Prime minister under fire as government backtracks on
plan for more onshore turbines to keep voters on side
Toby Helm
Political Editor
Sun 2 Jul
2023 07.00 BST
Rishi Sunak
is facing mounting criticism for putting politics above the fight against
climate change, amid clear signs that ministers are backtracking on plans to
allow more onshore windfarms in England before a general election.
The
Observer understands that a much-vaunted government consultation on ending what
has in effect been a ban on new onshore wind projects will lead to a minimal
relaxation of planning rules – because ministers do not want to anger potential
Tory voters who oppose huge wind turbines in their neighbourhoods.
On Saturday
night – as the Conservative party threatened to split over green policy – the
former Tory environment secretary and outgoing chair of the climate change
committee, Lord Deben, said it was simply unacceptable that the government was
still discussing whether it was in favour of onshore wind or not when it was widely
recognised as one of the cheapest forms of energy generation. The danger was
also that UK industry would lose out in the resulting green industrial
revolution for renewable energy to the US, China and the EU.
Deben, who
is retiring this weekend after 11 years as chair of the committee that
officially advises government, told the Observer: “It is unacceptable to have
spent so much time discussing something which should be immediate for
government. Why we need to go through all this palaver [of consulting] I am not
sure.
“In effect
we have stopped onshore wind. Having a basic opposition to it is just not a
sensible thing.”
On Friday,
Sunak was rocked by the resignation from the government of Tory peer and green
enthusiast Zac Goldsmith, who said the prime minister was “simply uninterested”
in the environment and the climate emergency.
Goldsmith
said in his resignation letter that the Tories would be punished by voters for
the party’s “apathy in the face of the greatest challenge we have faced” and
said his position had become untenable because of Sunak’s lack of commitment.
Sunak
countered shortly afterwards in a letter suggesting Goldsmith’s departure had
in fact been linked to No 10 asking him to apologise for having undermined the
House of Commons privileges committee’s inquiry into Boris Johnson and
Partygate.
The former
prime minister Theresa May also broke ranks against Sunak on climate policy
last week, saying the UK was falling behind other countries and had been too
slow to act in response to subsidies for green industries introduced by the US
and the EU.
Without a
clear response the UK was “putting at risk its reputation as a leader in
climate policy”, May said.
Instead of
taking a lead on climate matters, Sunak and his ministers are, critics say,
crudely trying to create a “wedge issue” with Labour over net zero policy in a
general election, including attacking the opposition for its decision to oppose
new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea.
Two weeks
ago energy secretary Grant Shapps accused Labour of becoming “the political
wing of Just Stop Oil – and other eco-extremists who use ordinary people’s
lives as their weapon”.
While such
comments will have pleased green sceptics on the Tory benches, they also
angered Conservatives who believe their party is sacrificing responsible green
policy to address a global emergency for what it believes will be short-term
political gain. They fear they will suffer in blue wall seats unless their
party is seen to have a credible and serious approach to tackling the climate
crisis.
At a
meeting last week of RenewableUK, a not-for-profit trade association representing
the green industry, the Tory MP and former energy minister Chris Skidmore, who
wrote a widely acclaimed report for the government on net zero strategy, made
clear he disagreed fundamentally with Shapps’s attack on Labour.
“When it
comes to the narrative of net zero, when it comes to the rhetoric we need to
deploy, no one is in the pocket of Just Stop Oil. Nobody wants to see
disruption on our streets. It simply is not an extreme opinion to believe that
one day we are going to have to end our use of fossil fuels,” Skidmore said.
Sam Hall,
director of the Conservative Environment Network, which includes many dozens of
Tory MPs, said it would be a mistake for the Conservatives to make oil and gas
a dividing line, as if it did then oil and gas rather than green energy would
become the main subject of debate. He added: “The Conservatives should focus on
their positive message around renewable energy ahead of the election, which has
been one of their greatest achievements in government.”
James
Robottom, head of onshore wind at RenewableUK, said there was now no
expectation that ministers would make any significant changes to planning rules
to allow more onshore wind projects in England as a result of its consultation.
He said his
organisation was “bitterly disappointed” by the evident lack of movement that
was clear from suggestions made in the process, and the fact that there had
been no response from government to the industry’s views over the past three
months. The result would be the loss of huge numbers of jobs and billions of
pounds of domestic and overseas investment.
Ed
Miliband, the shadow secretary of state for net zero, said: “Mainstream
Conservatives are right to be alarmed by the climate failure and lurch towards
a culture war on the part of Rishi Sunak and Grant Shapps.
“The Tory
leadership is way out of line with the British people, who do not want to see
the consensus for climate and environmental action broken.”
Robottom
said obstacles to new onshore wind development would “severely hinder
investment in the onshore wind industry and its supply chain due to the high
level of risk and uncertainty they create. We are being denied the opportunity
for thousands of new jobs and billions in private investment in England.”
He added:
“Even if a few new projects will be able to get planning permission, it will be
extremely difficult for them to source wind turbines, with markets in Germany,
Scotland and elsewhere being far more attractive, and crucially with clear
government backing and deployment targets.”
The
Department for Levelling Up said it had no statement to make on the planning
rules consultation other than that it was ongoing and that it would take time
to consider responses.
No 10
promised last year to dismantle the effective ban on onshore windfarms in
England, which was put in place in 2015 by tightening planning restrictions in
the national planning policy framework. However, after pressure from rightwing
Tory MPs, the most that is now expected are modest changes that will do little
to boost the number of English windfarms.
The former
prime minister David Cameron brought in the de facto onshore wind ban in 2015
after coming under pressure from more than 100 Tory MPs. As a result just 16
new turbines were granted planning permission in England between 2016 and 2020
– a 96% drop on the previous five years.
Recently
the Guardian revealed that Ukraine had built more onshore wind turbines than
England since it was occupied by Russian soldiers.
Only two
onshore wind turbines have been installed in England since February last year,
generating 1 megawatt (MW) of electricity in the Staffordshire village of
Keele.
Ukraine’s
Tyligulska wind power plant, meanwhile – the first to be built in a conflict
zone – has begun generating enough clean electricity to power about 200,000
homes just 60 miles from the frontline in the southern region of Mykolaiv, with
19 turbines providing an installed capacity of 114MW.
.jpeg)
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário