Former EU
environment chief warns against backsliding on climate crisis
Virginijus
Sinkevičius, a former environment commissioner, criticises bloc’s decision to
delay deforestation law
Jennifer
Rankin
Wed 1 Jan
2025 05.00 CET
A former EU
environment commissioner has warned against backsliding on the protection of
nature and the battle against the climate crisis after the bloc decided to
delay its landmark deforestation law.
Virginijus
Sinkevičius, the Lithuanian MEP and a vice-president of the European
parliament’s Green group, said he disagreed with the decision to amend the
deforestation law in order to give companies a year of extra time to ensure
their products are not implicated in the felling of trees.
Every EU law
“is born through a very difficult negotiation where everyone needs to give
ground a bit”, he told the Guardian. “A last-minute change does not give
credibility to the EU’s decision-making.”
Sinkevičius,
who was EU environment commissioner for nearly five years until July, was
responsible for drafting the legislation, which will ban the sale in the EU of
commodities linked to deforestation such as cocoa, coffee, soy, palm oil and
rubber, as well as products, including chocolate, leather and furniture.
Last month,
the EU agreed a one-year delay to the lawafter intensive lobbying from industry
and forested countries around the world. Sinkevičius said problems with
implementing the law could have been tackled with a grace period, rather than
reopening negotiations between EU lawmakers. “That additional year was a bit of
a reward to those who did not try hard enough in order to comply with the
legislation,” he said.
Some of the
biggest companies, he said, were waiting for the law to apply, because it
brings “fair competition”. He said businesses that were trying to avoid
deforestation faced additional costs, against competitors that would “cut
corners” on nature protection and yet “be on the same shelf in the shop”.
In 2023,
6.37m hectares of forests worldwide were lost to cattle raising, crop growing,
mining, road building or devastating fires among other causes, according to the
Forest Declaration Assessment.
Sinkevičius
was speaking at the start of a new five-year term for the EU institutions, with
growing pressure to roll back elements of the green agenda. MEPs in the
European parliament, which has a record number of far-right lawmakers, have
proposed cancelling the 2035 ban on selling petrol and diesel cars, as well as
suspending pollution trading (a CO2 reduction strategy) for heavy industry.
Speaking in
general about green policies, Sinkevičius said “it would be the biggest
possible mistake to now shift to reverse gear”, adding that the “clean
industrial deal” promised by the new commission in its first 100 days would be
“an important first test of how we see our economy of the future”.
Ursula von
der Leyen, the European Commission president, has pledged a “clean industrial
deal” for “competitive industries and quality jobs” although details remain
sparse.
Sinkevičius
was the EU’s youngest ever commissioner when he took charge of EU policy on
environment, fisheries and oceans in 2019, aged 28. Protecting nature was
always an “uphill battle”, he said, as business sees fewer opportunities in
conserving soil, forests, seas and oceans than investing in clean energy. But
he expressed confidence that the new commission had not forgotten nature
protection, despite the headline focus on Europe’s lagging economy.
During his
time in office, von der Leyen scrapped the ambition to halve pesticide use by
2030, after angry protests by farmers. Sinkevičius said he had always been
critical of that target, which he described as “overkill”. He contended the 50%
reduction target was unfair on member states that had already reduced pesticide
use: “When I have to cut 50% from a very little amount, that’s going to be
painful … while I see that my neighbour is cutting 50% from 20 times bigger
[starting point]. And that was a big issue. And therefore I was suggesting that
we need to find more tailor-made solutions.”
The draft
pesticides law, in fact, accounted for differences in historic use of
pesticides by setting national targets, requiring different efforts, underneath
the headline 50% reduction goal for the EU. Asked for clarification, an aide to
the MEP said he stood by his earlier remarks.
As a former
European commissioner, who was required to put aside his party affiliation,
Sinkevičius said he hoped to be a bridge between the Greens and other
mainstream pro-EU groups in the European parliament, the centre-right European
People’s party, the Socialists and the centrist Renew group.
He
acknowledged the Greens could be isolated if the centre-right chose to look
further right for allies, but said: “If you want a truly pro-European
coalition, the Greens is your answer because we are stable, we are reliable.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário