Trump Can Post Smaller Bond in Civil Fraud Case,
Court Rules
The former president must post a bond of $175 million
within 10 days as he appeals the $454 million judgment against him.
By Ben
Protess and William K. Rashbaum
March 25,
2024
Updated
11:52 a.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/25/nyregion/trump-bond-reduced.html
With Donald
J. Trump on the clock to secure a nearly half-billion-dollar bond in his civil
fraud case, a New York appeals court appears to have handed the former
president a lifeline on Monday, saying it would accept a far smaller bond of
$175 million.
The ruling
by a five-judge panel of appellate court judges was a crucial and unexpected
victory for the former president, potentially staving off a looming financial
disaster. Had the court denied his request — and had he failed to obtain the
full bond — Mr. Trump risked of losing control over his bank accounts and,
eventually, even some of his marquee properties.
For now,
those dire outcomes might be on hold. If Mr. Trump obtains the smaller bond, it
would prevent the New York attorney general’s office, which brought the case
accusing him of fraudulently inflating his net worth, from collecting while Mr.
Trump appeals the $454 million judgment imposed by a trial judge. The appeal
could take months or longer to resolve.
Mr. Trump
has 10 days to secure the bond, and two people with knowledge of his finances
said he should be able to do so by then.
In a
statement, a spokeswoman for the attorney general, Letitia James, noted that
Mr. Trump was “still facing accountability for his staggering fraud” and that
the judgment “still stands.”
An appeal
bond is a promise from an outside company that it will cover his judgment if he
ultimately cannot pay. In order to obtain one, Mr. Trump must pay the bond
company a fee and pledge a sizable sum of cash as collateral. Mr. Trump need
not turn over the collateral for now, but the bond company would be entitled to
collect it if he failed to pay.
Mr. Trump’s
lawyers had asked the appeals court to either accept a smaller bond or pause
the bond requirement altogether. They argued that the court would be likely to
overturn the trial judge’s $454 million penalty once it heard the substance of
his appeal, contending that it was “grossly disproportionate and
unconstitutional.”
The trial
judge, Arthur F. Engoron, found Mr. Trump liable for conspiring to inflate his
net worth to reap favorable loans from banks and other financial benefits. The
$454 million reflected the interest payments Mr. Trump saved by misleading his
lenders, as well as profits from the recent sale of two properties.
Justice
Engoron did not stop there. He also imposed several restrictions on Mr. Trump
and his family business. For three years, Mr. Trump cannot run any New York
company, including portions of his own, nor can he obtain a loan from a New
York bank. The same restrictions apply to his adult sons for two years. And he
extended the appointment of an independent monitor, a watchful outsider to keep
an eye on the family business.
In a
surprise move, the appeals court on Monday also paused most of those new
restrictions, save for the monitor.
Mr. Trump
is fighting all the punishments, but the financial penalty alarmed him most.
Until the
court accepted the smaller bond on Monday, Mr. Trump was on the hook to obtain
a bond for the full amount.
He would
have needed to pledge a significant amount of collateral to the bond company —
about $557 million, his lawyers said — including as much cash as possible, as
well as any stocks and bonds he could sell quickly. He would have also owed the
bond company a fee that could have amounted to nearly $20 million.
In a recent
court filing, Mr. Trump’s lawyers revealed that he had been unable to secure a
bond for the full amount despite “diligent efforts” that included approaching
more than 30 bond companies. They called it a “practical impossibility.”
The problem
was simple: Much of Mr. Trump’s wealth is tied up in the value of his real
estate, which bond companies rarely accept as collateral. A recent New York
Times analysis found that Mr. Trump had more than $350 million in cash as well
as stocks and bonds, far short of the $557 million he would have needed to post
in collateral.
He did,
however, have enough collateral to recently post a $91.6 million bond in the
defamation case he lost to E. Jean Carroll, and now appears to have enough to
secure a $175 million bond in the case brought by Ms. James.
Ben Protess
is an investigative reporter at The Times, writing about public corruption. He
has been covering the various criminal investigations into former President
Trump and his allies. More about Ben Protess
William K.
Rashbaum is a senior writer on the Metro desk, where he covers political and
municipal corruption, courts, terrorism and law enforcement. He was a part of
the team awarded the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News. More about William K. Rashbaum
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário