Opinion
Guest
Essay
Britain
Hates Trump. But It Quite Likes Trumpism.
Sept. 16,
2025, 1:00 a.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/opinion/trump-britain-state-visit.html
By Moya
Lothian-McLean
Ms.
Lothian-McLean is a contributing Opinion writer and a journalist who covers
British politics and culture. She wrote from London.
In
February, on a desperate diplomatic trip to the White House, Prime Minister
Keir Starmer of Britain pulled out a card from the inside pocket of his plain
black jacket. Gingerly, he presented it to President Trump: It was, he
explained, an invitation from King Charles III for Mr. Trump to make a second
state visit to Britain. The honor of a visit is traditionally extended to
American leaders in only their first term in office. A second visit, Mr.
Starmer was quick to point out, would be “truly historic.”
On
Tuesday, Mr. Trump will make good on the offer and pitch up in Britain for two
days of pageantry. There will be less outrage than during his first state visit
in 2019, but major protests are still planned. The American president is very
unpopular in Britain. Three-fifths of the British public disapprove of him,
according to one poll, and the top words associated with him include “idiot”
and “dangerous.” The government’s obsequious approach has attracted only scorn.
Over here Mr. Trump is an easy punchline, not a president.
Yet his
hard-right nativism isn’t getting such a hostile reception. On the contrary, it
is flourishing. Politically, this is expressed through the stunning rise of
Reform U.K., an aggressively anti-migrant party led by the establishment’s bête
noire, Nigel Farage. Socially, resentment and antipathy to outsiders are all
the rage. Britons may dislike Mr. Trump, as he embodies almost every negative
stereotype about Americans. But they seem, more and more, to like Trumpism.
The story
of how Britain arrived at this juncture is long and ugly, a moving-right show
played out over decades. But the most recent chapter would focus on widespread
disenchantment with the Labour government, elected with a huge majority in
2024. The party’s promise was to take the country out of the long winter
endured under 14 years of Conservative rule.
It hasn’t
happened yet. Instead, amid disarray that has seen scandals take down the
deputy prime minister and the ambassador to Washington in the past two weeks
alone, the message has been one of making “tough choices.” These choices are
oddly reminiscent of the ones pursued by previous governments: Chiefly, cut
public services and talk a draconian game on immigration.
The
strategy has proved unavailing. As large numbers of Britons experience severe
economic pressure and crumbling infrastructure, attention has focused on asylum
seekers arriving on British shores in small boats. Resentment toward refugees
and migrants, in an atmosphere of scarcity, has risen. Mr. Farage has adeptly
harnessed this anger. Like Mr. Trump, he offers a potent nationalist narrative
that blames shadowy interlopers for the country’s decline and promises a golden
future — or a return to an imagined golden past — once the foreigners are
expelled and Britain can be made great again.
Hoping to
steal the success of Reform, Labour and the much-diminished Conservatives have
tried to ape that message, though without its secret ingredient of optimism.
It’s a peculiar sight: Britain’s previously dominant political parties confined
to the sidelines, effectively cheerleading the far right’s dynamic insurgency.
The reality of this new political configuration was laid bare in May’s local
elections, when Reform won 41 percent of all seats, secured two mayoralties and
took over 10 councils. Remarkably, the once fringe party now has a strong shot
at becoming the next government.
Beyond
Westminster, a British form of Trumpism is taking root. Last summer,
anti-migrant riots erupted across the country as far-right groups capitalized
on misinformation about the identity of a child murderer. Since then there have
been alarmingly frequent protests at temporary accommodation sites that house
asylum applicants. These places, which are colloquially — and misleadingly,
given their dire living conditions — referred to as asylum hotels, have become
a regular target for far-right pugilists.
This
summer, a new phenomenon has emerged: flags. Across Britain, national flags are
suddenly everywhere. They hang from lampposts and windows and are daubed onto
walls and roundabouts. The trend began in a Birmingham suburb and has since
spread, under the name Operation Raise the Colors. Despite insistence from some
that it is an innocent attempt to reinstill national pride, research suggests
an organized far-right campaign is behind the banners, which have long been
associated with xenophobia and nativism.
Exposés
have revealed worrying details about those involved. In Manchester, a key
figure in the group overseeing the operation has links to a fascist party,
Britain First, and is also a convicted former people smuggler. In Glasgow, a
man fund-raising for the group claiming responsibility for the city’s flags
appears to have neo-Nazi sympathies. Nationally, a co-founder of the campaign
served a prison sentence for his role in the death of a Black man and provides
security to Britain First.
Pundits
and politicians alike don’t really know what to make of it all. Screeds about
the “Ulsterization” of Britain — referring to the belligerently nationalist
politics in parts of Northern Ireland — have appeared, while senior government
figures insist that flag-waving is a neutral act and that their homes are full
of Union Jacks, actually. Some local councils have resolved to remove the
flags; others have judged it less inflammatory to leave them alone.
Regardless,
the flags keep coming. On Saturday, as the far right mustered for one of its
biggest ever demonstrations, London was awash with them. When Mr. Trump touches
down on Tuesday, he’ll be greeted by more of the same. Perhaps such a clear
sign of his political success across the pond will, despite the jeers and boos
directed his way, make him feel right at home.
Moya
Lothian-McLean is a contributing Opinion writer and an associate editor at Mill
Media.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário