Press
Release
Airline
emissions soar to pre-COVID levels as Europe fails to price their pollution
April 28,
2025
https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/airline-emissions-soar-to-pre-covid-levels
Emissions
from European aviation have almost bounced back to 2019 levels, with flights
within Europe even exceeding these, a new T&E study shows. The EU’s carbon
market (EU ETS) is currently failing to address the true cost of these
emissions, amid signs of climate backtracking from airlines.
Europe's
2024 airline emissions uncovered
8.4
million
flights
departed from European airports last year, generating 187.6 Mt of CO₂
70%
of CO₂
emissions from aviation remained unpriced in 2024
Aviation
emissions and traffic up, low-cost airlines eat up more of the market
In 2024,
the European aviation sector almost fully bounced back to pre-COVID levels [1],
reaching 96% of 2019 flight numbers and 98% of emissions. The study also shows
that ten airlines were responsible for 40% of all European aviation emissions,
the top polluters being Ryanair (16 Mt CO2), Lufthansa (10 Mt CO2) and British
Airways (9 Mt CO2).
Over 8.4
million flights departed from European airports last year, generating 187.6 Mt
of CO₂. When it comes to intra-European flights, pre-COVID emissions levels
have been surpassed, with extra-European flights on a similar trajectory [2].
Krisztina
Hencz, Aviation Policy Manager at T&E, said: “Aviation emissions are
spiraling out of control. To add insult to injury, the sector continues to
dodge the true cost of its pollution, making a mockery of airlines’ pledges to
build back greener after COVID. If Europe continues down this path, ‘green’
aviation will remain a figment of people’s imaginations. Next year’s review of
EU carbon markets is a chance to rectify a loophole in the current legislation
and ensure airlines pay for the true cost of their pollution.”
The study
also charts the continuing trend of low-cost carrier expansion in the European
aviation industry. This is even the case in the extra-European market, which is
usually dominated by flagship carriers like Lufthansa and Air France.
The
highest-emitting routes departing Europe in 2024 were all intercontinental,
with London-New York topping the list. Currently, these emissions are not
priced under the EU, Swiss or UK carbon markets, which only apply to flights
within Europe [3]. As a result, no airline had to pay for their emissions on
the most polluting routes departing from Europe. T&E’s study suggests that
as much as 70% of CO₂ emissions from aviation remained unpriced in 2024.
The EU
will review its ETS next year, presenting the opportunity to address this
fundamental flaw by extending its scope to all departing flights. But the
review will come amid signs of climate backtracking from the aviation industry,
with CEOs from prominent airlines calling on the EU to weaken its carbon
pricing rules.
Extending
the ETS could generate billions for the green transition
Alongside
climate benefits, an extension of the European carbon markets could generate
significant revenues. T&E estimates that an extension of the EU and UK ETS
could have generated an additional €7.5 billion euros in 2024 if extra-European
emissions were priced [4].
Instead,
many airline CEOs are diverting attention by promoting the cheap global
aviation offsetting scheme CORSIA, which charges up to 23 times less to pollute
than an extension of the EU system [5]. In addition, CORSIA will not help to
raise revenues for green technologies like sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs)
and electric and hydrogen aircraft.
“Relying
on CORSIA to cover international emissions from aviation is a false economy,”
Krisztina Hencz added. “It is by far the worst option, both environmentally and
financially. An extended EU ETS would deliver the greatest positive impact for
European economies, alongside having the largest environmental benefits.”
[1] Every
April, the European Commission releases compiled EU and Swiss emissions trading
system (ETS) emissions data. While this dataset is limited to emissions from
intra-European flights, T&E incorporates into the analysis all flights
departing from EU Member States, Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and the UK, to
allow for a more comprehensive picture of aviation-related emissions at
European and international level. This is done by combining EU and Swiss ETS
data with emissions calculated from OAG flights data.
[2]
Zooming on on intra-EU flights only, 2019 emissions levels have been surpassed,
while extra-EU flights will reach that level soon (totalling at 91% of 2019
levels in 2024).
[3] The
first intra-European flight that is included in the current scope of the EU ETS
(Barcelona-London) would land as the 135th on this T&E study
[4] This
analysis does not account for the potential decrease in demand that could
result from pricing these emissions
[5] In comparison, calculating with an available
CORSIA offset price estimate of 16.56€ per ton, the total bill of EU aviation
would be 0.5 billion euros based on EU 2024 emissions. 23 times less to be paid
for then considering an EU ETS scope extended for all departing flights from
Europe. This is notwithstanding the fact that CORSIA revenues wouldn’t stay in
Europe but land in the pockets of global offset providers for questionable
international projects.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário