Why would anyone trust Brexit Britain again?
Analysis by
Hanna Ziady, CNN Business
Updated
0854 GMT (1654 HKT) July 24, 2021
London (CNN
Business)Just seven months after singing its praises, British Prime Minister
Boris Johnson is attempting to rewrite the Brexit deal he signed with the
European Union.
It's a
risky move that will undermine Britain's credibility as a trustworthy trading
partner at the very moment that the UK government is seeking to forge economic
alliances far beyond Europe to justify its "global Britain" sales
pitch for Brexit, according to experts.
EU
officials have already rejected the UK call for a renegotiation, which trade
experts say amounts to a brazen attempt to press the European Union to agree to
demands that it already rejected during several rounds of talks.
Other
countries watching the drama unfold will proceed with caution when it comes to
dealing with the United Kingdom, according to L. Alan Winters of the UK Trade
Policy Observatory at the University of Sussex in England.
"It
certainly does raise questions about the trustworthiness of this
government," he told CNN Business. "I don't think it will lead to the
complete cessation of negotiations between the UK and other countries, but I
think it will make it a little bit more difficult," he added.
Boris
Johnson's 'global Britain' needs more than a tiny
Australian trade deal
Boris
Johnson's 'global Britain' needs more than a tiny Australian trade deal
To be
clear, the UK government's capricious behavior is a bad look, but it won't
necessarily prove fatal to future trade alliances. It could, however, weaken
its negotiating position.
"The
UK is a substantial economy," and is an "attractive trade partner in
many ways," said Simon Usherwood, a professor of politics and
international studies at The Open University in England.
Potential
partners, such as New Zealand and other Pacific nations, may just insist on
more robust ways to settle disputes in case the United Kingdom tried to
backtrack on a deal, he told CNN Business.
"If
you wanted a trade deal with the UK, now is probably the best time to get one
on your own terms," Usherwood added, pointing to the highly accommodating
deal the UK government granted Australia. "The UK is in a tight situation.
It needs to show that leaving the EU was a worthwhile venture."
Chaos in Northern Ireland
For now at
least, the UK government's approach will further strain relations with the
European Union, still the country's biggest trading partner by a long way.
At the
heart of the issue is the Northern Ireland Protocol, which was included in the
Brexit deal to avoid the return of a physical border between Northern Ireland,
which is part of the United Kingdom, and Ireland, which is a member of the
European Union.
Border
checks and guard posts disappeared following the 1998 Good Friday Agreement
that brought peace to the island of Ireland after 30 years of violent conflict
between Catholic nationalists, who want a unified country, and Protestants who
are loyal to the United Kingdom.
The
European Union worried that a physical barrier could once again become a source
of tension, and it would not agree to police the border between Ireland and
Northern Ireland to protect the integrity of the EU market. Johnson, who helped
lead the campaign for Brexit, instead agreed that Northern Ireland would remain
subject to EU market rules, and to check goods flowing from the United Kingdom
to Northern Ireland.
But those
new checks on goods moving between mainland Britain and Northern Ireland have
created chaos, upending supply chains, adding costs to businesses and reducing
the availability of certain products in Northern Ireland supermarkets.
According to the UK government, at least 200 businesses in Britain have stopped
servicing the nation due to post-Brexit red tape.
On
Thursday, the British Generic Manufacturers Association, a trade body for
manufacturers of generic medicines, said onerous new trading rules have forced
its companies to put on notice over 2,000 medicines for withdrawal from
Northern Ireland.
The UK
government now wants "significant change" to the Protocol, which it
acknowledges in a paper published this week is the cause of "most of the
current friction" with the European Union. It is effectively trying to
renegotiate a deal it agreed to seven months ago, putting forward proposals that
it knows the European Union cannot accept.
The paper
"reads like a client's submission to their divorce lawyer — full of
blame-shifting, faux sadness and passive aggression," Winters and Michael
Gasiorek of the UK Trade Policy Observatory wrote in a blog on Thursday.
"It
reflects weakness and can only serve to diminish the Government's international
standing," they added.
The United
Kingdom has a lot at stake. Brexit has added costs to British exporters,
knocking trade with their most important market and hurting economic growth in
the long run. It needs new trade deals to offset some of the damage caused by
Brexit.
But if it
fails to honor treaties it has already signed, the UK government might find it
more difficult to secure agreements on favorable terms with other countries,
including the United States.
The threat to 'global Britain'
"We
will not agree to a renegotiation of the Protocol," European Commission
Vice President Maroš Šefčovič said in a statement on Wednesday.
"Respecting international legal obligations is of paramount
importance," he added.
This
sentiment is shared by Jacinda Ardern, the prime minister of New Zealand — a
country with which Britain is currently engaged in trade talks and which has
the power to prevent it from joining the Comprehensive and Progressive
Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).
The CPTPP
is an 11-country free trade pact that includes Mexico, Australia, Canada and
Singapore. While it won't compensate for the economic losses arising from
Brexit, it has nonetheless been described by UK Trade Secretary Liz Truss as a
"glittering post-Brexit prize."
In a speech
to the New Zealand Institute of International Affairs earlier this month,
Ardern said that New Zealand had agreed to negotiations that will pave the way
for the United Kingdom to join the partnership.
"CPTPP
is our highest quality agreement," she added. "Those aspiring to join
will have to be able to meet its high standards."
Some trade
experts interpreted the comment as being directed at Britain. "If it
wasn't intended for the UK it was a completely wasted breath," Winters
told CNN Business.
Even more
pointed warnings have come from other quarters. For any UK government, a trade
deal with the United States would be by far the biggest economic victory of a
post-Brexit Britain.
That has
always looked a long shot, given that neither former President Donald Trump nor
current President Joe Biden have had much appetite to sign up to major
international treaties, amid a broader shift away from trade liberalization.
But the UK
government's recent actions aren't helping its cause. In a statement this week,
US Democratic Congressman Brendan Boyle rebuked the UK government's approach to
Northern Ireland and highlighted "strong bipartisan" support for the
Good Friday Agreement.
"The
British government negotiated the Northern Ireland Protocol, agreed to it, and
its Parliament voted for it. Yet almost immediately after it went into effect,
the British government has tried to evade its responsibilities under the
protocol," he said.
"Their
latest statement and proposed changes just continues this trend and serves only
to further destabilize Northern Ireland," he added.
While Biden
has been clear that his focus lies mainly on domestic issues, he has also
repeatedly warned Britain against making the Good Friday Agreement a
"casualty of Brexit."
Bonfire
tradition continues amid post-Brexit tensions
"Biden
has a specific interest in Northern Ireland and its stability, and does view
the UK as the antagonist in that discussion," said Sam Lowe, a senior
research fellow at the Centre for European Reform.
"Ongoing
disputes with the EU over Northern Ireland and threats to renege on commitments
creates a problem with the US, but I'm not convinced it creates huge problems
with any other countries," he added.
David
Henig, UK director at the European Centre for International Political Economy,
said that other countries may view the spat over Northern Ireland as a unique
case.
"Other
countries will certainly be aware that the UK is going back on [its agreements
with the European Union], but each negotiation is separate," Henig said.
"It will not be viewed as a particularly good thing but I'm not sure that
they won't segregate it away from their own discussions. Northern Ireland
clearly is a special case."
With grace
periods on checks on some goods flowing between Britain and Northern Ireland
set to expire at the end of September, including animal products such as
chilled meats, more political wrangling between the United Kingdom and European
Union lies ahead.
"I can
quite easily see this carrying on for quite a while without a change,"
said Henig.
"The
state of uncertainty might become the status quo," added Lowe.
Northern
Ireland will bear the brunt of this sorry state of affairs. But Johnson's dream
of a "global Britain" will also suffer consequences.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário