Trump and
his officials pressure the news media in unison as Iran war scrutiny
intensifies
By
Brian
Stelter
Updated
Mar 16, 2026
Every day
brings a new complaint — or three — from the Trump administration about the
American news media’s coverage of the Iran war.
President
Trump is using words like “criminal” and “unpatriotic” to assail media
companies. His FCC chairman, Brendan Carr, is threatening broadcasters’
licenses. His defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, is insulting news outlets from
the Pentagon press briefing podium.
There’s
nothing subtle about their attack-the-messenger strategy. But it may betray
some anxiety about the war’s unusually low public approval ratings — or about
how the war itself is actually going.
After
hearing Hegseth’s criticism last Friday, CNN senior political commentator David
Axelrod observed, “It feels like a decision has been made that if the war news
isn’t better, better to attack those who report news of the war.”
Axelrod
theorized that Trump is “envious” of countries without a First Amendment:
“Putin doesn’t have to put up with this!”
Major
news outlets are undeterred by the administration’s criticism, recognizing that
attempts to deter and discredit wartime reporting are as old as war coverage
itself.
As CNN
chairman and CEO Mark Thompson recently pointed out in a statement,
“Politicians have an obvious motive for claiming that journalism which raises
questions about their decisions is false. At CNN our only interest is in
telling the truth to our audiences in the U.S. and around the world and no
amount of political threats or insults is going to change that.”
That
said, the rhetoric is worth monitoring and analyzing, since it’s a window into
the president’s worldview and it shapes his supporters’ perceptions.
Trump’s
media-bashing, often a dull roar in the background, is an unusually loud howl
right now. On Sunday night, he repeatedly dismissed difficult questions about
the war by calling stories “fake.” He accused Iran of spreading misinformation
but then spread some of it himself.
And the
wartime media criticism is coming not just from Trump’s White House but from
across his government, with cabinet officials, regulators and MAGA allies all
part of a campaign to discourage independent reporting.
Trump
cries ‘treason’
“I
actually think it’s pretty criminal,” Trump said Sunday aboard Air Force One,
“because our media companies, who have no credibility whatsoever, are putting
out information that they know is false.”
Trump
went on a tear against “corrupt media outlets” in a 401-word Truth Social post
on Sunday evening.
He
accurately pointed out that fake, AI-generated videos showing imaginary Iranian
military victories have been circulating. News outlets like CNN and The New
York Times have been debunking those videos.
But then
Trump falsely claimed that Iran has been “working in close coordination with
the Fake News Media” to show the videos, including one especially obvious fake
showing the USS Abraham Lincoln on fire. He wrote, “You can say that those
Media Outlets that generated it should be brought up on Charges for TREASON for
the dissemination of false information!”
While the
made-up video is easy to find on YouTube, responsible news outlets have not
distributed it, contrary to Trump’s charge.
Speaking
with reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday night, Trump sounded frustrated
by the proliferation of the AI-generated videos. He blamed AI repeatedly and
said, “Iran is known for a lot of fake news,” using the “fake news” phrase that
he personally popularized a decade ago to demean real US news outlets.
“I
actually think it’s pretty criminal,” Trump went on to say, “because our media
companies, who have no credibility whatsoever, are putting out information that
they know is false.”
News
outlets have no incentive to do such a thing. The whole business model is built
on truthful information, though the “fog of war” is real — it can be very
difficult to separate fact from fiction in wartime.
Trump
also bristled when an ABC News reporter brought up the fact that “your PAC put
out a fundraising email” using photos taken at a dignified transfer of US
service members killed in Kuwait. “Do you think that’s an appropriate email to
send?” Trump said yes, and that he didn’t see the email, then asked where the
reporter worked, and proceeded to tear into ABC News as an organization.
“I don’t
want any more from ABC,” he added, and then looked around the plane for other
questioners.
When the
ABC reporter tried again later and asked a simple question about US deployments
to the region — “Can you explain why we’re sending 5,000 marines and sailors?”
— Trump replied, “You’re a very obnoxious person.”
The FCC
attack dog
FCC
chairman Brendan Carr threatened broadcasters’ local station licenses over Iran
war coverage this weekend.
Also on
Sunday, Trump praised his handpicked FCC chairman, Brendan Carr, who visited
him at Mar-a-Lago earlier in the weekend.
While
there, Carr posted on X, threatening the licenses of local broadcasters. He
attached one of Trump’s recent messages complaining about news coverage of the
war.
Curiously,
Trump’s stated complaint was about Times and Wall Street Journal coverage, and
neither outlet is subject to FCC regulation. But local TV stations are, since
they broadcast over the public airwaves, and are granted licenses for eight
years at a time. “Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they
will lose their licenses if they do not,” Carr wrote.
Experts
told CNN that Carr has little ability to follow through and actually strip
stations of licenses, but they said the potential chilling effect is
concerning, nonetheless.
Numerous
Democratic lawmakers denounced Carr’s threat as a page straight out of an
autocratic playbook.
“This is
vindictive, fascist stuff,” Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer wrote on X,
adding, “If Carr continues down this route, Democrats will hold him
accountable. Threatening broadcasters’ licenses for war coverage this
administration doesn’t like is the worst thing Carr has done — and that’s
saying something.”
Some of
Trump’s fiercest allies also expressed apprehension. When asked about Carr’s
threat during a Fox News appearance, Republican Sen. Ron Johnson said, “I’m a
big supporter of the First Amendment. I do not like the heavy hand of
government, no matter who’s wielding it.”
But Trump
wrote Sunday evening that he was thrilled that Carr is “looking at the licenses
of some of these Corrupt and Highly Unpatriotic ‘News’ Organizations.”
Hegseth
versus the headlines
Hegseth
made his media criticism the centerpiece of last Friday’s Pentagon briefing.
Clearly attuned to the daily coverage, the former Fox News host suggested
networks swap on-screen banners such as “Mideast War Intensifies” for something
more to his liking: “Iran Increasingly Desperate.”
Coincidentally
or not, Hegseth’s old show, “Fox & Friends Weekend,” used that exact phrase
— “Mideast War Intensifies” — as an on-air chyron during its coverage two days
later.
At the
briefing, Hegseth also decried a CNN report about the Trump administration
underestimating the Iran war’s potential impact on the Strait of Hormuz. He
referred to Paramount’s pending takeover of Warner Bros Discovery, including
CNN, and invoked Paramount CEO David Ellison by name.
“The
sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better,” Hegseth said,
prompting gasps and grumbles from some of the journalists in the room.
The White
House also boosted several complaints about CNN last week, including an
objection to the network’s decision to show purported comments from the new
Iranian supreme leader’s first public statement. CNN said the comments were
aired “for their obvious news value.”
Then came
a Trump White House press release that baselessly claimed, “CNN Is Lying to
Undermine Operation Epic Fury’s Crushing Success.” Thompson’s subsequent
statement emphasized that “we stand by our journalism” and said the network
won’t waver.
On
Sunday, the Committee for the First Amendment, a free speech group
reconstituted by Jane Fonda last year, connected the dots between Carr, Hegseth
and other assaults on the media.
“Make no
mistake about it: These are direct attacks on the First Amendment and part of a
deliberate march toward authoritarianism,” the committee said. “In that world,
journalists are punished for telling the truth, media companies are expected to
fall in line, and dissent is treated as a threat.”
“But that
future is not inevitable,” the committee continued. “Do not obey in advance.
Speak loudly, stand with journalists, and defend the very freedoms that make
moments like today possible. None of this is normal — and we must act
accordingly, together.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário