Europe
faces political war on two fronts as backlash builds
The
EU's Eastern states shocked to lose their sovereignty over borders,
just as southern Europe lost economic sovereignty by joining the
euro.
By Ambrose
Evans-Pritchard9:45PM BST 09 Sep 2015 /
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11854259/Europe-faces-political-war-on-two-fronts-as-backlash-builds.html
The European Union
is fracturing along multiple lines of cleavage, torn by an emerging
Kulturkampf over migrant flows before it has overcome the bitter
conflict at the heart of monetary union.
“The bell tolls,
the time has come,” said Jean-Claude Juncker, the head of the
European Commission, in his State of the Union speech.
"We have to
look at the huge issues with which the European Union is now
confronted. Our Union is not in a good situation,” he said.
Perhaps it would be
churlish to point out that the cause of this near existential
breakdown is a series of moves that have his fingerprints all over
them:
The fateful decision
to launch the euro at Maastricht in 1991 without first establishing
an EU political union to make it viable, and to do this despite
crystal-clear warnings from experts within the Commission and the
Bundesbank that it would inevitably lead to a crisis - the
"beneficial crisis" as the EMU enthusiasts mischievously
supposed.
The escalating
treaties of Amsterdam, Nice and Lisbon, each concentrating power
further in the hands of a deformed institutional system, sapping at
the parliamentary lifeblood of the ancient nation-states that can
alone be the fora of authentic democracy in Europe.
Above all, to
destroy trust by overruling the categorical "No" of French
and Dutch voters to the European Constitution in 2005, and bringing
back the same treaty by executive Putsch, with a disgusted but
complicit British prime minister signing the document in a side-room
in Lisbon safely screened from the cameras.
One might have
thought that the proper conclusion to draw is that the EU can only
save itself at this stage by abandoning the Monnet method of
treaty-creep and reflexive attempts to force integration beyond
proper limits, and retreat instead to the surer ground of bedrock
nation states wherever possible.
But no, Mr Juncker
wishes to invoke treaty powers to force countries to accept 160,000
refugees by a quota, whether or not they agree with his solutions, or
indeed whether or not they think it is highly dangerous given the
state of total war that now exists between Western liberal
civilisation and Jihadi fundamentalism.
Personally, I think
Europe's nations should open their doors to those fleeing war and
persecution, with proper screening, in accordance with international
treaties on refugees, and in keeping with moral tradition.
Those countries that
etched the lines of Sykes-Picot on the map of the Middle East in 1916
as the Ottoman Empire was crumbling, or those that uncorked chaos by
toppling nasty but stable regimes in Iraq and Libya, have a special
duty of care. But the point is where the final authority lies.
By invoking EU law
to impose quotas under pain of sanctions, Brussels has unwisely
brought home the reality that states have given up sovereignty over
their borders, police and judicial systems, just as they gave up
economic sovereignty by joining the euro.
This comes as a rude
shock, creating a new East-West rift within European affairs to match
the North-South battles over EMU. With certain nuances, the peoples
of Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Poland and the Baltic
states do not accept the legitimacy of the demands being made upon
them.
There is a paradox
to Europe's crisis. Italy's ex-premier Mario Monti says all three of
the immediate dramas eating at Europe involve issues in which people
- in a sense - want to cleave more closely to the Union.
For refugees coming
in biblical proportions, EU soil is the promised land. The crisis
with Russia erupted because Ukraine wanted to join the club. The
perennial saga in Greece is dragging on because the Greek people want
to stay in the euro.
This is true, but it
is also meaningless if the project is disintegrating at the core.
Marine Le Pen's Front National in France has lost no time seizing on
events, insisting that nearly all the refugees are in fact migrants,
and claiming for good measure that Germany is letting them in only to
work as "economic slaves".
She continues to
lead the polls in France, rock solid at 29pc in the latest Figaro
survey despite expelling her own father from the party in an
astonishing spectacle of political parricide.
There is a high
chance that her lead will increase as the initial burst of generosity
and warm feelings in parts of French society start to fade, and the
long slog begins.
The eurozone is
still in a structural economic depression. Do not be fooled the
short-term cyclical recovery under way. It comes very late in a
global expansion that is already long in the tooth, and is too
anaemic to stop political revolt festering across much of southern
Europe.
The European Central
Bank expects growth of 1.4pc this year and 1.7pc next year. This is
thin gruel, given that all the stars are briefly aligned in favour of
what should be a roaring boom.
Fiscal policy is
neutral after years of pro-cyclical tightening. The ECB is conducting
€60bn a month of quantitative easing. The euro has fallen 24pc
against the dollar over the past year. Oil prices have dropped by
half. Yet even this blitz of stimulus cannot seem to close the output
gap.
The rift between
EMU's North and South was on vivid display last weekend at the
Ambrosetti forum on Lake Como - a gathering of the EU elites - where
a top French official accused the Germans to their faces of
conducting "religious war", wrecking monetary union in a
Calvinist urge for the moral cleansing of debt.
Even if the Teutonic
"morality tale" of what went wrong in EMU were true - and
Paris rejects the premise - it is too late to close the 20pc to 30pc
gap in labour competiveness between the two halves of monetary union
purely by forcing retrenchment on the South.
It is precisely such
an asymmetric policy that pushed the eurozone into a 1930s
contractionary vortex. It has been self-defeating, in any case. The
deflationary effects have pushed up debt ratios even faster.
Germany's push for
"competitiveness" is a cover for what has in reality been a
wage squeeze, stealing a march on other countries within EMU by
beggar-thy-neighbour tactics.
The French official
said such policies are a zero-sum game in a monetary union. They
should not be confused with genuine "productivity" gains,
the real measure of economic progress.
Berlin's idee fix
with moral hazard - its insistence that there should be no let up in
austerity until reforms are delivered, lest there be back-sliding -
flies in the face of the academic literature. Reforms need extra
stimulus to cushion the shock.
German officials in
the room smiled cherubically, unwilling to concede an inch of
ideological ground. Not only are they certain of their moral cause,
they also deem EMU policies to be vindicated. Just look at Spain.
Shows what a country can do.
The French might
retort that Spain has revived its car industry - now working "tres
turnos" around the clock, and exporting 85pc of output - by
luring production away from France to Spanish plants with a 27pc cut
in wages. This way lies a race to the bottom.
As for Greece,
nothing is resolved. There may or not be a workable government in
Athens after the elections next week. The creditors have yet to
clarify what they mean by debt relief, if anything, and the
International Monetary Fund refuses to participate in the latest
€86bn loan package until they do.
The level of
austerity agreed cannot plausibly be achieved. The primary surplus is
once again a box to be ticked, a lawyer's concoction. The terms for
Greece are even tougher than those rejected by Greek voters in a
landslide referendum in July. "It is impossible to enforce,"
said Yanis Varoufakis, the former finance minister.
"The IMF does
not think it can work, nor does the US Treasury, and I know Wolfgang
Schauble doesn't think so either because he told me. There is no
functioning banking system in Greece. Non-performing loans are 45pc,
and any recapitalisation will be wasted. In six months we're going to
have to go through exactly the same crisis again," he said.
The risk is that the
global economy tips into another downturn over the next 18 months,
before the eurozone is really back on its feet, with debt ratios much
higher than in 2008, unemployment still stuck at almost 11pc and
investment still 4.5 percentage points of GDP below pre-crisis levels
(IMF data)
As the World Bank
warned this week, all it will take is a mistake by the US Federal
Reserve as it begins to tighten, setting off a chain-reaction through
emerging markets.
The European Project
has very little economic and political capital left to defend it if
anything goes wrong now. As Mr Juncker says, the bell tolls.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário