Swedish and Finnish NATO deal with Turkey
triggers fears over Kurdish deportations
Opponents of President Erdoğan in Sweden and Finland
worry the deal will bolster efforts by Ankara to extradite them to Turkey
BY CHARLIE
DUXBURY
June 29,
2022 2:40 pm
https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-finland-nato-deal-turkey-trigger-fears-kurdish-deportations/
STOCKHOLM —
Relief over Tuesday night’s deal with Turkey unblocking the NATO accession
process for Sweden and Finland was palpable on Wednesday, but there were also
fears that the two Nordic states could have conceded too much to Ankara over
deportations.
Political
adversaries of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan based in Sweden were
quick to label the deal as a sellout, which could strengthen Turkey’s efforts
to secure extraditions of Kurdish rights activists and other opponents.
“This is a
black day in Swedish political history,” said Amineh Kakabaveh, an independent
Swedish lawmaker and longtime advocate for Kurdish rights. “We are negotiating
with a regime which does not respect freedom of expression or the rights of
minority groups,” Kakabaveh, a former fighter with Kurdish Peshmerga forces in
Iran, told the SVT Nyheter television channel.
Since
mid-May, Turkey has threatened to veto the NATO applications from Sweden and
Finland unless the two states complied with, among other things, its demands to
crack down on groups Ankara regards as terrorists.
This has
caused political tension because Stockholm and Helsinki don’t agree that all
the groups on Ankara’s list are terrorists. For example, all three regard the
PKK as terrorists but only Turkey sees the Syria-based Kurdish groups the YPG
and PYD as terrorists.
Over the
past two months, officials from the three states, as well as from NATO
headquarters, have sought to secure a compromise that would allow Erdoğan to
claim a diplomatic victory while not undermining Swedish or Finnish human
rights laws.
Turkey’s
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (L), NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg (C)
and Sweden’s Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson take part in a meeting on the
sidelines of the NATO summit in Madrid | Henrik Montgomery/TT News Agency/AFP
via Getty Images
The
10-point deal published late Tuesday ahead of a key NATO summit in Madrid was
that compromise.
The most
sensitive element was arguably point eight, which included a commitment by
Sweden and Finland “to address Türkiye’s pending deportation or extradition
requests of terror suspects expeditiously and thoroughly.”
Loose
wording
While
loosely worded, and arguably vague enough to be potentially insignificant, that
clause rattled some Kurds in Sweden.
Kurdo
Baksi, a prominent Sweden-based Kurdish writer, told Swedish TV he was worried
that Sweden and Finland might have promised to extradite Kurds and other
democratically minded Turks who have sought a refuge in the two countries back
to Turkey.
“I hope
that Sweden will enter NATO with the same view of democracy and human rights as
it had before (Foreign Minister) Ann Linde and (Prime Minister) Magdalena
Andersson traveled to the NATO meeting in Madrid,” he said.
In an
interview with Sweden’s national broadcaster on Wednesday, Prime Minister
Andersson sought to play down the implications of Swedish and Finnish
commitments to Turkey.
“I know
there are people who are worried that we are going to start hunting them and
deporting them and I think it is important to say that we always work in
accordance with Swedish law and existing international conventions,” she said.
“If you are not involved in terrorism, you don’t need to worry,” she added.
Reassurance
needed
But a raft
of opposition lawmakers, including from longtime NATO membership opponents the Left
Party, weren’t reassured.
Håkan
Svenneling, the party’s foreign policy spokesperson, said Sweden had made
“shameful concessions.”
Before
Sweden and Finland decided to apply to join NATO, the Swedish Left Party had
argued that joining an alliance with Turkey could have serious negative
consequences and its lawmakers were quick to claim vindication.
“Selling us
out to Erdoğan went quickly,” said Ulla Andersson, the Left Party’s former
economic policy spokesperson.
In Finland,
the reaction to the deal seemed notably more muted with the focus more squarely
on the brighter prospects for NATO accession the Turkish deal entailed, rather
than any eventual damage to human rights the agreement might cause.
This was in
part a reflection of the broader parliamentary consensus in Finland behind
applying to join NATO than had been achieved in Sweden.
In Sweden,
the Left Party and the Green Party remain vocal critics of the NATO membership
application, and Green Party joint-leader Märta Stenevi on Wednesday called on
Sweden’s foreign minister to explain to the parliament’s foreign affairs select
committee what she called “very worrying” developments regarding extraditions
to Turkey.
For her
part, Kakabaveh, a former member of the Left Party, said she might launch a
vote of no-confidence against Foreign Minister Linde.
It was
unclear how much support such a move would command in parliament, but a similar
vote targeting Justice Minister Morgan Johansson in early June almost brought
down the Swedish government, three months ahead of scheduled general election.
Kakabaveh
struck a deal with Prime Minister Andersson’s governing Social Democrats as
recently as last November guaranteeing more support for the Syria-based PYD and
its military affiliate, the YPG.
But
Tuesday’s 10-point deal with Turkey said the Swedish and Finnish governments
had agreed not to provide such support leaving the Social Democrats’ deal with
Kakabaveh on an unclear footing.
Kakabaveh
said she hoped the Left Party and the Green Party would join her in seeking to
apply pressure to the Swedish government over its concessions to Turkey.
“This is
not just about the Kurds, this is about Sweden not bowing to a regime like
Erdoğan’s,” she said.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário