Trump
makes rare admission of Musk’s conflicts of interest after Pentagon visit
President
says plans for potential war with China would not be shared with billionaire
due to his business interests
\Lauren Aratani and Joseph Gedeon in Washington and agencies
Fri 21 Mar
2025 15.51 EDT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/21/musk-pentagon-briefing-china
Donald Trump
said on Friday that plans for possible war with China should not be shared with
Elon Musk because of his business interests, a rare admission that the
billionaire faces conflicts of interests in his role as a senior adviser to the
US president.
Trump
rejected reports that Musk would be briefed on how the United States would
fight a hypothetical war with China, saying: “Elon has businesses in China. And
he would be susceptible, perhaps, to that.”
The
reference to Musk’s businesses – which include Tesla, an electric vehicle
manufacturer trying to expand sales and production in China – is an unusual
acknowledgment of concerns about Musk balancing his corporate and government
responsibilities.
Trump had
previously brushed off questions about Musk’s potential conflicts of interest,
simply saying that he would steer clear when necessary.
The
president said that Musk visited the Pentagon on Friday morning to discuss
reducing costs, which he has been working on through the so-called “department
of government efficiency” (Doge).
The defense
secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Musk was there “to talk about efficiencies, to
talk about innovations”.
Musk said
while leaving the Pentagon that he was ready to do “anything that could be
helpful”. He also refused to answer questions as to whether he received a
classified briefing on China as part of the visit.
As a key
adviser to Trump and the head of Doge, Musk has exercised broad powers in the
two months since Trump returned to the White House, conducting mass layoffs and
slashing budgets across the federal government. But while the Pentagon was also
in line to be a target for job cuts, Musk has yet to play any role there,
including in defense intelligence and military operations.
A senior
defense official told reporters on Tuesday that roughly 50,000 to 60,000
civilian jobs would be cut in the defense department.
Musk’s
involvement in any US plans or dealings with China would raise not only
security concerns but questions over a significant conflict of interest, as he
has considerable economic interests in China as the owner of Tesla and SpaceX,
which also has contracts with the US air force.
In the early
hours of Friday morning, Musk denied the reports that he would be briefed on
war with China, calling it “pure propaganda” and threatening to find those who
leaked the information.
“I look
forward to the prosecutions of those at the Pentagon who are leaking
maliciously false information,” he wrote. “They will be found.”
Musk
repeated his demand for such prosecutions upon arrival at the Department of
Defense on the outskirts of Washington DC on Friday morning. He left the
Pentagon about 90 minutes after arriving.
A Pentagon
spokesperson, asked by email to explain the true purpose of Musk’s briefing
given administration denials that it would involve putative war plans with
China, referred the Guardian to a statement posted on social media by Hegseth.
In a Friday
meeting at the White House to announce new air force fighter planes, Trump and
Hegseth both firmly rejected reports that Musk was shown any Pentagon plans
regarding a potential conflict with China during his visit earlier that day.
“They made
that up because it’s a good story to make up. They’re very dishonest people,”
Trump said about the New York Times reporting. “I called up Pete [Hegseth] and
I said: ‘Is there any truth to that?’ Absolutely not, he’s there for Doge, not
there for China. And if you ever mentioned China, I think he’d walk out of the
room.”
Hegseth
echoed Trump’s notion that the visit was focused on discussing government
efficiency initiatives and innovation opportunities, adding that there were “no
Chinese war plans”.
“We welcomed
him today to the Pentagon to talk about [the ‘department of government
efficiency’], to talk about efficiencies, to talk about innovations. It was a
great informal conversation,” he said.
Hegseth
suggested the reporting was deliberately intended to “undermine whatever
relationship the Pentagon has with” the Tesla CEO.
However,
some military experts have still expressed concern about Musk’s level of access
to sensitive information.
Wesley
Clark, retired general and former Nato supreme commander, told CNN in an
interview Friday afternoon that the administration has been “cutting a lot of
corners in a lot of areas”.
“It’s no
problem giving him a general impression, we do this for contractors, but the
conflict of interest – I’m more interested in his interests abroad, he talks to
Putin, he has business in China, he has other considerations and those can
impact things,” Clark said.
“I’m more
worried about Elon Musk coming into the Pentagon and saying ‘I’m high tech and
I have smart people in Silicon Valley and these generals do not know anything’.
You have got to be really careful about jumping on the next shiny object.”
According to
a New York Times report, the meeting was set to take place not in Hegseth’s
office, where informal meetings about innovation would normally take place, but
in a secure conference room known as “the Tank”, which is typically used for
higher-level meetings. Musk was to be briefed on a plan that contains 20 to 30
slides and details how the US military would fight a conflict with China.
Officials
who spoke anonymously with the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal
offered up potential reasons why Musk was receiving the briefing. The Times
suggested that Musk, in his Doge capacity, might be looking into trimming the
Pentagon’s budget and would need to know what military assets the US would use
in a potential conflict with China.
One source
told the Journal that Musk was receiving the briefing because he asked for one.
Though Musk
has a “top-secret” clearance within the federal government, lawyers at SpaceX
advised him in December not to seek higher levels of security clearances, which
would probably be denied due to his foreign ties and personal drug use.
Associated
Press contributed reporting
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário