Republicans continue to embrace Trump's election
lie at rightwing summit
Conservative gathering in Florida has seven sessions
this year focused on voter fraud and election-related issues
Sam Levine
in New York
Sat 27 Feb
2021 08.00 GMT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/feb/27/cpac-republicans-trump-election-lie
Republicans
have continued to embrace the myth of a stolen election the annual rightwing
conclave of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), underscoring
how the party continues to sustain the baseless idea months after Donald
Trump’s loss in the 2020 race and the deadly assault on the Capitol.
This year’s
gathering of some of the party’s most fervent supporters has a staggering seven
sessions focused on voter fraud and election-related issues. Several have
inflammatory titles. “Other culprits, why judges and media refuse to look at
the evidence,” was the name of one panel discussion on Friday. “The left pulled
the strings, covered it up, and even admits it,” was another. “Failed states
(GA, PA, NV, oh my!)” is the title of another scheduled for this weekend.
Several
speakers on Friday repeated debunked falsehoods about the election. Deroy
Murdock, a Fox News contributor, repeated the lie that there were “mysterious
late-night ballot dumps” that swung the election for Joe Biden and that there
were vehicles with out-of-state license plates unloading ballots in the early
hours of the election. Both of those claims have been debunked.
Stoking
fears about fraud and advocating for stricter voting rules has become
commonplace among Republicans in recent years, but in the wake of Trump’s
presidency – and his loss to Biden – it has become a common rallying cry in the
party. Even so, some observers said the focus on fanning the flames of the
conspiracy theory at CPAC was still alarming.
“One
program on lessons learned from voting in 2020 is appropriate to restore trust
for half of America, but not seven!” said Eric Johnson, a former Republican
lawmaker in Georgia who advised Kelly Loeffler’s US Senate campaign.
“Donald
Trump convinced his base – a majority of Republicans, if polls are to be
believed – that the election was stolen. Though the CPAC organizers likely know
it’s false, they’re using this as a wedge issue to excite the base and sell
more tickets,” said Nick Pasternak, who recently left the Republican party
after working on several GOP campaigns.
He added:
“CPAC’s willingness to make the election lie such a big issue this year is a
concerning symbol of what many in the party think – and what they’ll do.”
Even though
dozens of judges across the country, including several appointed by Donald
Trump, rejected claims of fraud after the election, Murdock and other speakers
at CPAC accused judges of being unwilling to examine evidence of fraud.
Hans von
Spakovsky, a well-known conservative who has agitated for more restrictive
voting policies for years, claimed that judges were reluctant to look at
evidence because they feared they would be attacked. “When it becomes an
extraordinary election contest, one with national implications and one in which
they risk being attacked by one of the political parties, the news media, their
reluctance gets even greater,” he said.
Pressed
whether judges were afraid to look at the evidence, Von Spakovsky added: “I
think in some cases that is true, in other cases they might have had valid
procedural grounds, but it sure didn’t look like it to me.”
Asked how
much evidence of fraud there was now, Murdock falsely said: “It may be shredded
by now.”
Jesse
Binnall, an attorney who represented the Trump campaign in Nevada, complained
about the short deadline lawyers had to put together a case after the election
and claimed judges were pressured by media reporting that noted voter fraud was
not a widespread problem. “Right or wrong, they never tried to dig into the
facts about voter fraud,” he said. “Our legs were cut off before we even walked
into the courthouse.”
Litigants
in American courts have to meet procedural thresholds to advance their case,
something that prevents courts from having to hear frivolous claims. Again and
again, Trump and his allies failed to convince courts that they cleared those
bars.
“One might
expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come
formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant
corruption,” Matthew Braun, a federal judge in Pennsylvania, wrote in December
as he tossed out an effort from Trump and his allies to block certification of
the election results there. “Instead, this court has been presented with
strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations …
unsupported by the evidence.”
The
comments at CPAC underscore how Republicans continue to stoke uncertainty about
the election – even after judges and Republican and Democratic elected
officials alike repeatedly examined allegations of wrongdoing and did not find
fraud, they continue to insist that there is unexamined evidence. In state
legislatures across the country, are pushing new restrictions on voting. There
are at least 253 pending bills to restrict voting across the United States,
according to a tally by the Brennan Center for Justice.
In his
remarks on Friday, Von Spakovsky expressed support for efforts to restrict
voting by mail and said HR1, the bill pending in Congress that would require
automatic and same-day registration, among other reforms, “the most
anti-democratic bill I’ve ever seen during my 20 years in Washington”.
Jay
Williams, a Republican strategist in Georgia, said the focus on elections was a
way to gin up support among the party’s faithful base, which remains largely
loyal to Trump and his allies.
“I would
not equate ‘the party’ with CPAC so I wouldn’t put much stock in it from that
perspective,” he said. “CPAC exists to make money and so it’s no surprise to me
the organizers have jumped on to this issue as a way to drive engagement of
their target market.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário