Opinion
Guest Essay
‘He’s
Nuts, Your Trump.’ Canada Unites Against America.
July 13,
2025, 1:00 a.m. ET
Serge
Schmemann
By Serge
Schmemann
Mr.
Schmemann, an Opinion writer, wrote from Labelle, Quebec.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/13/opinion/canada-america-trump.html
Even here,
among the sparsely populated lakes and thickly forested hills of the
Laurentians, it is hard for an American not to feel the anger and incredulity
President Trump has stoked with his tariffs, talk of a 51st state and offhand
insults.
Much of that
may be lost on Americans buffeted by the ceaseless rush of crises and clashes
generated by the president’s agenda. But up here, in what used to be the most
friendly neighbor a country could possibly ask for, the rage is tangible.
Advertisers
compete with claims that their products are “proudly Canadian.” YouTube, news
media and newsletters vigilantly follow the latest indignation. Polls track
plummeting positive attitudes toward America and surging pride in Canada; the
latest Pew poll found that 59 percent of Canadians now view the United States
as the “greatest threat” to their country. Bourbon and California wines are
nowhere to be found, and Canadians are canceling trips south in droves.
T-shirts display the latest anti-American slogan, whether “Canada Is Not for
Sale” or “Elbows Up” — a classic hockey gesture that means “stand up and fight
back,” which the Canadian comedian Mike Myers famously (at least for Canadians)
displayed on “Saturday Night Live.”
Even King
Charles III, the British monarch and Canada’s head of state, chimed in.
Presiding over the opening of the Canadian Parliament and delivering the Speech
from the Throne in May — only the third time a sovereign has done so and the
first time in decades — Charles III was cautious not to assail Mr. Trump
directly. But he offered clear support to Canada by quoting from the national
anthem: “The True North is indeed strong and free.”
Here in the
Laurentians, where I’ve been spending summers for much of my life, a French
Canadian spots my District of Columbia license plate and offers, with a hint of
sympathy, “Il est fou, ton Trump!” (“He’s nuts, your Trump!”) Fortunately,
Americans visiting Canada still seem to be generally regarded as fellow
sufferers, not enemies. Not yet.
It’s all so
sad. Because Washington’s targeting of Canada is so unnecessary and so
undeserved. A “national emergency” that justifies huge tariff increases because
Canada is purportedly failing to halt a “tremendous” (Mr. Trump’s word) flow of
fentanyl and immigrants over the U.S.-Canada border? Only a minuscule fraction
of the fentanyl seized in the United States, or of illegal crossings into the
United States, come from Canada. But that doesn’t stop Mr. Trump, or the
Homeland Security secretary, Kristi Noem, or the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel,
from trumpeting a northern border crisis.
Still, what
grates on many Canadians is not so much the tariffs Mr. Trump has threatened as
the gratuitous insults he lobs this way. “As one Canadian explained to me,
tariffs are problematic, but they’re economic, they can be negotiated,” said
John W. Gulliver, president of the New England-Canada Business Council. “But
the continued taunts about a 51st state, calling the prime minister ‘governor,’
calling the border a fiction — that really angers us.”
Those are
the better-known barbs. But there are many more, such as when Ms. Noem, on a
visit to a well-known library straddling the Canadian-Vermont border in
January, hopped back and forth over a line marking the frontier, saying “U.S.A.
No. 1!” on the U.S. side and “51st state!” on the other. And when the White
House press secretary, asked about Prime Minister Mark Carney’s scrapping of a
disputed tax on American tech giants after Mr. Trump threatened to abort tariff
negotiations, responded: “It’s very simple. Prime Minister Carney and Canada
caved to President Trump and the United States of America.” “Caved” made many a
headline here.
These jibes
may not make news in the United States anymore. But Canadians, more accustomed
to friendly ribbing over poutine and how they say “eh?,” are still stunned and
confused by the overt disdain from the White House, which seems to exceed
anything leveled, for example, at Europe or Mexico.
Charlie
Angus, a Canadian journalist, musician and former member of Parliament, has
gathered a broad audience with a newsletter called The Resistance, dedicated in
large part to the American attacks. He has tallied more than 100 public
assaults on Canada by Mr. Trump since November, which he depicts as a familiar
“right-wing playbook” for “creating a convenient enemy — an existential menace
that must be dealt with.”
His
response? “We will boycott everything American — your booze, your produce, your
tourist destinations — as long as you are under an administration that denies
our fundamental right to sovereignty while demonizing our nation as some kind
of terrorist gang haven.”
The “Buy
Canadian” campaign that arose with the first Trump threats of tariffs may have
tapered off a bit, but it is still having an impact on sales of Canadian goods
such as food and clothing. A recent Ipsos poll found that three-quarters of
Canadians surveyed said they intend to forgo travel to the United States, while
72 percent said they will avoid buying U.S.-made goods. American brands have
even jumped on the bandwagon, with companies like McDonald’s stressing their
Canadian ingredients. One Canadian clothing and sock brand, OkayOk, reported a
60 percent increase in wholesale transactions so far this year, according to
The Globe and Mail newspaper.
“Virtually
everyone we know checks the labels of grocery items and avoids buying anything
made in the United States,” said Tom Creary, one of my summer neighbors on the
lake and a consultant to Canadian companies on doing business with the United
States and vice versa. “It’s blueberries from Mexico now, no more from
California. Tangerines from Morocco, not Florida. Companies and entrepreneurs I
have helped are now exploring business relationships with Europeans. One of
them told me last week, ‘I can’t trust America anymore like I used to. I have
to look elsewhere. It’s sad, but I have to do it.’”
As with all
of Mr. Trump’s actions, it is hard to predict where the discord with Canada may
lead. But it is a strong example of the extraordinary damage the 47th president
is wreaking on America’s standing in the world, whether he’s slapping tariffs
on goods, talking about buying Greenland, humiliating visitors to the White
House, canceling lifesaving aid, barring citizens from a dozen countries,
bullying Ukraine or otherwise undermining the “soft power” America used to
wield around the globe.
However the
tariff wars play out, the growing sense in Canada that the “good America” is
gone is likely to linger for a long time. Mr. Carney is already in the process
of seeking stronger trade relations with Europe and Mexico. And Canadians have
begun re-examining the bonds they’ve forged with the United States over the
years and their own complex identity, including the geographic and language
differences that have fed tenacious secessionist movements in the oil-rich
province of Alberta or in French-speaking Quebec.
Michael
Ignatieff, a historian and a former head of Canada’s Liberal Party, recently
posted an article he titled “Lament for a Nation,” after a celebrated essay
published 60 years ago by a philosophy professor named George Grant. It accused
the Liberal Party of selling out Canada to America through economic and
military integration.
Mr.
Ignatieff wrote: “Grant struck a nerve by asking a question we still haven’t
answered: What kind of national independence is possible for a country that
shares an undefended border with the incorrigibly violent, expansionist and yet
irresistibly attractive monster state to the south?” Today, he said, Mr. Trump
is raising the same question in brutal, existential terms.
But he may
also have provided some kind of answer. Almost everyone I asked about the
challenge this American president presents said a version of the same thing:
Mr. Trump has done more for Canadian unity than any prime minister ever has.
Serge
Schmemann has worked as bureau chief in Moscow, Bonn, Jerusalem and at the
United Nations, and as editorial page editor of The International Herald
Tribune.


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário