As Powell
Steps Down, the Fed Confronts ‘Regime Change’
Jerome H.
Powell has officially stepped down as Chairman of the Federal Reserve, passing
leadership to Kevin M. Warsh following a high-stakes transition marked by public
political battles over central bank independence. Warsh, who openly campaigned
on a platform of "regime change," takes the helm at a time when the
Trump administration has repeatedly challenged the central bank’s traditional
insulation from executive branch pressure.
The Core
of the "Regime Change"
- Dismantling Status Quo
Practices:
Warsh aims to aggressively overhaul policy norms. He views the current Fed
framework as broken.
- Ending Forward Guidance: Warsh intends to abandon the
practice of signaling future interest rate pathways. He believes this
muddles market reactions.
- Scrapping Core PCE Targets: The incoming chair plans to
move away from the Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index. He
has dismissed the metric as a "rough swag" of price behavior.
- Narrowing the Fed Mandate: Warsh aims to strip out
non-monetary focuses. He has heavily criticized Powell's inclusions of
climate change and diversity initiatives.
Powell’s
Defensive Maneuver
- Staying on the Board: Though his term as chair
concluded on May 15, 2026, Powell will exercise his legal right to remain
as a regular Fed Governor. His governor term runs until 2028.
- Blocking a Trump Majority: By remaining on the 7-member
Board of Governors, Powell denies President Trump an immediate opening to
appoint another loyalist. This blocks the administration from quickly
reaching a "tipping point" majority to dismantle institutional
norms.
- Pledging a Low Profile: Powell stated he will not
interfere with interest-rate deliberations. He intends to maintain a
quiet, supportive role under the new chair.
Broad
Economic and Institutional Fallout
- Credibility Pressures: Warsh argues the Fed lost
public credibility by misjudging the post-pandemic inflation surge. He
plans to focus on directly suppressing long-term interest rates.
- Independence Questions: Congressional Democrats have
raised strict concerns over Warsh’s independence. During his confirmation,
he notably declined to condemn the administration's legal attacks on other
Fed officials.
- Boardroom Friction: If Warsh moves to withdraw the
Fed's legal defenses of its own staff, it will create unprecedented
friction. Technocrats on the board and regional bank presidents may form a
blocking coalition against aggressive executive overreaches.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário