Pressure
piles on Merz to punish Israel over Gaza
The
German chancellor is increasingly isolated among Europe’s big beasts for
refusing to endorse a Brussels plan to suspend EU research ties with Israel.
July 30,
2025 8:34 pm CET
By Elena
Giordano, Tim Ross and Nette Nöstlinger
https://www.politico.eu/article/israel-war-in-gaza-famine-starvation-germany-friedrich-merz/
BRUSSELS
— As famine looms in Gaza, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz faces pressure to
drop staunch support for Israel and allow Brussels to penalize Benjamin
Netanyahu’s government.
The
European Commission this week proposed halting parts of the EU-Israel
Association Agreement, warning that the Israeli government has triggered a
“humanitarian catastrophe” that threatens “virtually the entire Gaza
population.”
A growing
number of EU countries favor taking such a step, but Germany has so far refused
to sign off on the proposal, which would mark a clear break from its
traditionally unwavering support for Israel. Diplomats from multiple EU
countries privately voiced their frustration with Berlin after Merz suggested
he wanted to see how the situation on the ground develops in the coming days.
International
pressure has intensified on Israel in the past two weeks amid increasingly dire
warnings about the situation facing hundreds of thousands of people in Gaza. In
Europe, leaders including France’s Emmanuel Macron and the U.K.’s Keir Starmer
have announced they intend to recognize a Palestinian state, demanding Israeli
Prime Minister Netanyahu halts hostilities and opens up meaningful access for
aid agencies to deliver food and medical supplies.
Even
Donald Trump acknowledged this week that there is “real starvation” in Gaza.
Famine
risk
On
Monday, the Commission dropped months of diplomatic niceties in a scathing
assessment of the situation that directly accused Israel of violating
international humanitarian law. The document proposing action against Israel
stated the risk of famine for the entire Gaza population as well as “thousands
of civilian deaths” and a “collapse of basic services.”
The
Commission’s proposal, which circulated among EU ambassadors on Tuesday, calls
for the partial suspension of Israel’s access to Horizon Europe, the bloc’s
flagship research program. But despite the urgency, the measure did not appear
to have enough backing among EU countries at the meeting of envoys, and Germany
and three other countries blocked it.
But there
are signs Merz’s opposition is softening. The German leader said Monday that
Berlin would await the outcome of a planned visit to Israel next week by the
foreign ministers of France, Germany and the U.K. “We naturally reserve the
right to hold further discussions and make further decisions,” he said. “We
assume that the Israeli government is quite willing to recognize that something
must be done now.”
At home,
Merz is also facing increasing pressure. The German coalition’s Social
Democrats (SPD), along with parts of the opposition, have begun to question the
country’s unwavering support for Israel in light of the Gaza emergency.
Government
talks are scheduled for after the German foreign minister’s visit, said Derya
Türk-Nachbaur, an SPD lawmaker. “I would like us to decide on more concrete
measures.”
“Coordinating
at the European level also means possibly increasing the pressure with France
and England, and perhaps also not blocking measures announced by the EU,” she
added. In June, the SPD formally urged the government to stop blocking partial
suspension of the association agreement at the EU level.
No more
cover-ups
“Pressure
on Germany might come more from internal parties than from other EU countries,”
one diplomatic source told POLITICO. Even Merz’s Christian Democrats “can no
longer justify or cover up Israel’s actions.”
Italy,
which has aligned with Germany in resisting the Commission’s plan, is also
reconsidering its stance. “Italy is with Germany, but in fact, both countries
are considering changing their position, and discussions are underway with the
Israeli government,” the same person added. Other EU diplomats and officials,
all also granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, corroborated the
stance.
Several
countries are now impatient and want the Commission to go further and suspend
key trade links with Israel, including potentially a ban on importing all goods
from the occupied territories, according to the diplomats and officials.
A
spokesperson for the Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp told POLITICO that
due to “the lack of progress” on the agreements between the EU and Israel on
humanitarian aid for Gaza, the Netherlands had decided to advocate for the
suspension of the trade chapter of the EU-Israel association agreement.
Critical
days ahead
If Berlin
shifts, the delicate balance in the Council could tip in favor of a formal EU
rebuke of Israel, beginning with the Horizon Europe program but potentially
extending to broader trade measures.
The
diplomatic situation is changing rapidly, and observers think Germany could
change its position in the coming hours or days. EU countries’ ambassadors
could be recalled to Brussels for an emergency meeting to vote on the
Commission’s Horizon plan, potentially within the next week.
One
hold-up is the need for the Commission’s draft legal text to be translated from
English into other EU languages for countries to give proper consideration to
the proposal, one official told POLITICO.
France
and the U.K., meanwhile, are charting their own course, with both set to
formally recognize the Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly
in September.
Elsewhere
in Europe, the question of what to do about Israel and Gaza is also dominating
debate. On Monday, the Dutch parliament interrupted its summer recess to hold
an emergency session on the worsening humanitarian situation. The Netherlands
also became the second EU country after Sweden to sanction Israeli ministers by
banning two members of Netanyahu’s cabinet from entering the country.
“That’s
because we see that the steps in Brussels are taken slowly,” Veldkamp said at a
press conference on Wednesday, adding that for The Netherlands, “a country
that’s traditionally friendly to Israel, that is quite a step.”
Still,
Veldkamp ruled out unilateral recognition of Palestine, saying, “At this
moment, there is no process underway. Recognizing a Palestinian state now will
not make much of a difference on the ground.”
‘Political
gesture’
Italy,
another key player, is waiting to see the outcome of the U.N. meeting in
September before deciding whether to back recognition.
“If Hamas
remains, then declaring the willingness to immediately recognize Palestine as a
state is a political gesture, not an anathema,” said one Italian official,
speaking on condition of anonymity. “But we need to see what opportunities may
arise in a week’s time. As things progress with the current situation, or
rather the continuation of Israeli military attacks, even the Italian
government could change its mind,” he added.
In
Belgium, Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot said that any decision on recognition
will be postponed until at least early September. The country’s five governing
parties remain split on the issue, though opposition groups are intensifying
calls for Belgium to align with France’s position.
By
contrast, Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia have already taken the step to recognize
Palestinian statehood, a signal that the EU consensus is fracturing further as
pressure mounts for a more coordinated response to the war in Gaza.
Inside
the Commission, divisions are increasingly public. European Commission Vice
President Teresa Ribera broke ranks in a radio interview on Wednesday, accusing
the Commission of dragging its feet.
Ribera
said that “for months, practically every week,” she has urged European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to take a stronger stance. “The
Commission is a reflection of national sensibilities. Institutionally it
shouldn’t be so, it is supposed to be independent and represent the interests
of the EU, but the truth is that everyone comes with their cultural context,
their beliefs.”
For
people on the ground, the EU’s inability to agree on what amounts to a largely
symbolic measure underscores the toothlessness of its response.
“The mere
fact that the EU can’t even agree on the smallest step possible … is a joke in
the face of the scale of the suffering,” Bushra Khalidi, the policy lead for
Oxfam in the Palestinian territories, told POLITICO. “Some countries say they
need more time, but it’s just more time for more death in Gaza.”
Giorgio
Leali contributed reporting from Paris and Ben Munster contributed reporting
from London.

Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário