Labour
under fire for failing to name MPs for key EU role
Calls for UK
to work more closely with the EU on everything from defence and trade to
immigration grow following Trump’s re-election
Toby Helm
Political editor
Sun 10 Nov
2024 06.00 GMT
Keir
Starmer’s government is coming under fire for having failed over more than four
months to appoint new MPs and peers to a key EU-UK inter-parliamentary forum,
as pressure grows for closer co-operation with the European Union after
Donald’s Trump re-election to the White House.
Today in an
article for the Observer online the MEP and former Italian government minister
Sandro Gozi, recently elected as the new chair of the 70-strong UK-EU
parliamentary partnership assembly (PPA), and the chair of the Labour Movement
for Europe Stella Creasy MP say failure to reconstitute the PPA since the July
general election is an issue that “urgently” needs to be addressed.
They write
that since Labour took office, the body, set up in 2021 to scrutinise the
workings of the post-Brexit Trade and Co-operation Agreement and build closer
working links, has been unable to function because the UK has not taken any
steps to establish which 30 Westminster parliamentarians will form the
country’s delegation. A parliamentary source, while critical of the
government’s failure to appoint new MPs, suggested one reason for the delay was
a request from the Conservatives to wait until the conclusion of their
leadership election.
Calls for
the UK to work more closely with the EU on everything from foreign policy to
defence and trade – as well as immigration – have been growing since Trump’s
stunning re-election success.
The
president-elect has promised to impose substantial tariffs on all US imports in
a move that could seriously damage a UK economy already suffering from having
lost access to the EU’s single market as a consequence of Brexit. With Trump
also talking of ending US funding for Ukraine in its war with Russia, the UK
government finds itself in a position of potentially dangerous isolation from
both the US and the EU on issues of economic and security importance.
Against this
background, senior diplomats and Labour MPs now want Starmer to accelerate
moves to get closer to the EU.
Privately
diplomats and Labour politicians are astonished and despairing that many such
public appointments including new trade envoys have not been named since the
election. One key source said: “Whether it is all the trouble at No 10 I don’t
know, but it is pretty astonishing.” Another said: “They have just not wanted
to have any focus on what they are doing with Europe. With Trump back though
that has to change.”
Peter
Ricketts, former UK ambassador to Paris and one of the country’s leading
ex-diplomats, who was appointed to the UK-EU PPA on its formation, said that he
hoped the Starmer government would speed up the building of closer ties with
Brussels.
“I would
move away from the rather cautious and incremental approach to improving
relations with Europe,” he said. “It is really important that we are getting in
close and talking much more regularly to the French, the Germans, the Poles,
the Italians.
“I think
this is less about changing the treaty, which will inevitably take time, and
more about working on foreign policy issues such as Ukraine, and on finding
practical solutions on issues such as migration.”
Creasy told
the Observer: “Trump’s election shows the risks to the UK of going it alone in
an uncertain world. We have to rebuild our relationship with Europe as part of
protecting the public from the economic, security and climate shocks heading
our way.
“Yet the
democratic structures designed to do that aren’t up and running as the
Government hasn’t set out what will replace the Parliamentary European Scrutiny
committee it abolished or appointed people to the UK EU Parliamentary Assembly.
With so much at stake we can’t waste any more time – getting this right has to
be a priority before the new president is in post.”
In her
article with Gozi, they add: “When the UK left the EU it didn’t just abandon
the biggest trading bloc in the world. It also left the room where decisions
are made affecting our mutual security, climate and equality. Whether
protecting the future for Ukraine or Israel or Palestine, managing the need to
transition our economies or the challenge of migration, both are now poorer for
this break-up. The last UK government took Brexit as permission to isolate,
building further trade barriers at its borders in the name of Global Britain.
“The new
government has made clear it prioritises collaboration with its neighbours, not
the grievances of the past. This week’s events mean that defining what that
means in practice must now be fast-tracked.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário