Under US
pressure, EU moves to soften rules for fighting climate superpollutant
The
Commission is poised to weaken enforcement of its methane regulation.
May 7,
2026 7:31 pm CET
By Zia
Weise and Ben Munster
https://www.politico.eu/article/under-us-pressure-eu-softens-climate-superpollutant-methane-rules/
BRUSSELS
— The European Union is bowing to demands from the United States and the fossil
fuel industry that it scale back its efforts to fight a planet-warming
superpollutant.
The EU in
2021 vowed to curb emissions of methane and drew up legislation that forces the
oil and gas sector to limit emissions of the powerful greenhouse gas, which is
responsible for around a third of the global rise in temperatures since the
industrial era.
Now,
however, Brussels is poised to significantly weaken enforcement of its flagship
methane regulation, granting fossil fuel companies the freedom to pollute with
a focus on protecting the continent’s energy security, according to a draft
document seen by POLITICO.
The Trump
administration has intensified pressure on the regulation — a stark turnaround
from 2021, when the U.S. under then-President Joe Biden co-launched a worldwide
campaign with the EU to rein in methane pollution.
“The EU’s
Methane Regulation risks triggering another energy crisis,” Andrew Puzder, the
U.S. ambassador to the bloc, wrote last week. "To avoid it, Brussels needs
a regulatory environment that encourages, not discourages, suppliers."
The oil
and gas industry has also piled pressure on the European Commission to weaken
the regulation, arguing that enforcing the law would threaten the bloc’s energy
supply and drive up already rising prices from 2027.
That runs
counter to advice from the International Energy Agency, which this week warned
that methane escaping during fossil fuel production — the key issue the EU
regulation seeks to tackle — wastes more gas than flows through the currently
blocked Strait of Hormuz. (Natural gas is predominantly methane.)
But the
escalating pressure, coupled with concerns about the Iran war’s effect on
fossil fuel cost and supply, has left the EU susceptible to industry's energy
security framing.
“The
methane regulation on the one hand is a really important one, on the other hand
we also see that there are some concerns,” said Stientje van Veldhoven, climate
minister of the Netherlands, whose government usually backs ambitious action to
rein in global warming.
Asked if
she shared concerns that the regulation will threaten security of supply, she
said: “That’s at least what we should avoid. So if there are concerns, it’s
important to look into them carefully ... The question is what is needed to get
the benefits of what this regulation is trying to achieve, but not risking an
import shock.”
'Disastrous
signal'
Scientists
say curbing methane emissions is the fastest way to slow climate change. That’s
because the gas is both very effective at trapping heat and relatively
short-lived, staying just a decade in the atmosphere whereas CO2 sticks around
for hundreds of years.
The
majority of methane emissions linked to human activity are released through
agriculture, a tricky source to decarbonize. By contrast, quick and cheap fixes
are available to address pollution from the fossil fuel sector, which is
responsible for 35 percent of methane emissions.
The EU’s
methane regulation seeks to do just that, obliging the oil and gas sector to
monitor their sites for methane leaks and fix them fast. The law also bans
methane venting and non-emergency burning of gas, known as flaring.
The
legislation requires all oil and gas imported into the EU to meet the same
standards from 2027 — the crunch issue for fossil fuel producers, which would
effectively be required to comply with the bloc’s rules no matter where they
are based.
Now,
however, the Commission is planning to relax enforcement of those rules. In the
draft guidelines the EU executive says governments can grant companies broad
exemptions from penalties for breaching the rules if an energy crisis develops
— and even before any real disruption occurs.
The
recommendations could still change before their official release in June. But
Brussels’ apparent surrender to U.S. and industry pressure has already sparked
an outcry.
“Suspending
penalty payments puts those who have already fulfilled their obligations at a
disadvantage,” said Jutta Paulus, a German Greens MEP who negotiated the
methane regulation on behalf of the European Parliament.
“It sends
a disastrous signal in response to pressure from the U.S. and undermines our
energy security,” she added.
Washington's
ire
The Trump
administration has stepped up lobbying efforts against the EU’s methane rules
after demanding that the U.S. — which provides 28 percent of the bloc’s gas, up
from 6 percent in 2021 — be exempt from the regulation in a letter to
member-state governments in December.
Puzder,
the U.S. ambassador to the EU, has called for weaker methane rules on numerous
occasions, including in an op-ed in the Financial Times last month.
In a
statement to POLITICO, he repeated calls for Brussels "to extend the
timeline for compliance and make necessary changes to importer requirements so
energy producers can still supply necessary energy to Europe. Restrict[ing]
access to supply options forces EU factories, power plants and households to
face an energy supply gap and higher prices.”
Washington’s
lobbying has emboldened the already skeptical fossil fuel industry, which
launched a fresh campaign against the rules earlier this year.
The
International Association of Oil & Gas Producers argues that companies
can't conform to the regulation in time — jeopardizing the EU’s energy security
by leaving 87 percent of crude oil supply and 43 percent of gas non-compliant
for import.
Critics
say such warnings are overblown. The Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit, says
the IOGP’s forecasts are “a result of unrealistic modelling choices,
conservative market assumptions, and a basic misunderstanding of what the
regulation actually requires.”
Zombie
rules
The EU
executive has ruled out reworking the legislation itself. Instead the
Commission has sought to balance industry demands against green ambitions by
encouraging EU governments to “pragmatically” police the rules and take
advantage of existing loopholes, as the draft guidance shows.
The fudge
has left no one happy. Green groups say the proposed flexibilities are so
far-ranging that they will permit all manner of rule breaches on ill-defined
energy security grounds, without setting clear limits to such exemptions.
The
upshot is a “Schrödinger’s cat situation, where they can say the regulation is
still alive … but at the same time it doesn’t have any teeth,” said Léa
Pilsner, a senior climate policy analyst at the Environmental Defense Fund.
"The very real risk is a zombie regulation, one that walks and talks but
is structured in a way that it never has to be enforced."
Fossil
fuel executives are no more enthusiastic, warning that the Commission's
approach risks worsening the sense of regulatory uncertainty. Håkon Fonseca
Nordang, a spokesperson for IOGP’s Europe branch, said that while the lobby
group had yet to analyze the draft guidelines, “it is difficult to see how a
‘recommendation’ — however well-intentioned — can supersede some of the
challenging requirements set out in the regulation itself.”
He added
that the emphasis on flexibilities — instead of changing the law outright, or
pausing it — made compliance more difficult.
"While
this may help ease the financial risks of non-compliance, it will likely do
little to address possible legal and reputational risks," he said. That
such measures were being considered, he added, “suggests a recognition by the
Commission itself that the timeline and requirements written into the
regulation simply don’t work.”
The
Commission has a policy of not commenting on leaked documents, but said through
a spokesperson that the methane regulation "is the most ambitious and most
comprehensive methane-related regulatory framework of its kind worldwide."
EU
governments in December "agreed with us to work on guidance on compliance
solutions and penalty regimes," the spokesperson added. "We are now
pursuing this work with them."
This
article has been updated to include a response from the U.S. ambassador to the
EU.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário