Judge Tanya S. Chutkan rejected efforts by the former
president’s legal team to postpone the trial until 2026.
By Alan
Feuer
Aug. 28,
2023
Updated
12:11 p.m. ET
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/28/us/politics/trump-trial-date-jan-6.html
The federal
judge overseeing former President Donald J. Trump’s prosecution on charges of
conspiring to overturn the 2020 election set a trial date on Monday for early
March, laying out a schedule that was close to the government’s initial request
of January and that rebuffed Mr. Trump’s extraordinary proposal to push off the
proceeding until nearly a year and a half after the 2024 election.
The
decision by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan, issued at a contentious hearing in Federal
District Court in Washington, to start the trial on March 4 potentially brought
it into conflict with two other trials that Mr. Trump is facing that month.
The
district attorney in Fulton County, Ga., has proposed taking Mr. Trump to trial
on charges of tampering with the election in that state on the same day. A
second trial in Manhattan, in which Mr. Trump has been accused of more than 30
felonies connected to hush-money payments to a porn actress in the run-up the
2016 election, is set to go to trial on March 25.
While Judge
Chutkan noted that she had already spoken to the judge in the Manhattan case,
the fact that three of the four criminal cases confronting Mr. Trump could go
before separate juries in separate cities within weeks of one another reflects
the extraordinary nature of the former president’s legal situation.
Mr. Trump
has now been indicted four times in four places — Washington, New York, Atlanta
and Fort Pierce, Fla. — and prosecutors from across the country have been
jockeying for position. All of them are trying to find time for their trials
not only in relation to one another, but also against the backdrop of Mr.
Trump’s crowded calendar as the candidate leading the field for the Republican
Party’s 2024 presidential nomination.
Mr. Trump
has made no secret in conversations with his aides that he would like to solve
his uniquely complicated legal woes by winning the election. If either of his
two federal trials is delayed until after the race and Mr. Trump prevails, he
could seek to pardon himself after taking office or have his attorney general
dismiss the matters altogether.
In remarks
from the bench, Judge Chutkan, who was appointed by President Barack Obama,
played down arguments made by Mr. Trump’s lawyers that they needed until April
2026 to prepare for the trial given the voluminous amount of discovery they
will have to sort through.
The judge
also noted that while she understood that Mr. Trump had both other trial dates
scheduled next year and, at the same time, was running for the country’s
highest office, she was not going to let the intersection of his legal troubles
and his political campaign get in the way of setting a date.
“Mr. Trump,
like any defendant, will have to make the trial date work regardless of his
schedule,” Judge Chutkan said, adding that “there is a societal interest to a
speedy trial.”
Alan Feuer
covers extremism and political violence. He joined The Times in 1999. More
about Alan Feuer


Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário