause it in some way shape or
form,” Mr. Rubio told reporters.
These will
be the first high-level, in-person talks for the United States and Ukraine
since a Feb. 28 White House meeting between President Trump and President
Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine unraveled into an argument and insults. “You’ve
talked enough,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Zelensky at one point. “You won’t win.”
Since then,
Mr. Zelensky has sought to smooth relations with Mr. Trump, calling their
contentious meeting “regrettable,” and Ukrainian officials have been careful in
framing their cease-fire proposal. Over the weekend, French and British
officials coached the Ukrainian delegation on how to talk with the Americans, a
Ukrainian official with the delegation said. The delegation is also expected to
meet with the American national security adviser, Michael Waltz.
Ukraine
favors a truce at sea and in the air, said the official, who was not authorized
to speak publicly of the delegation’s plans, but may pose the idea tentatively.
“We don’t know if the Russians are ready for any steps to peace” the official
said. The official said the Ukrainians would ask if the Americans, who have
been talking to the Russians separately, had insight into Moscow’s position on
the Ukrainian proposal.
Mr. Zelensky
proposed the partial cease-fire last week, with support from President Emmanuel
Macron of France. Russia has not directly responded. Ukraine’s president has
also called for an all-for-all exchange of prisoners of war, a traditional
confidence-building measure in peace talks.
The
proposals that Ukraine is bringing to Jeddah are its most detailed to date. In
return, it is seeking one immediate action from the United States: a resumption
of military aid and intelligence sharing that was suspended by Mr. Trump after
the Oval Office debacle.
The
intelligence cutoff has already impaired soldiers in combat, particularly in
the Kursk region of Russia, where Russian soldiers, aided by fighter from North
Korea, have been rapidly advancing, according to Ukrainian commanders in the
field.
The picture
appears somewhat different of late in eastern Ukraine, where a slow reversal
for the Russians on the battlefield has come into sharper focus. Ukrainian
troops there have stalled a Russian offensive, and won back small patches of
land. Since the beginning of the month, Russia has captured only five square
miles of Ukrainian territory.
Mr. Rubio
declined to outline a potential agreement but made clear that concessions will
be critical. He said it would be important to learn what Russia is willing to
concede. “We don’t know how far apart they truly are,” he said.
“I think
both sides need to come to an understanding that there’s no military solution
to this situation,” Mr. Rubio said. “The Russians can’t conquer all of Ukraine,
and obviously it’ll be very difficult for Ukraine in any reasonable time period
to sort of force the Russians back all the way to where they were in 2014.”
It is
unclear whether the offer of an aerial and maritime truce, perhaps accompanied
by an agreement to share revenues from Ukraine’s mineral mining with the United
States, would be sufficient for Mr. Trump to resume intelligence sharing and
lift his halt on weapons shipments.
Mr. Trump
has pushed for the warring sides to stop fighting as soon as possible, without
first negotiating terms that might include mechanisms to safeguard the peace.
At the Oval Office meeting, he argued that a cease-fire could be achieved more
swiftly than a peace agreement, and that Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin,
would keep his word.
Russia
violated two previous cease-fires, reached in 2014 and 2015, and denied an
intention to invade just days before invading in 2022.
In an
interview on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” Mr. Trump once again said he
thought that Mr. Zelensky, on whom he has heaped vitriol, was not grateful for
American military aid. When the Biden administration was in power, he said, the
Ukrainian leader “took candy from a baby.”
Mr. Trump
also said that he also saw “some weakness” with Russia that would facilitate
talks. “You know, it takes two,” he said.
Russia has
publicly called for conditions to be imposed before a cease-fire takes effect,
and Mr. Putin has signaled that he wants to secure a raft of concessions from
Ukraine and the West.
Analysts
believe that beyond seeking to keep the territory Russia has captured so far
and claiming additional land, Mr. Putin will demand a guarantee that Ukraine
not join NATO, a retreat by the Western alliance from Central and Eastern
Europe and limits to the size and firepower of Ukraine’s military.
“We must
choose for ourselves a version of peace that would suit us and that would
ensure calm for our country in the long-term historical perspective,” Mr. Putin
said on Thursday.
Russia is
also pressing for Ukraine to hold presidential elections, arguing that Mr.
Zelensky’s rule is illegitimate. Ukrainian elections scheduled for the spring
of 2024 were suspended because of the war.
For Ukraine,
the talks pose the dispiriting challenge of adapting to an ally that is now
adopting positions of its enemy. Both Russia and the Trump administration have
questioned Mr. Zelensky’s legitimacy and accused Ukraine of starting the war.
“I am
finding it more difficult frankly to deal with Ukraine, and they don’t have the
cards,” Mr. Trump said last week.
The United
States has also offered no support for a role for European peacekeepers in
Ukraine under a cease-fire, but as Ukrainian and American officials meet in
Jeddah on Tuesday, top military officials are expected to gather in Paris to
discuss such a force. Asked how many troops might be required, France’s defense
minister, Sébastien Lecornu, told La Tribune du Dimanche that “everything
depends on their mission and positioning.”
Ukraine’s
broader goals in the talks with the United States are to slow, so far as
possible, the fallout on its war effort from America’s geopolitical pivot to
Russia under Mr. Trump. That might buy time for European states to ramp up aid,
analysts and former Ukrainian officials said.
“It’s the
alignment between Putin and Trump that is the problem,” said Orysia Lutsevych,
a Ukraine analyst at the London-based research institute Chatham House.
“There’s nothing that Zelensky can do. Ukraine is ready to compromise but not
capitulate. I don’t see a leader of Ukraine wanting to be friendly to Trump and
Putin.”
Ukraine is
not likely to bend on it insistence that there be an enforcement mechanism for
any cease-fire, said Andriy Zagorodnyuk, a former Ukrainian defense minister.
Russia has greater potential to rebuild its army over any pause in the
fighting, he said.
“If we have
nothing, and Russia is pumping up their forces, in one year they will be ready
to strike again,” Mr. Zagorodnyuk said in a telephone interview.
Marc Santora
contributed reporting from Kyiv, Ukraine, Anton Troianovski from Berlin, and
Aurelien Breeden from Paris.
Andrew E.
Kramer is the Kyiv bureau chief for The Times, who has been covering the war in
Ukraine since 2014. More about Andrew E. Kramer
Alan
Rappeport is an economic policy reporter, based in Washington. He covers the
Treasury Department and writes about taxes, trade and fiscal matters. More
about Alan Rappeport
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário