Facebook crisis grows as new whistleblower and
leaked documents emerge
Company under fire as news reports detail spread of
misinformation and conspiracy theories even as staff raised concerns
An anonymous whistleblower told the Washington Post
they had submitted a complaint to the SEC.
Kari Paul
in San Francisco and Dani Anguiano in Los Angeles
Sat 23 Oct
2021 03.25 BST
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/oct/22/facebook-whistleblower-hate-speech-illegal-report
Facebook
faced mounting pressure on Friday after a new whistleblower accused it of
knowingly hosting hate speech and illegal activity, even as leaked documents
shed further light on how the company failed to heed internal concerns over
election misinformation.
Allegations
by the new whistleblower, who spoke to the Washington Post, were reportedly
contained in a complaint to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the US
agency that handles regulation to protect investors in publicly traded
companies.
In the
complaint, the former employee detailed how Facebook officials frequently
declined to enforce safety rules for fear of angering Donald Trump and his
allies or offsetting the company’s huge growth. In one alleged incident, Tucker
Bounds, a Facebook communications official, dismissed concerns about the
platform’s role in 2016 election manipulation.
“It will be
a flash in the pan,” Bounds said, according to the affidavit, as reported by
the Post. “Some legislators will get pissy. And then in a few weeks they will
move on to something else. Meanwhile, we are printing money in the basement,
and we are fine.”
The claims
echo those of the whistleblower Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product
manager who has said the company repeatedly prioritizes profit over public
safety. Haugen’s recent damning testimony before the US Congress, and
forthcoming testimony before the UK parliament, has prompted a major PR crisis
for the social network, which is said to be readying plans for a rebrand.
The
whistleblower claims came on the same day that news outlets, including the New
York Times, the Washington Post and NBC, published reports based on internal
documents shared by Haugen. The documents offer a deeper look into the spread
of misinformation and conspiracy theories on the platform, particularly related
to the 2020 US presidential election.
The
documents show that Facebook employees repeatedly flagged concerns before and
after the election, when Donald Trump tried to falsely overturn Joe Biden’s
victory. According to the New York Times, a company data scientist told
coworkers a week after the election that 10% of all US views of political
content were of posts that falsely claimed the vote was fraudulent. But as
workers flagged these issues and urged the company to act, the company failed
or struggled to address the problems, the Times reported.
The
internal documents also show Facebook researchers have found the platform’s
recommendation tools repeatedly pushed users to extremist groups, prompting
internal warnings that some managers and executives ignored, NBC News reported.
In one
striking internal study, a Facebook researcher created a fake profile for
“Carol Smith”, conservative female user whose interests included Fox News and
Donald Trump. The experiment showed that within two days, Facebook’s algorithm
was recommending “Carol” join groups dedicated to QAnon, a baseless internet
conspiracy theory.
The reports
come as Facebook faces pressure from lawmakers on various fronts – including
pending legislation from Congress, a lawsuit filed by US attorneys general, and
a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit filed by the agency’s new chairwoman, Lina
Khan.
Facebook
watchdogs say the latest whistleblower accounts of wrongdoing underscore the
need to regulate the platform.
“It’s time
for Congress and the Biden administration to investigate a Facebook business
model that profits from spreading the most extreme hate and disinformation,”
said Jessica J González, co-CEO of the civil rights organization Free Press
Action. “It’s time for immediate action to hold the company accountable for the
many harms it’s inflicted on our democracy.”
Responding
to the Post about the whistleblower’s claims, Bounds said: “Being asked about a
purported one-on-one conversation four years ago with a faceless person, with
no other sourcing than the empty accusation itself, is a first for me.”
Erin
McPike, a Facebook spokeswoman, also criticized the Post’s reporting, saying in
a statement to the news organization that it set “a dangerous precedent to hang
an entire story on a single source making a wide range of claims without any
apparent corroboration”.
“This is
beneath the Washington Post, which during the last five years would only report
stories after deep reporting with corroborating sources,” she told the Guardian
in a statement.
But the
reports align with what others have shared about the company. Haugen in her
testimony stated that Facebook at one point tweaked its algorithm to improve
safety and decrease inflammatory content but abandoned the changes after the
election, a decision that Haugen tied directly to the 6 January riot at the
Capitol. Facebook also disbanded the civic integrity team after the election.
“As soon as
the election was over, they turned them back off or they changed the settings
back to what they were before, to prioritize growth over safety. And that
really feels like a betrayal of democracy to me,” she said in her testimony on
5 October.
Referring
to the algorithm change, Haugen added: “Facebook has realized that if they
change the algorithm to be safer, people will spend less time on the site,
they’ll click on less ads, and [Facebook] will make less money.”
Haugen’s
own SEC filings alleged that Facebook leadership avoided reporting such issues
in SEC filings available to investors. The SEC is tasked with scrutinizing
whether public firms should disclose such information to investors.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário