Times
Exclusive
The
Untold Story of Jeffrey Epstein’s Death
By
Charles Homans, Steve Eder, Jan Ransom and Michael Rothfeld
Visual
analysis and graphics by Helmuth Rosales, Aric Toler and Katherine Chui
Photographs by Andrew Moore and Cait Oppermann
June 16,
2026
Late in
the afternoon of July 6, 2019, about a dozen F.B.I. agents and New York Police
Department officers gathered at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey, waiting out of
view of the tarmac so as not to spook their quarry. The day before, they
received an email informing them that a private jet would be arriving at 5:20
p.m. Attached to the email was an arrest warrant for its lone passenger,
Jeffrey Epstein.
Returning
from Paris, Epstein was making plans on his phone: a trip to his private island
in the Caribbean, a documentary interview with Stephen K. Bannon, President
Trump’s former adviser. When the plane touched down, customs agents boarded to
check the passports of Epstein and the plane’s two pilots. Then they escorted
Epstein into the terminal, where an F.B.I. agent and a detective told him he
was under arrest.
Epstein
appeared shocked. He managed to send one last message to Bannon: “All
canceled.”
Bannon
wrote back immediately. “you r not coming in?” There was no reply.
As the
F.B.I. agents drove Epstein to Manhattan, he asked two questions. “Is this sex
trafficking?” “Is this about underage?” It was.
The
F.B.I. and federal prosecutors had quietly opened a new investigation eight
months earlier into Epstein’s activities in New York, focusing on victims who
had not been interviewed in his decade-old sex-crimes case in Florida. While
Epstein was abroad, he was indicted under seal on charges of trafficking minors
for sex. If found guilty, he faced up to 45 years in prison — a sentence far
worse than the 13 months he had served in Palm Beach after a plea deal in 2008.
“Oh, this
is bad,” he said aloud as he was booked into federal custody. “This is really
bad.”
An F.B.I.
agent and a detective took Epstein to the Metropolitan Correctional Center, a
federal jail in Lower Manhattan, shortly after 9 that night. The newly arrived
inmate caught the eye of a jail employee named Elba Torres as she passed his
cell. Epstein appeared “distraught, sad and a little confused,” Torres reported
in an email to the jail staff. When she asked him if he was OK, he replied that
he was. “But I am not convinced because he seems dazed and withdrawn,” she
wrote. “So just to be on the safe side and prevent any suicidal thoughts can
someone from Psychology come and talk with him.”
Neither
Torres nor anyone else on the jail staff seemed to have yet identified Epstein
as a figure of note. But her memo, written in the early moments of his
incarceration, documented an extraordinary reversal of fortune. Hours before,
Epstein had been cocooned within a personal empire of luxury and influence that
had for years seemed to operate effectively beyond the reach of the law. Now he
was in an overcrowded federal jail in an inmate’s uniform, reduced to a Bureau
of Prisons number: 76318-054. It was the beginning of a journey into darkness
that would end 35 days later, in the early hours of Aug. 10, 2019, when a guard
found him unresponsive in his cell, hanging from a noose made from orange jail
fabric.
The New
York City medical examiner ruled Epstein’s death a suicide. But seven years
later, the theory that Epstein didn’t kill himself, that he was murdered by
someone with an interest in keeping him quiet, is held by many people who agree
about little else. A broader discontent and suspicion around the handling of
his death helped prompt the Epstein Files Transparency Act, passed by Congress
with bipartisan support in November, which has since resulted in the disclosure
of more than three million pages of Epstein-related documents, photos and
videos.
These
include tens of thousands of pages of documents and hundreds of hours of video
gathered in the official investigations into Epstein’s death: an initial
inquiry by Justice Department prosecutors with F.B.I. agents and New York City
detectives and a yearslong investigation by the Justice Department inspector
general, both of which concluded that Epstein died by suicide.
The newly
released records have raised more questions about his death — but they have
also offered the clearest opportunity yet to answer them. Over the years, The
New York Times and other news outlets sued for records from these
investigations, but even those hard-won documents were dwarfed by the volume of
what was now public. Congressional action had made possible the fullest
examination yet of Epstein’s death, and we set out to do it.
Working
from the documents, we found and interviewed as many people as possible who
interacted with Epstein during his arrest and incarceration or participated in
the inquiries into his death. We spoke and corresponded with more than 40
inmates, jail employees, lawyers, federal officials and law enforcement
officers connected with the case — many of whom had not been previously
interviewed by reporters. Notably, many had also never been interviewed by
investigators. We also spoke with Epstein’s brother, Mark, and a pathologist he
hired to attend Epstein’s autopsy, as well as other pathologists with no
involvement in the case. For many more people connected to the death and its
investigation who declined to talk to us, we consulted newly released notes and
transcripts from the investigators’ interviews.
We went
to court to win access to a document that had been described as a suicide note
written by Epstein in jail before an earlier apparent attempt to take his own
life, which was hidden from the public and investigators for years. We obtained
about a dozen pages of other notes handwritten by Epstein in jail that were
also previously unseen — including some in which he tried and failed to come up
with significant information he might have on Donald Trump to offer to
prosecutors. And we worked with colleagues who specialize in open-source visual
investigations to analyze photographs and video footage from the unit where
Epstein was housed and create a 3-D model of it. We considered every plausible
theory of Epstein’s death, both official and otherwise, seeking out the most
persuasive arguments and evidence for each.
That the
official account of Epstein’s death would come under suspicion was all but
inevitable. Epstein was a man of extraordinary yet hazily explained wealth,
with private-plane manifests full of executives, dignitaries and even former
heads of state, and a record of lurid sex crimes involving teenage girls. This
profile, already fertile ground for conspiracy theories, became radically more
so after his death. And the facts, as they emerged, were rife with odd-seeming
coincidences, outwardly baffling decisions and credulity-straining mistakes and
oversights.
At the
time of his death, Epstein was alone in his cell in spite of clear guidance to
the contrary, while the guards assigned to his section of the jail neglected to
conduct their rounds for hours. The jail’s security-camera system partially
failed, and the video it did record showed an orange blur — the color of an
inmate’s uniform — moving toward Epstein’s corridor shortly before his death.
After Epstein’s body was found, evidence from his cell was not cataloged
carefully, and photographs and objects gathered there seemed difficult to
reconcile with aspects of his autopsy report. Two pathologists present at that
autopsy had differing interpretations of the injuries to his neck.
There
were so many people with an ostensible stake, one way or another, in Epstein’s
death. Was it possible that all of this just happened?
Some
important questions about Epstein’s death remain unanswered and likely
unanswerable. Nevertheless, our reporting establishes that Epstein showed a
clear pattern of behavior in the weeks before his death suggesting an intent to
kill himself. The apparent suicide note memorialized Epstein’s despair and
desire to “say goodbye” on his own terms. Other writings from his final days
presented a picture of a fraying mental state that sharply contrasted with the
upbeat picture he presented to jail psychologists, including another note in
which he hinted at ending his life.
In
addition to this, we were told by a former cellmate that Epstein made more than
one previously unreported attempt to craft a noose. And we located a former
inmate, never before interviewed, who was housed in a neighboring cell at the
time of Epstein’s death and whose account circumstantially supported the
conclusion that Epstein died by hanging himself. Consulting with independent
pathologists, we determined that a likely error in cataloging evidence from his
cell created the appearance of mysteries regarding his injuries that were, in
fact, potentially explained by other evidence from the scene that was
overlooked at the time.
The
picture drawn most clearly by this new information is not the elaborate
conspiracy that his murder would have required; rather, it is an unfortunate
though not improbable convergence of longstanding institutional failures, human
errors and chance events, which created an opportunity for Epstein to act on
what was by then a well-established desire that he had already tried and failed
to realize.
“ONLY
PAIN TO ME & others in the future,” he wrote during his incarceration. Days
later, a chance for him to escape that future would present itself. This is the
untold story of how it happened.
‘He
seemed a bit shellshocked’
Besides
Epstein himself, the most important character in the story of his death is not
a person but a place: the Metropolitan Correctional Center, a Brutalist
monolith infamous among federal prisoners and lawyers for its poor conditions
and dysfunction. The M.C.C., which housed federal criminal defendants
prosecuted by the Southern District of New York, was overcrowded and so squalid
and crumbling that Bureau of Prisons officials would later warn that it posed a
safety and security threat to inmates and employees alike. (It was closed in
2021.)
The
building was stiflingly hot in the winter and freezing cold in the summer,
leading inmates to hoard stashes of extra sheets so they could sleep through
frigid nights. Many of the M.C.C.’s corrections officers worked second jobs or
exhausting overtime schedules to make ends meet. More than a few extracted
income from the jail’s thriving underground economy, which was a reliable
source of federal indictments for smuggling contraband.
The
M.C.C.’s highest-profile inmates were usually housed in a maximum-security unit
on the 10th floor of the southern wing, a jail within a jail where they were
isolated from other prisoners and kept under 24-hour video surveillance. The
unit, known as 10 South, had held all sorts of violent, vulnerable or
potentially suicidal criminals: Joaquín Guzmán, the Mexican crime lord known as
El Chapo; Mafia hit men; terrorists from Al Qaeda; Bernie Madoff during his own
pretrial detention a decade earlier. But there is no indication from the
investigation documents that it was ever considered for Epstein.
New
York’s state-run facilities have protective custody units reserved for inmates
who are high profile or otherwise potentially in danger in prison. The M.C.C.
did not, and instead sometimes placed them in the special housing unit, or the
SHU. The SHU was punitive by nature — inmates were held in cells for 23 hours a
day and sharply limited in their contact with the outside world — and research
has shown that prolonged isolation in such conditions can exacerbate mental
illness and increase the risk of self-harm and suicide. This was where Epstein
would spend most of his time in the M.C.C.
At first,
however, little attention seems to have been paid to his arrival at the jail.
Although his arrest was already widely reported, when he was taken to the rear
gate of the jail on the night of July 6 he was not processed as a high-profile
inmate. As a result, he was placed in the M.C.C.’s general inmate population
that night.
An inmate
named Peter Bright recognized Epstein when they crossed paths in the unit to
which they were both assigned. Epstein was “not very communicative,” he
recalled. “He seemed a bit shellshocked.” The unit, 5 North, had a reputation
among M.C.C. inmates as a particularly rough part of the jail, and trouble
found Epstein there almost immediately in the form of another prisoner who went
by Loco Tron.
Two other
inmates recalled that Loco Tron accosted Epstein. “He was trying to get money
out of him,” one of them, Luis Fernandez, told us, recalling what Loco Tron had
told him. “He was trying to scare him.” Another inmate, Dayvon Williams, said
he intervened to stop him.
On July
7, Lamine N’Diaye, the M.C.C. warden, who had by then identified Epstein and
recognized the risks he faced in general population, ordered him moved to the
SHU. The SHU’s use as an ad-hoc protective custody unit had the perverse
consequence of placing some of the jail’s most vulnerable inmates alongside
some of its most violent. So it was that Epstein was led up to the SHU that
evening and introduced to a muscular man with a shaved head named Nicholas
Tartaglione, with whom he would be sharing his cell.
After the
door shut behind him, Epstein, visibly nervous, asked Tartaglione what he was
in for. Multiple homicides, Tartaglione told him.
Epstein
turned and pounded on the door, shouting for the guards.
‘How do
you make a noose?’
Tartaglione,
a 51-year-old former police officer, was awaiting trial on federal charges of
killing four men, one of whom was strangled with a zip tie. (He has since been
convicted and has appealed.) As strange as it might seem, his selection as a
cellmate for a prisoner who presented safety concerns, like Epstein, reflected
conventional, if counterintuitive, wisdom among corrections officials: Inmates
charged with serious crimes had the most to lose by committing new offenses in
prison.
Contacted
recently at a maximum-security prison in California where he is serving four
life sentences, Tartaglione told us that when he asked the guards why he was
put with Epstein, they said, “You’re the only guy who won’t beat him up or
extort him.”
The next
morning, Elissa Miller, the jail’s chief psychologist, placed him under
temporary psychological observation in a special cell, citing “multiple risk
factors for suicidality” because of his sex-crime charges, but quickly returned
him to his cell with Tartaglione. This, too, had a clear logic.
Suicide
is an omnipresent threat in prison. It is also a private act that prisoners are
less likely to attempt when they are around other people, and a cellmate can
generally be counted on to stop a suicide attempt or alert the guards — if not
out of compassion then at least out of self-interest. Saving another inmate’s
life avoids implication in a suspicious death and might even be factored into
sentencing.
But
Miller also came away from her early meetings with Epstein relatively
unconcerned about his suicide risk. In their conversations, he seemed to her to
be in a positive mood. He spoke optimistically about his prospects for being
released on bail in advance of his trial, and blew off the notion that he posed
any threat to himself. He had a “big business” to attend to on the outside, he
told her. And besides, he said, “being alive is fun.”
But over
the next week, the forecast clouded for him. During his bail proceedings,
Epstein’s lawyers proposed that he await trial in home detention in his
Manhattan townhouse, ensured by a substantial bond. Federal prosecutors argued
against his release, maintaining that he posed an extraordinarily high flight
risk based on his wealth and international connections. On July 18, his 13th
day in jail, a federal judge agreed, denying him bail.
Tartaglione
told us that when Epstein returned to their cell from court that day, he asked
abruptly: “How do you make a noose?”
In the
days that followed, Tartaglione said, he caught Epstein preparing for suicide
twice — an account that the inmate Peter Bright also recalled hearing from
Tartaglione shortly after Epstein’s death. Once, Tartaglione said, he noticed
Epstein trying to tie a sheet to the grate over the cell window. Another time,
he woke up to Epstein standing in the dark looking “a little suspicious” and
discovered a noose hidden under his mattress.
Tartaglione
told us he reported both attempts to guards, but they did not seem to take them
seriously, laughing him off. (We could find no mention of these attempts in the
jail records released in the Epstein files.)
At this
point, Epstein’s only regular connections outside the M.C.C. were his lawyers,
a seemingly never-ending parade of mostly young attorneys who met with him in
the jail’s legal-visit room. Although they were ostensibly there to plan his
defense, they knew their real role was to provide a highly compensated form of
companionship and a pretext for Epstein to remain out of his cell as much as
possible.
They sat
with him for hours at a stretch, often to the annoyance of other inmates and
their lawyers, who also needed to use the room. They listened as he seethed
about the former friends who were now publicly distancing themselves from him,
like Leslie Wexner, and tried to figure out whether he had any leverage to use
against former associates like Bill Gates. Once, they heard him mutter: “I
can’t do this.”
His
attorneys discussed with federal prosecutors the prospect of a proffer: giving
them information that might be useful in other cases in exchange for the
possibility of some leniency in his own. Epstein was particularly preoccupied
with what he might have on Donald Trump, who was then serving his first term in
office. Jotting on a legal pad, he returned to the president again and again,
trying to dredge up anything to offer prosecutors. But his scribblings — “Trump
is a total con artist — smoke & mirrors” and “Never had money”— suggest
that he could come up with little that wasn’t already known.
Epstein’s
writings were mostly elliptical, jottings rather than complete thoughts,
riddled with his distinctive idiosyncratic capitalization and punctuation — but
revealing all the same. He wrote about the frustrations and humiliations that
came with being seen as a wealthy “Pedophile in jail.” He was denied phone
calls and personal visitors, and it was “impossible to mount a defense” with
the incessant noise of the SHU — “no sleep, no air, screams.” The guards,
Epstein wrote, told Tartaglione that “if he beat the shit out of me, they
wouldn’t file a report.”
On July
22, four days after his bail was denied, he wrote across the top of a piece of
paper in large letters: “J’ACCUSE.” It was an apparent reference to Emile
Zola’s 1898 public letter denouncing the French government for the biased
prosecution of the Jewish army officer Alfred Dreyfus on treason charges of
which he was later exonerated. A fragmentary rant followed down the page.
“Me/Too -Jewish-Rich-Politics,” he wrote. “Believe the victim = Believe the
accuser — CRAZY!”
Hours
later, at 1:27 a.m., the guards on the night shift heard a banging sound coming
from the direction of his cell. Arriving on the tier, they heard Tartaglione
yelling. Looking through the narrow window of his cell, one of the officers saw
Epstein on the floor, motionless, an orange fabric noose hanging loosely around
his neck.
‘It is a
treat to be able to choose one’s time to say goodbye’
Epstein
and Tartaglione told sharply divergent stories about what happened that night.
Tartaglione said that he had been on his mattress on the floor, sleeping with
headphones on, when he felt something bump against his legs. Epstein was in a
seated position, his back against their bunk bed, dangling from the noose.
Tartaglione cut him down with a razor he had hidden in the cell, he told us,
and, recalling his police training, began chest compressions.
When the
guards arrived at the cell moments later, Epstein was breathing but still
unresponsive. As he regained consciousness, he appeared unable to stand. The
officers cuffed him and placed him on a stretcher, carrying him off to an
observation cell near the jail psychologist’s office. He was put in a rip-proof
suicide smock and left there for the rest of the night.
The first
detailed memo about the episode was written early the next morning by Glenda
Anderson-Layne, the operations lieutenant on duty that night, who reported that
Epstein behaved oddly after regaining consciousness. His eyes were open, but
when anyone made eye contact with him, he quickly shut them. In the observation
cell, he sat on the edge of the bed and slumped forward, falling over, but as
soon as the lieutenant looked away, he straightened up, as if it were all a
performance. Anderson-Layne told him she would cuff him for his own safety if
he repeated the act. “OK, I won’t do it again,” he told her and flashed a
thumbs-up.
Anderson-Layne
tentatively described what happened the previous night as a “possible suicide
attempt.” Epstein’s own story was inconsistent. At first, he told corrections
officers that Tartaglione tried to kill him, an account he later repeated to
another inmate, according to jail records.
But later
that day, he claimed to a jail psychologist that he had gotten up to get a
drink of water around 1 a.m., and the next thing he remembered, he was lying on
the floor surrounded by jail staff members, with no recollection of how he got
there. He gave a third explanation to David Schoen, a lawyer who met with him
in jail a week later, telling him that the incident began with a “prank”
Tartaglione “sort of forced on him,” Schoen told us, and that he made up
another story to tell the guards.
When
Miller, the chief psychologist, wrote her own memo about Epstein the morning
after the episode, she noted that it was “unclear at this time” what exactly
happened. She was, by then, approaching Epstein with some skepticism. In their
meetings, he demanded all kinds of special treatment, seemingly regarding her
like a personal assistant. She was forced to squeeze in these meetings around
his marathon sessions in the legal-visit room, where Epstein and one of his
attorneys mocked her for thinking he might be suicidal.
Considering
the incomplete facts and conflicting accounts, Miller believed there were three
plausible explanations. One was that Epstein really was suicidal and that the
attempt, clumsy as it was, was a kind of rehearsal. Another was that
Tartaglione attacked him.
The third
was that Epstein, Tartaglione or both were trying to game the jail system. It
was common enough for inmates to claim to be suicidal in order to get away from
a particular guard or to get a new cellmate. Miller knew Epstein had recently
been denied bail. It seemed possible, she later told investigators, that he was
trying to send a message: “‘I can’t take jail. Put me on house arrest. I’m
either going to hurt myself or someone else is going to hurt me. Get me out of
here.’” Epstein “came in very entitled,” she went on. “He had a lot of money.
He was meeting with his attorneys every day.”
There was
one piece of evidence that might have convinced jail officials that Epstein was
serious about taking his own life — but at the time, they didn’t know it
existed. It surfaced soon after the incident, when, Tartaglione told us, he
picked up a graphic novel that he had been reading and found a piece of paper
tucked between the pages. It appeared to be a suicide note, in Epstein’s
handwriting.
“They
investigated me for month — Found NOTHING!!!” Epstein had written, fuming about
the revival of “15 year old charges” against him. “It is a treat to be able to
choose one’s time to say goodbye,” he went on. “Watcha want me to do — Bust out
cryin!! NO FUN — NOT WORTH IT!!”
Tartaglione
did not report the note to officials at the M.C.C. Instead, he gave it to his
lawyers. Its value to him was clear enough. At the time, he was potentially
facing the death penalty. The note would not only dispel suspicions that he had
attacked Epstein, but it might also support his account of playing the hero
during Epstein’s would-be suicide attempt, saving his life.
Bruce
Barket, a lawyer for Tartaglione at the time, told us in an interview that he
contacted Epstein’s attorneys and warned that he had information to counter
Epstein’s claims that Tartaglione attacked him. Barket told us he planned to
present the note in court or at an administrative hearing if action were taken
against Tartaglione. “Look, we have objective, extrinsic evidence that this was
a suicide attempt,” Barket recalled telling Epstein’s lawyers. Epstein backed
off his claims, telling jail officials he had no issues with Tartaglione and
felt safe being housed with him.
As for
the note, it ended up sealed in Tartaglione’s own court filings, out of public
view. “Our obligation isn’t to the jail to help them do their job or to Epstein
or his family or anybody else on the planet,” Barket told us. “Our job is to
protect our client.” As a result, the note was not seen by the jail staff at
the time, or even by investigators looking into Epstein’s death in the weeks
and years to come. It was made public only this May, after The Times’s lawyers
petitioned the judge in Tartaglione’s case to unseal it.
There are
several reasons to believe that the note, as oddly as it reads, is authentic.
The handwriting closely resembles the handwriting in Epstein’s other jail
notes. The penultimate sentence (“Watcha want me to do — Bust out cryin!!”) is
a phrase from the “Little Rascals” film and TV franchise that Epstein
occasionally dropped into emails to close friends and family — a personal
flourish that Tartaglione was exceedingly unlikely to have known about.
Most
revealing, the same phrase, in the same handwriting and with similar irregular
punctuation, appears among the notes Epstein scribbled at the M.C.C. In one of
these notes, Epstein wrote: “ONLY PAIN TO ME & Others in the future. NOT
very much fun! Why should people I Lov suffer for my problem. So … Watcha want
me to-do? …. Bust out cryin!! Best for all.”
These
notes, with their intimations of suicide, raise one of the great
counterfactuals of Epstein’s incarceration: If the jail psychologists had known
about them, would they have treated him differently? Instead, in her report the
day after the episode, Miller described Epstein’s acute suicide risk as
“moderate” and his chronic suicide risk as “absent.” Later that day, his status
was downgraded from suicide watch to psychological observation.
For the
next six days, he remained in the observation unit by the psychology office.
The cells there were spartan even by jail standards, containing only a single
mattress on a metal frame, a toilet and a sink. The front walls were clear,
allowing the inmates to be observed at all times. The task of watching them
fell to a rotating crew of “inmate companions” usually assigned to four-hour
shifts, who monitored the cells’ occupants and recorded updates on their
behavior every 15 minutes in a watch log.
William
Mersey, one of the companions assigned to Epstein, was the proprietor of an
escort advertising service and was at M.C.C. on a brief sentence for tax
evasion. Like Epstein, Mersey was a Jewish New Yorker in his 60s, whose amiable
chatter, he recalled, seemed to put Epstein at ease. Sometimes during their
conversations, he told us, Epstein would drift off despairingly. Mersey assumed
he was “thinking about how he is going to spend the rest of his life in
prison,” he told us. “He looked defeated.”
Epstein
made a similar impression on another inmate companion, Michael Tisdale, who was
watching Epstein the evening after the July 23 episode. “Everything OK?”
Tisdale asked him.
“It’s all
right,” Epstein said, according to Tisdale. But it wasn’t clear that it was.
“This is a really different world,” he went on. “A really crazy world.”
Miller
planned to take Epstein off observation and return him to the SHU on July 29.
When they met that day, Epstein insisted again that he simply could not
remember what happened and suggested that perhaps his memory was impaired by
his sleep apnea; he was awaiting delivery of a CPAP machine, a commonly
prescribed device that would help him breathe in his sleep. He asked if he
could stay in the observation cell for another week. It was “safe” there, he
said.
Miller
said he could stay one more night. But then he had to return to the SHU. There
were “no mental health issues” precluding his return, she wrote in an email.
‘He’s not
good to be alone’
Epstein
was not placed back with Tartaglione when he returned to the SHU on July 30,
three weeks into his incarceration. His former cellmate had not yet been
cleared of any wrongdoing in the apparent suicide attempt, an M.C.C. warden
would later write. Instead, Epstein was placed with Efrain Reyes, a 50-year-old
Bronx native facing charges in a drug-trafficking case. Reyes was housed in the
SHU because he had been extorted and threatened in his previous unit and was
cooperating with prosecutors in another case.
The two
men were placed in Cell 220 on the SHU’s L Tier. Each eight-cell tier in the
SHU had its own locked door and was reached from the unit’s central common area
by a short flight of stairs. The guards’ desk sat in a corner of the common
area near the stairs to L Tier. Cell 220, chosen for its proximity to an
electrical outlet in the corridor that would allow Epstein to use his CPAP
machine, was also one of the closest to the guards’ desk.
The
guards brought in two mattresses so Epstein could sleep on the floor, as
Tartaglione did in Epstein’s previous cell — a violation of M.C.C. policy, but
one that was rarely enforced. Epstein, following Tartaglione’s example,
positioned the mattresses in a corner where he would not be visible through the
window in the door. It made Reyes nervous. “Please don’t do nothing while I’m
in here,” Reyes recalled telling Epstein. “I have a chance to go home soon.” He
added: “I don’t care what you did. That’s all I ask. If I can help you, let me
know.”
As a
cellmate, Reyes proved to be a thoughtful choice. He struck the investigators
who interviewed him after Epstein’s death as genuinely well intentioned. On
their first night in the cell, he noticed that Epstein still had not learned
how to make a jail bed, and he showed him how. Epstein seemed to appreciate
that, and he returned the favor by getting Reyes a radio and a bar of soap from
the commissary.
The
guards were on “eggshells” around Epstein, Reyes noticed. He was always making
demands, and if they did not comply, he would make a show of writing down their
names, telling them that he would talk to his lawyers. They seemed to approach
Epstein deferentially, allowing him to keep items like extra pens and bedding
that were officially forbidden for safety reasons — an obvious concern with
Epstein, as officials knew.
Robert
Adams, a corrections officer working at the M.C.C. at the time, said he was
“dreading” dealing with Epstein for fear that he would somehow suffer
consequences from his legal team. He recalled that once, when he returned
Epstein to his cell after a full-day session with his lawyers and gave him a
meal, Epstein asked for his name. Fearing the worst and panicking, Adams gave
him someone else’s. But instead, to his surprise, Epstein said to him, “Thank
you for treating me with dignity and humanity.” Adams thought Epstein appeared
“downtrodden,” like “a lion taken out of the jungle and put in a cage.”
Jail
officials had been formally warned of continuing concerns about Epstein’s
mental health. On July 31, the day after Epstein was sent back to the SHU with
a clean bill of mental health from Miller, the U.S. Marshals Service, which
escorts inmates between jail and court, flagged him with an “alert notice” upon
his return from a court hearing, noting that he was showing “suicidal
tendencies.”
As
Epstein continued to spend most of his waking hours in the legal-visit room,
there were moments that would in retrospect seem ominous to his lawyers. Once
they saw him examining a computer cable. Epstein, noticing their attention,
reassured them that he was too much of a “coward” to kill himself. Most
fatefully, he made an unusual request: He told them he wanted to update his
will.
One
night, Reyes recalled, he woke up to see Epstein fidgeting with a piece of
fabric — a clothesline that Reyes made out of a bedsheet, as M.C.C. inmates
often did. “Bro, we not doing this,” he said he told him, and flushed the line
down the toilet. Epstein insisted to Reyes that he had never attempted suicide
during his incarceration, but he wondered aloud about how he could live in
prison. “Don’t try to kill yourself in this cell,” Reyes told him again in one
of their conversations. “I don’t want to wake up and find you dead.”
“Don’t
worry,” Epstein told him. “I’m never going to cause you trouble.”
With
little to do, Epstein and Reyes watched the corrections officers. The cell
window, looking out onto the guards’ desk, provided a view of their regular
derelictions of their responsibilities. Once, around 5 in the morning, Reyes
woke up for a smoke and saw the guards sleeping, huddled in orange prisoners’
sheets against the cold of the air-conditioning. “Look, they’re using our
blankets,” he told Epstein. “They’re asleep.”
“Fucking
incredible,” Epstein said.
Reyes
would return occasionally to the subject of Epstein’s apparent attempted
suicide. “You tried to off yourself,” he recalled asking one night. “Why? You
got money. You can pay for protection.”
Epstein
told Reyes he was extorted during his brief stay in 5 North. “That’s the
hottest house,” Reyes told him.
“They
threw me to the wolves,” Epstein said.
“You can
live in jail,” Reyes insisted. Epstein, he said, replied that the government
was mad about the plea agreement he had negotiated in Florida. “I know I’m
never going to see the street again,” Reyes recalled him saying. He told Reyes
that prison was “no way to live.”
On the
morning of Aug. 9, Reyes was transferred to a private detention facility in
Queens that was often used to house inmates who were cooperating in other
prosecutions. As he left the tier for the last time, he told a jail staff
member to look out for Epstein. “Get him a good bunkie,” Reyes said. “He’s not
good to be alone.”
Reyes was
not the only one who understood this. Because of Epstein’s suicide risk, Miller
had ordered him housed with another inmate at all times. Several corrections
officers throughout Aug. 9 noted that Epstein had not been assigned a new
cellmate and later said they passed along the information. But no one resolved
the problem.
On the
day that Reyes left, a cache of particularly damaging documents was unsealed
and made public in a defamation lawsuit filed by one of Epstein’s victims,
Virginia Guiffre. Epstein held what would be a final meeting with his lawyers
that day and ended it earlier than usual. That evening, it would later be
discovered, a supervisor named Nathaniel Bullock allowed Epstein to make an
unmonitored phone call. Epstein told Bullock that he wanted to call his mother,
who had been dead for 15 years.
In fact,
he called his girlfriend, Karyna Shuliak. “They are trying to keep me safe,”
Epstein said of the guards, according to an account of the call that Shuliak’s
lawyers later gave to investigators. His case would take longer than expected,
he said. He told her that he would not be able to call for another month, that
she should be strong and that he loved her.
After the
phone call, Epstein was escorted back to his cell. He found it empty. No new
cellmate had been sent to join him. He was alone.
‘We’re
going to be in so much trouble’
The two
officers on duty in the SHU late that evening were Tova Noel and Ghitto
Bonhomme. Noel, who would stay on through the morning, had worked at the M.C.C.
for just over a year. Although she had not received any specific training for
the SHU, where she had worked for less than two months, she later told
investigators that she had been instructed to sign documents saying she had.
She routinely worked 16 hours at a stretch and had, at times, dozed off behind
the wheel of her car on her drive home to the South Bronx. Sometimes she called
in sick just to get time off from work to sleep.
None of
this was unusual at the M.C.C., which had been battered by years of budget
cuts, unfilled vacancies and bureaucratic lethargy in hiring. Understaffing was
so severe that six months before Epstein arrived at the M.C.C., Serene Gregg,
the president of the corrections officers’ union at the jail, wrote to top
Bureau of Prisons officials warning of “a dire situation” at the jail. “Quite
frankly, at this point, we are one incident away from a staff or inmate
fatality,” she wrote.
The week
Epstein died, 11 M.C.C. officers were absent from their regular shifts. The
jail was short-staffed enough that desperate supervisors ordered Noel, who was
already working until midnight on Aug. 9, to take the overnight shift, too.
Noel
conducted rounds — walking past the cells to confirm that all inmates were
alive, which officers were required to do twice an hour — shortly after 10
p.m., visiting one tier after another in the SHU. When she passed Epstein’s
cell, he called out for her to plug in his CPAP machine. She did and continued
on her way. It was the last time anyone would acknowledge seeing Epstein alive.
There
were approximately 11 surveillance cameras placed in and around the SHU,
positioned to comprehensively cover its common spaces and corridors, though not
the interiors of its cells. But M.C.C. technicians had discovered a major
hardware failure a week earlier: Nearly half of the system’s cameras, while
working in real time, were not recording. The jail staff had gotten replacement
hard drives that day but had not yet installed them. As a result, only two
cameras in the SHU were recording in the hours before Epstein’s body was
discovered. One covered most of the unit’s common area, including the guards’
desk and a sliver of the staircase leading up to the locked door to L Tier.
Beyond the door was Epstein’s cell.
The
camera’s footage is for the most part too low-resolution and blurry to identify
individuals and their movements with certainty, which has produced one of the
great enigmas in the Epstein case. Around 10:40 p.m., the camera covering the
common area momentarily captured, in the corner of its frame, an indistinct
orange shape that appeared to move up the staircase toward the L Tier door,
most of which was off-camera.
Although
the camera does not capture the entire staircase, the footage is the only
indication that a person might have entered or exited Epstein’s unit in the
hours between Noel’s round after 10 p.m. and the discovery of Epstein’s body
about eight hours later. An F.B.I. investigator’s notes on the video suggested
that it “could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that tier” — an observation
that has fueled speculation that it was Epstein’s killer.
Absent
other footage, it is likely impossible to say for certain whose movements are
captured in those frames. Bonhomme, who did not respond to multiple interview
requests for this article, is not visible in any of the footage from this time
period, and his whereabouts are unaccounted for. In a closed-door interview
before a congressional committee this year, Noel said that Bonhomme, who by
then had worked for more than 22 straight hours, was asleep at the time.
Bonhomme told investigators that he did not recall where he was between 10 p.m.
and the end of his shift at 12 a.m.
Based on
the footage, interviews and jail records, the Justice Department inspector
general would later conclude that the shape was most likely Noel — the only
other corrections officer on duty in the SHU that night besides an occasionally
visiting lieutenant — carrying orange inmate linens or clothing up to the tier.
Noel has repeatedly denied this in sworn testimony and interviews with
investigators, but two key details support the inspector general’s conclusion.
One is
that, as multiple M.C.C. officers testified under oath or told us separately,
only one set of keys to the tiers was kept in the SHU, on the person of one of
the two on-duty guards. “Officers guarded those keys with their lives,” aware
of the consequences if they didn’t, Adams said. A figure that appears to be
Noel is seen on the video minutes earlier making her rounds of the other tiers
shortly after 10 p.m., meaning she would have had the keys at the time. The
other notable detail is that the movement up and down the staircase corresponds
with a brief moment in which Noel’s location is otherwise unaccounted for in
the video.
When
Bonhomme’s shift ended at midnight, he was relieved by a jail employee named
Michael Thomas, a 12-year veteran of the Bureau of Prisons. Struggling to keep
pace with his rent and child-support payments, Thomas frequently volunteered to
work overtime on guard shifts, and this was his third consecutive shift. Thomas
was not principally a corrections officer; he mostly handled commissary,
laundry and supplies. But confronted by staffing shortfalls, jail officials
increasingly used teachers, nurses, clerical workers and other members of the
support staff to fill in.
Epstein’s
presence, and the extra attention he was now supposed to receive, was indicated
by a sardonic sign attached to the computer at the guards’ desk: “MANDATORY
ROUNDS MUST BE CONDUCTED EVERY 30 MINUTES ON EPSTEIN #76318-054 AS PER GOD!!!!”
Noel told investigators that she tried to do a count — in which two officers
are required to carefully inspect each cell together — at midnight. But Thomas
brushed her off. Then, Noel said, he pulled his hoodie over his head and fell
asleep.
Sound
carried between individual cells in the SHU, several former M.C.C. inmates told
us — easily enough that they could shout and sometimes even speak at normal
volume from one cell to the next and could hear some of what their neighbors
were doing. One of the two inmates in the cell adjoining Epstein’s on Aug. 9
was Chad Brown, who was awake late that night when, he told us, he heard a
noise from the other side of the wall. It sounded like ripping sheets.
Brown,
recognizing what the sound could mean, said he tried to distract Epstein by
asking if he had any postage stamps he could use.
“I didn’t
order any stamps,” he recalled Epstein replying.
The
tearing sound continued for about 10 minutes. Then it stopped, and Brown fell
asleep.
From 1
a.m. to 2:44 a.m., Noel and Thomas could be seen on the camera footage, seated
at the guards’ desk, motionless. Investigators later contended that they were
asleep, though Noel has denied she was. At 3 a.m., Noel said, she tried to wake
Thomas, but he would not get up. She left the desk to help a colleague with a
count upstairs in 10 South at 3:14 a.m., returning three minutes later.
Just
after 6:30 a.m., Thomas began delivering breakfast on Epstein’s tier. As he
came to Epstein’s cell, he would later tell investigators, he saw him
motionless inside and called for him to come to the door. When there was no
response, he unlocked the cell and went in. Epstein was hanging by a fabric
noose tied about four feet up the frame of the bunk bed, his body suspended an
inch or so off the cell floor. Thomas tore him down and shouted for Noel.
Noel
activated an alarm. Thomas heaved Epstein to the floor and administered chest
compressions. “Breathe, Epstein, breathe!” Noel recalled him shouting. And
then: “We’re going to be in so much trouble.”
‘It would
have taken a massive conspiracy’
Early on
the morning of Aug. 10, Geoffrey Berman’s phone rang. It was a U.S. marshal,
informing him that Jeffrey Epstein was dead.
Berman,
the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, and his prosecutors
had been building a case against Epstein for nine months, managing every little
detail — the indictment, the arrest, the bail process — to avoid the strategic
errors that had allowed Epstein to wriggle free from the Justice Department a
decade earlier. But now, in the most ghastly way, Epstein had wriggled free
anyway. Hanging up, Berman fumed to his wife. “The fucking M.C.C. has one
fucking job — to keep our defendants safe,” he later recalled saying. “And they
can’t even get that right with their most famous inmate.”
Suspicions
that Epstein had been murdered spread rapidly, especially on social media. That
theory seemed to assume that the M.C.C. was a state-of-the-art fortress, its
administration vigilant and all-seeing, where the death of an inmate as
significant as Epstein would be inconceivable under normal circumstances.
Berman and his prosecutors knew better, as did officials at the Justice
Department headquarters in Washington. When Bill Barr, Trump’s attorney
general, received the news himself in a call from his chief of staff, Brian
Rabbitt, Rabbitt told him that the M.C.C. was a “shit show.”
But when
F.B.I. agents descended on Epstein’s cell seven hours after the discovery of
his body, what they found suggested a sequence of failures that was stunning
even by M.C.C. standards. The U.S. Marshals Service had notified the M.C.C.
staff twice on Aug. 8 that Reyes was going to be moved the next day. And yet
Epstein, in spite of the warning signs and explicit policies to the contrary,
was left alone in his cell.
The cell
itself was filled with heaps of linens Epstein was not supposed to have and
scattered with multiple nooses and other ropelike strips of orange fabric. When
investigators tried to retrieve the camera footage from the hallway outside the
cell, they learned that it did not exist. As they toured the SHU, an inmate
named Jeffrey Estevez told us, “everybody was screaming, saying: ‘Y’all
murdered him! Y’all murdered Epstein!’”
Scrutiny
quickly fell upon Noel, the one M.C.C. corrections officer who had been present
for the entire period in question, and Thomas, who discovered the body. In the
moments immediately after the body was discovered, a lieutenant asked them what
happened. Thomas leaped to Noel’s defense: “It’s not her fault,” he said. “We
fucked up.” Bonhomme, who considered Noel a friend, later told investigators
that he spoke to her on the phone on the afternoon of Aug. 10. She told him she
was scared of talking on the phone, he recalled. (Through her lawyer, Noel
denied that this conversation took place.)
Noel and
Thomas both had at least one clear reason to be scared: They knew that they had
lied on their paperwork the night before. Although neither had done any of the
required counts of the inmates, they had signed forms stating that they did —
which federal investigators quickly discovered. Prosecutors in Berman’s office
opened criminal investigations into both guards, and Noel and Thomas were later
indicted on charges of falsifying records.
The
investigations effectively removed from the inquiry into Epstein’s death the
last guard to see him alive and the only guard who saw his body and cell in an
undisturbed state that morning. Neither guard cooperated in the initial Epstein
investigation. And neither would be interviewed under oath by federal
investigators until two years later, as a condition of having their
prosecutions deferred.
By
contrast, the investigators found that the inmates who agreed to talk were
valuable sources of information. The inmates surveilled their surroundings at
least as carefully as the guards; at any given time on any given tier, someone
was awake, bored and paying attention. Several inmates separately gave largely
consistent accounts of hearing Thomas arrive at Epstein’s cell that morning.
None recalled hearing anything out of the ordinary the previous night.
The
investigative and jail records released this year with the Epstein files
included a list of the inmates housed on L Tier that night, and we tried to
locate and contact all of them. Two of them, Chad Brown and Lorenzo Babrow,
agreed to speak with us; neither was interviewed by federal investigators in
2019. Babrow recalled hearing Epstein calling out about his CPAP machine that
night. Brown recalled hearing Epstein ripping sheets. Neither remembered any
sounds suggesting an entry into or a struggle in Epstein’s cell.
The
inmate whose account of Epstein’s time in jail struck the investigators as
particularly persuasive was Reyes, his former cellmate. Reyes, who would die of
heart disease after a bout of Covid in 2020, spent hours talking to Epstein,
and his account of Epstein’s mental state struck them as a truer portrait than
the one the psychology staff drew from their brief meetings with him. It was
one of several important factors in their eventual conclusion that his death
was a suicide.
Another
was their understanding of the SHU’s security. The confluence of human and
technological errors that attended Epstein’s death might have been suspicious,
but any explanation besides suicide required a persuasive theory of how an
assassin could have slipped into Epstein’s locked cell within the locked L Tier
sometime after Noel’s 10 p.m. rounds.
There
was, in fact, a route from the elevators to Epstein’s tier that would have
allowed an assailant, hugging the wall, to pass undetected by any recording
camera. But making use of such a route would have required passing in front of
multiple cameras that, while not recording, were monitored in real time by the
M.C.C.’s control center, which also remotely controlled the locks to the SHU’s
outer doors. It also would have required three physical keys, to the SHU’s
interior door, to L Tier and to Epstein’s cell — keys that multiple M.C.C.
staff members said were separately held by Noel and Thomas while they sat at
the guards’ desk, visible on camera.
In other
words, killing Epstein would have required not just the complicity of one or
two on-duty guards. It would have entailed an elaborate choreography involving
at least two distinct operations of the jail, the SHU and the control center,
at least one of which was unpredictably staffed. It would also have required
detailed knowledge of the SHU’s camera placements and which recording systems
were malfunctioning and which were not. And it would have required a
willingness to risk capital charges — the death penalty — for the murder of an
inmate in a federal facility.
“The
ability for somebody to have killed him — it would have taken a massive
conspiracy that I can’t imagine somebody not finding out about it at this
point,” Hugh Hurwitz, who was the head of the Bureau of Prisons at the time,
said in an interview. “Too many people would have been involved.”
Even in
the absence of evidence of a grand conspiracy, other suspicions remained
regarding the guards: namely whether the jail staff might have been complicit
in Epstein’s planning of his suicide. Questions would persist in particular
around Noel, on account of bank records that investigators subpoenaed and that
were released early this year in the Epstein files, which showed a $5,000 cash
deposit to her bank account 10 days before Epstein’s death, which the bank had
flagged as suspicious. But on closer review, it appeared unlikely that it had
anything to do with Epstein: The records showed a pattern of similar
transactions beginning in April 2018, long before the new federal investigation
into Epstein had even begun.
Despite
Noel and Thomas’s apparent negligence, prosecutors ultimately dropped the
charges against them, concluding that even if they had conducted the rounds,
they most likely could not have stopped Epstein from killing himself. Death by
hanging could be accomplished quickly enough that Epstein, who could clearly
see the guards’ desk from his cell window, easily could have timed the act
between the guards’ rounds. The one truly fatal error on the part of the jail
staff had occurred hours earlier, when multiple lieutenants who had been
notified of Reyes’s departure failed to find Epstein a new cellmate — the only
person who would have been capable of intervening quickly enough to save his
life.
‘Forensics
is not an exact science’
Epstein’s
body was taken by ambulance to New York-Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital,
where he was declared dead at 7:36 a.m. on Aug. 10. Later that day, his body
was sent to the New York City mortuary in an unmarked vehicle after a medical
examiner’s office van loaded with a decoy — cardboard boxes and sheets arranged
in the approximate shape of a person — departed first to distract the
photographers circling the hospital loading dock.
The next
morning, around 9 a.m., Kristin Roman, a veteran medical examiner for the city,
arrived to conduct the autopsy. Her findings, announced five days later, were
unequivocal: Epstein died by self-hanging.
Roman’s
determination was another factor in the federal investigators’ conclusion that
Epstein died by suicide. (Roman, who has never spoken publicly about the case,
retired recently from the medical examiner’s office and did not respond to
requests for comment.) And like other pillars of that conclusion, her
determination quickly came under scrutiny.
The first
and most influential skeptic was Michael Baden, a pathologist enlisted by
Epstein’s brother and only surviving family member, Mark Epstein, to observe
the autopsy. Baden, now 91, ran the medical examiner’s office himself in the
late 1970s and has since become known for conducting high-profile and
occasionally controversial investigations into famous deaths: John Belushi,
Nicole Brown Simpson and George Floyd, among others.
Emerging
from the examination room after watching Roman examine Epstein’s body, Baden
told Mark that the injuries appeared more in line with a homicidal
strangulation than a self-hanging but that he wanted more information. Two
months later, he announced on Fox News: “I think that the evidence points
towards homicide rather than suicide.”
Michael
Baden, a former medical examiner, was enlisted to attend Epstein’s autopsy by
his brother, Mark Epstein. He believed the injuries to the body were more
consistent with homicide than suicide. Cait Oppermann for The New York Times
His
argument rested on one particular detail from the examination: three bone and
cartilage fractures in Epstein’s neck. This pattern of injuries, Baden argued,
was common in a strangulation and unheard-of in a suicide.
We
presented Baden’s claim to nine pathologists and doctors in related
disciplines. Many noted that while such fractures were once considered a clear
indicator of homicide, they are now understood to occur in suicidal hangings,
too. More broadly, nearly all of them rejected the notion of conclusively
determining the manner of an otherwise mysterious death based purely on the
findings of an autopsy.
“Forensics
is not an exact science,” said Judy Melinek, a board-certified forensic
pathologist who often consults on criminal cases. “It really isn’t. It’s
interpretive. You can have injuries that look exactly the same; one is a
homicide, and the other is a suicide.” This is particularly true of neck
injuries, which pathologists consider among the hardest to interpret
conclusively. For that reason, Melinek said, medical evidence was less
important in making such a determination than the details of the scene of the
death — which meant that knowing those details was critically important.
The
problem was that those details, in Epstein’s case, were mostly missing. In a
recent interview, Baden acknowledged that, like Roman’s, his assessment of
Epstein’s manner of death was made in the absence of crucial facts. “The
information we wanted and didn’t have,” he told us, “was how he was found.”
There was
only one person who had that information: Michael Thomas, the corrections
officer who discovered Epstein’s body. But the fact that Thomas was under
criminal investigation in the falsified records case meant that federal agents
and prosecutors investigating Epstein’s death were unable to interview him. He
would only provide a more detailed, if still incomplete, account of the scene
two years later, when the inspector general interviewed him for its report. All
that the investigators knew in 2019, and therefore all that Roman or Baden
knew, was that Thomas found Epstein hanging from the frame of the bunk bed with
a piece of orange fabric around his neck.
The
scene, meanwhile, had been so fully contaminated by the M.C.C. staff and
paramedics by the time the F.B.I. arrived that investigators did not bother to
sample anything in it for DNA testing, according to internal messages. (In
other cases, forensic teams routinely collect DNA at trampled crime scenes.)
And the evidence they did gather included at least one significant error: They
took the wrong noose.
This
would give rise to further suspicion about Epstein’s death years later, when
some images from the investigation and the autopsy were made public, revealing
visible discrepancies between the noose that was logged as evidence and the
shape and angle of the marks that were left on Epstein’s neck: a narrow, deep
furrow that traveled in a straight horizontal line across his Adam’s apple,
branching out into a Y-shape on one side of his neck.
According
to records from their inquiry, the inspector general’s investigators later
homed in on a different noose in photographs taken from the scene: a length of
fabric that had landed in a far corner of the cell amid the chaos of Aug. 10.
It was a longer and more narrowly twisted loop, ripped apart in one place and
creased in a pattern that suggested it had been doubled over — and had borne
weight. Like the other objects from Epstein’s cell, it was thrown away before
anyone recognized its potential significance.
All that
anyone trying to revisit Epstein’s death has to work from, then, is one guard’s
recollections years later and the unredacted photographs of Epstein’s body
taken during the autopsy — the full set of which has been tightly held by Mark,
who maintains today that his brother was murdered.
Mark
shared the photos with a few medical researchers, including Michael Freeman,
the editor in chief of The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. Freeman, a
professor of forensic medicine, has submitted a report to a scientific journal
in which he argues that several details in the photograph — patterns of
bruising and cuts on Epstein’s neck, face and shoulder; the angle of the furrow
on his neck — point decisively to homicide. If Epstein’s death was a suicide,
Freeman said, “it would be the most unusual hanging ever.”
The
forensic pathologists we consulted, most of them experienced medical examiners,
ranged widely in their assessments of the limited facts at hand, but all
stressed their limits; none was willing to entirely rule out either homicide or
suicide based on those facts alone. Conclusively interpreting features like
cuts and bruises and furrow marks, most believed, was not possible with so many
unknowns in the hours around Epstein’s death.
Several
thought that a scenario suggested by Melinek, based on the publicly available
facts of the case, seemed plausible: Securing the noose to the bunk frame and
wrapping it more than once around his own neck, Epstein could have leaned
forward from the lower bunk from a sitting or kneeling position, his head
providing enough weight to cut off the blood flow, losing consciousness within
seconds and dying within minutes, eventually slumping to the position in which
Thomas said he found him. It wasn’t possible to say for certain that this
happened, but it also wasn’t possible to say for certain that it did not.
“With
20/20 hindsight, we can say: This was a high-profile case. It should have been
treated like a homicide, even if it was assumed by police to be a suicide,”
Melinek said. “Does it change the determination of the cause of death?
Ultimately, I haven’t seen sufficient evidence that it does.”
In the
end, the autopsy photos were like everything else in the Epstein case, offering
more possibilities than conclusions. Every question was easier to ask than to
answer. It made the case the perfect petri dish for conspiracy theories, a
space in which nothing could definitively be proved wrong, as long as someone
wanted to believe in it.
It is
fitting, then, that the last known image of Epstein alive appears to be a brief
fragment of surveillance camera footage at 7:49 p.m. on Aug. 9, the last full
day of his life, after his final phone call, as he was led back to his cell for
the last time. In it, he is little more than a silver head of hair, visible for
a split second — stripped of his wealth and influence, reduced to something
vague, elusive, a blur, a ghost. He is there, and then he is gone.
If you
are having thoughts of suicide, call or text 988 to reach the 988 Suicide and
Crisis Lifeline, or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for a list of
additional resources.
Shaila
Dewan contributed reporting. Susan Beachy, Andrew Chavez, Will Houp and Julie
Tate contributed research. Alexander Cardia and Karthik Patanjali contributed
graphics production.
Charles
Homans is a reporter for The Times and the magazine, covering national
politics.
Steve
Eder has been an investigative reporter for The Times for more than a decade
and has been reporting on Jeffrey Epstein since 2019.
Jan
Ransom is an investigative reporter for The Times focusing on the criminal
justice system, law enforcement and incarceration in New York.
Michael
Rothfeld is an investigative reporter in New York, writing in-depth articles
focusing on the city’s government, business and personalities.
.jpeg)

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário