Newsletters
London
Playbook
Feel that
sweet Brexit bonus
By Andrew
McDonald
23 mins read
April 3,
2025 8:02 am CET
https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/london-playbook/feel-that-sweet-brexit-bonus/
London
Playbook
By ANDREW
MCDONALD
with BETHANY
DAWSON
Good
Thursday morning. This is Andrew McDonald.
DRIVING THE
DAY
NO
LIBERATION FROM A HANGOVER: Keir Starmer is meeting worried business leaders
right now as the government tries to move back into schmooze mode over Donald
Trump’s tariffs. Ministers’ goal over the coming days is twofold: to reassure
businesses and Brits that everything will be all right, despite the major
economic damage to come from blanket 10 percent charges … and to push on with
efforts to secure a deal with the U.S. that might give us a carve-out down the
line. Things can only get better, right?
Trump card:
As you’ll have seen by now, the U.S. president’s sandwich board of “reciprocal”
tariffs revealed Britain is getting the “minimum baseline” rate of 10 percent —
which sparked small sighs of relief throughout the government, given all
countries were included and many, including the EU, were hit much harder.
Almost all of the national papers (bar the Metro and Sun) splash on Trump, and
you can catch all 48 minutes of his rambling speech in the White House Rose
Garden here.
Taking
stock: The move by Trump — probably the biggest of his second term so far —
sent stocks sliding in after-hours trading, suggesting that investors expect
deep losses when Wall Street opens today. All eyes on the U.K. markets when
they open at 8 a.m. As it stands you’d expect Britain’s growth forecasts to be
downgraded, with implications for the autumn budget.
**A message
from Lloyds Banking Group: Right now, over 1.5 million households across the
country are on waiting lists for social housing. At Lloyds Banking Group, we are continuing to champion social housing
and that’s why we have supported £19.5 billion of funding to the sector since
2018. Find out what’s ahead**
Chin up!
Whitehall officials were still trying to work out the details and small print
from the U.S. late last night, but those Playbook spoke to believed that things
could have been much, much worse — at least for the U.K.
Hence … the
early efforts from No. 10 to push the narrative that Starmer’s efforts to charm
the president paid off. “We don’t want any tariffs at all, but a lower levy
than others vindicates our approach,” a Downing Street source told Playbook
(and large parts of the Lobby). “The difference between 10 and 20 per cent is
thousands of jobs. We will keep negotiating, keep cool and keep calm. We want
to negotiate a sustainable trade deal, and of course to get tariffs lowered …
we will continue with that work.”
Trade phony
war: Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, in the government’s first on-record
response last night, said “nothing was off the table” in terms of potential
retaliatory action — though he maintained that the U.K.’s preferred outcome is
still a deal that eliminates the tariffs instead of a trade war.
Expect to
hear much more of that … from Reynolds on the morning broadcast round shortly.
He’ll also make a statement to the Commons later this morning, while hacks will
have a chance to grill Starmer himself when he launches Labour’s local election
campaign in the East Midlands in the late morning. After speeches from the PM,
his deputy Angela Rayner and Labour Chair Ellie Reeves, he’ll do a short
Q&A with journalists.
The problem
with the rosy narrative: That baseline tariff of 10 percent is still a very
significant blow to the U.K. economy. Britain also exports a lot of vehicles to
the U.S., which as of 5 a.m. are subject to the previously announced 25 percent
tariff Trump confirmed at the start of his speech. Remember we’ve already got a
25 percent import tax on steel and aluminum, too.
He doesn’t
care about you, babe: The positive vibes are also diminished by the big list of
other countries that escaped relatively lightly on the 10 percent flat rate,
given they didn’t bother offering handwritten invitations to state visits with
the king … or (allegedly) float binning or watering down the digital services
tax … or drone on and on about the “special relationship.” Leftist-led Brazil,
which briefly banned Elon Musk’s X last year, is also at the lowest rate.
Now that’s a
line: “Even the Taliban got a better deal than Starmer,” an SNP official, of
all people, griped to Playbook last night as it was revealed Afghanistan is
also in the 10 percent club despite “charging” the U.S. more in tariffs than
the U.K. … err, if you include “currency manipulation,” “compliance hurdles”
and all the rest, according to Trump’s highly suspect sandwich board figures.
Just check out the White House’s supposed mathematical formula.
But at least
… we’re not the EU, which got hammered with 20 percent as a whole bloc. How’s
that for a Brexit bonus, or “dividend,” as the Telegraph playfully dubs it?
Team Trump
agrees: Trump ally and admin official Sebastian Gorka told Newsnight: “After
Brexit, you’ve reaffirmed your independence, and I think that is being proven
today by the special rate that has been afforded to the U.K.”
Then there’s
this: POLITICO’s senior trade reporter in the U.S., Doug Palmer, points out
that one of the 60 trading partners hit with higher rates than Britain was the
27-nation EU … so the number (and the U.K.’s good fortune to avoid higher
rates) is actually bigger than it appears. Harder hit were Japan (24 percent)
and China (34 percent), among others. Though before anyone gets too excited,
remember that global economic shocks will rebound on Britain, too — especially
with expected retaliation overseas.
How Britain
got away with it: No doubt Starmer’s top team would love to claim credit for
Britain’s relatively lenient treatment on Trump’s Liberation Day, Playbook
D.C.’s Managing Editor and Author Jack Blanchard emails in from Washington. But
while it’s true the PM has struck up a surprisingly warm relationship with the
U.S. president over the past 12 months, the White House has been crystal clear
that these supposedly “reciprocal” tariffs were all about a simple — in fact,
terrifyingly simple — calculation.
Back of a
fag packet: As one random internet sleuth figured out, it appears the
calculation used by Trump’s crack team of officials to work out the tariffs was
based almost entirely on each nation’s trade imbalance with America. While half
the world is up in arms at that approach, it worked out quite well for the U.K.
By Washington’s counting methods, the U.S. actually has a trade surplus with
Britain. This appears to be the reason Britain is anchored on Trump’s baseline
rate of 10 percent, along with Brazil, Australia and the penguins of these
Antarctic islands. Still, a win’s a win … If you can call that a win.
Not
currently clear … is whether that 10 percent baseline is fixed. U.K. officials
are certainly hopeful it isn’t, and a second government official said Britain
will be “back to the negotiating table” today to secure a deal that might
reduce or — dream big! — eliminate the tariffs. “We don’t want to see any
tariffs, and the only way that we do that is by negotiating the deal,” this
person added.
Gorka, you
corker: Those dreaming big will be cheered by other comments from Gorka on
Newsnight, where he said there’s “nothing to say that the current rate … could
not improve. It is the beginning.” Though, of course, no one really knows
what’s going on in Trump’s mind.
For one
thing: Remember when Trump told POLITICO this? “I think there’s a very good
chance that in the case of these two great, friendly countries, we could very
well end up with a real trade deal where the tariffs wouldn’t be necessary.”
That was February.
What is
clear … is that the tariffs are coming, and fast. The 10 percent baseline
tariff on the U.K.’s £60 billion worth of annual exports to the U.S. comes into
effect from Saturday at midnight. Government officials are gonna have a busy
weekend.
Maybe
Charlie can help: Former NASA astronaut and Democrat U.S. Senator Mark Kelly
tells POLITICO’s Power Play podcast that Trump could be swayed in tariff
negotiations by the “golden coach” strategy of a state visit to the U.K.
“That’s kind of his thing — golden coaches, so I imagine he would appreciate
that,” Kelly said. Listen here.
SO, WHAT
NOW? First up for the government is reassurance time. As this email goes out,
Starmer is chairing a roundtable of business leaders from “key sectors” — those
likely impacted by Trumpageddon. His words at the top of the meeting are on
camera and should be released shortly.
While
elsewhere in government … there is gonna be a flurry of calls with business all
day mainly led by DBT ministers. Reynolds will, at some point, speak to the
very worried automobile industry.
Not
involved: But David Lammy won’t be raising the issue when he talks to Marco
Rubio at a NATO foreign affairs summit in Brussels, Playbook’s Sam Blewett
texts in.
In fairness:
The transatlantic top diplomats are meeting at the NATO summit in Brussels to
discuss Ukraine, as well as maintaining the fragile peace in the Western
Balkans. Lammy was instead deferring trade talks to Business Secretary Jonathan
Reynolds and the PM, insisting to Sam that Rubio came away from the G7 foreign
ministers meeting in Canada last month “pretty clear that all of us are
concerned about a sort of return to protectionism.”
On the Lam:
Lammy was speaking to Sam in Belgrade for a piece looking at the ever-thorny
region (watch this space in the days to come) before the foreign secretary
heads to Belgium. Diplomacy was proving tough in Serbia despite the foreign
secretary signing various deals aimed at fostering closer ties, with Lammy
getting a slapdown from the increasingly authoritarian President Aleksandar
Vučić as he dared to raise protests gripping the Serbian capital. “It doesn’t
even occur to me to make any comment on protests and demonstrations in Great
Britain because I respect the sovereignty of Great Britain,” Vučić said in a
statement before assembled media.
Surprise,
surprise: There was “no time” for questions at the “press conference.”
BACK TO
TRUMP … and the U.S. president will be dealing with the fallout in his own way
today — you’ll want to read this morning’s D.C. Playbook by Jack when it lands
in a few hours.
One side
plot: Will the president pop up with another birthday wish for Nigel Farage
this evening? The Reform UK leader is holding a “small” party to mark the
occasion this evening, Playbook hears — but the expectation within Reform was
that Trump would be too busy to partake. Cynics may wonder if their special
relationship has cooled.
FEELING FOR
A DEAL
AFTER THE
REASSURANCE … comes the push for a deal that might see Britain get out of the
tariff hole and prove just how special the relationship is — though that’s
easier said than done, innit. The Times’ Steven Swinford reports that the
government will embark on a “frenzy of diplomatic activity in the coming days”
to get the deal over the line. Luckily, POLITICO’s ace trade reporter Graham
Lanktree has some insight into what a trade agreement between the U.K. and the
U.S. could look like.
Up for
review: The draft U.K.-U.S. trade agreement contains commitments by Downing
Street to review enforcement of its online safety and digital competition
regulations, two people briefed on the pact tell Graham. The deal currently
sitting on Donald Trump’s desk in the White House is a framework agreement
that, officials hope, would see the U.K. eventually get carve-outs from Trump’s
tariffs imposed today.
Couple
cobblers: The deal has been cobbled together in a little over a month by
Reynolds, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative
Jamieson Greer and their negotiating teams.
Digital
dilemma: It contains “a commitment to a review of the Digital Markets and
Competition Act and the Online Safety Bill,” said one of the people. “So just a
regulatory review of the implementation of those various pieces of legislation.
Not a do-over.” All of these commitments from the U.K. are “all in the mix,
yes,” said a second person briefed on the talks. “But whether the prime
minister or secretary are able to overrule the rights of consultation, the
right of parliament in agreeing something,” they said, “that’s where I think
that’s probably politically ambitious for government to do.”
The when:
The Guardian’s Pippa Crerar also hears that “broad agreement” has been reached
with the U.S. over a deal the U.K. hopes will reduce tariffs — but officials
she spoke to acknowledged getting a trade deal over the line could take weeks
or months.
And of
course … as former Trade Minister Greg Hands told Wednesday’s Playbook PM,
previous trade talks were sunk by wanting a carve-out from the Online Safety
Act. It doesn’t sound like something that will especially please digital health
campaigners, many of whom were involved in Starmer’s big “Adolescence”-themed
roundtable this week.
Summed up
well: A source tells the Mail’s Jason Groves that “everything we are discussing
is going to be controversial.” Another blunt reminder that all roads for the
government will lead to pain in some form.
TODAY IN
WESTMINSTER
OFF THE
RUNWAY: A planning decision is coming this afternoon on the proposed expansion
of Luton Airport — and the expectation in government is that an approval is
likely to be handed to Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander today. The decision
will be announced via a letter on the national infrastructure planning website
at 2 p.m.
Ironically:
A High Court case by climate charities fighting the government’s aviation
expansion hopes reaches its third day today. They hope to take the plans back
to the drawing board by arguing that net zero aviation ain’t possible. The
government disagrees, obvs.
TANGLED UP
IN VIEWS: Ministers plan a fresh round of reviews to mollify MPs and artists
furious at plans to let AI rake over copyrighted material. My colleagues Joseph
Bambridge and Dan Bloom have dug into how the two biggest questions — how
artists can “opt out” of AI learning, and how they’ll get transparency about
what AI has learned — still simply don’t have an answer. Ulp! The reviews
(which Tuesday’s Times got wind of, too) are set to be announced as part of the
Data Bill.
Officially,
there’s no delay here … but it sure feels like the go-slow. Campaigners and big
tech firms are entrenched and digging in their heels. One government figure
says: “There’s a danger that we get this badly wrong.” Read the full piece
here.
WHAT THE
GOVERNMENT WANTS TO TALK ABOUT: Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall and
Employment Minister Alison McGovern will be in Barnsley to launch the first of
nine “Get Britain Working trailblazer” programs — fourth sector pathfinders,
anyone? — to tackle inactivity. Kendall is likely to do a pool clip and a media
huddle shortly after 2 p.m.
What the
government also wants to talk about: Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson
will use a speech at the “festival of children” to argue that more men should
become teachers to help combat “toxic” behavior in boys. The Guardian’s Richard
Adams has a preview.
BUT HAVING
MORE FUN THAN ALL OF THEM … is Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, who’s in New York
on a trade mission that may have been complicated by recent events. He’s got a
full pipe band with him, and even got Peter Mandelson to wear Tartan troosers.
Murray also met Trump’s U.K. envoy at the U.K. embassy Tuesday night, Playbook
hears, where the pair discussed Trump’s Scottish roots.
MORE PLEDGE
PROBLEMS: Starmer looks unlikely to fulfil a pre-election pledge to introduce a
Hillsborough law by the disaster’s anniversary to prevent cover-ups from public
bodies, the Times’ Patrick Maguire reports.
MEAT FOR
DONORS: In case Elon Musk is looking for a next move after the White House …
POLITICO’s expert in all things lobbying, John Johnston, has a tongue-in-cheek
(but detailed) guide to how to meddle in U.K. politics.
FROM COURT:
A High Court hearing about Labour’s decision to impose VAT on private schools
concludes today. A ruling on the case is expected at a later date.
USURPING THE
MAYOR: The leaders of London’s 32 local boroughs have appealed to Deputy Prime
Minister Angela Rayner in Jim Waterson’s London Centric for more power over
Mayor Sadiq Khan. They want a “combined board” of twelve council leaders and
the mayor, forcing him to get majority approval on any key strategic and
funding issues.
STATS DROP:
Fortnightly pupil attendance figures for schools in England … the weekly
situation report for NHS hospitals in England … and business insights and
impact on the U.K. economy all appear at 9.30 a.m.
SW1 EVENTS:
Former Sports Minister Tracey Crouch discusses the efficacy of government
reviews with the IFG at 2 p.m. (details here).
REPORTS OUT
TODAY: The government should adjust protection to defined benefit pensions to
encourage investment and spur economic growth, says the Social Market
Foundation.
HOUSE OF
COMMONS: Sits from 9.30 a.m. with culture, media and sport questions …
questions to the Church Commissioners, House of Commons Commission, Public
Accounts Commission, Restoration and Renewal Client Board and Speaker’s
Committee on the Electoral Commission … business questions to Leader of the
House Lucy Powell … a select committee statement on the first report of the
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee, “England’s Homeless
Children: The crisis in temporary accommodation” … a backbench debate on the
impact of digital platforms on U.K. democracy (led by Alliance MP Sorcha
Eastwood) … and a debate on access to sport and P.E. in schools (Labour MP
Leigh Ingham). Lib Dem MP Tom Gordon has the adjournment debate on adoption
breakdown.
HOUSE OF
LORDS: Sits from 11 a.m. with royal assent of the Church of Scotland (Lord High
Commissioner) Act 2025, Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025, National
Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1; Contributions) Act 2025, and
Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Act 2025 … questions on a
poll which found that one in five people aged 18 to 45 in the U.K. prefer
unelected strong leaders to democracy, reducing reported delays in holding
funerals, and ensuring that aid reaches those affected by the earthquake in
Myanmar … urgent question on NHS pensions and Bosnia-Herzegovina … a statement
on sentencing council guidelines … a debate on the impact of the government’s
economic and planning measures on farming and rural communities … a short
debate on NATO withdrawing from the Ottawa Treaty on anti-personnel landmines
and the Convention on Cluster Munitions … and a debate on the affordability of
net zero by 2050.
**After
Trump’s tariffs announcement yesterday, EU-U.S. relations are entering a new
chapter. Join our online debrief later today at 4 p.m. CEST with editors from
Brussels, Washington and London to get all the details and political
consequences. Register here.**
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário