Geert Wilders’ anti-Islam Party for Freedom predicted
to win 35 seats in 150-seat parliament
Jon Henley,
Pjotr Sauer and Senay Boztas in Amsterdam
Wed 22 Nov
2023 21.29 GMT
Geert
Wilders’ far-right, anti-Islam Party for Freedom (PVV) is on course to be the
largest party in the Dutch parliament, according to exit polls, in a major
electoral upset whose reverberations will be felt around Europe.
The PVV,
whose manifesto includes calls for bans on mosques, the Qur’an and Islamic
headscarves in government buildings, was predicted to win 35 seats in the
150-seat parliament, more than double the number it won in the previous ballot
in 2021.
However, it
is unclear whether Wilders – whose party has finished second and third in
previous elections, but always been shut out of government – will be able to
win enough support to form a coalition with a working parliamentary majority.
“I call on
the parties,” Wilders said in an initial reaction after the vote. “The campaign
is over and the voters have spoken. Now we will have to look for agreements
with each other. With a wonderful position of 35 seats, the PVV can no longer
be ignored.”
He insisted
in his victory speech that he was “confident we can reach an agreement”,
adding: “I understand perfectly well we should not take any measures that would
be unconstitutional.”
Far-right
figures across Europe including Hungary’s Viktor Orbán, France’s Marine Le Pen,
Matteo Salvini in Italy and Germany’s AfD rushed to congratulate the PVV
leader. But the heads of the three other biggest Dutch parties have all said
they would not serve in a PVV-led cabinet.
A
left-leaning GreenLeft-Labour party alliance (GL/PvdA) led by former EU
commissioner Frans Timmermans, forecast to finish second on 25 seats, has said
it would not enter any coalition with the PVV as a member, as has campaigning
centre-right MP Pieter Omtzigt’s centrist New Social Contract (NSC) party,
which is in fourth place with 20 seats.
The
liberal-conservative Party for Freedom and Democracy of the outgoing prime
minister, Mark Rutte, whose projected 24 seats would leave it in third place,
has said it was open to the idea – but this week ruled out supporting Wilders
as prime minister.
“I have
said I can’t see that happening, because Wilders cannot form a majority,” said
Rutte’s successor as VVD leader, the outgoing justice minister, Dilan
Yeşilgöz-Zegerius. “But it’s his move now. He has to show whether he can form a
majority.”
Wilders,
who has been under police protection since 2004 and in 2016 was convicted of
discrimination after he called Moroccans “scum” at a campaign rally, is likely
to start sounding other party leaders out on Friday.
Although
the party that wins the most seats traditionally provides the next prime
minister, it is by no means guaranteed to do so. Rutte will remain in a
caretaker role until a new government is installed, which might not be before
next spring.
The outcome
of the election, set to usher in the Netherlands’ first new prime minister in
13 years after four consecutive Rutte-led coalitions, could lead to
“constitutional stalemate”, said Kate Parker of the Economist Intelligence
Unit.
Analysts
have predicted that coalition negotiations could prove even longer and more
complex than after the previous 2021 election, when four coalition partners
took a record 271 days to hammer out an agreement.
The shape
of the new coalition could have a major impact on the Netherlands’ immigration
and climate policies, as well as relations with its European partners. The
country was a founding EU member and punches above its weight in the bloc.
Rutte’s
fourth and final coalition resigned in July after failing to agree on measures
to rein in migration, one of the key issues of the campaign, along with a
housing crisis that especially affects Dutch youth, the cost of living, and
voter trust in politicians.
Wilders is
an outspoken Eurosceptic and has long campaigned for the Dutch government to
take back control of the country’s borders to reduce immigration, slash
payments into the union’s budget and veto any further expansion of the EU. He
has also demanded the Netherlands stop sending arms to Ukraine.
Wilders has
recently attempted to soften his more hardline anti-Islam language, apparently
in hopes of entering a coalition government for the first time, conceding that
there were “bigger problems” than bringing down refugee numbers, and that he
could put some of his anti-Muslim positions “on ice”.
He would be
“prime minister for everyone” in the Netherlands, he promised during the
campaign, “regardless of their religion, background, sex or whatever”, adding
that the cost of living crisis was a bigger priority.
Tom van der
Meer, a political scientist at the University of Amsterdam, described the
result as “the biggest shift we have ever seen in the Netherlands”. Wilders had
surfed a wave of anti-immigration sentiment and frustration with cross-party
coalitions, he told the public broadcaster NOS.
Voting took
place in polling stations including the Anne Frank and Van Gogh museums in
Amsterdam, with voters facing a choice of 26 parties – 18 of which could enter
parliament – in one of Europe’s most fragmented political landscapes.
At the De
Duif church in Amsterdam, Lisa, a 28-year-old architect, said she had decided
to vote “tactically” for the GreenLeft-Labour alliance to prevent Wilders’
far-right PVV from becoming the biggest party.
“I realised
I had to vote for GreenLeft-Labour because I don’t want PVV to win,” she said.
“The environment and cost of living crisis are the most important topics for
me. I don’t foresee a leftwing government, but this is the least I can do.”
Lisette,
47, a consultant, said she had decided to vote for the the VVD because of the
“long-term stability the party brings”. “Internationally, I have been very
happy with the way Rutte has presented our country,” she added.
Stijn, 26,
a student, voted for the pro-farmer BBB movement. “I know how hard it is for
them,” he said. “My parents are farmers and I know first-hand how much they
struggle. Other parties go too far with their climate change proposals.”
Voting at
the Anne Frank museum, Mirjam Stoker, 52, said she had opted for Green-Labour
because she was “a bit scared of the PVV”. “The government needs to stay a bit
in the middle,” she said.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário