New
Counterterror Strategy Eyes Tucker Carlson
Administration
deems anti-Trump right wingers terrorists
Ken
Klippenstein
May 13,
2026
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/new-counterterror-strategy-eyes-tucker
Two
right-wing figures — Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes — have been named by the
White House as possible domestic terrorists, according to the Trump
administration’s top counterterrorism official.
Sebastian
Gorka, himself a former right-wing influencer turned National Security Council
principal, has been making his rounds on conservative media, explaining the
meaning and purpose behind the President’s new National Counterterrorism
Strategy (which I reported on previously).
Between
grandiose monologues about his vision of a crusade to save Western civilization
from “anti-American” and “anti-Christian” extremism, Gorka let slip that the
administration’s war on “domestic terrorism” isn’t just aimed at the left. It
targets anyone who isn’t in line with the broader MAGA agenda. While Trump’s
national security directive NSPM-7 explicitly singles out the left with its
list of so-called terrorism indicators, many of them could describe people on
the right as well.
The new
Counterterrorism Strategy, Gorka’s brainchild, identifies three groups as
priorities for the administration: narco-terrorists, Islamist terrorists, and
“Violent Left-Wing Extremists.” Nowhere in the document does it mention
right-wing extremists; and while that may have led those on the right to
believe they are immune, Gorka’s remarks make clear that they are not.
Asked by
Breitbart editor-in-chief Alex Marlow if there’s any “right-wing terror” or
“right-wing extremism” threat, Gorka replied by pointing to former Fox News
host Tucker Carlson and streamer Nick Fuentes — both of whom have become vocal
critics of the Trump administration — arguing they aren’t actually
conservatives anyway. Here’s the exchange:
MARLOW: “ I wanna get your thoughts on any
right-wing terror … Do you
regard it as a threat at all or anything that's important to be considering
right now?”
GORKA:
“…I'm not sure that Nick Fuentes or Tucker Carlson are conservatives. If you
are lauding Sharia law, if you are saying that there are Muslim states that
seem to be better qualitatively than America in terms of freedom and
prosperity, I'm not sure that means you're part of the conservative movement. So if you remove those individuals
and you understand that they're not conservatives, what's left?”
Gorka’s
charge that Carlson lauds Sharia law is, to put it lightly, ridiculous.
Here’s
what Carlson actually said:
CARLSON:
“But you go to a country like Japan or the Emirates or Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and
you see that when people are self-confident, when they’re really pleased with
what they’re doing, and they believe their system is the right system — that
self-confidence results in a kind of welcoming attitude. So you'll be sitting
at dinner in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and you'll say, you know, I just, I'm really
kind of pro-Jesus, like I'm a Christian. They’ll be like, ‘That’s so great!’
HOST: And
they don’t have the same beliefs?
CARLSON:
No, they’re Muslims. It's a country governed by Sharia law! — [laughs] — I
mean, and they're like, ‘That's great!’
Is
Carlson naive for mistaking his Four Season’s experiences in whatever Gulf
monarchy with an egalitarian society? Absolutely. But “lauding Sharia law?”
Come on.
I’m an
absolutist when it comes to free speech, for the right and the left (and anyone
inside or outside that spectrum). Gorka as a government official has no
business sticking his nose into whether people define America in the same way
he does.
And let’s
be real: none of this is actually about extremism. It’s about the fact that
Carlson, like Fuentes, recently broke with Trump — bitterly — over the Iran
War. That's the real offense. So now they’re being cast as extremist threats.
But to avoid alarming conservatives, the administration can't just say that —
it has to first strip them of their conservative credentials, redefine them as
something foreign-affiliated and dangerous, and then go after them.
That’s
how the terrorism two-step works: the Trump administration just asserts that a
right-winger isn’t really a right winger and then it can say it doesn’t target
right-wingers. This is literally the No True Scotsman fallacy (No Scotsman puts
sugar in his tea / But Ian from Glasgow does / Well, no true Scotsman does).
That, in a nutshell, is how NSPM-7 can be weaponized against the right without
calling it that.
You don’t
have to like Carlson or Fuentes (who says things like “I love Hitler” and is
easy not to like) in order to see that. Consider, for a moment, the rhetoric
that likely fueled Gorka’s freakout.
Carlson
has called Trump’s Iran war “the single biggest mistake Trump, or any American
president, has made in my lifetime.” He has slammed the strikes as
“reprehensible and immoral,” insisting the war “doesn’t serve American
interests in any conceivable way” and suggesting it happened “at the behest and
then the demand of Israel.”
When
Trump ordered strikes on Iran, Fuentes said in a social media post: “NO WAR
WITH IRAN. ISRAEL IS DRAGGING US INTO WAR. AMERICA FIRST.”
You can
imagine why Fuentes feels so strongly about Israel.
Taken
together, that’s the substance Gorka is trying to launder out of the
“conservative movement” by redefining Carlson and Fuentes as something else: in
Carlson’s case, a Sharia fan.
At this
point you might be wondering why none of this has been reported — a question
big mouth Gorka answers in an interview with actor-turned-media commentator
Dean Caine about the National Counterterrorism Strategy. Gorka beams about how
little negative coverage the media have given the Strategy, calling it
“delicious.”
Gorka
said:
“I did a
kind of press call when we released the strategy. 50 articles were written that
day about the press call. Only one of them from those putzes at Politico was
even slightly negative... We are moving so fast, they just can’t keep up with
us, which is delicious.”
Here
Gorka is mostly right — the media really have been asleep at the wheel on this
story.
I say
“mostly” because I wrote a negative story about the Strategy, which he
apparently didn’t notice. Maybe he’ll notice this one.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário