BLITZED
‘Dictator’ Trump Plans to Deploy Massive Number
of Troops on U.S. Soil
In his first term, Trump’s plans to send troops to
“war” on the southern border were thwarted. This time, he’s talking about
sending up to 300,000 there
BY ADAM
RAWNSLEY, ASAWIN SUEBSAENG
DECEMBER
14, 2023
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/dictator-trump-troops-border-1234929369/
Donald
Trump’s plans to give himself sweeping powers on “day one” of a new
administration include sending vast numbers of U.S. troops — potentially
“hundreds of thousands” — to close the southern border and to help build a new
network of immigrant detention camps, three people familiar with the situation
tell Rolling Stone.
Trump and
some of his lieutenants have repeatedly stated that any second administration
must treat migrant crossings as a “war” on American soil. During Trump’s first
term, officials and attorneys had thwarted similar plans for a military police
force at the border due to legal fears, according to former top officials such
as Secretary of Defense Mark Esper.
Now, the
former president is determined to surround himself with aides and MAGA-friendly
lawyers who can make such draconian policies “perfectly legal” in a potential
second term, two sources close to Trump say. While a second Trump
administration is far from certain, groups like the American Civil Liberties
Union are nonetheless preparing for a possible blitz of orders involving
military authorities should he win, lawyers and activists say.
Over the
past year, Trump and some of his closest allies have talked about how they
would immediately deploy a “surge” of federal troops to the U.S.-Mexico border
to seal it, should Trump win reelection next year, according to three people
familiar with the matter. At times, Trump has expressed a desire to send what
one source describes as “many thousands” of U.S. troops to close the southern
border and implement his draconian vision. Another source familiar with the
matter recalls Trump has said the operation may require anywhere between tens
of thousands — even hundreds of thousands — of troops.
“I have
heard anywhere between 100,000 to 300,000 from President Trump, Stephen Miller,
and others on what may be required to get the job done right,” one of the
people familiar with the matter says. “There are differences of opinion on how
many you would actually need, and everyone has their own ideas.… Nothing is set
in stone.”
Since the
1980s, presidents of both parties have sent active-duty and National Guard
troops to the U.S. border, often with the support of Congress. Those
deployments have often involved troops performing either support or
administrative functions in order to allow Customs and Border Protection
officers to focus on law enforcement. During his first administration, Trump
sent more than 5,000 National Guard troops to the border, where they assisted
in support activities like stringing concertina wire along the border with
Mexico.
At the
time, Trump would repeatedly grumble about how this act was a half-measure and
complained that “disloyal” administration officials kept him from sending a
larger force to the southern border, according to a former senior
administration official.
Those
instincts prompted a clash between Trump’s top immigration aide Miller and
Secretary of Defense Mark Esper. At the outset of the Covid-19 pandemic, Miller
began drafting a plan for another deployment, which would have called for
sending 250,000 troops to seal the border with Mexico, according to The New
York Times. An angry Esper reportedly intervened and thwarted the idea.
The
tentative strategy for a second Trump term — using the active-duty military in
a direct law-enforcement role on the border — may be a continuation of Miller’s
plans. But it represents a break with how presidents have used the military.
Trump and his aides envision using deployed troops to carry out roles currently
prohibited under federal law — including the arrest, detention, and transport
of migrants at the southern border. Doing so would require a historic power
grab in order to enable it, according to both critics and sources close to
Trump.
Trump has
privately weighed invoking the Insurrection Act in order to give himself the
authorities necessary to turn the military into his own border police force.
The act was passed in the 19th century and designed to allow presidents to
provide militia to what were then sparse civilian authorities in the event they
became overwhelmed. Since then, presidents have used those authorities in rare
circumstances, including President Dwight Eisenhower’s use of the 101st
Airborne in Little Rock, Arkansas, following the Supreme Court’s order
desegregating schools.
Beyond a
possible troop surge, Trump and his policy advisers have also considered using
the first day of a second administration to institute an expanded version of
the infamous travel ban (dubbed the “Muslim ban” by critics); direct the
government to begin using the pandemic-era Title 42 restrictions, which allow
the government to turn away migrants on public health grounds; and launch what
he publicly claims would be “the largest domestic deportation operation in
American history,” sources say.
As The New
York Times reported in November, these initiatives would require the
construction of “sprawling camps” to “round up” massive numbers of undocumented
immigrants, and such “plans would sharply restrict both legal and illegal
immigration in a multitude of ways.”
Sources
tell Rolling Stone that the former president and some of his political allies
and counselors have discussed how thousands of federal troops could be used to
rapidly build and manage camps to house undocumented immigrants awaiting
deportation.
Neither
Miller nor a Trump spokesman responded to questions from Rolling Stone.
If Trump is
reelected, immigration law will have “fewer safeguards” and administration
officials are likely to “get even more creative,” American Immigration Council
policy director Aaron Reichlin-Melnick tells Rolling Stone. He says he and
colleagues are already preparing for the worst. “The biggest fear for a future
Trump administration is not just that they would weaponize existing immigration
laws, but they will act in a way — whether with the military, or public-health
laws — that supersedes immigration law.”
The Posse
Comitatus Act bars American presidents from using the military as a domestic
police force, as Trump’s border militarization plans demand. But in a second
administration, Trump may be able to sidestep those restrictions by invoking
the Insurrection Act.
“The
problem with the Insurrection Act is that it is not the carefully crafted
break-glass-in-case-of-emergency kind of tool that it should be,” Joseph Nunn,
a counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice, explains. “Instead, the
Insurrection Act gives essentially unlimited discretion to the president to use
the military as a domestic police force.”
Both courts
and Congress have historically granted presidents broad discretion in
determining when to invoke the act, and presidents have largely been cautious
in requesting those powers, Nunn says.
But Trump’s
recent talk of a limited dictatorship and his history of disregarding norms
raise questions about how far he would take the already broad authorities
granted by the Insurrection Act.
MAGA policy
wonks and former Trump administration officials who have talked to Trump about
these matters predict that if he were reelected and actually went through with
much of this, doing so would likely spark a wave of resignations, two sources
with knowledge of the situation say.
Those two
sources say they expect that Trump’s authoritarian plans for an immigration
crackdown in a second administration would likely prompt high-profile
resignations among senior military officers fearful of executing unlawful
orders.
“We hope
that the military, as well as all sectors of the government and society, would
push back, as well,” says Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s national
Immigrants’ Rights Project. But whether or not Trump faces any meaningful
pushback from within over his immigration plans, “we are prepared to use every
tool we have to combat that, including litigation,” he adds.
Despite the
discussions taking place within Trump’s inner circle, it remains unclear just
how far a reelected Trump would ultimately go. The border policy discussions
taking place at the upper echelons of Trumpland remain fluid, and other sources
close to Trump stress that any plans for a war zone-type deployment of troops
could easily be scaled back.
In public,
the ex-president has hinted at his desire to turn at least some of them into a
reality. “Upon my inauguration I will immediately terminate every open-borders
policy of the Biden administration,” Trump told his fans during an Iowa rally
in September. “I’ll make clear that we must use any and all resources needed to
stop the invasion, including moving thousands of troops currently stationed
overseas.”
That
rhetoric matches what Trump has said in private. In one conversation earlier
this year, a longtime Trump ally relays to Rolling Stone, the ex-president said
his advisers had told him that building up the kind of military border force he
wants may require pulling American troops “from Germany” or other nations, then
redeploying them for the U.S.-Mexico border.
Miles
Taylor, a former Trump Department of Homeland Security official, says he saw
similar ideas from the then-president thwarted by attorneys. At times, Taylor
says, he learned that Trump had told his White House chief of staff, John
Kelly, and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen that he wanted to send
“hundreds of thousands of troops to the southern border to handle enforcement
and stop the ‘invasion.’”
“Whenever
he’d bring this up, he would be repeatedly told that that would be illegal and
violate the Posse Comitatus Act, to which he’d demand that the administration
lawyers needed to ‘find a way’ to make it legal,” Taylor recalls. Faced with
inaction by administration attorneys, Trump often forgot about the issue and
moved on.
“If he gets
reelected, I think it would be foolish to think he would just let it go again,”
Taylor says.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário