Trump
declaration of Greenland framework deal met with scepticism as doubts persist
Nato
chief Mark Rutte says there is ‘a lot of work to be done’, as some Danish MPs
voice concern at Greenland apparently being sidelined in US president’s talks
Jonathan
Yerushalmy
Thu 22
Jan 2026 03.49 CET
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/22/trump-greenland-framework-future-deal-reactions
Donald
Trump’s announcement of a “framework of a future deal” that would settle the
issue of Greenland after weeks of escalating threats has been met with profound
scepticism from people in the Arctic territory, even as financial markets
rebounded and European leaders welcomed a reprieve from further tariffs.
Just
hours after the president used his speech at the World Economic Forum to insist
he wanted Greenland, “including right, title and ownership,” but backed away
from his more bellicose threats of military intervention – Trump took to social
media to announce “the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland”
after talks with Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte, and withdrew the threat of
tariffs against eight European countries. He later called it “a concept of a
deal” when he spoke to business network CNBC soon after Wall Street closed.
“The day
ended better than it started,” said Danish foreign minister Lars Løkke
Rasmussen. “Now, let’s sit down and find out how we can address the American
security concerns in the Arctic while respecting the red lines of the Kingdom
of Denmark,” he said.
Italy’s
prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, also welcomed Trump’s decision, but Rutte, who
negotiated Wednesday’s deal with Trump, issued a note of caution, saying there
remained “a lot of work to be done”.
When
asked by Fox News if Greenland would remain a part of the Kingdom of Denmark
under the deal, Rutte said the issue had not come up, and offered few further
details about the agreement. Nato spokesperson Allison Hart said talks on the
framework Trump was referring to would focus on ensuring Arctic security
“through the collective efforts of allies.”
But there
was anger from some Danish MPs, including Sascha Faxe who took umbrage with
Greenland’s exclusion from Wednesday’s negotiations.
“It’s not
real negotiations; it’s two men who have had a conversation,” she told Sky
News. “There can’t be a deal without having Greenland as part of the
negotiations.”
According
to media reports, the compromise deal could see the US granted sovereignty over
small pockets of Greenland where military bases are located, with unnamed
officials in the Telegraph comparing the proposal to the UK military’s bases in
Cyprus, which are regarded as British territory.
The
framework would also potentially allow the US to mine for rare earth minerals,
without seeking permission from Denmark, according to the Telegraph.
It
remains unclear whether Denmark has signed up to the deal, but on Wednesday
night Aaja Chemnitz Larsen, a Greenlandic member of the Danish parliament, said
that the idea that Nato should have anything to say about the territory’s
sovereignty or minerals was “completely out of the question”.
After
days of ratcheting tensions which signalled the deepest rupture in
transatlantic relations in decades – and saw Canadian prime minister Mark
Carney issue a stirring eulogy for the rules-based order on Tuesday – Trump’s
reasons for apparently backing down remain unclear.
Sweden’s
minister for foreign affairs, Maria Stenergard, said the work of Europe’s
allies has “had an effect” and she reiterated that they would not be
“blackmailed”.
The Dutch
prime minister, Dick Schoof, called Trump’s decision to waive threatened
tariffs against European allies a sign of “de-escalation” and EU leaders are
now set to discuss their options at an emergency summit in Brussels on
Thursday.
Others
pointed to wobbles on the financial markets, after Trump’s more hawkish
comments on Greenland on Tuesday led to a sharp selloff on the US share
markets. Global markets rebounded on Wednesday after Trump’s announced the
framework deal and reneged his threat of tariffs.
“The
market bounced when he said we wouldn’t use force,” said Mark Hackett, chief
market strategist at Nationwide in Boston, while financial analyst Matthew
Smart said “uncertainty just got priced out.”
Others
noted that Trump has a history of making escalating threats, only to pull back
when financial markets start falling. After he reined in his global trade war
in April last year, following a rout in the markers, the Financial Times came
up with the acronym “Taco” – “Trump Always Chickens Out” – to describe the
phenomenon.
US
publication Semafor reported that Trump appeared frustrated by the turn in the
markets this week, and noted that his antagonism towards European allies came
with huge risks.
“Countries
like the UK, Belgium, and France hold trillions of dollars in US assets like
treasuries. If they decide to sell those, it could send interest rates
skyrocketing,” reporter Eleanor Mueller wrote.
Michael
McFaul, a former US ambassador to Russia and avowed Trump critic, suggested the
change in tone was a result of a variety of pressures on the president: “United
Europeans, the market, other US politicians, independent media, and public
opinion combined to stop Trump’s crazy gambit to invade & annex Greenland.”
In
Greenland however, Trump’s announcement was greeted with serious scepticism.
“He’s
lying,” said one main in the capital Nuuk, who was interviewed by the AFP news
agency.
That
sentiment was shared by care worker Anak, who told AFP “Greenland belongs to
the Greenlanders.”

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário