domingo, 28 de fevereiro de 2016

Germany 'threatens to close borders to refugees' to put pressure on its neighbours



Germany 'threatens to close borders to refugees' to put pressure on its neighbours

The interior minister has apparently ordered officials to draw up plans to close the borders, according to sources close to Thomas de Maiziere

By Justin Huggler, Berlin6:11PM GMT 28 Feb 2016

Germany is threatening to close its borders to asylum seekers in an attempt to pressure other governments into doing more to solve the migrant crisis.
While Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, insists she wants to keep Europe’s borders open, plans leaked to German newspaper on Sunday suggest that her government is drawing up measures to reinstate its own national controls.
In what Welt am Sonntag newspaper called a “clear threat to the EU”, sources said that Germany was considering turning away asylum seekers at the border.
Such a move could leave countries that have been critical of Mrs Merkel’s “open-door” refugee policy struggling to cope with hundreds of thousands of migrants.
Sources close to Thomas de Maiziere, the interior minister, told Welt am Sonntag that he had ordered officials to draw up plans to close the borders.
“For de Maiziere, the time of waving the refugees through is over,” the sources said.
Sigmar Gabriel, Germany vice-chancellor, has commissioned a report on the possible economic consequences of closing Germany’s borders.
In Bavaria, the state government has ordered police to make preliminary preparations to reintroduce permanent border controls and start turning away asylum seekers.
Any closure of Germany’s borders would have to be approved by Mrs Merkel.
The latest moves appear to be an attempt to pressure other governments ahead of an EU-Turkey summit next Monday.
Mr de Maiziere has decided the summit will be the “turning point”, according to Welt.
If EU leaders cannot agree a joint strategy to tackle the crisis at the meeting, Germany is prepared to take unilateral action.
Mrs Merkel has been leading negotiations for EU states to take in a fixed quota of Syrian refugees from Turkey in exchange for Turkish help reducing the flow of migrants into Europe.
But she has faced growing opposition from a number of European countries, who say they will not accept quotas.
Austria and several eastern European counties have called for Greece’s northern borders to be closed as an alternative way to stop the influx.
That has left Greece fearful it will be left to deal with the crisis alone.
Mr de Maiziere’s move appears to be an attempt to turn the tables on other European governments, warning that if Germany closes its borders they will be left to deal with the influx.
Germany is understood to have drawn up plans to turn asylum seekers away by enforcing the EU’s Dublin regulations, under which asylum seekers must register their claim in the first member state they reach.
That could leave countries across the continent scrambling to send refugees back to their first point of entry in the EU.
While other governments have attacked Mrs Merkel’s “open-door” refugee policy, Germany has long complained that has been left to shoulder most of the burden alone.

What's Wrong with Saxony? A Search for the Roots of Fear and Racism / DER SPIEGEL


What's Wrong with Saxony? A Search for the Roots of Fear and Racism

By Maximilian Popp, Andreas Wassermann and Steffen Winter
February 25, 2016 – 07:05 PM

For a time after reunification, Saxony was widely considered an eastern German success story. Lately, however, the state's image has darkened. Weekly Pegida marches combined with an ongoing rash of anti-immigrant attacks are raising uncomfortable questions.

Horst Hirsch saw it all coming. He warned that all of Germany could start looking like Duisburg or Cologne, metropolises with a large and visible immigrant populations. He warned that the country would begin losing its identity in the face of foreign influence. He wondered out loud: "Do we want our country to become Islamic?"
Hirsch, a 72-year-old from the Erzgebirge Mountains in southern Saxony, made his comments on Jan. 21, 2015, almost a full year before the New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Cologne. He was at a meeting of 300 citizens of Saxony who had gathered in Dresden's International Congress Center to talk about asylum and integration with political leaders. For weeks, the anti-immigrant group Pegida had been marching on the streets of Dresden and the state government wanted to counter that movement with an open dialogue. By chance, Hirsch ended up at a table with Saxony Governor Stanislaw Tillich, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union.
That evening, Hirsch said he was concerned about becoming a foreigner in his own country and that he was worried about the "militant ideology of Islam." It was also the evening when Tillich, seated at table 26, made a clear statement: "Islam does not belong to Germany."

One year later, the Saxony governor doesn't have second thoughts about his statement that night. But he is beginning to despair of his state. It is a sunny morning at the end of January in Dresden and frost still covers the meadows on the banks of the Elbe River as it meanders through the city. Tillich opens his office window in the state capital building to let in some fresh air.

Every Monday, Tillich has to watch as thousands of his fellow Saxons march through the historical town center waving Pegida flags. Many among them have long supported the CDU, but now accuse Tillich of being a "Volksverräter," a Nazi-era term that means "traitor to one's people." The governor feels isolated on such days. Where are the churches, the labor unions, the business community and the artists? Why are there so few people standing up to Pegida? "It is a challenge for all of society," Tillich says.

A Riddle of Significant Concern

The weekly protests against the presumed demise of the West have been ongoing in Dresden for more than 12 months, and they are set to continue. Pegida organizers have already reserved city-center squares for their demonstrations through the end of March.

What is wrong with Saxony? It is a riddle that is of significant concern to Tillich and also one that has people across the country shaking their heads. It has also attracted attention internationally, with Time magazine recently putting a Pegida demonstration on its cover along with the headline: "Unwelcome."

Recently, the state's image has become even darker. Last Thursday evening, an angry mob chanting "we are the people" blocked a bus full of refugees from pulling into an initial reception facility in the city of Clausnitz, near Saxony's border with the Czech Republic. The resulting video, which clearly shows the fear of the refugees inside the bus, some of them children, quickly spread around the country and beyond. Then, on Saturday night, a planned refugee hostel in the Saxon city of Bautzen, just east of Dresden, went up in flames in what police are now calling an arson attack. Some onlookers attempted to prevent the fire department from extinguishing the blaze and "demonstrated their undisguised pleasure that the building was on fire and that asylum-seekers likely won't be able to move in very soon," Thomas Knaut, from the Bautzen police, told SPIEGEL ONLINE.

The state's image has suffered tremendously as a result of such blatant racism and the negative effects on its economy have become noticeable. Tourists are staying away and scientists from abroad are cancelling planned visits to Saxon research institutes and universities, not wanting to spend time in Pegida's homeland. The xenophobic demonstrations "are destroying Dresden's image in the world," complains Christian Thielemann, principal conductor at the Staatskapelle Dresden, the city's celebrated orchestra. He would like to see a ban on demonstrations in the city center.

Prior to the beginning of the Pegida marches, the city was famed for its high culture: the Grünes Gewölbe (Green Vault) museum, with its treasure chamber created by August the Strong, the Staatsschauspiel theater, the city's collection of masters, both new and old. A 2012 PISA study found the state's education system to be the best in Germany and Dresden is widely considered to be an economic motor of the former East Germany. But now? Anti-immigrant groups in the state register around 40 demonstrations per week. One-fifth of all attacks on refugee hostels in Germany occurred in Saxony last year, according to Mediendienst Integration, an organization which assembles facts and statistics pertaining to refugees in Germany. Leipzig Police President Bernd Merbitz has warned of a "pogrom-like atmosphere" against migrants in the state.

It has often been said in recent months that the public mood regarding refugees in Germany is in danger of becoming nasty. In Saxony, it already has. The state offers a prime example for what happens when civil society partly fails and when discourse is non-existent.

Thankful for Pegida

In Flöha, a town near Chemnitz, Horst Hirsch is sitting in the small kitchen of his ground-floor apartment, pictures of his eight grandchildren and four children hang on the wall behind him. An amicable man with silver hair, eyeglasses and a full beard, he was monitored by the East German secret police, the Stasi, before the Wall fell and his children were not allowed to enroll in university. He earned his living working for an Evangelical youth group.

The table is set with blue-onion patterned tableware and a flagpole rises outside. Next to the kitchen window hangs the Order of Merit of the Federal Republic of Germany, which he received in 2003 from then-German President Johannes Rau for his involvement in youth work, for his principled resistance to the East German regime and for his engagement on behalf of Roma from Romania.

This same Horst Hirsch has taken part in Pegida demonstrations -- out of curiosity, he says. But also because he is happy "that there are people who open their mouths. That releases some of the pressure." Hirsch thinks that Germany should be thankful for Pegida "because step-by-step politicians have adopted positions long demanded by the demonstrators from Dresden."

Hirsch believes the German government has moved to the left, a shift that isn't popular in eastern Germany, he says. He sees the reemergence of old socialist ideologies that promise people a kind of paradise. One example, he says, is Merkel's refugee-crisis insistence that "we can manage it." It is, he says, an attempt to manipulate the populace in accordance with one's own needs and to silence critical voices. "People in the east notice such things because we've seen it before. We've experienced forced education and patronizing," he says. People, he goes on, don't want Islam and the refugees have to respect the country's traditions instead of "putting on airs." But what are the country's traditions? "Christianity. That's what defines the social order in Germany."

Statistics show that 4 percent of the populace in Saxony is Catholic and 19 percent Protestant. Fully 75 percent are unaffiliated with any religion. Forty years of socialism effectively drove religion out of the state. Hirsch is nevertheless convinced that this religious tradition holds the state together. And that Islam represents a threat to this traditional social order. The events in Cologne on New Year's Eve, which saw hundreds of women being sexually abused on the public square in front of the train station by a mob made up primarily of migrants, proves as much, he believes. He argues that the state must crack down and the police must become more proactive. Incidents like in Cologne, he says, "are the first fruits of negligent politics."

Fear of Multiculturalism

But why haven't people in western Germany drawn the same conclusions? Why have there been no mass protests there? Hirsch believes it is simply because western Germans are out of practice. Eastern Germans realized in 1989 that taking to the streets can lead to change. Although Saxons are cosmopolitan people, Hirsch says, they are afraid of the ideology of Islam and of multiculturalism. He believes that the demonstrations in Dresden will continue. "Because the problem is ongoing and because there are no significant elections approaching that might change things."

The conversation with Horst Hirsch in his kitchen was largely congenial. He didn't refer to journalists as the "lying press" as Pegida does, instead calmly presenting his point of view. Could such a discussion perhaps be the foundation for a broader societal debate?

Not long later, Horst Hirsch sent a furious email to the SPIEGEL editorial offices. He was upset about a critical cover story about the right-wing populist party Alternative for Germany (AfD) and suddenly no longer wanted to be quoted by name in a "leftist organ," which is why we have chosen to use a pseudonym, Horst Hirsch, to refer to him. During the interview, he was pleased by the attempt to start a dialogue, but in the email, he made it clear that the conversation was over. "Even the sweetest broth tastes terrible if the pot is dirty," he wrote.

It is difficult to understand why it is Saxony where the rhetoric has grown so radical, positions so obdurate and space for exchange and compromise so limited.

Many people have been monitoring this development for quite some time, and one of them is Omar Allham. He, too, has taken part in marches in Dresden -- counterdemonstrations protesting against Islamphobia and fears of foreigners felt by people like Hirsch. Born in Syria, Allham joined a demonstration of perhaps 150 people on a central square in Dresden to defend the city's diversity against thousands of Pegida fans. Allham still can't understand why more people didn't show up. "You have to show that Dresden is more than just Pegida," he says.

Allham has been living in the Saxon capital for 22 years. He came to East Germany from Damascus in 1986 to study medicine. During his university years, Allham says, he encountered no racism at all. "We came from different countries, were friends with other students from Germany and we all had a common goal: to become good doctors," he says.

'Happy to Make It Home Safe'

All that changed suddenly with the end of East Germany, with taunting, threats and even physical violence becoming a common occurrence. "Often, I was just happy to make it home safe," Allham says, recalling the early 1990s when skinheads and neo-Nazis in the east hunted down immigrants, often without fear of police interference.

Allham long ago took on German citizenship and works in the Heart Center at the Dresden university hospital. He lives in a middle-class, Gründerzeit neighborhood in eastern Dresden. Like Hirsch, he too believes in God, though Allham's god is called Allah. And in contrast to Hirsch, Allham doesn't believe that religion should have anything to do with politics.

A look at Saxony's history could help explain why potential threats to identity may be felt more strongly here than elsewhere. It was in Saxony where the Reformation put down its first roots. Johann Sebastian Bach developed his artistic genius here and Saxony also developed its own formula for the manufacture of porcelain, a triumph of German chemistry. "All of this made Saxony a breeding ground for ideas, the center of the world," says Martin Roth, who led the Staatliche Kunstsammlungen -- the world-famous collection made up of several art and ethnographic museums in Dresden -- for years before moving on to the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.

Yet Saxony has also long had a problematic relationship with its own identity. The region was the cultural heart of the German-speaking world, but its Prussian neighbors to the north were much more powerful. It was well educated, had a self-confident middle class and didn't lack for prosperity, but the region was nonetheless among the first to throw its support behind the Nazis. The state suffered World War II bombing raids on its capital comparable to those in Hamburg and Cologne, but it was only in Saxony that a cult of mourning developed -- one that continues to hold sway to this day.

"In Dresden, you can still sense the loss of identity during and after the Third Reich," says Roth. "What remains is this self-importance, this navel gazing, combined with the belief that they are the greatest."

Just a few kilometers up the Elbe River from Dresden is Kötzschenbroda, a district of the town of Radebeul. Gabled houses from past centuries surround the central square, their ground floors providing quarters for small shops or comfortable pubs with names like Old Dispensary or Steam Ship, where the odor of Saxon specialties is unmistakable.

Author Jörg Bernig moved to the tidy little town 14 years ago, renovating a 19th-century house together with his wife. Now, the place is just as attractive and comfortable as the Old Dispensary. Bernig could be completely satisfied with life. But the 52-year-old feels estranged from his country, its politicians, the media and the cultural scene. Bernig, who is a member of the Saxon Academy of Arts and the German PEN Center, is bothered by what he sees as a political correctness that imposes multiculturalism and ignores "people's need for homogeneity."

'Rage Everywhere'

A sign printed with a verse from the Book of Matthew hangs in Kötzschenbroda's main church: "Quoth Christ: For I was a stranger and you invited me in." Such "campaigns dictated from above," Bernig says during a walk across the churchyard, "are what upset the people in Saxony." He says they also alienate churchgoers "who reject the policy of unlimited admission of refugees."

"Rage Everywhere" is the title Bernig chose for an essay he wrote about his views on the state of Germany and of a world that has become unmoored. The piece includes ideas that can also be found at the Pegida marches in Dresden, though they are more elegantly articulated.

Instead of using the loaded Pegida term Volksverräter, Bernig writes: "What rage over the federal government's brushing aside of state sovereignty by opening the doors -- even appealing for -- mass uncontrolled, or hardly controlled, border crossings."

Instead of adopting the phrase "Lügenpresse," or "lying press," he writes: "What rage too that we, the people, to use a term of pathos, are daily told how to think. Look at the chastening tone and view adopted by (the evening news) when discussing people who express criticism of refugee policies."

The Dresden-based daily Sächsische Zeitung was wary of printing the piece, but it ultimately appeared on Dec. 21 and met with broad agreement. "Thank you for the courage to publish this piece," wrote one reader. Another opined that it was no longer possible "to be proud of Germany" and that one could only "think and speak in terms acceptable to the 1968 Zeitgeist."

The term "1968 Zeitgeist," referring to the anti-establishment counterculture that evolved in Germany in protest against the conservative war and immediate postwar generations, is a central battle cry in Saxony. The societal modernization that took place in West Germany following the student revolts at the end of the 1960s is seen by broad swaths of Saxon's educated middle class as a fundamental evil. Modern and conflict-prone Germany has never been well received in Saxony, and not just in the narrow valleys of the Erzgebirge Mountains. Even members of the educated middle class in Dresden harbor yearnings for yesteryear. Such desires survived East Germany by way of the house concerts and poetry readings held in private salons -- and they informed the historically accurate rebuilding of Dresden.

A Glorious Past

The reestablishment of a pre-socialist civil society was one of the most important goals for them following reunification. It was an urge that Kurt Biedenkopf, the West German CDU politician who became governor of Saxony in 1990, recognized and encouraged. He realized that people are better able to deal with political upheaval if they can look back to a glorious past and cultivate a feeling of homeland. He took Bavaria, with a similarly proud history, as an example.

At the CDU's initiative, state parliament resolved to declare Saxony a "free state" once again, recalling its 19th century history. Politically, it was a rather meaningless move, but it was full of symbolism. The people of Saxony were enthusiastic and it also served the needs of those in power. As the man who gave Saxony its identity back, Kurt Biedenkopf could stand up to his political adversary Chancellor Helmut Kohl in a way that only Bavarian Governor Franz-Josef Strauss had before him. At the time, SPIEGEL wrote a cover story about Saxony, with Biedenkopf depicted on horseback as Saxon Prince August the Strong. A poster of the cover image still hung in the governor's office years later.

Dresden-based political scientist Hans Vorländer believes that one of Pegida's roots can be found in such regionalism. He speaks of a kind of "Saxon chauvinism": the idea that Saxons know what's right and are thus entitled to more than others.

In Kötzschenbroda, the author Bernig -- who has received numerous literature prizes named after the likes of Eichendorff, Hölderlin and Lessing -- searches for other words to describe the Saxon character. Citizens of the Free State, he says, are not "outmoded," they just want to protect their state. They have been forced to endure significant changes since 1990, he says. "Now they need time to reflect and take a deep breath. They don't want the conflicts of other cultures imported."

Yet when it comes to conflicts in Saxony, it is primarily the locals who are responsible, as can be seen from reports gathered on a random winter weekend: In Chemnitz, three masked men chase two migrants through the city and demolish a döner-kebab stand, injuring the owner and one of the migrants. In Bautzen, two men attack the information stand of a pro-diversity organization. On the same weekend, right-wing extremists set a former asylum-seeker hostel on fire. In Altenberg, a town in the Erzgebirge Mountains, a man wearing a steel helmet and sporting a Hitler moustache goes after two Afghans. He beats one of the two men and raises his arm in a Hitler salute.

In Meissen too, home of the famous porcelain factory, a building being prepared to house refugees was set on fire. Prior to the blaze, there were anonymous warnings: notes posted on the door telling future residents to leave "our Meissen" as quickly as possible.

Harmful to the CDU's Image

The target of the arson attack is just a few hundred meters from the porcelain factory, which received 90,000 visitors from abroad in 2015. "Some people in Meissen only like foreigners when they spend money and then leave the city again at 6 p.m.," says Walter Hannot.

Originally from the Rhineland, Hannot has lived in Saxony since 1991. He has been a member of the Christian Democrats since his youth and has been deputy head of CDU chapter in Meissen for just short of a year. He has organized candlelight vigils against racism and thrown parties for refugees. But many of his fellow party members aren't particularly pleased by such events, believing them to be harmful to the CDU's image. One CDU member, who used to be part of the city government, is one of the founders of Pegida and has written hate-filled postings on his Facebook page. But the local party chapter has nevertheless declined to expel him from the party. Another Christian Democrat from Meissen, Geert Mackenroth, became Saxony's commissioner for foreigners, but prefers to call himself the "commissioner for natives" and has adopted positions represented by Alternative for Germany.

In such a climate, it has become difficult to represent other points of view. One group, called "Buntes Meissen," or "Diverse Meissen," promotes cooperation between Saxony and the refugees. But many shop owners prefer not to display the group's posters for fear that they might get a brick through their shop windows. "There are patrols in the city," says Hannot. "I'm beginning to feel foreign myself here in Meissen."

Saxony's racism problem hasn't just developed in the last year. There have long been regions of the state where neo-Nazis have essentially taken control. The escalation of right-wing violence, Pegida's success, xenophobic demonstrations: Dietrich Herrmann, a social scientist at the Technical University of Dresden, believes that it's no accident such things are taking place in Saxony. Rather, he argues, it is the product of the state's political culture. For years, he says, manifestations of right-wing extremism have been ignored and trivialized in the state.

Andrea Hübler, who works for an organization that helps victims of right-wing violence, agrees. "For years, very little has been done to counteract the daily lunacy in Saxony," she says. Every day, reports about attacks on migrants land on her desk. On behalf of her organization, Hübler has spent countless hours in recent years at trials against right-wing extremist perpetrators. Her evaluation is devastating. She says that it often takes years before perpetrators end up in court and potential right-wing motives are all too often ignored. She says that the oft-invoked judicial severity is rarely seen in practice.

Instead, activists who actively campaign against racism and neo-Nazis are hassled. Anti-fascists, opposition activists and refugee helpers are often seen as disturbing the peace or meddling -- or are perceived as a threat. For a time, Saxony even had a so-called "Extremism Clause" enshrined in law, a codex that required initiatives to formally pledge allegiance to the state. The Saxon Police Force likewise spent years investigating a presumed "Antifa Sports Club," which was suspected of hunting down neo-Nazis in Saxony. The police raided apartments, forced people to take DNA tests and eavesdropped on more than 200,000 telephones. A year and a half ago, the case was dropped. The alleged leader of the group was only proven to have taken part in a peaceful demonstration against neo-Nazis.

'Problem on the Left'

When over 250 neo-Nazis and hooligans laid waste to the Connewitz neighborhood of Leipzig in January, the head of the Saxon Police Force, Jörg Michaelis, issued a warning -- against left-wing extremism and not against right-wing violence. Left-wing anarchists had engaged in a street battle with police in Leipzig just before Christmas. "We have a serious problem on the left," he said at a CDU event in Dresden.

And now? Will business as usual in Saxony continue for the next several months, or even years? Has the public peace been compromised to such a degree that there is no longer room for understanding, or even for measured debate?

There are places in Saxony where politicians, church leaders, artists and businesspeople stood up to Pegida from the very beginning. In Leipzig, for example, the largest city in the state. On Monday, Jan. 11, Mayor Burkhard Jung, a member of the center-left Social Democrats, joined thousands of other Leipzig residents, candle in hand, to demonstrate against Legida, the local chapter of Pegida. The organizers of the original in Dresden had called for a large rally in Leipzig, but their success was limited. Racists and Islamophobes have never had much success here, regularly encountering large groups of counter-demonstrators, as often happens in cities in western Germany.

Why is Leipzig different than Dresden? Jung doesn't have an immediate answer to the question. He thinks for a while, gazing into the middle distance. He then leans over the table in his city hall office and says: "Leipzig is constantly changing and renewing itself. Half of our population has turned over since 1990. Many new residents have come over from the west." Like the mayor himself. Jung grew up in Siegen, near Cologne, and first came to Leipzig in 1991. So has Leipzig become a western German city? "In terms of its approach to life, I would say yes," Jung responds. "At least we are cosmopolitan, because of the trade shows we host, and not too Saxon."
Even in Dresden, though, there have been periodic signs of improvement. It used to be that the anniversary of the Feb. 13, 1945 bombing of Dresden brought out thousands of neo-Nazis protesting the "bomb Holocaust." There were demonstrations this year too, but they were smaller -- and dwarfed by the 13,000 people who formed a human chain in opposition to war, xenophobia and extremism. "Those who close their hearts to people who come here looking for protection haven't understood the message of Feb. 13," said Dresden Mayor Dirk Hilbert.


Just five days later, though, when the chanting mob blocked the refugee bus in Clausnitz, Dresden's mini-victory against extremism proved empty. Then came the refugee hostel fire in Bautzen. What's wrong with Saxony? The search for answers goes on.

Catarina Martins reconhece que cartaz polémico foi "um erro"


Catarina Martins reconhece que cartaz polémico foi "um erro"
PÚBLICO 27/02/2016 -

A porta-voz do BE admite responsabilidades da direcção no recursos à imagem de Jesus e diz que a mensagem "não foi compreendida".

Catarina Martins reconheceu este sábado que o cartaz com a imagem de Cristo e as palavras "Jesus também tinha dois pais", feito pelo Bloco de Esquerda para assinalar a aprovação da adopção plena no Parlamento, foi "um erro".

"Quisemos assinalar uma conquista muito importante no campo da igualdade, uma forma de o fazer foi a tradução de um slogan do movimento internacional Cristão pela Igualdade, não foi compreendido e como não foi compreendido é um erro", afirmou Catarina Martins aos jornalistas à entrada para a sessão de encerramento do XIII Congresso da CGTP, em Lisboa, transmitidas pela RTP3.

Questionada sobre se a direcção do partido tinha sido consultada sobre aquela campanha, Catarina Martins assumiu a responsabilidade, dizendo que "tudo o que o BE faz passa pela direcção".

Mas a seguir esvaziou a polémica: "As imagens passam, mas as conquistas pela igualdade ficam", afirmou, pondo um ponto final na polémica.

Já na sexta-feira, a eurodeputada Marisa Matias, questionada no Facebook sobre o cartaz, também considerou que "saiu ao lado da intenção que se pretendia", e por isso "foi um erro".

Este sábado, o semanário Expresso avança que o provedor de Justiça está a analisar uma queixa apresentada por quase três mil pessoas, contra o cartaz, que consideram "blasfemo e ofensivo dos sentimentos religiosos de muitos portugueses".

Depois do PÚBLICO ter noticiado a campanha do BE na qual se inseria a imagem polémica, as reacções sucederam-se em cadeia ao longo de toda a sexta-feira. As maiores críticas vieram logo de manhã, pelo porta-voz da Conferência Episcopal Portuguesa, Manuel Barbosa, que considerou a imagem “uma afronta aos crentes”, “uma analogia sem sentido”.

Também o cardeal-patriarca de Lisboa, Manuel Clemente, afirmou que a imagem "falseia a verdade". "Com certeza que Jesus sempre se referiu a Deus como seu pai, mas tinha uma mãe, que era Maria, casada com José, que adoptou Jesus", disse, citado pela Agência Ecclesia.

O CDS também não perdeu tempo. No Parlamento, Pedro Mota Soares ressalvou que "a liberdade de expressão” é “total", mas há que ter em conta " a sensibilidade das pessoas". E aquela imagem é uma "ofensa gratuita à sensibilidade de muitos portugueses".


A imagem circulou apenas nas redes sociais, não tenho chegado a transformar-se em cartaz, como tinha sido anunciado pelo BE. E foi nas redes sociais que deu origem a um intenso debate e provocou o aparecimento de muitas outras imagens humorísticas envolvendo figuras nacionais e até dirigentes do Bloco.

A razão contra a barbárie / TERESA DE SOUSA


OPINIÃO
A razão contra a barbárie
TERESA DE SOUSA 28/02/2016 -PÚBLICO

1.Quando regressou a casa, depois da cimeira europeia em que conquistou um “estatuto especial” para o seu país, David Cameron declarou o seu amor à pátria e esclareceu que não amava Bruxelas. Muita gente se espantou com o sound-bite do primeiro-ministro britânico, interpretando-o como um sinal, mais um, do seu total desapego pela integração europeia, uma espécie de pecado original que o Reino Unido trouxe para a Europa desde que aderiu. Uma segunda linha de comentários foi mesmo no sentido de que a saída do Reino Unido seria uma espécie de bênção para a Europa, que poderia libertar-se da “chantagem” britânica e regressar aos seus valores fundamentais, preservar o seu modelo social, restaurar a solidariedade e prosseguir o caminho de uma “ever closer union”, como dizem os tratados. Felizmente, nem o PS nem o PSD vêem a presença do Reino Unido na Europa dessa maneira. Como disse o primeiro-ministro em Bruxelas, para Portugal a paisagem europeia sempre incluiu e continua a incluir o Reino Unido.

Mas a “falta de amor” de que acusam Cameron merece uma reflexão pelo que significa sobre o que é a União Europeia hoje, precisamente quando atravessa a sua mais grave crise existencial, na confluência de muitas crises: da dívida e da divergência económica, aos refugiados e à segurança, passando pelo seu lugar num mundo cada vez mais multipolar e em profunda desordem. Não vale a pena idealizar uma União Europeia que já não existe nem, muito menos, diabolizar um dos seus membros. A Europa foi construída, desde o seu início, pela razão contra a barbárie (sim, a nossa maravilhosa Europa nasceu da barbárie em solo europeu). A razão não desperta emoções e, por isso, é difícil de amar. Mas a História europeia é um verdadeiro cardápio sobre a forma como as emoções e os mitos nacionais (verdadeiros ou inventados) podem matar a razão. É essa a experiência da Europa na primeira metade do século XX, quando duas “guerras civis” quase a destruíram e quando um pequeno número de visionários, de Robert Schuman a Alcide De Gasperi passando por Jean Monnet ou Winston Churchill, decidiu que o melhor caminho para impedir mais guerras em solo europeu era ir contra a própria História, criando um projecto de integração política capaz de deslegitimar o nacionalismo. Fizeram-no, cinco anos depois do fim da II Guerra, quando as marcas da barbárie ainda estavam demasiado vivas. Fizeram-no também pelo impulso dos Estados Unidos. Fizeram-no a partir da mais improvável das alianças, entre a França e a Alemanha Ocidental. Fizeram-no, finalmente, a partir do único critério seguro para afastar a guerra, que é o critério da democracia. A Comunidade foi a obra de uma elite europeia corajosa e lúcida que soube colocar a razão acima da História, provando que o determinismo pode ser vencido. A ameaça soviética ajudou a consolidar a integração europeia e a fortalecer a aliança transatlântica. Feitas as contas, foi um tremendo sucesso que abriu as portas à prosperidade e à paz.

2.Quando o Muro caiu e a União Soviética implodiu, foi preciso encontrar uma nova razão para a Comunidade Europeia. De repente, a perspectiva de uma grande Alemanha unificada de novo no coração da Europa fez abalar algumas convicções e recordar alguns velhos demónios. Foi, de novo, graças à obra de visionários, como Kohl ou Mitterrand, e ao empenho dos Estados Unidos que a Europa conseguiu sobreviver. Maastricht e o euro foram, uma vez mais, uma decisão política capaz de moldar o rumo dos acontecimentos. A razão vencia de novo os medos e as emoções. Apesar da guerra nos Balcãs, o regresso da História ficaria adiado e o futuro parecia magnífico, graças à vitória do Ocidente que pôs fim à Guerra Fria e ao início da globalização económica. As economias ricas chegaram a acreditar que os ciclos económicos tinham desaparecido perante o milagre da expansão dos mercados. O “fim da História” de Fukuyama parecia ser possível. Por uma década, a integração europeia transformou-se num exemplo para o mundo. Durante algum tempo, entre Maastricht e o chumbo da Constituição (2005), a Europa tornou-se ela própria numa ideologia. Em Paris, Londres (com Blair), Berlim, Lisboa ou Madrid, a Europa era um programa político que o centro-esquerda e o centro-direita partilhavam. Durou pouco, como durou pouco o anunciado fim da História.

A queda das Torres Gémeas e a queda do Lehman Brothers vieram pôr tudo em questão. A globalização revelou-se mais útil para as potências emergentes do que para as potências estabelecidas. O unilateralismo americano dividiu os aliados europeus. A crise financeira fragmentou a união monetária, abrindo as portas à crise da dívida. A Alemanha viu nisso uma possibilidade de recriar o euro à sua imagem e semelhança, ignorando as suas consequências politicas. Hoje, os egoísmos nacionais dominam a política europeia, como a crise dos refugiados (mais ainda do que a crise do euro) o prova todos os dias. As emoções estão a vencer a razão e o nacionalismo, mesmo que ainda em forma mais ou menos benigna, envenena de novo a integração europeia. Não é um problema de Cameron, apesar de todos os seus erros. Racismo, xenofobia, medo do outro, passaram a ser de novo moeda corrente. As fronteiras reerguem-se e os muros também. Esta é a Europa que temos hoje, da qual só podemos sair se a razão política voltar a dominar as pulsões nacionais.

3.Olhando para a campanha de Cameron em favor do sim à Europa, até se poderia dizer que o líder britânico ama mais a Europa do que se poderia esperar. Finalmente, as verdadeiras razões que justificam ficar dentro foram assumidas com total clareza, substituindo a imigração ou a “soberania” ou os arranjos técnicos que negociou com os seus pares. Cameron já disse que a influência britânica no mundo seria menor, que a segurança do seu país e o combate ao terrorismo ficariam prejudicados, que a economia britânica perderia milhares de empregos e o acesso ao Mercado Único teria de ser negociado numa posição de fraqueza. A ele, juntou-se um vasto coro de adeptos, desde os chefes militares aos grandes empresários. Tudo isto devia ter dito antes da negociação em Bruxelas. No dia 23 de Junho saberemos se foi demasiado tarde. Os seus parceiros europeus não quiseram esticar a corda. Não há tripés de duas pernas. O triângulo entre Paris, Londres e Berlim é fundamental para a capacidade europeia de influenciar o mundo e para a coabitação entre visões distintas sobre o que deve ser a Europa que são necessárias.


4.Hoje, a crise dos refugiados tornou-se a prova de vida da integração europeia. O Monde escrevia a toda a largura da sua primeira página: “Refugiados: a Europa desintegra-se”. A cimeira europeia para encontrar uma solução, marcada para o dia 7 de Março, pode ser o limite a partir do qual já não haverá solução para preservar Schengen. Os rostos das crianças que choram de medo junto a mais um arame farpado já não são suportáveis. A destruição da Síria atinge uma dimensão diabólica. A Europa e os Estados Unidos parecem totalmente impotentes perante esta catástrofe humana. Em Shangai, os ministros das Finanças do G20, para além de avisarem para as repercussões económicas globais de uma saída do Reino Unido, parecem repetir o guião do início da crise financeira de 2008, defendendo a utilização de todos os meios ao alcance dos Governos para intervir nos mercados, para evitar nova descida aos infernos. A Alemanha opõe-se. Os analistas admitem que esta nova crise pode não ser tão má como a de 2008 porque há novos instrumentos para a conter. Enquanto tudo isto acontece, Bruxelas dorme sobre uma Europa de outro tempo, enquanto a actual se desmorona.  

Crise des réfugiés : l’Europe vit un moment historique


Crise des réfugiés : l’Europe vit un moment historique
LE MONDE | 26.02.2016 à 13h41 • Mis à jour le 27.02.2016 à 10h55

EDITORIAL
On ne sait plus quelle expression utiliser. Sous le choc de la vague migratoire, l’Europe se disloque, se désintègre, se déconstruit. Sauf sursaut d’ici à un prochain « sommet » européen en avril, les historiens dateront certainement de cette affaire, de ces années 2015-2016, le début de la décomposition de l’Europe. Ils diront que ce fut un beau projet commencé au milieu des années 1950 et qui s’achève avant le premier quart du XXIe siècle.
Lire aussi : L’Europe cède à la panique dans le dossier des migrants

L’esprit européen aura soufflé, avec le soutien des peuples, plus d’un demi-siècle, avant que le projet ne s’éteigne, devenu impopulaire, victime de son incapacité à se renouveler, plombé par l’absence de dirigeants politiques européens d’envergure.
Encore une fois, il ne faut pas désespérer d’une possible rémission. Mais les faits sont là, durs, irréductibles à l’un de ses communiqués « communs » débiles dont Bruxelles a le secret. Les Européens se déchirent sur la crise des migrants. Les Européens soit ne veulent pas, soit ne peuvent pas faire face ensemble. Ils savent qu’il n’y a pas de solution unilatérale – sauf à sacrifier l’un d’eux, la Grèce, qui se transformerait en un immense camp de réfugiés. Ils n’ignorent pas que les questions posées par l’afflux de ces cohortes de malheureux fuyant les guerres d’Irak et de Syrie sont par nature transnationales.

La panique gagne
Mais à Vingt-Huit, ils sont devenus inaptes à l’action collective, hormis la gestion du marché unique. La tragédie des réfugiés a brisé les Européens politiquement, avec une Europe de l’Est qui n’éprouve aucunement le besoin d’une action collective solidaire : les pays dits « de Visegrad » ne voient pas en quoi ils sont concernés. La tragédie les a aussi brisés juridiquement : même votées dans les règles, les décisions prises par les sommets des chefs d’Etat et de gouvernement sont violées sans vergogne par des pays membres qui ne s’estiment aucunement liés par leur signature.
Le spectacle donné ces derniers jours est bien celui d’une Europe en pleine rupture. En principe, les pays membres se sont mis d’accord en septembre sur la « relocalisation » de quelque 160 000 réfugiés, chaque Etat membre en accueillant selon ses possibilités. Mais sous la force d’un flux migratoire – plus d’un million de personnes l’an passé, autant attendues cette année –, la panique gagne. Un par un, les Etats suspendent les accords de Schengen sur la libre circulation au sein de l’Union européenne (UE). Les quotas de relocalisation ne sont pas respectés. Certains des pays qui furent des plus généreux comme l’Autriche – avec l’Allemagne et la Suède – referment leurs portes.

Référendum pour quelques centaines de réfugiés
Ridiculisant les décisions prises lors des réunions européennes, l’Autriche a convoqué cette semaine à Vienne une sorte de sommet informel rassemblant neuf pays qui forment la « voie des Balkans ». C’est cette route qu’empruntent les réfugiés pour gagner la frontière autrichienne à partir de la Grèce. Les représentants de la Bulgarie, de la Roumanie, de la Croatie et de la Slovénie, membres de l’UE, et ceux de l’Albanie, de la Bosnie, du Kosovo, de la Macédoine, du Montenegro et de la Serbie se sont retrouvés pour « isoler » la Grèce : en clair, contenir autant que possible les réfugiés en deçà des frontières grecques.
Ni la Grèce ni la Commission européenne, pas plus que l’Allemagne, voisine de l’Autriche, n’ont été prévenues. Tout s’est passé en dehors du cadre de l’UE, comme si elle n’existait pas. Colère de la Grèce, qui a rappelé son ambassadeur en Autriche. A Budapest, le premier ministre, Viktor Orban, veut organiser un référendum pour approuver ou non l’accueil des quelques centaines de réfugiés attribués à la Hongrie. Il en va, a-t-il dit, de la préservation du « profil culturel, religieux et ethnique » de son pays. Cependant que la Belgique, amie de la France, rétablissait des contrôles aux frontières de crainte d’un afflux de migrants provoqué par le démantèlement partiel de la « jungle » de Calais...

Bref, une addition de réflexes nationaux, conflictuels et querelleurs. Comme avant « l’Europe »...

Welcome to a two-speed Europe / Brexit would spark decade of ‘economic limbo’, claims top Tory

Brexit would spark decade of ‘economic limbo’, claims top Tory

Europe minister says under EU rules UK would be cut out of single market before it could negotiate new deals

Toby Helm and Daniel Boffey
Saturday 27 February 2016 23.01 GMT

The UK would face a decade of massive economic uncertainty with potentially disastrous consequences for business and the pound if it were to vote to leave the EU, the Europe minister says.

The dramatic warning from David Lidington, a key figure in David Cameron’s renegotiation of EU membership, is part of a frontal assault launched by Downing Street and the Foreign Office aimed at discrediting the campaign for Brexit, now headed by Boris Johnson and Michael Gove.

In an interview with the Observer, Lidington, who has served a record period of six years in his post and has more experience of EU negotiations than most in the cabinet, says the UK would be thrust into economic “limbo” for up to 10 years if the UK were to leave, as it tried to disengage from the EU on favourable terms and then establish a set of highly complex replacement trade deals across the world.

The intervention came as finance ministers of the G20 group of leading industrial nations meeting in China listed “a shock of a potential UK exit from the European Union” as one of the biggest risks to the world economy this year.

David Cameron said: “With so many gaps in the ‘out’ case, the decision is clearly one between the great unknown and a greater Britain.” Writing in the Sunday Telegraph, he said Brexit would create “huge amounts of uncertainty” and added: “It would be our children’s futures on the table if we were to roll the dice.”

Echoing a view shared by the prime minister and George Osborne, Lidington said that, according to the EU rulebook, the UK would be cut adrift from European treaties, and therefore the single market, two years after a vote to leave – before it would have had time to negotiate replacement trade deals.

“Trade deals between the EU and other countries and bilateral trade deals of any type normally take six, seven, eight years and counting,” Lidington said. “Everything we take for granted about access to the single market – trade taking place without customs checks or paperwork at national frontiers, the right of British citizens to go and live in Spain or France – those would all be up in the air. It is massive. It is massive what is at risk.

“You would be in complete limbo and I think what that would do for the pound and for business confidence would be very serious indeed. It could last a decade.”

Boris Johnson performed a sudden U-turn over Brexit, ruling out the possibility of a second referendum after a Leave vote – something he, Gove and other Outers, including former Tory leader Michael Howard, have recently suggested would be possible.

Johnson told the Times he wanted the UK to “get out and then negotiate a series of trade arrangements around the world” and that “out is out”.

As part of a coordinated assault, foreign secretary Philip Hammond accused the Leave camp of confusion and of having no clear idea of what would follow a vote to get out of Europe. He told the Observer: “The Leave campaign has come up with 20 possible options, but they all contain significant risk to the British economy. Leave campaigners now have to answer these key questions: what does leaving look like? How many years would it take to put in place a new deal with the EU? And what will happen to our security cooperation arrangements with the EU?

“Until we have their answers, a vote to leave is a leap into the dark that would put the security of Britain’s future at risk.”

A document published on 28 Februaryby the Britain Stronger in Europe campaign says Brexit campaigners have floated 30 different models of independent statehood from Peru to Iceland, suggested as worthy of replication. The document highlights differences among Out camp leaders over whether the UK would end freedom of movement or continue to make a contribution to the EU budget.

It claims that Matthew Elliott, the chief executive of the campaign group Vote Leave, has said that the UK “would still retain its membership” of the single market but also that “the benefits of the single market are far outweighed by the costs”.

In response, Elliott said: “If we vote to remain, we will keep giving away power and money every year. If we vote to leave, we will take back control and spend our money on our priorities.

“We will be able to kick out those who make our laws. We will be able to have a fairer, more humane and more sensible immigration policy. We will have a new UK-EU partnership based on free trade and friendly cooperation. We will regain our independent voice on international bodies such as the World Trade Organisation, where we have given away our seat to Brussels. We will have more international influence to argue for greater international cooperation.”

In his Observer interview, Lidington said the Out campaign was peddling two contradictory arguments. “Their first belief is that inside the EU we cannot achieve any meaningful change and that too often the other countries are in some sort of nefarious conspiracy against our interests.

“But their second belief – which they hold equally firmly – is that outside the EU these very same countries and government would rush to give us some new deal that had all the benefits of EU membership … I think the Leave campaign is still in a state of confusion about what it actually means by leave.”

At the G20 finance ministers meeting US Treasury secretary Jack Lew expressed clear support for Britain’s continued membership of the EU. “Our view is that it’s in the national security and economic security [interests] of the United Kingdom, of Europe and of the United States for the United Kingdom to stay in the European Union.

“This is an issue that will be decided by the voters of the United Kingdom in June and we certainly hope that [they]reach that conclusion,” he added.

Ukip leader Nigel Farage said the G20 statements were “no surprise” and examples of “mates helping each other out”. “I’m not surprised that big government gets together to support David Cameron. This is big banks, big business, big government all scratching each other’s backs. I don’t think that impresses voters,” he said.

Welcome to a two-speed Europe

Desperate to keep the UK from leaving, Europe is inching towards a dual-track reality.

By MATTHEW KARNITSCHNIG 2/23/16, 5:30 AM CET Updated 2/25/16, 5:47 AM CET

BERLIN — Europe’s leaders emerged from last week’s marathon session with David Cameron hoping they had just avoided a messy divorce.

They may yet discover that staying together can be just as traumatic.

Most of the focus in the wake of the deal has been on whether British voters will endorse the plan hammered out at the Brussels summit. As important as the deal is to the U.K., its impact on the EU may be even greater. Put simply, the agreement effectively rewrites the rules for member states’ dealings with Brussels.

“What it does is set a precedent that everything is up for renegotiation,” one Brussels official said.

Until now, members have generally been compelled to accept the full canon of EU rules and regulations, notwithstanding a few notable exceptions, such as the U.K.’s right to opt out of the euro.

The EU’s agreement with London goes much further, however, creating the political equivalent of an open marriage. While the two sides would retain their legal union, they wouldn’t be chained to one another. Such arrangements may sound good in the abstract. In practice, they can prove tricky.

After the summit, Cameron left no doubt about what the deal would mean: “Britain will be permanently out of ever-closer union, never part of a European superstate … Britain will never join the euro and we’ve secured vital protections for our economy.”

Welcome to a two-speed Europe.

The idea of a closely integrated core Europe surrounded by more loosely linked affiliates isn’t new. Many would argue the dual-track already exists with the eurozone. But nearly all the non-euro countries, including all EU members in Eastern Europe, are obliged to work towards membership in the currency area. So to the degree that the two-speed Europe exists, it has been, at least nominally, temporary.

The EU’s proposed arrangement with the U.K. would go a step further by institutionalizing the so-called à la carte approach to membership.

Instead of a core group of like-minded countries coming together to embrace closer integration, one country is pulling way, opening the door for others to do the same.
With nationalism on the rise across much of Eastern Europe, it’s not inconceivable that countries such as Hungary and Poland will also ask for exemptions from joining the euro or other aspects of the EU.

Over time, such moves could further undermine public confidence in the EU, eroding its legitimacy.

Two speeds, no agreement

Many die-hard Europeans have long-argued a two-speed solution is the only way forward. Influential European politicians from Germany’s Wolfgang Schäuble to Italy’s Romano Prodi have endorsed the idea. The challenge has been in agreeing on what it means.

There’s consensus, for example, that the eurozone needs a finance minister. When it comes to defining the role, however, Berlin, Paris and Rome remain far apart.

So far, steps toward a two-speed Europe have been made under duress, such as when the eurozone created a bailout fund. With the common currency under the threat of collapse during the debt crisis in 2011, the then-17 eurozone countries agreed to pool resources to create the bailout fund. The U.K. refused to participate, however, forcing the euro countries to conclude the agreement outside the European treaty.

Unless the Stay camp wins by a wide margin, Brexit will likely remain on the political agenda in the U.K.
Now, desperate to keep the U.K. from leaving, Europe is again inching toward the two-speed reality.

But this isn’t the model Europe’s idealists had hoped for. Instead of a core group of like-minded countries coming together to embrace closer integration, one country is pulling way, opening the door for others to do the same.

Even if the British voted to remain in the EU, it’s far from certain the agreement would actually work.

One aspect of the deal, for example, would allow London to object to regulatory moves in the eurozone that it believes could place the City at a disadvantage. But the remedy for such disputes is vague, suggesting they could easily escalate, again pushing the relationship to the brink.

More generally, unless the Stay camp wins by a wide margin, Brexit will likely remain on the political agenda in the U.K., especially given the support the Out camp has received from popular establishment politicians.

Time for integration?

In some respects, a positive outcome would be the perfect moment for the core EU to pursue integration. One factor holding countries like Germany back has been the fear of offending the U.K.’s sensibilities. By clearly defining the U.K.’s position, the deal would appear to remove that obstacle.

The question is whether the U.K. would remain sanguine about a more tightly integrated EU once it became a reality or see it as a threat.

For now, that scenario remains remote. Europe, divided by the refugee crisis and its economic travails, is in no position to pursue “ever-closer union.”

Despite those challenges, many Europhiles welcome the deal. The EU has been hobbled for more than a decade by uncertainty over the U.K.’s role and the pace of integration, they argue. Even if more countries follow its example, there is no other way for Europe to move forward.

“There will still be a core. The rest will opt out of certain aspects and won’t have as much influence, but I don’t think it’s that dramatic,” said Thorsten Benner, co-founder and director of the Global Public Policy Institute, a Berlin-based think tank. “That’s sensible and it’s the only way this can work.”

Authors:


Matthew Karnitschnig 

Refugee Crisis Disunity: A De Facto Solution Takes Shape in the Balkans / DER SPIEGEL

With a special EU summit on refugees approaching on March 7, German Chancellor Angela Merkel continues to hope that Turkey will help Europe solve the crisis. But patience has become thin in many capitals across the EU, particularly in Eastern Europe.

Refugee Crisis Disunity: A De Facto Solution Takes Shape in the Balkans

Angela Merkel is still hoping for a European solution to the refugee crisis. But with patience running out, Austria has joined countries on the Balkan Route to impose Plan B. But with the closure of borders, the situation in Greece is becoming dangerous.

February 26, 2016 – 08:00 PM

It is a recent Wednesday morning and on the glass-walled 20th floor of the Ringturm highrise in the heart of Vienna, generals in their moss-green uniforms have gathered along with other decorated military officers and top-level government officials. The view is expansive, stretching to the Vienna Woods in the east and to the forests on the banks of the Danube River to the west. One can see as far as the Slovakian border and to the lowlands at the border to Hungary -- two of the frontiers the country intends to immediately begin protecting in an attempt to block the inflow of more refugees, absent a functioning European plan.


Defense Minister Hans Peter Doskozil, a Social Democrat who has only been in office for four weeks, is speaking to a small group. He is not one to shy away from conflict. Instead of criticizing Austria for introducing a ceiling on the number of refugees it is willing to allow into the country each day, the minister says, the European Commission should finally fulfill its obligation to come up with a European solution to the refugee crisis. Otherwise, the current trends will only be magnified, he says. "Every EU member state is currently withdrawing to its own position and is taking its own national measures."
It has been a week of solo measures and heightened tensions within a deeply fractured Europe. On March 7, the EU will once again attempt to find a solution to the refugee crisis at a special summit meeting in Brussels. German Chancellor Angela Merkel continues to place her hopes on Turkey, with her plan calling for the country to stop the flow of refugees and even take some of them back. But at the same time, countries along the Balkan Route have begun taking measures of their own, with Austria leading the way.

Now that Vienna is only accepting 80 asylum applications per day at the Spielfeld border crossing with Slovenia -- and now that other Balkan countries have constricted the refugee flow in response -- migrants have begun backing up in Greece. In his interview, Defense Minister Doskozil makes no attempt to contradict the impression that exactly that outcome was intended. Currently, he says, his ministry is examining whether and how many soldiers should be sent to Macedonia to help the country secure its border with Greece. That border has been closed to Afghans since Monday, with only Syrians and Iraqis allowed to pass. On Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, a total of only 150 refugees entered Macedonian territory. On Thursday morning, another 100 were allowed to pass, before Macedonia completely sealed off its border. When and whether it will be reopened is unclear.

Giving Austria the Middle Finger

One day earlier, the Austrian government had held a conference on the refugee question in Vienna, with only select countries on the Balkan Route invited to attend. Greece and most other EU member states were not among the invitees. Greece was furious at being excluded and reacted on Thursday by recalling its ambassador from Vienna, a gesture that in the diplomatic world is akin to giving Austria the middle finger. Athens followed up on Friday by cancelling a planned visit to the Greek capital by Austrian Interior Minister Johanna Mikl-Leitner.

Concern in Brussels has been rising rapidly in recent days that the uncoordinated border closures could result in chaos and perhaps even instability in the Balkans. The European Commission has sought to put a stop to the domino effect on the Balkan Route with strong words: Vienna's cap on refugees is "incompatible with Austria's obligations under European and international law," wrote European Migration Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos in a harshly worded letter to the Austrian interior minister. Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn said on Thursday that Europe no longer has a plan. "We are heading into anarchy," he said.

Greece has now de facto become the collecting point for the vast majority of refugees heading north. The country, says one EU diplomat candidly, "is turning into a single enormous hotspot," referring to the plan to establish central refugee registration points on Europe's periphery. Greece has been in the throes of a deep economic crisis for years and is now completely overwhelmed by the task of providing food and shelter to tens of thousands of refugees. Some 12,000 migrants are currently stranded in the country and the four official camps are hopelessly overcrowded. A spokeswoman from Doctors without Borders says that if Afghans continue to be blocked from continuing northward, the system will collapse "in just eight days." Because there is "no realistic emergency plan," she says, her organization is preparing for the worst. The European Commission is likewise developing emergency aid so as to prevent the collapse of the state on the Turkish border.

Dozens of buses with around 5,000 refugees on board were stopped on the highway by police earlier this week in Greece because the camps in Idomeni, on the Greek-Macedonian border, were already filled beyond capacity. Some 500 people continued on foot, walking along the highway and spending the night alongside angry farmers who have been blocking traffic with their tractors in recent weeks to protest against Tsipras' austerity policies. They are shameful scenes that played out across the country -- all symbolic of European failure.

'A Miracle'

The situation in the Greek capital is particularly dramatic. The most recent focal points of crisis can be found among the ferry terminals at the port of Piraeus and on Victoria Square in the heart of Athens. Hundreds of people are camped out on the square, sleeping on the ground and loitering in the streets. The burgeoning chaos is reminiscent of the situation in Hungary last summer when Prime Minister Viktor Orbán allowed the situation to become so intolerable that Chancellor Merkel responded by opening the borders.

Hassan Mohamadi, a lanky 26-year-old from Afghanistan, knew nothing of the disarray when he disembarked from the ferry Blue Star 1 at 6:30 a.m. on Thursday morning. Holding his wife's hand with one hand and his five-month-old daughter with the other, he said that morning that he was happy again for the first time in a long while. Some 1,300 migrants from the islands of Lesbos and Chios arrived in Athens that morning on board the Blue Star 1.

"It is a miracle that we have arrived," Mohamadi said, adding that he and his family had been underway for 12 days, having fled their village of Qur due to poverty, suicide bombings and Islamic State, which has begun expanding in Afghanistan. Mohamadi wants to continue on to Germany, but for now he and his family are stuck in Athens. He looked uncomprehending when he learned that he would be unable to continue his journey northwards. At the port, a migrant smuggler approached him and said: "If you have money, I can bring you there." The trip to Germany via the new route through Albania goes for around €3,000.

In parliament this week, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said: "We will not accept turning the country into a permanent warehouse of souls," threatening that Athens would block EU decisions until the distribution of refugees among member states is implemented. "We will not tolerate that a number of countries will be building fences and walls at the borders without accepting even a single refugee," he said. But what might the consequences be? Is the threat from Athens merely an empty one?

Deputy Foreign Minister Nikos Xydakis spoke with SPIEGEL by phone to address such questions. "Since Sept. 23, when the first refugee summit took place, there have been many subsequent meetings. In October, Turkey took part and we agreed on a joint plan, with Turkey agreeing to take back a generous number. But neither Turkey nor EU member states have adhered to the agreement. Germany promised to maintain the status quo at its border until the next summit on March 7, but that failed as well."

Greece, Xydakis says, is all alone. "So why should we adhere to any new agreements?" He says that Greece could begin exercising its veto beyond just the refugee summit and use it on all EU issues where unanimity is required.

'Greece's Closest Ally'

SPIEGEL has learned that Athens is considering declaring a state of emergency and applying for EU aid to cope with the refugee situation. Thus far, the government in Athens has declined taking such a step out of political considerations. But doing so now, Athens believes, could push EU member states to show solidarity with Greece in the refugee crisis.

The man who is primarily responsible for preventing refugees from continuing on their northward journey out of Greece is Gjorge Ivanov, the president of Macedonia. At his residence in Villa Vodno, in southern Skopje, Ivanov makes the claim that "Macedonia is Greece's closest ally." But things look different in reality. Relations between the two countries have been tense ever since Macedonia became an independent state, primarily because Greece is unwilling to accept that its neighbor to the north has the same name as one of its own provinces. Europe is a complicated continent.

The closing of the border to Greece, Ivanov says, was merely a reaction. "Whenever a country to our north restricts its borders, we do the same," he says. Macedonia, Ivanov continues, made it clear that it would only be able to tolerate 2,000 migrants at a time making their way through the country. Macedonia may not be in the EU, but it is still behaving more responsibly than some EU member states, the country's president insists. He says he could no longer wait for a decision to be made in Brussels, otherwise Macedonia would have been overrun by refugees. "In times of crisis, each country must find its own solutions."

Ivanov's words are a requiem to the vision of a Europe that can find joint answers to problems that individual countries cannot confront on their own.

Solidarity is a word that has failed to gain traction in Eastern Europe. Members of the Visegrád Group, made up of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, share a common past as communist countries and often see themselves on Europe's periphery, both geographically and psychologically. Governments of those countries have the backing of a population that is broadly skeptical of welcoming refugees into their midst.

Among political leaders in the Videgrád Group, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is the most influential opponent of Merkel's refugee policies. This week, he announced that he intended to hold a referendum on the distribution of refugees among EU states as was agreed to last September. Voters will be asked: "Do you want the EU to prescribe the mandatory relocation of non-Hungarian citizens to Hungary without the approval of the Hungarian parliament?"

Doing Germany's Dirty Work

People in Brussels and Berlin are furious with Orbán because of the move. European Parliament President Martin Schulz told SPIEGEL: "According to the distribution plan, Hungary is supposed to take a mere 1,294 refugees. I don't understand how you can hold a referendum against that, unless one sees it as an additional step away from a Europe of solidarity and common accountability."


The likelihood that the EU refugee summit on March 7 will find success is diminishing by the day. And Chancellor Merkel is increasingly isolated with her plan to solve the crisis with the help of Turkey. Many Eastern European politicians and EU diplomats don't believe that Merkel's Turkey solution will yield rapid results. Skepticism is widespread in Vienna as well, with hardly anyone believing that the problem can be solved by sending a few billion euros to Ankara. "And if it can," says a member of Austrian Foreign Minister Sebastian Kurz's staff, "then we have to make it much clearer to Turkey what we expect -- that they prevent refugees from traveling onward but also that they stop bombing the Kurds."
Displeasure with the Germans is growing for another reason as well: Even as Berlin is criticizing the measures that countries on the Balkan Route have taken, Germany has profited from them as well in the form of plunging numbers of refugees entering the country. "We are doing the dirty work for the Germans," says one Eastern European EU diplomat.

Austrian Defense Minister Doskozil agrees. "Germany should be more grateful to us." Austria, he says, is merely ensuring that countries along the Balkan Route are coordinating with one another. The criticism from Germany "is completely incomprehensible," he says, adding that the refugees are being sent north in an orderly fashion. "There is an alternative," he says. "We could just allow them all to haphazardly continue to Germany."


By Giorgos Christidis, Katrin Kuntz, Walter Mayr, Peter Müller, Jan Puhl and Mathieu von Rohr