Rishi Sunak urged to heed criticism on climate
after Zac Goldsmith quits
Tory peer claims PM uninterested in environment but No
10 suggests exit had alternative motive
Rowena
Mason, Helena Horton and Patrick Greenfield
Fri 30 Jun
2023 18.02 BST
Rishi Sunak
is embroiled in an extraordinary standoff with Zac Goldsmith after the Tory
peer quit the government, accusing Sunak of being “simply uninterested” in the
environment and the climate emergency.
Lord
Goldsmith resigned as a Foreign Office minister with a highly personal attack,
warning that voters would punish the prime minister at the polls for his
“apathy in the face of the greatest challenge we have faced”.
Goldsmith,
a close ally of Boris Johnson, said his position had become untenable after
Sunak dropped a key animal welfare bill, broke a promise on environmental aid
spending and went to a party hosted by Rupert Murdoch rather than to a climate
summit.
Sunak hit
back shortly afterwards in a letter suggesting Goldsmith’s departure was linked
to No 10 asking him to apologise for having undermined the privileges
committee’s inquiry into Johnson.
“You were
asked to apologise for your comments about the privileges committee as we felt
they were incompatible with your position as a minister of the crown. You have
decided to take a different course,” the prime minister wrote in an unusually
blunt response.
Goldsmith
said No 10 had subjected him to “misleading briefing” as he had been willing to
acknowledge his error. He insisted that his resignation had been a long time
coming because of Sunak’s “lethargic” approach to the environment in contrast
to Johnson’s.
Environmental
groups and leading opposition MPs said Sunak should listen to Goldsmith’s
criticisms of the government’s record on the environment regardless of the
controversy over the privileges committee.
Ed
Miliband, the shadow energy secretary, said Goldsmith had “blown open the truth
about the utter failure and negligence of Rishi Sunak’s government on the
climate and nature crisis”. “It’s no wonder ministers are resigning from the
government because they are so horrified by the government’s approach,” he
said.
Sunak has
long been accused of falling short on the environment and climate, failing to
include it in his five priorities as well as repeatedly taking short-haul
private jet and helicopter flights.
Goldsmith’s
analysis that environmental policy in Whitehall was in “paralysis” under Sunak
was backed by a string of charities and environmental groups.
Craig
Bennett, the chief executive of the Wildlife Trusts, said he agreed with the
thrust of Goldsmith’s critique. “At the Wildlife Trusts, we recognise the
‘paralysis’ on environmental action that has befallen Whitehall in recent
months. There is now a very long list of environmental commitments made by the
Conservatives over the last 13 years that have not yet been delivered. And, at
the same time, no obvious sense of urgency around getting them delivered any
time soon.”
Shaun
Spiers, the executive director of Green Alliance, said: “Rishi Sunak, please
take note of this devastating critique of government and your own apathy and
inaction. It is a tragedy that ‘the UK has visibly stepped off the world stage
and withdrawn our leadership on climate and nature’.”
Stephanie
Draper, the chief executive of Bond, the UK network for non-governmental
organisations, also highlighted Goldsmith’s criticisms of Sunak for failing to
appear at a Paris summit on the climate, debt and poverty last week hosted by
the French president, Emmanuel Macron. “The UK is stepping back as a global
partner and is no longer playing a leadership role,” she said.
Sunak
partially addressed Goldsmith’s criticisms of his record on the environment in
his letter acknowledging the resignation. “We can be proud of the UK’s record
as a world leader on net zero,” he said. “We are going far beyond other
countries and delivering tangible progress whilst bringing down energy bills.
This government is also committed to leaving the environment in a better state
than we found it, as set out in our environmental improvement plan.”
The spat
between Sunak and Goldsmith further exposes fissures within the Conservative
party that threaten its messaging before the next general election.
Andrea
Leadsom, a senior Conservative MP, said Goldsmith’s resignation was
“inexplicable” and his claim Sunak did not care about the environment was “flat
wrong”. She told Times Radio: “It’s much easier to throw your toys out the pram
and become a protester than it is to actually be inside the tent finding
solutions.”
However,
others such as David Frost, another Conservative peer, said they hoped
Goldsmith was right that Sunak was toning down his ambitions on “global
preaching on fashionable environmental and climate causes, paid for by UK
taxpayers”.
In
contrast, some Conservative MPs fear that Sunak’s lack of interest in the
environment will cost them votes, with many among the public exercised about
the climate emergency and sewage discharges, as well a dropped pledge to ban
puppy farming.
In his
various government jobs since 2020, Goldsmith has helped negotiate a global
deal to halt deforestation announced at Cop26 and pushed for a target to
protect 30% of the planet for nature, the headline target agreed at last
December’s biodiversity Cop15 summit in Montreal.
“He was
instrumental in raising the profile of biodiversity in the climate agenda at
Cop26 and made valuable contributions to Cop15,” said the interim UN
biodiversity chief, David Cooper.
A UK
government source said: “It’s a huge loss for the nature agenda. His visionary
leadership was ahead of many others internationally. But he’s done a huge
amount to create the long-term conditions for success. I hope that this serves
as a serious message to every party ahead of the election that nature and
climate matters – to voters at home and to countries around the world.”
Alastair
Driver, the director of Rewilding Britain, said: “Irrespective of your
political views (and I for one am a typical floating voter), Zac Goldsmith has
been a rare species in parliamentary circles who truly understood the magnitude
of what’s needed to reverse biodiversity decline and tackle climate change. The
task just got harder.”
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário