The Iran War’s Economic Threat to Europe and Asia
Inflation and its consequences for growth are a
growing concern for countries where memories of the 2022 energy crisis are
fresh.
Eshe Nelson River Akira Davis
By Eshe Nelson and River Akira Davis
Eshe Nelson reported from London and Brussels,
and River Akira Davis from Tokyo.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/19/business/iran-war-fiscal-spending-debt.html
March 19, 2026
Updated 2:06 a.m. ET
For governments around the globe, the prospect of
a prolonged war in the Middle East is raising the risk of fiscal strain on
already stretched public budgets.
Officials from London to Seoul to Bangkok are
starting to grapple with a vexing dilemma: Spend more to shield citizens from
surging energy costs, risking the ire of global debt investors, or choose
fiscal discipline and face the political backlash that is certain to follow.
No country is immune to the problem, but it is
especially acute in countries throughout Europe and Asia where dependence on
imported oil and gas is great and inflation is an economic and political
concern.
Governments with high debt levels are staring
down creditors restless about public finances drawn down by military spending,
critical public services, aging populations and infrastructure investments.
At the same time, the scars of the last energy
crisis, which followed the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, are still
visible. Some countries have moved quickly to offer relief to households as the
war in the Middle East has escalated. Portugal has cut taxes on diesel. Greece
has imposed a cap on corporate profit margins on the sale of fuel and some
groceries. In South Korea, the government is considering expanding an energy
voucher program for households.
“Fiscal space is important, but the political
pressure here is a much more important driver,” said Angel Talavera, the chief
European economist at Oxford Economics, a research group. “The threshold for
action is much lower because prices have become a hugely contentious issue with
voters.”
So far, fiscal interventions have been limited
and skewed toward cutting fuel costs for drivers; targeted support is
affordable.
But with Iran targeting major energy facilities
in Qatar and Saudi Arabia in retaliation for airstrikes on its South Pars
offshore gas field, disruptions to global energy flows are showing little sign
of subsiding. Officials may soon have to make difficult choices between
alleviating economic pain and reducing budgets for popular programs,
potentially borrowing more in the process.
In Europe, doable but painful options.
Of the roughly 20 percent of global oil and
liquefied natural gas that moves through the strait, about 80 percent is
destined for Asian markets. Some Asian airlines are worried about running out
of jet fuel; in Bangladesh, the government ordered fuel rationing and closed
universities. Several local governments in the Philippines have shifted to
four-day workweeks.
While European countries import relatively little
oil and gas from the Middle East, energy prices have still surged. Analysts
warn that European buyers will face heavy competition from Asian importers for
supplies from other parts of the world, further driving up prices.
Sander Tordoir, chief economist at the Center for
European Reform, a research institute, said Europe’s overall public finances
are in good shape, but that a repeat of the level of relief that governments
provided consumers and businesses in 2022 would raise troubling prospects. In
the European Union, energy subsidies nearly doubled to 397 billion euros, or
$457 billion, in 2022 from a year earlier. Over two years, the British
government provided about 75 billion pounds ($100 billion) of support, including
subsidizing household energy bills.
“If that’s the kind of order of magnitude that
European countries will have to spend on this, it is doable, but painful,” Mr.
Tordoir said.
The starkest example may be Britain. This week,
its government announced £53 million to help those who depend on heating oil,
an acute problem in Northern Ireland. But it has so far stopped short of wider
changes, such as postponing an upcoming increase in fuel taxes for drivers.
The British government has bound itself to strict
fiscal rules to appease bond investors who are wary of the country’s high debt
levels and low growth outlook. Britain’s bond yields tend to rise more sharply
than those of its neighbors in a sell-off, driving up borrowing costs. Last
year, the government was spending £1 in every £10 on debt interest payments.
Now, just as the fiscal picture is starting to improve, the war in Iran risks
derailing it.
“The U.K. is especially vulnerable,” Mr. Tordoir
said.
Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has very
little fiscal leeway, said Marcel Fratzscher, the president of the German
Institute for Economic Research. In 2022, Germany slashed taxes on gasoline and
diesel for a few months, costing €3 billion, among other measures. If oil and
gas prices stay at current levels for the year, Germany’s expected economic
growth this year would be halved to 0.5 percent, Mr. Fratzscher’s organization
estimates.
“This is nothing that the government can find in
the current budget or shift money around,” he said. “And that’s only the
beginning.”
Likewise with France. Though it is insulated by
having a lot of domestic nuclear energy, the French government has struggled to
bring down debt levels. It is a country that “can’t afford to be doing
extravagant spending,” Mr. Talavera of Oxford Economics said.
Greece, Spain and Portugal make up one relatively
bright spot. Once marked by high debt and loose commitments to fiscal
responsibility, the three have improved their fiscal positions, either by
bringing down debt or, like Spain, by generating strong economic growth. That
has allowed them to act first to try to shield households and businesses from
rising costs.
In recent years, Asia had been making progress
reining in deficits that spiked during the Covid-19 pandemic, according to
Albert Park, the chief economist at the Asian Development Bank. But trade
disruptions stemming from the war are “another shock” that could push debt
higher again.
“That is a concern especially for those countries
that are already walking a fine line on debt sustainability,” he said.
The wealthier economies of Japan, South Korea and
Taiwan have measures, such as energy voucher programs, to help shield consumers
from surging prices. They also have relatively robust foreign exchange reserves
and credit lines.
The impact is expected to be more pronounced in
Asia’s emerging markets, said Stefan Angrick, head of Japan and frontier market
economics at Moody’s Analytics. In Southeast Asia particularly, governments
have historically relied on state funding as a shield against energy price
volatility, a strategy used aggressively in 2022.
At that time, Thailand tapped a state-led fuel
fund designed to subsidize costs during price spikes. Midway through 2022, the
fund started running a multibillion-dollar deficit, forcing the government to
secure emergency loan guarantees.
Thailand has resumed its reliance on the fund,
spending tens of millions of dollars daily to subsidize diesel. This month, its
balance plunged into a deficit again, prompting the government to consider new
loan guarantees.
Both Thailand and Indonesia, whose government has
signaled plans to increase fuel subsidies, face significant risk of sovereign
rating downgrades, the Japanese bank Nomura warned recently. That could raise
their borrowing costs.
For now, the two countries’ financial
interventions “will limit volatility,” Mr. Angrick of Moody’s said. “But given
fiscal limitations, that’s also something that they will not want to keep up
for a prolonged period,” he added.
Among Asia’s most vulnerable countries, according
to Mr. Angrick, are Bangladesh and Pakistan, which rely on the Mideast for
two-thirds or more of their liquefied natural gas and oil supplies and already
face financing pressures.
Also at risk are Pacific Island economies
including Tonga, Fiji and Samoa, according to Mr. Park of the Asian Development
Bank, as well as the Maldives.
While energy costs are still a long way from
their 2022 levels, the pressure to spend and the damage to economic growth will
compound if the war drags on.
Governments with tight budgets will need to use
directed subsidies, not broad spending measures, Mr. Park said. At the same
time, higher energy prices and inflation will weigh on companies and consumers.
“There will be bigger and bigger effects on
economic output,” he said, “and that is another shock that will undermine debt
sustainability.”
Eshe Nelson is a Times reporter based in London,
covering economics and business news.
River Akira Davis covers Japan for The Times,
including its economy and businesses, and is based in Tokyo.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário