News
Analysis
Trump’s
Two Minds on China Sow a Chaotic Few Days
The
president’s bellicose vow of steep new tariffs, followed quickly by a more
conciliatory message, pointed to an internal tug of war over his approach.
Zolan
Kanno-Youngs
By Zolan
Kanno-Youngs
Reporting
from Washington
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/13/us/politics/trump-china-tariffs.html
Oct. 13,
2025
Just days
ago, President Trump indicated his trade war with China was entering a more
belligerent phase. China’s new, “unheard of” controls on rare earth minerals
were “sinister and hostile” and a “moral disgrace,” he fumed, vowing to hit
back with 100 percent tariffs on all products from China.
“The rest
is History,” he said in a social media post.
Just 48
hours later, Mr. Trump appeared eager to rewrite that history.
President
Xi Jinping of China was only having a “bad moment,” Mr. Trump said on social
media on Sunday. “Don’t worry about China, it will all be fine!” He reassured
his followers that the United States “wants to help China, not hurt it!!!”
The
dueling messages appeared to provide a window into an internal tug of war for
Mr. Trump over the best way to approach China on trade issues. He has
repeatedly seesawed between retaliation and reconciliation, rattling markets,
sending businesses scrambling and leaving questions about whether he has a
larger strategy.
At times,
Mr. Trump has taken steps to “decouple” the United States from China,
threatening severe tariffs, moving to suspend sales of critical technology and
even revoking the visas of Chinese students. But with a potential meeting with
Mr. Xi expected this month, Mr. Trump and his aides have also struck a
conciliatory tone in hopes of reaching a trade agreement and cementing Mr.
Trump’s self-described role as a master deal maker.
Both
approaches were on display in recent days.
Markets
in the United States plunged on Friday amid Mr. Trump’s threats, and then
rebounded some on Monday as he seemed to back off. Stocks in Asia, which had
closed for the week before Mr. Trump’s bellicose turn, fell on Monday amid
fears of an intensified trade war.
Mr. Trump
most likely saw China’s curbs on rare earth minerals, which tighten its grip
over global manufacturing, as a personal slight, particularly after the two
sides agreed to defuse tensions and scale back tariffs in the spring, said Josh
Lipsky, the senior director of the Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center, a
think tank.
At the
same time, the administration wants to keep a summit with Mr. Xi, and a broader
trade agreement, on the table, particularly as American farmers begin to feel
the trade war’s toll. Mr. Trump raised the possibility on Friday of canceling
the meeting, a threat his Treasury secretary backpedaled on Monday.
China has
halted purchases of American farm products such as soybeans, using U.S. growers
to gain leverage in the talks.
“We know
the pressure the administration’s facing on that front,” Mr. Lipsky said. “So
it’s competing priorities, and at any given moment one might win out.”
Craig
Singleton, senior China fellow at the nonpartisan Foundation for Defense of
Democracies in Washington, said Mr. Trump most likely had two different
audiences in mind.
“The
initial threats were meant to show resolve and punish Beijing’s overreach; the
softer tone since is aimed at calming markets and reassuring allies,” Mr.
Singleton said. “Trump and his team seem to believe Beijing miscalculated — and
they’re leaving room for Xi to walk it back without escalating further.”
White
House officials did not respond to questions about what prompted Mr. Trump and
his aides to change their tone over the weekend.
Rare
earth minerals are crucial for making an array of products including motors,
brakes, semiconductors and fighter jets. China controls much of the world’s
supply, and the minerals have become one of the more pressing sticking points
between U.S. and Chinese negotiators.
China’s
new restrictions would require companies anywhere in the world to obtain
licenses if they were exporting products containing even a minimal amount of
Chinese-produced rare earths minerals, including for chip manufacturing. Those
exports would also be controlled if the minerals were produced using Chinese
mining, processing or magnet-making technologies. Companies with any
affiliation to foreign militaries would be denied licenses.
The
restrictions came after the Trump administration took steps to expand its
global technology restrictions, and Chinese officials have accused the
administration of undermining progress between the two nations.
On
Sunday, the Chinese Commerce Ministry pointed to the U.S. Commerce Department’s
expansion of the companies subject to sanctions when included on a government
“entity list,” a move that would affect many Chinese and Russian firms.
“It’s
pretty clear to me that China does not put out the new rare earth restrictions
in the absence of the commerce rule,” Mr. Lipsky said. “We had what I would
call a kind of temporary truce between the sides over the summer, where neither
side wanted to escalate in advance of the two leaders meeting. That was pretty
clear on all sides. And the commerce rule was seen by the Chinese as a
violation of that, just as what China did on rare earths was seen by the U.S.
as a violation.”
Treasury
Secretary Scott Bessent tried to calm markets on Monday, saying on the Fox
Business Network that Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi could work out their differences
before the Nov. 1 deadline that Mr. Trump set for his 100 percent tariffs.
Mr.
Bessent said that the Trump administration was working to find a way to
stabilize the finances of farmers.
“The
Chinese have unfortunately turned our soybean farmers into pawns,” Mr. Bessent
said. “They’re trying to manipulate them, and our farmers overwhelmingly back
President Trump.”
Vice
President JD Vance also appeared to leave a door open to a deal with China
during an appearance on Fox News on Sunday. Mr. Vance reiterated that Mr. Trump
appreciated the friendship he had developed with Mr. Xi.
But he
also warned China not to “respond in an aggressive manner.”
“I
guarantee you the president of the United States has far more cards than the
People’s Republic of China,” Mr. Vance said.
Whether
the administration will have the same leverage in the months to come is
uncertain. Mr. Vance noted that the Supreme Court was scheduled to hear
arguments over the administration’s use of emergency authorities to impose
tariffs.
“Unless we
have access to this tariff authority, it’s going to be very hard to negotiate
with China,” Mr. Vance said.
Alan
Rappeport and Gillian Wong contributed reporting.
Zolan
Kanno-Youngs is a White House correspondent for The Times, covering President
Trump and his administration.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário