Newsletters
London
Playbook
Starmer
arrives in Kyiv
By Stefan
Boscia
22 mins read
January 16,
2025 8:00 am CET
https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/london-playbook/starmer-arrives-in-kyiv/
London
Playbook
By STEFAN
BOSCIA
with NOAH
KEATE
WHILE YOU
WERE SLEEPING: Joe Biden used his farewell address to warn that an “oligarchy
is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence.” In an
attack on Silicon Valley, the U.S. president said he was “concerned about the
potential rise of a tech industrial complex” that spreads disinformation and
compared America’s ultra-wealthy to early 20th century “robber barons.”
Defending
democracy: Biden went on to warn about the dangers to American democracy in a
thinly veiled attack on Donald Trump. “I know believing in the idea of America
means respecting the institutions that govern a free society,” he told the
cameras in the Oval Office. “The presidency, the congress, the courts, a free
and independent press.”
Who could he
be talking about? He also called for the constitution to be amended “to make
clear that no president is immune from crimes that he or she commits while in
office.”
Now read … a
full wrap of the speech from my D.C. colleagues here.
Good
Thursday morning. This is Stefan Boscia.
DRIVING THE
DAY
STARMER
UKRAINI: Keir Starmer arrived in a grey and frosty Kyiv this morning for his
first trip to Ukraine since entering office six months ago. The PM goes
equipped with a new treaty promising the U.K. will partner with Ukraine for the
next century, along with further military aid for Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s
government. Just like the newly inked Israel-Hamas cease-fire deal (plenty more
on that below), the timing of today’s visit will not be seen as a coincidence.
It comes days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, which means it’s Britain’s
final chance to flaunt support for Ukraine’s defense against Russia before a
possible handbrake turn in American policy.
From sea to
shining sea: POLITICO’s Tim Ross, who is on the ground with Starmer, reports
the PM’s “100-year partnership” treaty will primarily beef up security in the
Black Sea, Baltic Sea and Azov Sea. But it will also include a commitment to
build stronger economic and cultural ties between the two nations. Starmer is
also expected to unveil a new package of support for Ukraine’s immediate needs,
including “lethal aid,” with precise details still to come.
100 years of
fortitude? The “nine pillars” in the partnership will include joint work on
science, technology, health care, agriculture and education. No. 10 said this
would include 100 schools from the U.K. and Ukraine buddying up in a joint
program focused on encouraging children to read for pleasure. Starmer is set to
join a class full of Ukrainian pupils as they dial into a call with a school in
Liverpool (Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson will be on the other end of
the line). Tim’s got a full write-up of the agreement here.
Starmer
said: “This is not just about the here and now, it is also about an investment
in our two countries for the next century, bringing together technology
development, scientific advances and cultural exchanges, and harnessing the
phenomenal innovation shown by Ukraine in recent years for generations to
come.”
Grain from
Ukraine: Britain has also been working on a system to trace Ukrainian grain
that has been stolen from Russian-occupied areas and then sold. The
British-made database will be ready and shared with the Kyiv government in the
coming weeks, while there are also promises to collaborate on energy and
critical minerals (Ukraine has lots of natural supplies), as well as green
steel production.
NOW, THE
SUBTEXT: The trip will be seen in the context of Trump’s return to the White
House next week and what that will mean for Ukraine’s future. The
president-elect and his allies have consistently said there must be a deal to
stop the war, with the expectation Kyiv may have to give up conquered territory
in negotiations. Even Zelenskyy acknowledged this point last month (via Sky)
and Western leaders have been busy trying to fortify their support for Ukraine
since Trump won the election.
In case it
wasn’t clear: Secretary of State nominee Marco Rubio said on Wednesday the war
“has to end,” adding that calling for a cease-fire should become official U.S.
policy. Speaking to a Senate confirmation hearing, Rubio said: “It is important
for everyone to be realistic. There will have to be concessions made by the
Russian Federation, but also by the Ukrainians.” The Kyiv Independent has his
full quotes.
Where have
you been? It’s not all a bed of roses with Britain, either. The trip comes
after several recent news reports suggesting Zelenskyy has been frustrated with
Starmer’s unwillingness to deliver on requests for more significant military
aid. Bloomberg’s Ellen Milligan and colleagues write today that Zelenskyy and
his team are unhappy that the PM took so long to personally visit Ukraine.
Rishi Sunak went there in his first month in No. 10, though that was, of
course, in a very different phase of the war.
Endgame:
Bloomberg also reports that Starmer and Emmanuel Macron are in talks over
potentially sending peacekeeping troops to Ukraine if a peace deal is struck.
Ben Riley-Smith also had the peacekeeping line in today’s Telegraph — though a
Whitehall official does not sound sold on the idea, telling the paper that
“there are challenges over what we could support, what would we want to
support, and the broader question about the threat that those troops may be
under and whether that is escalatory.”
SPEAKING OF
PEACE DEALS: While Starmer’s trip may drive much of the Westminster news agenda
today, another massively consequential international story dominates this
morning’s papers. The Gaza cease-fire is due to begin on Sunday, after Israel
and Hamas agreed to a complicated deal on Wednesday that will stretch over
months. The terms of the deal will go to Israel’s Cabinet for approval this
morning, where it is widely expected to pass — despite opposition from
far-right ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.
Closer to
home: The deal was hailed by Starmer last night as “the long overdue news that
the Israeli and Palestinian people have been desperately waiting for.” Foreign
Secretary David Lammy will make a statement to parliament at around midday
today (with the usual Commons scheduling caveats) about the agreement.
What happens
now: The remaining Hamas-held hostages from the Oct. 7 terror attack, estimated
to be 98 people, will be released in two stages. In return, Israel will free a
large number of Palestinian prisoners, withdraw from Gaza and let in
humanitarian aid. Thirty-three hostages will be released in the first six weeks
in exchange for hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, while a second phase will
include the release of the remaining hostages.
This one
could be tough: The third stage of the deal is still being negotiated and
relates to the reconstruction of Gaza. This part of the deal would also include
Hamas returning the bodies of dead hostages.
Still
obstacles to surpass: A person close to the talks told the FT that Israel
raised a “new outstanding issue” at the last minute, which still needs to be
resolved. Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu also said there were unsolved issues to
sort out in the coming weeks. All this is a reminder of the fragile nature of
talks, which will need to be managed carefully over several months to sustain
the cease-fire.
Both after a
ticket to Sweden: Biden and Trump are both claiming the credit for the deal,
after nine months of negotiations mediated by the U.S., Qatar and Egypt. Trump
said the “EPIC cease-fire agreement” was because of his election victory — a
notion that Biden described as “a joke” to reporters. He said the “deal was
developed and negotiated under my administration” and followed the “precise
contours” of his peace plan from May. He did, however, acknowledge that Trump’s
team did help with negotiations.
But but but
… It is very difficult to ignore the timing of the deal (it will literally
start a day before the inauguration) and the prospect that Trump’s
unpredictability scared both sides into getting it done. Israel’s Channel 14
reported that Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff put serious pressure on
Netanyahu last week to end the war. The Guardian has a write-up of the
exchange.
Madman
theory in play? Trump also warned Hamas last month there would be “all hell to
pay” if they didn’t release the hostages by his inauguration. Former Foreign
Secretary Jeremy Hunt told Robert Peston last night that he was “broadly
calling this for Trump,” because “both sides in this dispute know … that Trump
is not just strong, but he’s also unpredictable.”
Don’t get
clingy: As governments make final preparations for a Trump presidency, a former
foreign policy adviser to Tony Blair and Gordon Brown told POLITICO’s Power
Play podcast that the U.K. should “avoid being too needy.” Tom Fletcher, the
U.N.’s humanitarian relief boss, told Anne McElvoy that Starmer should avoid
caving to “the immediate things that Donald Trump might want — a trip in a gold
carriage along the Mall and all that sort of thing.” Even if it’s the only
thing that’ll actually butter him up.
ON THE
OPPOSITION BENCHES
BREAKING
WITH BORIS: Kemi Badenoch will promise to win back the public’s trust this
afternoon as she properly starts her long journey of detoxifying the
Conservative Party (which is beginning to look like Starmer’s three-stage plan
when he was in opposition). Badenoch will say “the Conservative Party made
mistakes” during 14 years in government in a speech that will try to break with
some of Boris Johnson and Theresa May’s actions in No. 10.
Today’s
timings: Badenoch will give her first major speech of 2025 at 1.30 p.m., which
will include a Q&A with assembled hacks. She will then take an hour’s worth
of questions from Iain Dale and his callers on LBC at 7 p.m. One senses “Call
Kemi” might produce some news lines.
Reading
between the lines: The Tory leader will promise to always tell the public “the
truth” in her speech and claim she is not interested in the easy fixes of her
predecessors. She will hit out against previous Tory governments for bringing
on Brexit “before we had a plan for growth outside the EU” and for bringing in
policies to increase immigration — two policy legacies of the Johnson era. She
will also hammer May for not having a plan for the green transition when she
announced the 2050 net-zero target.
Shoot first
and ask questions later: “These mistakes were made because we told people what
they wanted to hear first and then tried to work it out later,” Badenoch will
say. The Indy’s David Maddox has a full
write-up of the speech trail.
The truth
hurts: A Tory official told Playbook the attacks “aren’t aimed at anyone” (good
luck with maintaining that one) and that Badenoch is “just telling the truth.”
They added: “Kemi has a mandate to renew the Conservative Party from top to
bottom.”
Believe it
when I see it: One part of the party that she apparently won’t be changing from
top to bottom is her shadow Cabinet. Badenoch’s spokesperson claimed on
Wednesday that there would not be a reshuffle before the next election (via the
Telegraph) — perhaps this isn’t as unbelievable as it first sounds considering
how few MPs the party has. She’s already said she won’t be racing out with big
policies just yet, either.
IN THE
YELLOW CORNER: We will also get Ed Davey’s first major speech of 2025 at 10.30
a.m. in what is shaping up as a packed Thursday for Westminster hacks. The Lib
Dem leader will give a sermon on why the U.K. should rejoin the EU’s customs
union and steer away from a deeper economic relationship with Trump’s White
House.
Same ol’ Lib
Dems: Davey will call on the government to be “far more positive, far more
ambitious” than just “tinkering around the edges of the botched [Brexit] deal
the Conservatives signed four years ago.” He reckons this will “show we are not
so reliant on the United States, that the U.K. has alternatives, and won’t be
bullied into taking whatever Trump offers us.” The Guardian’s Peter Walker has
his full quotes.
Looking to
’29: The New Statesman’s George Eaton writes that Davey wants to position the
Lib Dems as “the only party that will criticize Donald Trump” as a part of a
long-term electoral strategy.
REEVES AND
THE REGULATORS
WHAT’S THE
PLAN? Rachel Reeves will drag a bunch of Britain’s regulators into No. 11 this
afternoon and demand to see their plans to generate economic growth. The
chancellor last night said she would warn the regulators at their lunchtime
meeting that they must look “at regulation across the piece” and do “what is
necessary to reform it.”
Hoping for
more good news: Reeves was buoyed by unexpectedly positive inflation figures on
Wednesday, down from 2.6 to 2.5 percent, which raised hopes of an accelerated
pace of interest rate cuts this year. The ONS also released its monthly GDP
estimate for November just as Playbook went to pixel this morning. You can find
that figure here, and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds is out to talk about
it on the morning broadcast round.
Who wants to
start? A senior Treasury figure told the Times’ Oliver Wright (in a story not
yet online) that she would challenge any regulators today who were not
ambitious enough in their plans to cut red tape. Playbook is told to expect a
readout after the meeting.
Roll call:
Attending the meeting will be bosses from the Competition and Markets Authority
(CMA), Ofcom, Ofwat, Ofgem, the Office of Rail and Road, the Environment Agency
and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). POLITICO’s James Fitzgerald texts in to
point out that Britain’s two main financial services regulators, the Financial
Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority, will not be there. A
further meeting is expected next week.
Need for
speed: Shadow Business Secretary Andrew Griffith will say during a speech at
the Enterprise Forum today that Reeves’ meeting today “smacks of desperation.”
“It’s like asking the village speed watch group to organize the next British
Grand Prix,” he will add. Ba dum tish.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário