Trump
Targets Workplaces as Immigration Crackdown Widens
Many
industries have become dependent on immigrant labor. Some workplace raids have
been met with protest.
Lydia
DePillis Ernesto Londoño
By Lydia
DePillis and Ernesto Londoño
June 7, 2025
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/07/us/trump-immigration-raids-workplaces.html
The chaos
that engulfed Los Angeles on Saturday began a day earlier when camouflage-clad
federal agents rolled through the garment district in search of workers who
they suspected of being undocumented immigrants. They were met with protesters,
who chanted and threw eggs before being dispersed with pepper spray and
nonlethal bullets.
The
enforcement operation turned into one of the most volatile scenes of President
Trump’s immigration crackdown so far, but it was not an isolated incident.
Last week,
at a student housing complex under construction in Tallahassee, Fla., masked
immigration agents loaded dozens of migrants into buses headed to detention
centers. In New Orleans, 15 people working on a flood control project were
detained. And raids in San Diego and Massachusetts — in Martha’s Vineyard and
the Berkshires — led to standoffs in recent days as bystanders angrily
confronted federal agents who were taking workers into custody.
The
high-profile raids appeared to mark a new phase of the Trump administration’s
immigration crackdown, in which officials say they will increasingly focus on
workplaces — taking aim at the reason millions of people have illegally crossed
the border for decades. That is an expansion from plans early in the
administration to prioritize detaining hardened criminals and later to focus on
hundreds of international students.
“You’re
going to see more work site enforcement than you’ve ever seen in the history of
this nation,” Thomas D. Homan, the White House border czar told reporters
recently. “We’re going to flood the zone.”
It remains
to be seen how aggressively Mr. Trump will pursue sectors like construction,
food production and hospitality. Raids are sometimes directed based on tips,
but otherwise appear to be distributed without a clear pattern, hitting
establishments large and small.
A
spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to an email
seeking details about the government’s plans, including an explanation about
why the administration is ramping up work-site arrests now.
Over the
past month, though, the White House has pressured immigration officials to
increase deportations, which have fallen short of the administration’s goals.
The number
of arrests has risen sharply in the past week, according to figures provided by
the Department of Homeland Security.
Tricia
McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for Homeland Security, said 2,000 immigrants per day
were arrested over the last week, up from 600 earlier in the administration. It
was not clear how many of those arrests were made at raids of work sites.
More than 4
percent of the nation’s 170 million person work force was made up of
undocumented immigrants in 2023, according to estimates from Goldman Sachs,
making job sites a prime setting for agents to find people.
The number
of immigrants who could be subject to such sweeps increased by at least 500,000
at the end of May, as the Supreme Court allowed the administration to revoke
the temporary status that had allowed many Venezuelans, Cubans, Haitians and
Nicaraguans to work.
Workplace
raids require significant planning, can be costly and draw on large teams of
agents, but they can yield more arrests than pursuing individual targets. The
raids may have become feasible in recent weeks, experts said, as personnel from
the F.B.I. and other law enforcement agencies have been enlisted on immigration
operations.
“Goosing the
numbers is a big part of this because it’s so much more efficient in manpower
to raid a warehouse and arrest 100 illegal aliens than it is to send five guys
after one criminal,” said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for
Immigration Studies, which advocates less immigration.
Workplace
raids also send a warning to a far broader group of undocumented people, most
of whom have not committed crimes. “If you want to get people packing up and
leaving, that isn’t going to happen if you’re just focusing on the criminals,”
Mr. Krikorian said.
In
interviews, migrants and employers expressed alarm about the toll a sustained
crackdown could take on the work force. Undocumented immigrants are
concentrated in a few American industries, making up 19 percent of landscaping
workers, 17 percent of farm workers and 13 percent of construction workers,
according to the estimates from Goldman Sachs.
Gus Hoyas, a
Republican who runs a construction firm in Cleveland, said his industry has
long leaned heavily on people with valuable skills who are in the country
without permission.
“They’re
undocumented, but we’ve got to do something, because these people are tradesmen
— they’re pros in the field,” said Mr. Hoyas, a naturalized immigrant from
Colombia. “You get rid of these folks, and it’s going to kill us in the
construction arena.”
During his
first term, Mr. Trump — whose own businesses have employed workers without
papers — sent mixed messages about his eagerness to crack down on undocumented
labor. Early on, his administration carried out several workplace raids, and
conducted more audits of worker eligibility paperwork than the Obama
administration had.
But Mr.
Trump’s Justice Department prosecuted relatively few employers for hiring
undocumented workers. And in 2017, the president commuted the sentence of an
Iowa meatpacking plant executive convicted in the Obama era after a jury found
that he knowingly hired hundreds of undocumented workers and paid for their
forged documents.
The Covid-19
pandemic halted efforts to go after undocumented workers. “These were people
who were processing our food, making our food, delivering our food so we could
all live in the comfort of our Zoom existence,” said Muzaffar Chishti, a senior
fellow at the nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute. “That was not lost on
people.”
Mr. Biden,
who began his presidency facing a beleaguered economy and a severe labor
shortage, never prioritized workplace immigration enforcement.
The system
that gave rise to this shadow work force dates to 1986, when President Ronald
Reagan signed a bill granting amnesty to nearly three million undocumented
immigrants, allowing them to pursue citizenship. The bill also criminalized
hiring people without legal status and required that employers collect an I-9
form from every new hire, substantiating their work authorization with
identification.
In 1996, the
Internal Revenue Service created an alternative to a Social Security number
that allowed immigrants to file federal tax returns on their earnings.
Unauthorized immigrants often do so because it can be beneficial on citizenship
applications down the line and also count toward Social Security benefits if
they are able to naturalize. Their payments generate tens of billions of
dollars in tax revenue each year.
Since then,
enforcement of immigration labor laws has varied widely. In the late 1990s, the
government prioritized egregious cases of employers who abused workers or who
knowingly hired large numbers of undocumented migrants. After the Sept. 11,
2001, attacks, investigators focused on sensitive sites such as airports and
military bases.
Over the
years, raids at farms, meatpacking plants and construction sites have grabbed
headlines, but employers have seldom faced severe consequences. Many
subcontract to avoid liability, and managers have long asserted that it is
difficult to identify fake documents.
“They have
plausible deniability for just about any hires,” said Daniel Costa, an
immigration labor expert at the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think
tank. “The system was kind of rigged against workers and in favor of employers
from the beginning.”
Immigrant
workers tend to be younger, while the U.S.-born population is aging into
retirement. Millions of people who arrived between 2022 and 2024, largely from
Latin America, Ukraine and Afghanistan, were generally eligible to work, since
the Biden administration granted most of them some kind of temporary legal
status.
For those
reasons, the share of the labor force that is foreign born rose to 19.7 percent
in March, the highest on record.
That is why
a serious work-site crackdown could severely affect some industries, especially
if employers begin preemptively firing people known to be undocumented.
Employers also must balance verifying a worker’s status with risking
accusations of discrimination on the basis of race and national origin, which
is also illegal.
“If you’ve
done your due diligence as an employer, your own doubt or suspicion isn’t going
to be enough for me to say, ‘Yeah, fire that person,’” said Eric Welsh, an
attorney with Reeves Immigration Law Group, which helps both individuals and
companies with visa issues. “You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t.”
After Mr.
Trump’s election, employers started performing more internal audits to verify
employees’ identification documents and work permits, immigration attorneys
said.
Chris
Thomas, a partner with the firm Holland & Hart in Denver, said his business
clients had seen more notices of investigation and letters from the Internal
Revenue Service flagging Social Security numbers that don’t match the agency’s
records.
The
Department of Justice raised the stakes in early February with a memo that
directed attorneys to use “all available criminal statutes” to enforce
immigration laws.
“If you know
you have undocumented workers, and you’re not severing ties with them at this
stage, you’re in a position where they’re coming pretty soon,” Mr. Thomas said.
“If you wait until they arrive on the scene it’s probably too late.”
Greg Casten,
who co-owns several restaurants, a fish wholesaler and a few other hospitality
businesses in Washington D.C., has watched the government’s shifting approach
to undocumented workers for more than 40 years. Many of his 600 employees are
immigrants. He has found Salvadorans in particular, to be skilled at cutting
fish.
Every year
he gets a list from the I.R.S. of Social Security numbers on his payroll that
don’t match official records, and every year he goes through to try to address
any gaps. Still, it’s not perfect.
“I do have
some people who work for me who can barely speak English, and I find it hard to
believe sometimes when they’re giving me paperwork,” Mr. Casten said. But since
he puts in the necessary effort, he doesn’t worry much about punishment.
In early
May, the Department of Homeland Security served inspection notices to 187
businesses in Washington, though none of Mr. Casten’s.
“Right now,
as fragile as this industry is, if they came in and took 20 percent or 10
percent of someone’s work staff, they would be out of business,” he said.
The
heightened risk of enforcement has led some employers to preemptively let go of
workers they suspect are undocumented.
Miriam, a
mother of five in Los Angeles who crossed the border illegally 26 years ago,
said the Trump administration’s immigration policies led her boss at a 24-hour
laundromat to fire her recently.
“Many people
have lost their jobs overnight,” said Miriam, who is 40 and agreed to be
identified only by her first name out of concern about drawing the attention of
immigration officials. “We’re all afraid.”
Hamed
Aleaziz contributed reporting.
Lydia
DePillis reports on the American economy. She has been a journalist since 2009,
and can be reached at lydia.depillis@nytimes.com.
Ernesto
Londoño is a Times reporter based in Minnesota, covering news in the Midwest
and drug use and counternarcotics policy.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário