Why the Dutch election result spells trouble for
Europe’s climate efforts
Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party wants to undo the green
transition.
BY ZIA
WEISE
NOVEMBER
23, 2023 9:21 PM CET
The
far-right party that surged to victory in Wednesday’s Dutch election wants to
ditch all efforts to stop climate change.
About a
quarter of Dutch voters backed Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party (PVV), whose
platform includes exiting the Paris climate accord, dismantling domestic green
legislation, and scrapping measures to reduce planet-warming emissions.
While
right-wing politicians from Scandinavia to Italy have won big over the past
year, this is the first time a party openly calling for an end to the green
transition has won a national election in the European Union.
To govern,
Wilders needs to convince several other parties to join the PVV in a coalition,
and even if he succeeds, he may still not end up as prime minister. But whether
in government or as the loudest opposition block, Wilders and the PVV will have
significant influence on setting climate policy in the Netherlands — a country
that has prided itself on being among Europe’s most ambitious in tackling
global warming.
Coming just
ahead of the EU elections next summer, the PVV’s victory also reflects a wider
shift that may spell trouble for Europe's climate efforts in the coming years.
What exactly happened?
Running on
an anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim platform, the PVV scored a surprise election
victory, winning 37 of 150 parliamentary seats, according to preliminary
results.
The
second-placed Labor-Green alliance, led by former EU climate chief Frans
Timmermans, is far behind on 25 seats, while the liberal People’s Party for
Freedom and Democracy (VVD) of outgoing PM Mark Rutte is projected to come
third with 24 seats.
What does the PVV say about climate change?
“The
climate is always changing,” the PVV asserts in its election manifesto,
disregarding the current rapid warming trend driven by humanity’s fossil fuel
consumption. “When conditions change we adapt … by raising dikes when
necessary.”
In general,
the party wants to “stop the hysterical reduction of CO2,” which it considers
unnecessary and a waste of money.
The PVV
wants to rip up the Dutch Climate Act, which enshrines the country’s climate
targets in law. It also wants to withdraw from the Paris Agreement.
“The
Climate Act, the [global] climate accord and all other climate measures go
straight into the shredder,” the party manifesto says.
The PVV
wants to build more nuclear power plants, but opposes wind energy and
large-scale solar parks. Its demands include keeping coal and gas power plants
open and stepping up oil and gas extraction in the North Sea. A new €35 billion
climate fund should be scrapped, the party says.
Did that play a role in the election?
With the
campaign dominated by immigration issues, voters might not have backed the PVV
because of its anti-green stance.
“But at
minimum, they were okay with it, provided they were going to deliver on stuff
they did care about — like immigrants, health care, law and order,” said Pieter
de Pous, who focuses on the green transition at think tank E3G.
Isn’t the country sinking?
The
low-lying country is at high risk of rising sea levels and flooding, while also
grappling with growing water scarcity and drought in recent years.
The PVV
acknowledges that’s a problem, but says the country can just adapt to those
changes by building higher dikes and restoring river plains. “We should no
longer allow ourselves to be frightened. The Netherlands is a smart country: we
have the best water engineers in the world,” the PVV manifesto states.
It’s a
common view, de Pous said. “Many Dutch feel like they can handle the floods,
because we handled it in the past, we’re clever engineers, that sort of stuff.
That’s getting in the way of realizing that there are limits to adaptation.”
Will all this become government policy?
Definitely
not all. The PVV will need coalition partners to govern. Wilders said that he
might try to build a coalition with the VVD, the centrist New Social Contract
(NSC), and the right-wing populist Farmer-Citizen Movement (BBB).
While
there’s some overlap — the NSC, too, wants to scrap the climate fund — the
other parties are more moderate on energy and climate. But as that’s the case
with most policy issues, parties willing to join the PVV in a coalition need to
pick their battles, and whether they’ll fight for better green policies is an
open question.
With the
campaign dominated by immigration issues, voters might not have backed the PVV
because of its anti-green stance | Carl Court/Getty Images
The
centrist parties might also drop the PVV and try to build a left-leaning
coalition with the Labor-Green alliance, although Timmermans has hinted that he
sees himself joining the opposition benches.
What does that mean on the EU level?
The
Netherlands has in recent years emerged as one of the most ambitious EU
countries on climate change. That’s likely to change under a coalition
government involving the PVV.
“It’s
likely that it will join the other side of the member state groupings, that are
a bit more of a brake on climate ambition,” said de Pous. “That, I think, is a
serious risk.”
Does this
reflect a wider trend?
Many
far-right parties in Europe hold skeptical or even outright denialist views on
climate change, but there’s also been considerable backsliding on green issues
among European center-right parties this year. Polling indicates that the next
European Parliament will lean more conservative.
That’s a
stark shift from the previous EU election in 2019, when green-minded parties
made gains, spurred on by massive climate protests like the Fridays for Future
school strikes.
No. Polling
this summer showed that 77 percent of EU citizens see climate change as a very
serious problem — in the Netherlands, it was even ranked as the most serious
problem facing the world.
But other
issues appear more urgent to many voters. This time around, concerns over cost
of living, immigration and conflicts encircling the Continent have overtaken
climate change in voters’ rankings of the most pressing problems.
Immigration,
in particular, surged past climate in the most recent Eurobarometer survey.
One lesson
from the Dutch election is that “as long as migration in Europe is seen as
primarily a problem and a threat, [far-right] parties will do really well,” de
Pous said. “And on the back of it, they will also be an obstacle to the green
transition.”


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário