.jpeg)
Hitler’s
Eagle’s Nest retreat was torched in an arson attack. Should it be rebuilt?
With the
far right resurgent in Germany, experts are divided as to whether the
dictator’s former mountaintop retreat is better restored or left a ruin
Deborah Cole in Berlin
Sun 1 Nov
2026 05.00 GMT
One of
the last structural relics of Adolf Hitler’s dictatorship was conceived to
project indomitable power. Last month it was destroyed in a suspected arson
attack. Will it, and should it, be rebuilt?
The
historic Nazi mountaintop retreat known as the Eagle’s Nest is perched on an
Alpine peak at an altitude of 1,834 metres (6,000ft), with stunning views over
southern Germany and
Austria. In German, its design is known as Überwältigungsarchitektur,
intended to overwhelm and intimidate.
Now,
despite the
efforts of 200 firefighters battling through the night, only charred ruins
remain of the former guest lodge, tourist magnet and remembrance site destroyed
in the blaze which started on 23 October. It is closed indefinitely.
“Even if
a British air force bomb had struck the building on 25 April 1945, as it did
most of the other structures in what was then the ‘Führer’s no-go zone’ on the
Obersalzberg near Berchtesgaden, Hitler’s former tea house … could scarcely
have been more severely damaged than it was by the fire,” Munich’s Süddeutsche
newspaper said.
A
brass-plated lift, built into the rock, took 41 seconds to bring visitors up to
the Eagle’s Nest. Photograph: Horst Friedrichs/Alamy
The fire
has triggered a debate about whether, and how, to rebuild at the toxic site for
the next generation of visitors, while mitigating the never-quite-banished risk
of creating a shrine for neo-Nazis.
While the
places associated with Hitler’s victims, including the former concentration
camps, are preserved in perpetuity, the question of how to treat the
perpetrators’ artefacts remains fraught, particularly given the resurgence of
the far right in Germany and in Europe more broadly.
Local
authorities believe the fire was deliberately started by a 33-year-old suspect
with a history of mental illness. The site, which is owned by the German state
of Bavaria, attracts more than 300,000 people each year but was closed to
visitors that day. No one was injured.
The
Eagle’s Nest is known more prosaically in German as the Kehlsteinhaus,
for the mountain it rests on. Photograph: DEA/W. BUSS/De Agostini/Getty Images
Bavarian
state culture minister Markus Blume has said a commission of experts in
heritage conservation, construction and Germany’s culture of Holocaust remembrance
would be enlisted to help determine the future of the Eagle’s Nest.
Given the
building’s inextricable links to the Nazi regime and its crimes, Blume said,
“any reconstruction must do justice to this historical responsibility”.
The
marvel of Alpine engineering, which took 3,800
workers just over a year to build, is known more prosaically in German as
the Kehlsteinhaus, for the mountain it rests on.
After a
coach ride on serpentine roads through five tunnels, visitors rode a
brass-plated lift, built into the rock, for 41 seconds to reach its portal.
The
Eagle’s Nest pictured in 2019. Photograph: Maurice Savage/Alamy
“The
prestige project and the road leading to it cost about 30 million Reichsmarks,
equivalent to about 130 million British pounds today,” said Nazi-era historian
Felix Bohr, author of Before the Downfall: Hitler’s Years in the Wolf’s Lair,
which is being published in the UK in November.
“Hitler
loved architecture that made other people look small. He insisted on being
involved in the planning and construction of propaganda buildings.”
The lodge
was completed in 1938, and mainly used to welcome and impress state guests,
diplomats and select foreign journalists.
Just a
short distance down the mountain at the Obersalzberg complex was Hitler’s own
residence, the Berghof, where he spent about a quarter of his 12 years in
office.
The
Eagle’s Nest pictured in 1940. Photograph: Hulton Deutsch/Corbis/Getty Images
“Important
decisions about prosecution and crime, about war and genocide were taken
there,” said Sven Keller, director of the Obersalzberg Documentation Centre, an
educational facility at the site.
“The
surrounding mountain scenery was used as a backdrop for the construction of
Hitler’s ‘Führer’ image. It offered spectacular, awe-inspiring views, and
demonstrated technical prowess to subjugate even this rough natural
environment.”
Inside,
it had many of the trappings of Nazi bling, including Untersberg marble donated
by Mussolini, Venetian mirrors and plump green leather armchairs recalling an
English country manor house.
Hitler is
known to have visited the Eagle’s Nest only 14 times until 1939 and then never
again due to the second world war’s outbreak, when the tea house no longer
matched the warrior-statesman image he wished to project, Bohr said. Close
associates including his companion Eva Braun still used it regularly, however.
Heinrich
Hoffmann, Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler at the Berghof in 1942. Photograph: Prisma
by Dukas Presseagentur GmbH/Alamy
After the
war, Obersalzberg became a recreation centre for occupying US troops, but the
last vestiges of the Berghof were torn down and hundreds of trees were planted
in its place – a fateful decision that has served as a cautionary tale.
“The
Americans and the Bavarian state tried to prevent it from becoming a pilgrimage
site for old Nazis and Hitler admirers. It didn’t work. If anything, a hidden
site in the woods is even more interesting and mysterious,” Keller said. Nazi
swastikas were often found carved into the tree bark.
He said a
180-degree pivot toward clearly marking the site and exposing its history,
including how it fit into the Nazi power apparatus, proved the healthier
approach.
“Public
accessibility creates transparency whereas barriers or fences encourage rumours
and legends,” Keller said. “Today, a popular public trail crosses the site, and
mundane activities such as hiking keep it from becoming a sacred space (for
neo-Nazis).”
Hitler
with Eva Braun at the Berghof in June 1942. Photograph: Pictorial Press
Ltd/Alamy
Keller
said transparency should be the watchword going forward.
“I cannot
imagine that those responsible would opt for [a] simple reproduction of Nazi
architecture, but it also can’t be left as a ruin – those tend to be even more
fascinating,” he said.
“Instead,
we should find ways to integrate the material remains and new information and
education, showing the temporal layers, including the use as a tourist
destination since the 1950s. The fire added a new layer to the history to
Obersalzberg, and this should be visible too.”
New
political realities in Germany and Austria, where the far-right Alternative
für Deutschland (AfD) and Freedom
Party lead the respective national polls, will have to be taken into
account as well, he said.
A US
soldier at the Eagle’s Nest, 4 May 1945. Photograph: Eric Schwab/AFP/Getty
Images
Bohr said
that troubling context led him to oppose any reconstruction of the Eagle’s
Nest. “Hitler’s megalomania should remain a ruin. My suggestion would be to
secure the remaining structure as far as possible and to use it to convey the
history of the site,” he said.
“Particularly
in view of the strength of the AfD and the rise of right-wing extremism in
Germany, the focus should be on coming to terms with Nazi ideology, not on
restoring its stage sets.”
.jpeg)
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário