Trump Urged Armed Supporters to Capitol, White
House Aide Testifies
June 28,
2022, 12:38 p.m. ETJune 28, 2022
June 28,
2022
Luke
Broadwater and Michael S. Schmidt
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/28/us/politics/trump-meadows-jan-6-surprise-hearing.html
WASHINGTON
— The first White House aide to testify publicly before the House committee
investigating the Jan. 6 attack provided a damning account on Tuesday of how
former President Donald J. Trump, knowing his supporters were armed and
threatening violence, urged them to march to the Capitol and sought to join
them there, privately siding with them as they stormed the building and called
for the hanging of the vice president.
The
testimony from the aide, Cassidy Hutchinson, was extraordinary even by the
standards of Mr. Trump’s norm-busting presidency and the inquiry’s remarkable
string of revelations this month. In fly-on-the-wall anecdotes delivered in a
quiet voice, she described how frantic West Wing aides failed to stop Mr. Trump
from encouraging the violence or persuade him to try to end it, and how the
White House’s top lawyer feared that Mr. Trump might be committing crimes as he
steered the country to the brink of a constitutional crisis.
Drawing
from conversations she said she overheard in the West Wing and others
contemporaneously relayed to her by top officials, Ms. Hutchinson, a
26-year-old who was an aide to Mark Meadows, Mr. Trump’s final chief of staff,
provided crucial details about what the former president was doing and saying
before and during the riot. She painted a portrait of an unhinged president
obsessed with clinging to power and appearing strong, and willing to tolerate
violence as a result — as long as it was not directed at him.
“They’re
not here to hurt me,” she testified that Mr. Trump said as he demanded that
security checkpoints be removed outside his rally on the Ellipse on Jan. 6,
knowing that many of his supporters were armed and threatening violence. “Take
the f-ing mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from
here.”
It was an
act of vanity by Mr. Trump, who wanted his crowd to appear as large as
possible, that recalled his first day in office, which was consumed by his
false claims about the size of the crowd at his inauguration. Ms. Hutchinson
recounted it as she laid out a day of chaos in the White House, in which the
president’s top advisers sought to rein him in and Mr. Trump pressed repeatedly
to join up with his supporters.
She
recalled being told of one particularly dramatic moment in which an irate Mr.
Trump tried to grab the wheel of his vehicle from a Secret Service agent when
he was told he could not go to the Capitol to join his supporters, an account
that the former president quickly denied and that Secret Service officials said
would be rebutted in forthcoming testimony.
The
revelations, over a two-hour hearing, tied Mr. Trump more closely to the
violence that disrupted the certification of President Biden’s victory, raising
fresh questions about whether Mr. Trump could face criminal charges for his
actions on Jan. 6. At the end, Representative Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming
and the panel’s vice chairwoman, hinted at yet another potential area of
liability, suggesting that Mr. Trump and his allies could be engaging in an
effort to tamper with witnesses and obstruct the committee’s work.
Ms.
Hutchinson testified that Mr. Trump’s anger had become so uncontrollable in the
weeks after the 2020 election that when he was told in December that Attorney
General William P. Barr had said publicly that there was no widespread election
fraud, Mr. Trump threw a plate in the West Wing, shattering it and leaving
ketchup dripping down a wall.
In the days
leading up to the attack, she said, White House aides were concerned that Mr.
Trump might be breaking laws against obstructing justice and impeding a
congressional proceeding. On the day of the attack, Mr. Trump rebuffed efforts
by aides and family members, including his daughter Ivanka, to put out a
statement telling the mob to stand down. Instead, he posted a tweet attacking
Vice President Mike Pence, who the committee has said came within 40 feet of
the rioters at the Capitol.
Committee
members and staff listening to Ms. Hutchinson tesify on Tuesday.Credit...Haiyun
Jiang/The New York Times
“Mark, we
need to do something more,” Ms. Hutchinson said she heard the White House
counsel, Pat A. Cipollone, tell Mr. Meadows, when he came rushing into her
office as Mr. Trump’s supporters entered the Capitol. “They’re literally
calling for the vice president to be f-ing hung.”
“You heard
him, Pat,” she said Mr. Meadows responded. “He thinks Mike deserves it. He
doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong.”
Ms.
Hutchinson said that in the days after the siege, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer,
Rudolph W. Giuliani, and Mr. Meadows discussed seeking pardons with the
president; neither received one.
Her
testimony elicited praise for her willingness to speak out against Mr. Trump
and was compared to some of the most consequential moments in presidential
history. John W. Dean III, whose testimony during Watergate rocked the Nixon
presidency, compared Ms. Hutchinson’s appearance to the stunning moment in 1973
when Alexander Butterfield, another Nixon aide, revealed in a Senate hearing
the secret taping system that would lead to the president’s downfall.
“Cassidy
met the Butterfield standard with instant gratification,” Mr. Dean said. “It
took a long time to learn the content of the tapes. Here we learn immediately
what she heard and observed.”
No hearing
had been scheduled for this week. But on Monday, the committee put out a
cryptic news release saying that a witness with new information had come
forward and would testify on Tuesday, touching off suspense and speculation
about who it might be.
Ms.
Hutchinson recently sat for a fourth interview with the committee, and, with
new counsel advising her, informed the panel of previously unknown information
that lawmakers felt needed to get out quickly, according to a person familiar
with the committee’s work. More so than previous witnesses, the panel had also
grown concerned for her security, and lawmakers decided to try to keep her
planned testimony quiet for as long as possible, the person said.
The
committee’s first four hearings this month had focused on Mr. Trump’s efforts
to overturn the results of the 2020 election, during which he sought to wield
his presidential power to pressure the Justice Department, state officials and
Mr. Pence to help him stay in office. But the session on Tuesday focused almost
exclusively on Mr. Trump’s conduct, revealing how, as the White House learned
of a potentially violent effort to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, the
president not only failed to intervene, but appeared to be cheering it on.
In Ms.
Cheney’s closing remarks, she read aloud from testimony given by two witnesses
whom she declined to identify, in which they spoke about having been pressured
by Mr. Trump’s allies to withhold information from investigators.
“They have
reminded me a couple of times that Trump does read transcripts,” one witness
told the committee.
Another
witness, Ms. Cheney said, told the committee that a Trump ally said Mr. Trump
wanted the witness to “know he’s thinking about you. He knows you’re loyal and
you’re going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition.”
Making a
case against Trump. The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack appears
to be laying out evidence that could allow prosecutors to indict former
President Donald J. Trump, though the path to a criminal trial is uncertain.
Here are the main themes that have emerged so far:
An
unsettling narrative. During the first hearing, the committee described in
vivid detail what it characterized as an attempted coup orchestrated by the
former president that culminated in the assault on the Capitol. At the heart of
the gripping story were three main players: Mr. Trump, the Proud Boys and a
Capitol Police officer.
Creating
election lies. In its second hearing, the panel showed how Mr. Trump ignored
aides and advisers as he declared victory prematurely and relentlessly pressed
claims of fraud he was told were wrong. “He’s become detached from reality if
he really believes this stuff,” William P. Barr, the former attorney general,
said of Mr. Trump during a videotaped interview.
Pressuring
Pence. Mr. Trump continued pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to go along
with a plan to overturn his loss even after he was told it was illegal,
according to testimony laid out by the panel during the third hearing. The
committee showed how Mr. Trump’s actions led his supporters to storm the
Capitol, sending Mr. Pence fleeing for his life.
Fake
elector plan. The committee used its fourth hearing to detail how Mr. Trump was
personally involved in a scheme to put forward fake electors. The panel also
presented fresh details on how the former president leaned on state officials
to invalidate his defeat, opening them up to violent threats when they refused.
Strong
arming the Justice Department. During the fifth hearing, the panel explored Mr.
Trump’s wide-ranging and relentless scheme to misuse the Justice Department to
keep himself in power. The panel also presented evidence that at least half a
dozen Republican members of Congress sought pre-emptive pardons.
Trump’s
rage. Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Mr. Trump’s final chief of staff,
delivered explosive testimony during the panel’s sixth hearing, saying that the
president knew the crowd on Jan. 6 was armed, but wanted to loosen security.
She also revealed that Mr. Trump, demanding to go to the Capitol, tried to grab
his vehicle’s steering wheel from a Secret Service agent.
Ms. Cheney
said such attempts raised questions about whether Mr. Trump was engaged in
ongoing criminal conduct.
“I think
most people know that attempting to influence witnesses to testify untruthfully
presents very serious concerns,” she said.
Dozens of
Trump administration officials and aides have testified privately before the
committee, and video and audio clips of what they told investigators have been
a central part of the committee’s hearings. But until Tuesday, no official who
worked directly for Mr. Trump in the White House had sat before the committee
to give live, nationally televised testimony.
After the
hearing, Ms. Hutchinson was immediately surrounded by a phalanx of news
photographers who had been documenting her every gesture as she sat, alone at a
witness table, facing the committee. At times during her testimony she seemed
nervous, but she appeared to gain confidence as she testified. By the end, the
panel’s chairman praised her courage, and made an appeal to other witnesses to
follow her example and speak out.
“If you’ve
heard this testimony today and suddenly you remember things you couldn’t
previously recall, or there are some details you’d like to clarify, or you
discovered some courage you had hidden away somewhere, our doors remain open,”
Mr. Thompson said.
Ms.
Hutchinson said Mr. Meadows was worried as early as Jan. 2 that Mr. Trump’s
rally could get out of control — “Things might get real, real bad on Jan. 6,”
she said he told her. She testified that Anthony M. Ornato, the former White
House chief of operations, warned Mr. Meadows on Jan. 6 that the crowd seemed
ready for violence, and had knives, guns, bear spray, body armor, spears and
flagpoles.
She said
Mr. Meadows appeared unmoved by the information, only asking Mr. Ornato whether
he had informed Mr. Trump, which Mr. Ornato said he had.
Later, Ms.
Hutchinson described being within earshot of Mr. Trump as he demanded that his
supporters be able to move around the Ellipse freely even though they were
armed.
As the mob
began to descend on the Capitol, Ms. Hutchinson said she heard Mr. Trump insist
on going to Capitol Hill to join them. When Mr. Cipollone heard of the
prospect, she testified, he objected. “We’re going to get charged with every
crime imaginable,” Ms. Hutchinson said Mr. Cipollone told her.
Ms.
Hutchinson said members of the president’s cabinet were distressed enough by
the assault on the Capitol and the president’s encouragement of the mob and
refusal to intervene that they quietly discussed invoking the 25th Amendment to
remove him from office. The ignominious prospect of being the first president
to be subject to the amendment was one of the reasons he agreed to record a
video on Jan. 7 committing to a peaceful transfer of power, she said.
Mr. Trump
responded angrily to Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony, using profanity and calling
her “disgraceful” and a “phony.”
But she
told the committee she was doing her duty, speaking out against what had
happened on a dark day in American history. She said she had been particularly
dismayed when, as violence raged at the Capitol and the mob chanted, “Hang Mike
Pence,” the president had attacked Mr. Pence anew on Twitter.
“As an
American, I was disgusted,” she said. “It was unpatriotic. It was un-American.
We were watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie.”
Reporting
was contributed by Maggie Haberman, Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Chris Cameron, Carl
Hulse and Peter Baker.
Luke
Broadwater covers Congress. He was the lead reporter on a series of
investigative articles at The Baltimore Sun that won a Pulitzer Prize and a
George Polk Award in 2020. @lukebroadwater
Michael S.
Schmidt is a Washington correspondent covering national security and federal
investigations. He was part of two teams that won Pulitzer Prizes in 2018 — one
for reporting on workplace sexual harassment and the other for coverage of
President Trump and his campaign’s ties to Russia. @NYTMike
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário