Melania
Trump Says She Was Not Associated With Jeffrey Epstein
In an
extraordinary surprise address from the White House on April 9, 2026, First
Lady Melania Trump categorically denied any personal or professional
relationship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associate
Ghislaine Maxwell. Speaking from the Grand Foyer, she called for an end to
"unfounded and baseless lies" linking her to the disgraced financier.
Key
Denials and Clarifications
In her
six-minute scripted remarks, she addressed several specific points of
speculation:
No
Friendship: She explicitly stated, "I have never been friends with
Epstein".
Casual
Social Overlap: She acknowledged attending the same parties as Epstein
"from time to time" because overlapping social circles were common in
New York and Palm Beach.
Meeting
Details: She asserted that she first "crossed paths" with Epstein in
2000 at a party she attended with Donald Trump—two years after they met—and
denied that Epstein introduced them.
Correspondence
with Maxwell: She characterized her 2002 email exchange with Ghislaine Maxwell
as "casual correspondence" and a "trivial note" rather than
a sign of a relationship.
Knowledge
and Involvement: She maintained she had no knowledge of Epstein's crimes and
was "never involved in any capacity".
Call for
Public Hearings
Beyond
her personal denial, the First Lady urged Congress to hold public hearings for
the survivors of Epstein's crimes. She proposed that each victim should have
the opportunity to have their testimony officially entered into the
Congressional Record.
Context
of the Statement
Timing:
The statement was unexpected, as her office gave no prior indication she would
address this topic.
President's
Response: President Donald Trump reportedly told media outlets he was unaware
his wife intended to make the address beforehand.
Legal
Background: The address followed a period of legal tension between the First
Lady and journalist Michael Wolff over his reporting on her and Epstein.
According
to reports from Reuters and The New York Times, while she seeks to clear her
name, some critics and survivors have questioned why she chose to bring the
issue back into the spotlight at this time
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário