Le Pen’s
fighting spirit fades as presidential dream slips away
The
far-right leader seems increasingly resigned to her fate despite fighting to
overturn the ruling that knocked her out of the 2027 presidential election.
February
4, 2026 6:14 pm CET
By Victor
Goury-Laffont
PARIS —
Marine Le Pen recent public statements seem to indicate that she’s losing faith
in her effort to quash the five-year election ban standing in the way of her
becoming France’s next president.
In her
latest comments Tuesday, outside the gilded Parisian courtroom where she has
been appealing since January an embezzlement conviction that knocked her out of
the 2027 election, Le Pen told reporters: “I never expect a good surprise when
I step into a courtroom.”
But, she
added: “I am a believer. I still believe in miracles.”
The dour
pessimism in those and similar comments is striking coming from a leader who
had vowed to fight what she framed as politically motivated hit job. Le Pen
even held a Stop-the-Steal-type rally last year after she and her codefendants
were found guilty of misappropriating €4 million of European Parliament funds.
But as
the months have dragged on, Le Pen has seemed increasingly resigned,
recognizing that her shot at the French presidency is slipping away just as her
party, the National Rally, is enjoying an historic surge in popularity.
Nonetheless, it’s possible the doom and gloom are all part of her strategy to
express more contrition to get a more favorable verdict.
Whatever
it is, Le Pen has presented this appeal as her last chance to mount a bid for
the Elysée Palace and acknowledged publicly that she may be forced to step
aside in favor of her 30-year-old protégé, Jordan Bardella.
Tuesday’s
sentencing recommendations appeared to confirm her suspicions at first.
Prosecutors
asked the court to uphold her five-year electoral ban, but in an unexpected
twist, argued against its immediate implementation.
Should
the court agree, it offers Le Pen a small glimmer of hope. But it’s a legally
complex and politically risky path back into the race, and one that Le Pen
herself appears to be placing little hope in.
What’s
the deal with immediate implementation?
In French
criminal law, penalties are typically lifted when a defendant appeals a verdict
to a higher court.
Part of
the reason Le Pen’s initial sentence drew so much backlash is prosecutors
argued — and the judges agreed — that her crimes were so grave that her ban on
running for public office should be handed down immediately, regardless of
whether she appeals.
But
during the appeal the prosecution did not recommend immediate implementation
because there was insufficient proof that Le Pen could commit further crimes if
she is not sanctioned immediately.
So, can
Le Pen run for president?
In
theory, if the appeals court rules in a manner that bars Le Pen from running in
2027 but does not order immediate implementation, she could appeal again to an
even higher court — thereby lifting her ban temporarily. She would then need to
hope that the gears of the justice system grind slowly enough to push the issue
past the next election.
But it’s
not clear cut. Some French legal scholars have debated if and how a new appeal
would lift her electoral ban at all.
Le Pen
has said she will make a final call once there is a verdict in the current
appeal. She has also said she would drop out of the running if the electoral
ban is upheld to avoid the risk of having the National Rally run its
presidential campaign with no guarantee of who the candidate would be until the
last minute — an ignominious end to a career dedicated to dragging her
far-right party from the political fringes into the mainstream.
It is
unclear if a ban without immediate implementation, as sought by the
prosecutors, changes her reasoning — but her comments to French broadcaster
TF1-LCI after the prosecutors made their recommendation seemed to indicate that
she’d still rule herself out in that eventuality.
“If the
prosecutors’ recommendations are followed, I won’t be able to run,” she said.
Le Pen
now has to hope that she’ll be acquitted, which appears unlikely, or that the
case’s three-judge panel reduces or scraps her electoral ban. The judges are
under no obligation to follow the prosecution’s recommendations.
When will
this be resolved?
The
judges hearing the case are expected to render a verdict before the
summer.
The Cour
de Cassation, which would take up any ensuing appeal, has said it would aim to
examine the case and issue a final ruling before the 2027 election “if
possible.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário