A New Wave
of Refugees?
Idlib
Violence Puts Pressure on EU-Turkey Pact
With Russia
and Iran joining the Syrian regime in pounding the population of Idlib in
northern Syria, a new wave of refugees is heading for Turkey. Ankara has
signaled that it may mark the end of the Turkish-EU refugee pact.
By Melanie
Amann, Giorgos Christides, Steffen Lüdke, Peter Müller and Maximilian Popp
Gianmarco
Maraviglia/ DER SPIEGEL
January 03,
2020 06:36 PM
Shortly
before the sun rose in Idlib, Yaman al-Hammo made the decision he had long been
dreading. He had just spent the night in the basement next to his two sons, his
wife and his mother listening to the detonations of barrel bombs and artillery
shells blasting into his hometown of Maarat al-Numan in the Syrian province of
Idlib. The women cried, as did the children, he says today, three weeks later.
As dawn
broke, Hammo's wife and mother wrapped the children in blankets. He made one
final call to determine where the Russian jets were attacking at that moment
before starting his white Hyundai van and heading off toward the Turkish
border.
When he
heard the explosions behind him, Hammo hit the gas, his children bumping their
heads in the back. He sped past desperately waving families at 80 to 90
kilometers per hour, the van too full to take on any more passengers. Only when
Hammo felt that he had managed to get his family to safety did he stop. He then
broke down in tears for several minutes.
A New Mass
Exodus?
For weeks,
Syrian dictator Bashar Assad and his supporters from Russia and Iran have been
attacking the last remaining rebel stronghold in northwestern Syria, intentionally
targeting residential housing, schools and hospitals. The Idlib offensive could
finally mark the end of the war in Syria -- but also the beginning of a new
mass exodus.
An
estimated 3 million people live in the region, including many who fled to the
province from other parts of Syria. According to the United Nations, more than
235,000 people were displaced from Idlib in the two weeks leading up to
Christmas alone. On Jan. 10, a UN Security Council resolution enabling aid
deliveries to Syria is set to expire, with both Russia and China blocking an
extension of the mission. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians are left with no
other choice than to make their way to Turkey.
And that
means that the situation in Idlib is also putting significant pressure on the
already fragile migration deal between the European Union and Turkey. For the
time being, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is keeping the refugees out
of Turkey with the help of a wall. But with hundreds of thousands of suffering
refugees swarming the Turkish border, women and children among them, will he
continue to do nothing? And if he does allow the people to enter Turkey, will
he shelter them in his own country as the EU-Turkey pact calls for, or will he
allow them to continue on to Europe?
Erdogan has
already made clear that his country cannot handle any more refugees. If the
Idlib offensive doesn't come to an end, he said in a speech in Istanbul just
before Christmas, "all European countries, above all Greece," would
experience the negative consequences. Scenes reminiscent of those in 2015, when
800,000 migrants traveled to Europe via Turkey, he said, would be
"unavoidable."
Leverage
for Erdogan
It isn't
the first time that Erdogan has threatened to abandon the migration deal with
Europe, but his tone has rarely been so strident, nor have events been as
pressing.
In 2016,
the EU pledged 6 billion euros to Turkey in addition to a package of visa relaxation
measures for Turkish citizens in exchange for Ankara preventing migrants from
continuing onward to Europe and accepting the return of migrants from the Greek
islands. The pact has played a significant role in the much lower number of
asylum-seekers now reaching Europe. But it has also given the autocrat in
Ankara leverage against Europe, to be used as he sees fit.
Erdogan is
fully aware of just how valuable he is to the Europeans -- particularly for
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who was a key architect of the controversial
migration deal. The crisis in Idlib is a problem for Erdogan, with Turkish
citizens largely unwilling to accept yet more refugees. But the images of huge
numbers of displaced Syrians making their way to the Turkish border are also a
welcome opportunity to force more concessions, in the form of money, from the
Europeans.
The 6
billion euros pledged by the EU have largely already been allocated, but the
huge number of refugees Turkey is already hosting will continue to cost money
in the years to come. There are already more than 3 million Syrians living in
Turkey, a number that will likely expand to around 5 million a decade from now
as families have children. Erdogan wants the EU to cover a part of the costs
associated with hosting them. Indeed, when the Turkish president receives
Merkel for a visit in January, money is likely to be a primary focus of their
negotiations.
Just
recently, Merkel met with the new leaders of her coalition partner, the
center-left Social Democrats, to inform them of the situation facing German
foreign policy. In her comments on Syria, according to meeting participants,
she said that it was undesirable for someone like Russian President Vladimir
Putin to be able to influence refugee flows to Europe. It almost sounded like
justification for talks with Erdogan.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan: "All
European countries, above all Greece," will experience the negative
consequences.
Europe,
though, finds itself in a weak negotiating position with Ankara. EU member
states still haven't managed to agree on a unified asylum system for the
continent, resulting in a situation whereby even a moderate increase in the
number of refugees arriving in Greece, for example, can trigger a humanitarian
crisis.
Indeed, the
island of Samos is a perfect illustration of just how poorly Europe is managing
to care for the refugees currently in its charge. Fully 7,500 asylum seekers
are camped on the slopes of a hill with the sounds of coughing and labored
breathing coming out of the tents. Rainwater runs between the plastic tarps,
with camp residents suffering from cold and illness. Fires break out regularly.
Hopelessly
Overcrowded
The
situation isn't much better on the mainland of Greece. For months, the Greek
government has been putting refugees up in hotels because the camps have become
hopelessly overcrowded.
And this
despite the fact that the EU has had plenty of time to improve conditions in
the country. In the first six months of 2017, not even 10,000 asylum-seekers
reached the islands. Neither the Greek authorities nor the European Commission
thought it necessary to develop a reliable infrastructure to house and process
the refugees. At the same time, Greece is no longer allowing asylum-seekers to
travel onward, as they did in 2015. In response to pressure from Brussels,
Athens has closed its northern border with North Macedonia. According to public
opinion surveys, a majority of Greek citizens are concerned that the
slow-burning refugee crisis could spin out of control. Almost three-quarters of
the population now views migration as the most pressing problem facing the
country.
Ankara is
fully aware of the rather precarious situation in which Europe currently finds
itself when it comes to the migration issue. And Erdogan is an expert when it
comes to taking advantage of his adversaries' weaknesses. He doesn't have to
unload busloads of refugees at the border, as he once threatened to do. It
would be enough for him to simply loosen Turkish coast guard patrols, since
Greece isn't even able to handle the arrivals of just a few thousand refugees
per month. Erdogan, as one German diplomat put it, has begun using border
patrols "as a kind of volume knob," turning it up or down depending
on his political interests.
For Merkel,
the relationship with the Turkish president is a political high-wire act. She
knows she needs Erdogan, but at the same time, she must avoid the appearance of
exposing herself to blackmail.
The
Bavarian conservative Manfred Weber, head of the European People's Party in the
European Parliament, has already voiced those concerns ahead of the German
chancellor's trip to Turkey. "The refugee pact is in our interests, but we
can't allow ourselves to be blackmailed," he says. "Those who don't
pursue honest cooperation cannot continue to receive economic privileges in the
long run."
'The Wrong
Path'
Weber is
primarily focused on Turkey's customs union with the EU, from which Ankara
benefits enormously. In exchange, he believes, the EU should be able to expect
greater collegiality. He insists that the money paid to Turkey as part of the
refugee pact was a good investment, but adds that a continuation of the
payments depends on Turkey's behavior. "Threats are the wrong path."
Greece
feels the same way. Turkey is using the migrants as a foreign policy lever,
says Miltiadis Varvitsiotis, Greece's deputy foreign minister. He says Europe
must not appear to fear Erdogan's threats at all.
The
Turkish-European negotiations will be made all the more difficult by the fact
that Erdogan finds himself facing intense pressure domestically, with many
Turks eager to finally get rid of the refugees. In a 2018 survey conducted by
the Center for American Progress, an American think tank, 80 percent of
respondents said that Ankara was spending too much money on refugees.
Furthermore, several Turkish cities have seen attacks on Syrians, with racists
shattering the front windows of Syrian-run shops.
Ibrahim Abdullah,
for his part, simply wants out. He hopes to be able to find his way to Europe
by way of the Greek islands. Abdullah (not his real name) fled Aleppo in 2016
with his wife and three children and was able to find work in Istanbul as a
decorator. But because his family had initially registered in Ankara, they were
sent back to the Turkish capital, where Abdullah has been unable to find a new
job. He says his children are beaten at school and that increasing racism has
made his future look bleak.
Merkel must
now perform the delicate trick of saving the refugee deal despite the fact that
its central premise hardly seems sustainable. For many migrants, Turkey has
long since ceased being a safe country. According to the Turkish Defense
Ministry, over 500,000 Syrians have now returned to Syria of their own free
will. According to Syrian opposition activists, though, Turkey has also
deported several thousand refugees back to the embattled region of Idlib.
Fences in
the Balkans
If the deal
collapses, the father of the pact, Austrian political consultant Gerald Knaus,
fears a "field day for populists." He says: "We would soon have
even more fences in the Balkans."
Thomas
Gammeltoft-Hansen, a professor of migration and refugee law at the University
of Copenhagen, believes that a vast new wave of refugees is a realistic
scenario. "Deals with autocratic countries usually have a limited
lifespan," he says. After a couple of years, he continues, the political
conditions in the host country change or more migrants come than expected. In
situations like that, he says, such deals tend to collapse or have to be
renegotiated.
The people
in Idlib, meanwhile, feel as though they have been left in the lurch. "We
are the victims of an international game," says Yaman al-Hammo. He has now
rented an apartment in the border town of Darkush, but he doesn't want to stay
there for long. At night, he can see the lights across the border in Turkey.
Hammo says
he has contacted a human smuggler to take him and his family across the border.
He has heard from friends who made it out of Syria that the Turkish army on the
border fires live ammunition. But it is a risk, says Hammo, that he will just
have to accept. Despite the children.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário