From the
Magazine
July/August
2021 Issue
The
Secret History of Gavin McInnes
In the ’90s,
he played punk rock and helped create Vice magazine. Five years ago, he founded
a very different organization: the Proud Boys, the far-right group that came to
personify the vilest tendencies of Trump’s America. A former Vice editor
interviews one of our era’s most troubling extremists.
By Adam
Leith Gollner
June 29,
2021
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-secret-history-of-gavin-mcinnes
On election
night in 2016, four years before the January 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol,
the Proud Boys threw a party. That November evening, Proud Boys founder Gavin
McInnes—my former boss—summoned his followers to the Gaslight Lounge in New
York’s Meatpacking District to watch the returns. “Tonight we either take back
the country or we lose the country to the establishment,” he told the
attendees, a mixture of Trumpist trolls, frat bros, and the sort of amped-up
nationalist types who call themselves “Western chauvinists.”
McInnes had
just created his gang months before. But as someone who’d always predicted
trends, he could see where this would lead. “If Donnie wins,” he bellowed into
a distorting microphone, the Proud Boys will “own America. We’ll just walk into
the White House.” They began chanting “USA! USA! USA!” the same way the Proud
Boys would when breaching the Capitol complex in January. Few back in 2016
realized how far the group would go—soon establishing chapters in 45 states,
with members eventually indicted on charges ranging from civil disorder to
conspiracy in the Washington, D.C., rampage. McInnes had founded what would
become, according to the Canadian government, a “terrorist entity.”
At 2:40
a.m., when Fox News decreed that Donald Trump had won, the crowd in the
Gaslight erupted. Howling men in MAGA caps hoisted an ebullient McInnes into
the air, crowd-surfing him across the throng. But life hadn’t been so joyous in
the eight years since he’d left Vice, the Montreal magazine cum media
conglomerate he’d cofounded in 1994 at age 24. He’d lost so much in the
intervening years: friends, fistfights, the respect of peers, a stake in Vice
Media Group’s future profits, presumably countless brain cells. In his
departure letter from Vice, he’d vowed his ideas would one day “blossom into
fruition like a hundred humid vaginas in the presence of God’s boner.” Now,
here he was—a legal immigrant from Canada, living in the
McInnes
didn’t simply feel vindicated; he believed he was at the pinnacle of a new
world. “I feel like Clark Kent,” he tweeted. “I’m just a guy in a suit but if
you have a problem, I’d be happy to punch through your face.” Interviewed today
for this story, he told me that Trump’s victory party was “one of the greatest
nights in my life.”
In the
1990s, McInnes was hardly a far-right menace. He was a tree-planting
vegetarian, a druggy anarchist, and a self-described “dogmatic feminist.” Some
people who knew him then still regard him as one of the funniest people they’ve
ever met. He counted comedians such as David Cross and Sarah Silverman as
friends, both of whom contributed articles to Vice. (Neither agreed to
interview requests.) But over time McInnes accelerated his drift to the
political fringe.
In 2003,
when Vice was largely an extension of McInnes’s psyche, Jimmy Kimmel told The
New York Times that its “brand of humor is what I would do if there were no
‘standards and practices’ on TV.” The whole Vice gestalt was so laced with
sarcasm that The Village Voice called it “brilliant hipster self-parody.”
McInnes’s early provocations were widely perceived as a commentary on hate
rather than hate itself. When his stance began to grow more blatantly
xenophobic, he turned to stand-up, a medium that allowed him to claim he was
only “joking around.” Just kidding had long been his default position. But
couching his beliefs in humor didn’t hide the deadly serious nature of his
politics. His true intentions were tattooed right on his back—in a tableau
depicting a jellyfish with Chiang Kai-shek and Fidel Castro, “two immigrants,”
he once proclaimed, “that came into a country, wiped out the previous cultures
and started new, prosperous ones…. The days of the West are numbered, and I
will be the impetus that destroys it. I am turning America inside out from the
outside in.”
By 2016, his
unseemly pronouncements had become a part of American political discourse. He
made an overt statement on his webcast: “Can you call for violence generally?
’Cause I am.” He also declared, in a textbook example of hate speech, bordering
on incitement: “Fighting solves everything—we need more violence from the Trump
people. Trump supporters: Choke a motherfucker”—going on to use derogatory
terms about trans people and women—“Get your fingers around the windpipe.” The
expletive-laden comment was among the reasons he would ultimately get
deplatformed from Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter. In November 2018,
he reluctantly stepped down as leader of the Proud Boys. But by then he’d
already lit the match and passed the torch. A peer-reviewed Bard College study
this year determined that, based on an analysis of his public statements, “the
rhetoric spouted by McInnes is actually fascist political action.”
No longer
the make-believe insurgent he’d been in his punk days, the Canadian originator
of the Proud Boys had become—at 50, his beard specked with gray—a fever-dream
incarnate of the tattoo on his back. Not unlike his “good friend” Roger Stone,
the Trump crony—and, not incidentally, pardoned felon—who has Nixon’s face
emblazoned between his shoulder blades, McInnes wanted to subvert things. He
wanted to cause chaos. He wanted to break America—and remake it in his
imaginings.
This
account, based on my firsthand observations and interviews with McInnes’s
friends and former colleagues—as well as McInnes himself—is the forgotten
backstory of how a wisecracking media maverick became a well-known and
influential “hatemonger,” to quote the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
Iworked
alongside McInnes at the start of Vice in 1994, becoming the magazine’s editor
shortly after it moved from Montreal to New York in 1999. Though McInnes
immediately struck me as someone to avoid outside of work, nothing then
indicated he would hatch an organization as vitriolic and violence-prone as the
street-brawling Proud Boys. He and I were never friends. Founding editor
Suroosh Alvi—who remains at Vice Media with the title of founder—brought me on
board as a writer at the same time as McInnes. And when I stepped down in early
2001, it was largely because of McInnes’s toxic attitude. (By then his title
was cofounder.)
Vice’s third
cofounder, Shane Smith, was integral to the arc of McInnes’s life. He
was—before their very public falling out—McInnes’s bandmate, roommate, rival,
and best friend. Close since the age of 12, they shared everything from
mescaline (then the Canadian name for PCP or horse tranquilizer) to lovers. How
tight were they? A 2002 book they coauthored, The Vice Guide to Sex and Drugs
and Rock and Roll, claims that McInnes once unwittingly squeezed his penis into
the same condom as Smith’s during a threesome.
Smith today
serves as executive chairman of Vice Media. He is considered an internet-age
pioneer, having expanded an indie magazine into a global powerhouse. He is
sometimes referred to as “Citizen Shane” among certain ex-colleagues, as much
for his Hearst-like legacy as a media baron, huckster, and former purveyor of
yellow journalism as for his Xanadu-like home in Santa Monica. In April,
Smith’s wife, Tamyka, filed for divorce, and the mansion was sold for $48.7
million—the approximate amount, according to The Wall Street Journal, that Vice
Media lost in 2019. Smith declined to be interviewed for this story.
The company
provided the following statement to Vanity Fair: “VICE and Gavin parted ways in
2008—many years before Gavin founded the Proud Boys. VICE unequivocally
condemns white supremacy, racism and any form of hate, has shone a fearless,
bright light of award-winning journalism on extremism, the alt-right and hate
groups around the world, and has created one of the most inclusive, diverse and
equitable companies in media. Our respective records of the last decade and a
half speak for themselves.” Vice News, in fact, has been unflinching in its
extensive and clear-eyed coverage of the Proud Boys. (Media executive Nancy
Dubuc took up the role of CEO in 2018 after Vice Media began to buckle in the
#MeToo era, triggered in part by a New York Times sexual harassment exposé in
which the founders apologized for the company’s “detrimental ‘boy’s club’
culture.”)
Though
neither Smith nor McInnes typically comment on each other—due to the terms of a
separation agreement—the latter recently told CNN that he still haunts Smith’s
company “like Banquo’s ghost.” Lies, betrayal, greed: There’s a Macbethian
whiff to the entangled narratives of McInnes and Smith. But even though Banquo
gets sacrificed to the vaulting ambition of Macbeth, his former
brother-in-arms, McInnes would seem to have more in common with Coriolanus, a
violence-for-violence’s-sake fame-lord whose opportunism outweighs genuine
political convictions. Shakespearean or not, McInnes started both Vice magazine
and the Proud Boys, and one metastasized out of the other.
Gavin Miles
McInnes was born in England to Scottish parents in 1970. His family immigrated
to Ontario when he was five, settling in suburban Ottawa. In high school, he
formed a gang called the Monks with guys nicknamed Pig Al and Pukey Stallion.
Among the dozen-odd outcasts in the crew were McInnes’s two best friends, Eric
Digras and Steve Durand. As kids, they said, McInnes’s predominant
characteristic was his recklessness. “A super-radical shit disturber,” Durand
told me. “Anything to provoke an extreme reaction.”
Was there
any foreshadowing that he would go on to form a group as extreme as the Proud
Boys? “Gavin was really into making rules that you had to abide by,” recalled
Digras, explaining that one rule McInnes devised as a teenager has since become
codified as a Proud Boys bylaw. The clan’s second-degree initiation rite—for
“adrenaline control”—involves naming five breakfast cereals while being punched
in the arms. The Monks did the same thing: “We’d all beat the shit out of you
until you could say five breakfast cereals,” Digras said. “The culture of our
gang was that if you were ever earnest or vulnerable, you lost all
credibility.”
McInnes and
his Monks were stoner freaks, on a different planet entirely than the Carpies,
rural farm lads from up Carp River. “Nobody wanted us to show up at their party
because we were the guys who started doing drugs and we’d always fuck shit up a
little bit,” said Digras, then nicknamed Dogboy. Moving on from bongs, some of
the Monks, by age 15, were dropping acid and huffing Pam cooking spray.
In 1986, a
police officer came to their school to screen a PSA about the dangers of drunk
driving. As McInnes relates in his 2012 autobiography, the students at Earl of
March Secondary School watched the sobering account of a young woman paralyzed
in an accident. During the Q&A that followed, McInnes took the microphone.
“Why do you consider being in a wheelchair so horrible?” he asked the officer.
“My mother is in a chair and has been her whole life, and our family certainly
doesn’t see her as some kind of tragedy.” This was a lie, but it already
revealed his affinity for darkly unfunny identity-based jokes. Even at that
early age, he was both a class clown and “a very natural manipulator,” Digras
explained.
McInnes,
Digras added, would use him and Durand as “the fall guys” for his jokes when
girls were around. “We called ourselves ‘the cardboard guys’ because we were
just these cutouts that he would use as props for his show.” Later in life,
several people who became close with McInnes would come to understand a similar
dynamic, most notably his two partners at Vice, Smith and Alvi.
The origins
of Vice can be traced to a rehab facility 30 minutes south of Montreal. In
1994, Alvi was 25 and had been shooting heroin for five years. Having OD’d
multiple times, he was thieving where he could, pawning gold or cameras to cop
his fix. He’d tried getting clean many times. Nothing worked. Blaming
Montreal—“It’s too decadent of a city”—he moved away, to Minnesota, Vancouver,
even Slovakia. But wherever he went, after the dope sickness wore off, he’d
kick, get clean for a little while, and turn to Valium until he could find a
dealer; then he’d get strung back out.
That spring,
Alvi checked into the Foster Addiction Rehabilitation Centre, a clinic
overlooking a cemetery in Saint-Philippe, Quebec. “If you keep using,” they
told him, pointing at the tombstones, “that’s where you’ll end up.” Two years
ago, I drove out to Foster with Alvi, where, sitting in a grassy ditch at the
graveyard’s edge, he recounted the story of Vice’s beginnings.
Days before
entering rehab, Alvi had gone with his family to the mosque to celebrate Eid.
As a Pakistani-Canadian, Alvi was raised Muslim but had never been observant.
On that day in the prayer hall, however, he got down on his knees and begged
for mercy: “If there’s an Allah up there,” he prayed, “I need your help now.”
He felt a sense of surrender, of submission to Islam.
Everything
after that started changing, quickly. During treatment, the therapists asked
the inpatients to do a career exercise: Write down their ideal job, imagining a
time when they would be sober and try to reintegrate themselves into society.
Alvi described himself working for a magazine somehow—even though he couldn’t
imagine any media company ever giving him a job.
After rehab,
he attended a Narcotics Anonymous meeting where a stranger named Walter walked
up to him, offering to become his sponsor. Walter asked if he was interested in
writing. Alvi nodded, adding that he’d never written before. It didn’t matter;
the next day, Walter introduced him to two Haitian publishers who were starting
a cultural newspaper called Voice of Montreal. The job was part of a government
program that supplemented regular welfare checks. Alvi, already on welfare, was
hired on the spot.
The exercise
from rehab had come true. “I wrote that, and Allah made it happen,” as he put
it. “If I hadn’t been a heroin addict, Vice wouldn’t exist.” He felt that it
had all been preordained, that heaven-sent grace was coming his way. He would
think things and they would happen, he told me. While vacuuming at his parents’
house one day, he found himself thinking about a song by Hüsker Dü, the first
punk band he’d loved. Knocking the remote with the vacuum cleaner, he
accidentally turned on the TV and the video for that exact song came on. Hüsker
Dü had broken up but the band’s frontman, Bob Mould, would soon be performing
live in Montreal. Alvi knew his magazine would cover it. He just needed to find
someone to review the concert—which is how I ended up writing for volume one,
issue one, of Voice of Montreal.
At
university in Ottawa, McInnes took women’s studies courses and got a ♀ tattoo with an E for equality. He started aligning himself
with socially conscious groups. “He did it for social currency—as a fashion statement—rather than
because he really believed in the ideology,” claimed Digras. Around that time, McInnes started a punk band called
Leatherassbuttfuk with his grade school friend Shane Smith. McInnes sang songs
like “You Can’t Rape a .38” as Smith,
attired in leather chaps, banged away at a flying V guitar. “They had this
weird bondage element,” said Durand, who saw them perform live. “There was
blood involved…. Their shtick was being half naked, falling-down drunk. It was
fucking gnarly.”
After
university, both McInnes and Smith bummed around Europe. Smith relocated to
Budapest, where he became, as he’s described it, “a criminal” involved in
arbitrage (money trading). McInnes stayed in squats and attended a fascist
skinhead rally in Germany. “They look great,” he wrote, shortly thereafter, of
the skinheads. “Why is it the bad guys always look cool?”
Asked today
about that experience, he grew agitated. “Are you implying that I somehow
became enamored with Nazi skinheads at that rally?”
“Not
enamored,” I replied. “But there was a fascination?”
“That’s a
terrible angle,” he argued. “Skinheads have always been the bad guys.” He
vehemently denied any links between skinheads and the Proud Boys, even though
Fred Perry polo shirts are worn by both groups, and members of 211 Bootboys,
described by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)—the watchdog organization
that monitors extremist and hate groups—as “an ultranationalist far-right
skinhead crew,” fought alongside members of the Proud Boys after a McInnes
speech in New York City in 2018, singling out left-wing protesters and
assaulting them. “It’s more of the media’s desperate need for Nazis,” he
insisted over the phone. “We don’t allow any Nazis or any kind of racism…. We
take in these people and we say, ‘We don’t care what race you are—as long as you
think the West is the best.’ ”
He kept
saying we instead of they. “Gavin,” I interjected, “are you still part of Proud
Boys?”
“No, sorry,”
he replied. “They do this. They do this.”
After
Europe, McInnes moved to Montreal to become a comics illustrator. The city in
1994 was suffering an economic downturn, and cheap rent led to a thriving arts
scene as well as a strong underground comics movement. McInnes started making
his own zine—a photocopied mini-comic called Pervert—about some of his life
experiences. I tracked down back issues at Arcmtl, a nonprofit that preserves
independent Montreal cultural artifacts. (Their archival team was debating what
to do with works by McInnes, whom one of them described as “the embodiment of
smoldering ratshit.”)
When other
publications wrote negatively of Pervert, McInnes sent reviewers threatening
letters splattered in his blood. Contemporaries in the comics community tried
to reason with him. “You need to learn that there is a fine line between humor
and offensiveness,” explained Ariel Bordeaux, of Deep Girl, encouraging him to
“grow up.”
Even so,
Pervert brought McInnes to Voice of Montreal’s attention. Alvi had started
recruiting contributors. Local scenester Rufus Raxlen thought McInnes could
help curate a comics page for the paper. “I introduced Suroosh to Gavin,
unfortunately,” Raxlen told me from his home in Texas. “I knew people who
[Suroosh] bought drugs with.” He emphasized that ’90s McInnes had little in
common with the person he’s become: “But even back then, Gavin made an art out
of getting on people’s nerves. He got off on it.”
One
respected cartoonist from that circle described the Montreal McInnes as already
going out of his way to be mean or disruptive: “That’s why he’d always get
punched in the face.” He recounted one episode in particular. Standing at a
busy intersection at rush hour, the cartoonist noticed McInnes across the
boulevard. “All of a sudden, to make his friends laugh, he pulls his jacket
completely over his head, hockey-fight style, and runs blindly into the
traffic. Cars in both directions go screech, screech! I thought for sure I’m
gonna see this guy get hit. Luckily, the drivers braked in time and swerved,
honking and screaming. His friends were doubled over laughing.”
“That rings
a bell,” McInnes commented when I asked him about it. “You’re not committed to
the joke unless you’re willing to die to make people laugh.”
Imet Alvi
just after turning 18. He was looking for contributors, and when he learned
that I wrote for my college paper, he asked me to bring clips to the office. My
published output consisted of a political think piece on fascist tendencies in
Quebec’s separatist party and music reviews, including a write-up of a new
album by Hüsker Dü’s frontman. At our meeting, Alvi asked if I’d cover his
upcoming concert. He couldn’t pay for the review—but he could get me in for
free, and he offered a token amount to stick around after the show and hand out
flyers for Voice of Montreal’s launch party.
On the night
of the performance, I filled my backpack with the rocket-shaped leaflets.
Outside the auditorium, a friend told me he’d gotten me a gift to celebrate my
first writing assignment.
“Close your
eyes and open your mouth,” he said. He then placed a tab of LSD on my tongue.
I’d never done acid.
I started
peaking during the band’s set. The only notes I took were about a made-up song
they didn’t play called “A.C.I.D.” During the encore, I felt something land on
my head. Looking up, I saw what looked like thousands of starry birds
fluttering through the concert hall. I soon realized: The origami sparrows
twirling from the rafters were actually the fliers from my backpack. Someone
had opened it—the friend who’d dosed me?—and tossed the contents into the air.
The fliers got swept up and dispersed over the crowd.
It seemed
appropriate; after all, what does a rocket ship do? But as high as I was, I
never imagined that Alvi’s zine would one day take off too. Afterward, he said
it hadn’t been a bad way to promote the party—as if God had handed out the
fliers. He suggested I write about all of this in my review.
It ran in
issue one, November 1994, as did a feature on LGBTQ+ cinema; a write-up of a
playwright exploring immigrant experiences; and an essay on white privilege
which noted that, though advances had been made in multiculturalism, “the
potential for more insidious racism is nipping at our collective nose.” The
cover story consisted of a Black perspective on the use of the N-word in
hip-hop. Over half the issue’s writers were women or people of color. At its
inception, this was not the “lad mag” it would one day morph into. Instead, the
publication had a clear emphasis on diversity and inclusion. And only one
editor was listed on the masthead of the debut issue: Suroosh Alvi. For his
part, McInnes contributed cartoons and a record review. “I couldn’t write,”
McInnes told me. “I didn’t know what writing was; I’d never done it before.”
Still, Alvi soon hired him as assistant editor. To qualify, McInnes too had to
be on welfare.
Watching the
CAPITOL RIOT on TV, McInnes thought, What the fuck have you IMBECILES done now?
They’re not the BRIGHTEST BULBS in the tree. They’re not exactly sophisticated.
Shane Smith
didn’t join the team until 1995, around the time he wrote a screed celebrating
the violence of war: “War is the shit; as addictive and consuming as heroin.
War is an invitation to the greatest party of all.” The story’s moral seemed to
hint at things to come: “You should fear this. This is the heat of a conflict
that burns everything it touches.”
He’d come to
Montreal at the urging of McInnes—they needed help selling advertising, and
“Bullshitter Shane,” as McInnes was known to call him, seemed like a solution.
In Ottawa, Smith had been a waiter in a fancy restaurant. “He was always a
great hustler,” McInnes told me. “He was either broke or he’d have like 3,000
bucks from tips.”
The night he
was introduced to Alvi, at a local dive bar, Smith dropped LSD. He kept trying
to tell Alvi that they were “going to take over the world,” but he was tripping
so hard that the words would only come out garbled: “I was going, ‘I can’t get
it out, I can’t get it out.’ ” On acid, Smith could already see how their
magazine would lift off—the vision for global domination was clear—he just
couldn’t articulate it yet.
Upon Smith’s
arrival, they shortened the magazine’s name to Voice in order to sell ads in
other Canadian cities. The masthead soon listed Alvi as editor in chief,
McInnes as office manager, and Smith as business manager. The three were
running things self-sufficiently, so they decided to cut ties with their
Haitian publishers, changing the magazine’s name yet again by dropping the o.
The name
Vice didn’t simply mirror its creators’ appetites. It also got them press. The
founders made up a tale that they’d been forced to switch names because The
Village Voice had threatened to sue. The story got picked up by Canadian media.
“We were in every local paper, every national paper,” McInnes has written. “The
lie just snowballed…. Lying became part of who we were.” Though they were still
essentially a culture zine, Smith brought a focus on “good story-telling
ability (i.e., being able to lie through your teeth),” as one early feature
story formulated it. “We were all about making up shocking stories,” Smith
would later explain.
It’s hard to
unravel the truth of Smith’s own backstory. He has said, for example, that he
grew up “dirt poor,” but both his and McInnes’s father worked at Computing
Devices of Canada, a military engineering firm. Their dads helped design a
ballistic computer for the M1 Abrams tank used by the U.S. Army. “The truth of
it is I always thought I was going to die, because when I was young I was in a
kind of quasi-gang,” Smith remarked in an interview with filmmaker Spike Jonze,
then the creative director of Vice. “There [were] 12 of us, and then by the
time I was 18, nine had died.”
This much is
certain: Smith attended one of Ottawa’s top-ranked high schools, Lisgar
Collegiate Institute, as did the late news anchor Peter Jennings and actor
Matthew Perry. Smith was already blurring things then: In the school yearbook,
he described himself as a “real real rumcullie.” (Rumcully is an arcane pirate
word for “a rich fool.”)
Smith
started enlisting Alvi and McInnes to help with ad sales. He did the same with
me. (Alongside writing pieces and selling space and distributing the magazine,
I also played guitar in Smith’s swamp-rock band, Ultraviolet Booze
Catastrophe.) An immense amount of work went into producing each issue, but
there was a DIY spirit, with everybody pitching in.
In 1997,
Vice took on a new editor: Robbie Dillon, a bank robber and loan shark who had
just been released from Bordeaux Prison for drug trafficking. He was enrolled
in journalism night classes, where he wrote an article called “How to Survive
in Prison,” which got him the editor gig. Even Dillon was taken aback by Vice’s
journalistic standards, as he told me recently: “Gavin might have been making
stuff up, but Shane was making up the rules. I’d say, ‘Shane, you can’t write
an article about smuggling guns into Ireland—you were never in Ireland. You
can’t say that this guy said this—he’s not even a guy.’ He’d go, ‘Well, can we
be sued?’ I’d go, ‘Not if it’s not a real guy.’ And he’d go, ‘Okay, we’ll do
it!’ ”
Despite his
criminal background, Dillon was a solicitous editor who wanted verifiable
stories that took readers inside places they wouldn’t otherwise be able to
access. In McInnes’s words, Dillon “wrote the only serious content in our
magazine for months.” The publication became a blend of outright fabrication
and almost confessional sincerity—“Whatever bile oozes from the hissing bag of
snakes inside my skull,” as Dillon wrote in one editorial. They started to find
their voice by doing, as they often said, stupid stories in a smart way and
smart stories in a stupid way. An interview with a piece of pasta, for example,
might explore the philosophical realities of inanimate objects; an article
purporting to help readers “get laid” would be written in binary code.
While
McInnes and a small coterie wrote the lion’s share of the pieces, an array of
contributors shaped it, including Amy Kellner, Bruce LaBruce, Lesley Arfin,
Derrick Beckles, Lisa Gabriele, Thomas Morton, and photographer Ryan McGinley
(who shoots on occasion for Vanity Fair). Their combined voice was a
combustible mix. “I thought of it as like a hyperintelligent teenaged Valley
Girl from the ’80s who’s read Michel Foucault,” explained Jesse Pearson, a
former Vice editor. “There was a lot of, like, barf-me-out kinda slang but also
a certain intelligence hiding behind it.”
There was
also something else hiding behind it. And that duplicity is what got them to
New York when, in 1999, McInnes, Smith, and Alvi pulled off their biggest con
to date. During a Montreal newspaper interview, they claimed that a local
multimillionaire software entrepreneur named Richard Szalwinski wanted to buy
Vice. As they tell it, he read the ensuing article and ended up investing $1
million for 25 percent of the company.
Then came
the thunder, McInnes told me. Two years after relocating to Manhattan, he was
standing on his roof on the Lower East Side when he saw the second plane hit
the south tower of the World Trade Center. That moment, he said, changed
everything for him: “9/11 made me a nationalist and made me a Western
chauvinist.” Until then, he claimed, he hadn’t really cared about politics. But
the idea of pinning some newfound chauvinism on 9/11 is inaccurate. He’d
already been churning out provocative, race-baiting content before the attacks,
even if there was a marked shift in his approach soon after he moved to the
U.S.
Looking back
on his output from that pre-9/11 period, two articles stand out as harbingers.
The first is a photo shoot from the fall of 1999, shortly before I became the
editor, that shows a multicultural array of male and female models hugging a
man in a KKK robe. The section, which billed itself as “a nine page fashion
shoot that single-handedly stops all racism forever,” was intended to troll
readers—it “lampooned racism,” McInnes told me—but the concept behind it
stemmed from a supposed weakness that McInnes immediately detected in his new
homeland: America’s sensitivity around race. Just as he had done with the
Monks, he set out to mock what he perceived as a vulnerability, prodding at it
in hopes of creating laughs or havoc.
The second
piece dropped the following year. Written by McInnes, a recent immigrant, it
called for closing the borders of the U.S. With lines like “Everything from
deformed frogs to the allergy epidemic can be attributed to overpopulation,” it
may have seemed like another one of his freaky jokes—but there was nothing
funny about it. (He had inserted it into the magazine without me having seen
it; I was the editor then, but he made many of the final decisions about the
magazine’s content.) Asked about that story today, he claimed that his
anti-immigration stance then came “from an environmental perspective.”
In
retrospect, none of us, including myself, were innocent bystanders. Some were
even enablers. Smith, for his part, would tell Wired in 2007, a year before
McInnes’s departure: “Gavin liked to push buttons, and he got a lot of personal
notoriety for dealing with race issues. This is not what we’re about, it’s
never what we’ve been about.” Though the organization’s complicity during
McInnes’s tenure can’t simply be waved aside, there’s also no way that Vice’s
management and staff could have seen all that was coming. Part of the failure
may be that nobody understood his tactics, even if his politics were hiding in
plain sight. In that regard, the circle of people who worked with McInnes—and
avidly read Vice in that era—might be compared to, say, the parts of the
culture that long celebrated Woody Allen or Louis C.K., two humorists who
achieved fame and fortune even as they openly told us, through their work, who
they were all along. (In McInnes’s case, he also told us through the work of
Vice’s contributors, whose words he sometimes changed freely, adding entire
paragraphs to writers’ articles, according to several sources.) He was my boss
and the de facto editor in chief; looking back now, I deeply regret not pushing
back, especially during my year at the helm.
Until that
point, McInnes had been, above all, a trickster—“a mean clown,” as two former
associates put it. But with 9/11, many culture critics began to assert that
irony was in retreat, and irony, after all, had been Vice’s primary register. A
change came over the magazine. McInnes too became more hawkish. “Politically
correct words are the result of liberals trying to shape fear and guilt into
meaningless syntax,” McInnes wrote in 2002. In an unhinged New York Press
interview that same year, he uttered homophobic and racist slurs, using the
N-word and denigrating Puerto Ricans. Regarding Williamsburg’s gentrifiers, he
said, “At least they’re white.”
With his
partners busy expanding the brand—and seeking wealth (“I was willing to
sacrifice happiness for greed,” Alvi admitted in 2002)—McInnes became
increasingly influenced by the writings of Jim Goad, author of The Redneck
Manifesto. “The greatest writer of our generation,” McInnes has said of him.
(Goad attended the Proud Boys’ election night party in 2016; the organization’s
now-defunct website described a book of his as “Proud Boy Holy scripture.”)
Another writer who made a lasting impression on McInnes was paleoconservative
Pat Buchanan, from whose book he has often read aloud at Proud Boys events. In
January 2003, Vice did a “The West is the Best” issue, inspired by Buchanan’s
The Death of the West. In that issue, McInnes ran an interview entitled “The
Merits of War” with Scott McConnell, executive editor of Buchanan’s magazine,
The American Conservative. That August, McInnes himself published an AmCon
piece about his efforts to convert Vice readers to conservatism: “I felt like
Dr. Frankenstein,” he wrote, of his red-pilling campaign. “‘IT’S ALIVE!’ ”
When other
media outlets confronted him about the monster he was creating, he brushed it
off—“I did it for a laugh”—telling Gawker that he’d fabricated facts and nobody
had caught on. The New York Times ran a feature describing McInnes’s views as
“closer to a white supremacist’s”—a characterization he bridles at today. “I
love being white…. It’s something to be very proud of,” it quoted him as
saying. “I don’t want our culture diluted. We need to close the borders now and
let everyone assimilate to a Western, white, English-speaking way of life.”
I remember
how upset Alvi was whenever we spoke about that article. For him, the son of
Pakistani immigrants, the situation seemed particularly noxious. Smith too was
allegedly furious. Even so, it would take five more years for his partners to
cut ties with McInnes—which is when things got truly Shakespearean.
On meeting
the three witches, Banquo wonders whether he has consumed some “insane root /
That takes the reason prisoner.” McInnes certainly took a prodigious amount of
drugs, especially cocaine, as he’s often bragged. Under his leadership, the
magazine openly discussed ways to “max out your coke high.” But the
intensification of his far-right views coincides with the time that he started
taking another psychotropic drug: Adderall, an amphetamine-based stimulant that
helps with focus and is prescribed for ADHD. It can be taken recreationally or
to boost productivity—but there are serious consequences if abused. (Donald
Trump, it is worth noting, has himself weathered unproven allegations of hearty
Adderall use.)
McInnes, who
has spoken publicly about taking Adderall to help him write, has dated his use
of the drug back to the early 2000s. “I didn’t take more or less than anyone
else,” he wrote in an email, “and NO it did not effect [sic] my writing.” But
those around him took notice. “Adderall is a really big part of the story,”
alleges a former colleague. “He was using a lot of Adderall—a lot lot… We know
what the side effects are: It can lead to grandiosity, to feeling like you are
right and the world is wrong. It can include elements of paranoia. And all
those psychological phenomena are wrapped up in Gavin’s transformation.”
In one
episode of his podcast, McInnes has described procuring Adderall from a Park
Avenue doctor. He continued taking the drug after having children with his
wife, Emily Jendrisak, whom he married in 2005. The way he describes his stag
party, held in upstate New York, gives a sense of how altered his worldview had
seemingly become. As relayed in his autobiography, he got upset at his father
“for not doing cocaine with us.” Then, he claims, 10 of his friends dressed up
as Klansmen, “hoods and all,” as they burned a 15-foot wooden cross. (Nobody I
spoke to would confirm whether this actually happened; McInnes insists in the
memoir that its contents are true.) By that point, McInnes, still at Vice, was
also contributing to VDARE.com, a site that promoted “the work of white
supremacists,” according to the SPLC.
Smith
attended the wedding. “I remember him standing there, surveying,” Eric Digras
recalled. Smith, according to former Vice employees, seemed to know that
something, somehow, would need to change. “There was a kind of rivalry there
that I think was mainly coming from Shane,” said Jesse Pearson, the editor at
the time. “That’s when it became like a Shakespeare play: These two
power-hungry lords fighting for the kingdom.” Added another colleague from this
period, “The defining aspect of the relationship was their rivalry. They were
two trashy dudes in spandex trying to out-guitar-solo each other every night.”
A decisive
turning point came five months after the wedding, when McInnes attended the
2006 American Renaissance Conference, a “racial realist” meetup that attracted
hundreds of white nationalists. According to an article from The Forward,
posted on American Renaissance’s website, “attendees are united by a common
belief in black intellectual inferiority, opposition to non-white immigration
and ardor for maintaining America’s white majority.” While there, McInnes
noticed former KKK leader David Duke at the bar. “I texted my friends: Just
hanging out with my old pal David Duke,” he explained in our interview. “That
became like, I’m at a Klan rally…. I think some people used it as an
excuse”—meaning a reason to link McInnes to the KKK and, perhaps, get rid of
him.
Though he
never actually wrote about the gathering, he characterized it as a reporting
assignment. “It was just me doing my job,” he claimed. Those around him weren’t
so sure. This was, after all, the same McInnes who’d written in 2002 that a
liberal spotted at a strip club “would either deny it was happening or claim it
was some sort of research project.” However one chooses to interpret McInnes’s
presence at the conference, it pretty much ended his relationship with Vice.
“That became the moment,” noted Pearson. “That forcing-out-of-the-company
thing.”
The
separation with McInnes took time, a period during which he and his wife had
their first child. “One day,” McInnes recalled, “corporate built a closed
office for the top brass and I was not in it.” His desk, instead, was in the
bullpen, from which he worked—as well as working remotely—until he and the
company parted ways. Lesley Arfin, a magazine contributor at that stage, who
went on to be a writer on Brooklyn Nine-Nine and Girls as well as cocreator of
Love, believes that McInnes, to this day, may be “stuck in trauma” over what
happened. “I don’t think that he ever recovered from that humiliation,” she
insisted. “You lose your best friend and your job, that is like your entire
fucking personality—and you just had a baby, like boom! Three life-changing
things right in the same [stretch of time].” (“I was not fired,” McInnes
clarified. “We split because I wanted to keep it offensive and they wanted to
get serious.”)
Following
McInnes’s departure (the company completed its separation agreement with him in
2008), Vice started to experience phenomenal growth. By then, the company had
pivoted toward online video, which would become one of the main sources of its
success. In time, Vice Media, led by Smith and serving a lucrative millennial
audience, would launch new digital video platforms and expand into film, music,
and news, joining forces with partners such as MTV, HBO, Showtime, and Snap
Inc, while attracting investors ranging from 21st Century Fox to Disney to
George Soros. The office environment, however, was marred by allegations of
sexual misconduct and bullying behavior as well as outright sexism. (Two years
ago, the company agreed to a $1.87 million payout to women employees who had
been compensated less than their male counterparts. A heavily female leadership
team is now in charge, with women currently accounting for more than half of
Vice Media’s global workforce.)
McInnes’s
deepening radicalism can be tracked online in a weekly column he wrote from
2008 to 2017 in Taki’s Magazine, the at times far-right-fomenting webzine
published by the Greek journalist and socialite Taki Theodoracopulos, cofounder
of The American Conservative. Sample titles: “The Myth of White Terrorism,”
“Rioting: The Unbeatable High,” and “What’s the Matter With Blackface?” McInnes
was recruited to write there by Richard Spencer, who has since become one of
the country’s most reviled anti-Semites. “People change and movements evolve,”
McInnes told me in one email. “Richard Spencer said ‘Hail Trump’ at that
conference and the whole thing went careening off a Nazi cliff…. Spencer was a
cool guy. He got me my job at Takimag in 2008 after I left Vice. Back then, he
was just some paleoconservative who was obsessed with the founding fathers. The
Spencer of today has nothing to do with the guy I knew 10 years ago.”
For his
part, the McInnes of today describes his position as “basic dad politics.” He
sent me a list outlining his views, saying, “They’re the same views as any
rational person.” It included his thoughts on subjects such as “Racism is not a
thing,” “America was not built on slavery,” and “Gay marriage is a scam.” His
views were openly Islamophobic, transphobic, anti-feminist, and discriminatory
toward a variety of groups. One through line: his underlying preoccupation with
other people’s bodies, identities, and their realities or personal decisions.
When I asked him why he dwelled on that theme, he deflected, as usual: “Proud
Boys are unique Americans in the sense that they eschew identity politics.” But
as described by the SPLC, “McInnes plays a duplicitous rhetorical game:
claiming to reject white nationalism while espousing a laundered version of
popular white nationalist tropes.”
McInnes is
someone who apparently concluded long ago that white male privilege was
imperiled. Come 9/11, believing that his reality was literally under attack,
he’d embraced the notion that conservatism was essentially about upholding the
status quo for those in power, meaning white men like himself. By 2016, in
founding the Proud Boys, he tried to turn his ideologies into political action.
Beyond that, McInnes’s overarching philosophy seemed to be that free speech
included hate speech. “When you hate someone,” as he once said, “it’s because
you recognize something that you hate about yourself.”
“I always
thought he was a narcissist,” Arfin mused.
“He’s
definitely profoundly narcissistic,” Eric Digras stated, while other members of
his inner circle didn’t hesitate in using stricter diagnostic labels.
Regardless, Digras still maintains ties with McInnes as an old friend in hopes
of keeping him “tethered to his humanity.”
In terms of
my own reportorial interactions with McInnes, when I contacted him after a
break of two decades in our communication, he offered to “just jump ahead of
all” my questions and essentially interview himself so that I wouldn’t need to
interrupt with cardboard-people words of my own. Among his concerns: that
nothing he’d said be linked with Nazism. “Everyone keeps coming back to, ‘Are
you a Nazi?’ ” he huffed. Nothing could be further from the truth, he insisted.
“I can only
imagine it just seems like an unfortunate misunderstanding?”
“It’s not a
misunderstanding,” he retorted. “It’s a weapon that people use to try to
silence someone else.”
Why, then,
did he think that he’s perceived to be the founder of a hate group? “I am the
most misunderstood person in America,” he emphasized in a follow-up email,
again deflecting—and sounding not unlike one of his icons to whom he owes his
recent notoriety: Trump. “At no time in history has someone this reasonable
been this misrepresented.”
He believed
his predicament stemmed from the fact that in 2018 the SPLC classified the
Proud Boys as a hate group, based on group members’ violent conduct, “their
associations with white nationalist and neo-Nazi organizations, and statements
disparaging women, minorities, and other marginalized groups.”
To date, he
claimed, he has spent $200,000 after raising it to sue the SPLC for defamation.
“The left set out to destroy my reputation and they did a great job,” he said.
His latest opponent is the Canadian government, which has listed the Proud Boys
as a terrorist neo-fascist entity; McInnes’s association with the group could
render him inadmissible if he attempts to return to the country.
Although he
served as its leader during its first two years while the group became more
formalized and militarized, he may have stepped down just in time. In Trump’s
America, the idea of the Proud Boys caught on and “very quickly accelerated out
of control,” explained Jared Holt, resident fellow at the Atlantic Council’s
Digital Forensic Research Lab in Washington. “It went from a gaggle of street
brawlers into something able to earn the buy-in and the respect of massive
portions of the GOP base.” Holt, who has been monitoring the group since the
start, told me, “It’s really just a few steps removed from white genocide
conspiracy theories.”
Throughout
our conversation, McInnes came across as unwilling to take full responsibility
for his situation. In his words, he’d simply wanted to “fuck shit up.” He
didn’t appear to recognize that statements he has made outlining his ideology
are at the root of his troubles.
McInnes’s
views have affected his home life. In 2018, ABC’s Nightline interviewed him and
his wife, Emily, at their house in New York’s Westchester County, where
residents put up signs vilifying him. On ABC, McInnes drank beer as his wife
told him, “Your politics having evolved this way in the last few years has been
a challenge.” He looked away. Asked whether he was willing to apologize for
what he’d created, he said no, firmly. Would he take any of it back if
possible? He thought about it, stroking his face roughly. “Yes, I guess, well….
I don’t know.” Then he made a final, dismissive wave. “Nah,” he said, as
conclusively as he could muster. It was too late for all that.
“It’s a very
chillax day,” McInnes said when I called him around midday on a Friday in
March. “Trying to avoid the bar for as long as possible. If you go there at
noon, you’re kinda fucked for the day. At night, you’re slurring.”
McInnes, an
avid boozer, has consistently maintained that he started the Proud Boys as an
outlet for harmless fun: an Animal House-style drinking club for male buddies.
But even he could see that what began as an extension of his brand had spiraled
into something much more nefarious. He’d watched the Capitol riot on TV like
everyone else. “I thought, What the fuck have you imbeciles done now?” he said.
“They’re not the brightest bulbs in the tree. They’re not exactly
sophisticated.” At one point he mentioned that he had warned his cohorts,
“You’re gonna get shot; someone’s going to die; do not go”—insisting a march on
Washington was an “obvious trap,” just as he had cautioned marchers attending
the deadly 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which was
organized by a then Proud Boy.
Of all the
pro-Trump outfits that broke into the houses of Congress, more Proud Boys have
been arrested than those affiliated with other groups, such as the Oath Keepers
or Three Percenters. Even so, McInnes contended that the group is being
demonized. “The media wanted it to be a Proud Boys event so badly,” he argued
in March. “There were 30,000 people there that day, 250 arrested for storming
the Capitol.” Only a handful, he said, “happened to be members.” (More than 100
Proud Boys from across America traveled to Washington for the riot. To date
over two dozen purported members have been charged; prosecutors also allege
that some of them coordinated their efforts with Oath Keepers.)
At the same
time that FBI indictments of Proud Boys were being released publicly, a number
of reports described McInnes’s former company, Vice Media, as seeking to close
a deal with a special-purpose acquisition company at around half its peak
valuation of $5.7 billion four years ago. (It wasn’t clear, given Vice’s
outstanding debt and investors, where this would leave Smith, the company’s
biggest individual shareholder.)
Through the
years, McInnes seemed to have adhered to the first half of his magazine’s
principles, by living the stupid young part of his life smartly. Now well into
his Gen X dotage, his current reality is another question. Either way, Vice
alum Arfin noted, “Vice will always be tied to this alt-right shit, and Gavin
will always have this hipster-liberal phantom cell phone vibration buzzing in
the back pocket of his khakis.”
In our
conversation, McInnes struck a genial tone. He said he hadn’t changed much
since the time I knew him: “I hated the government; I still hate the
government. I want to burn it to the ground.” I asked if he thought the
government has him under surveillance. “Oh, they absolutely do,” he replied.
“This call’s being listened to right now by the feds. The FBI and the NYPD
monitor all my calls and follow all my texts. I’m banned from all social
media…. I’ve been de-personed.”
He had a
theory on how he’d ended up this way; it went back to eighth grade. “They put
me in a special class, even though my grades were okay, because I was just a
lot to handle,” he confided. “Eventually, if you keep being provocative,
they’ll try to separate you from the rest of the students. And that’s what’s
happened on a much grander scale: I’m in the special class right now. That’s
the fate of someone who keeps being a class clown.”
I wondered
whether he could see the difference between being a clown and inciting
violence. Did he know that his actions led him here, that the words he’d
uttered had consequences? “I’m not going to deny any culpability here,” he
admitted. “I’ve always wanted to kick the hornet’s nest and keep things
exciting. But the most recent developments are insane. I didn’t know the
hornets would be doing that.”
Some sources
I interviewed wondered if McInnes, instead of playing the victim, might take
this opportunity to repent or reverse course, no matter how cynically. He did
neither. Others were curious if perhaps his parents and loved ones were in a
position to help put him on a better path. But when I called his father, Jim
McInnes, he was adamant that everything his son had done was a joke, that the
media simply didn’t get it. In fact, he said, he’d been writing a book about
the whole thing. He even had a title. He was calling it Proud of My Boy.
This story
has been updated.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário