segunda-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2022

France's far-right Rassemblement National looks to redefine environmental policy

 


 France's far-right Rassemblement National looks to redefine environmental policy

 

The party's only specialist on environmental matters was recently convicted of domestic abuse. His supposed replacements are loyal to his 'localist' approach, far from the reality of climate change.

 

By Clément Guillou

Published on December 9, 2022 at 17h35, updated at 17h35 on December 9, 2022

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/politics/article/2022/12/09/france-s-far-right-rassemblement-national-looks-to-redefine-environmental-policy_6007169_5.html

 

When member of the European Parliament Hervé Juvin was convicted of domestic violence, as revealed by L'Obs in November, the far-right Rassemblement National (RN) lost one of the only two potential ministers Marine Le Pen liked to quote for her promised government. It was also the worst possible moment to part ways with a man who inspired the party's environmental policy, named "localism". The RN's strong presence in the Assemblée Nationale now means it needs to position on issues it was not highly interested in until now, but which. Climate change and possible energy shortages are now inevitable aspects of the political agenda.

 

Environmental protection is asserting itself as the second highest priority for French voters, behind purchasing power: a party aspiring to govern cannot reasonably leave its thinking on the subject underdeveloped. The new president of the RN, Jordan Bardella, is aware of this: "Our political family would be making a big mistake if it behaved as blindly on the environmental issue as the left has done on immigration for the past 30 years. We can no longer afford to deny, it" he recently told Valeurs actuelles.

 

With Mr. Juvin, the RN had strengthened its doctrine on environmental matters. It proposed a wide-scale counter-referendum project in 2021, after the citizens' convention on climate. The referendum would have been about the environment, food security, energy, concreting, green spaces and carbon tax at borders. The fight against free trade is also at the heart of the party's thoughts. Although it has abandoned its denial of global warming, the RN does not propose anything that responds to this issue, or anything that would meet France's climate objectives.

 

In addition to "localism," the RN wages two of Ms. Le Pen's personal battles: the rejection of wind turbines and the defense of animals, as well as a rather vague "protection of our landscapes". None of this is by accident, said a former party official: by associating two electorally promising niches with a nationalist ideology that cannot be applied in isolation, the RN gives the illusion of being interested in environmentalism without losing votes.

 

Climate skepticism

According to Stéphane François, a historian of the radical right and political environmentalism, the whole thing is "greenwashing": "Their defense of the countryside is not environmental, but sentimental and patriotic. It is not a defense of rare or threatened natural environments. The relocalization of industrial production is not necessarily pro-environmental either, especially when they slam renewable energies. And the RN wants voters to keep their way of life and not to be dissatisfied, so it does not turn its back on the productivist society; as the environmentalism of the new right would," in reference to the only theoretical movement of the far right that has seriously tackled the environmental question.

 

Can the place left vacant by Mr. Juvin allow the RN to take a step forward in its environmental thinking? Our interviews with the local officials who are expected to take up the issue do not suggest a revolution. A working group is being put together. It would include Andréa Kotarac, Mr. Juvin's right-hand man in his mini-party Les Localistes and president of the RN group in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes regional council; Pierre Meurin, the coordinator of the RN lawmakers in the sustainable development committee at the Assemblée Nationale; and Mathilde Androuët, who sits in the analogous body at the European Parliament.

 

All of them reject what they call "media environmentalism" and "punitive" environmentalism, which they say are "taken hostage by far-left currents of thought," as opposed to "working-class environmentalism" and "real environmentalists, the French who grow organic tomatoes in their garden." They display their skepticism towards climate objectives in many ways. "The RN lives on the same planet as you: yes, there are limits to its exploitation," said Mr. Kotarac. "But by saying, 'We're going to die if the targets aren't met,' we end up with morons who glue their hand to the road and prevent people from going to work." Mr. Meurin, on the other hand, puts things into perspective: "We may well achieve carbon neutrality, but it will be difficult to force India to stop coal-fired power plants."

 

'The Greta Thunberg sham'

On the energy front, massive support for nuclear power remains the key of the RN's policy. The three elected officials struggle to name a scenario that would make it possible to achieve carbon neutrality, but they are careful not to say that France should give up its greenhouse gas emission targets.

 

Skepticism toward global warming experts remains another marker of far-right environmentalism. Few experts are quoted beyond engineer Jean-Marc Jancovici, whose support for nuclear power is retained by the Lepenist party, but not his demand for reducing energy use. Ms. Androuët mocks "the Greta Thunberg sham, which reeks of lobbying, Malthusian stuff," as well as "the COPs, because there can be no unilateral solution," or the notion of "scientific consensus." "Global warming is real, but the real question is how much of it is due to human activity. The debate is still open," she said, recommending Steven Koonin's Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn't, and Why It Matters. It is a bestseller in the United States despite receiving criticism from the scientific community. The climate-skeptic work of this physicist who worked for Barack Obama's administration questions the extent of man's influence on global warming.

 

The RN's position can be summarized as an absence of constraints, which is at odds with its usual positioning in favor of a strong state. Hence the use of the referendum on environmental questions and the confidence in "French expertise." "I am not interested in simplistic and unrealistic solutions, said Mr. Meurin. "Everything appeals to me as long as the French accept it." However, he admits that there is a "certain amount of constraint on energy renovation" and thinks that a plan to develop transport links at the entrance to cities, with park-and-ride facilities, could be a prerequisite for reducing the number of cars in the city.

 

'Protection of the home'

Under Mr. Bardella, the RN's work on the environment is unlikely to deviate from an identity-based theory, in line with Mr. Juvin's thinking. The young party president believes that the issue of climate change must be treated in "ideological coherence with all the questions" raised by the Front National (the RN's former name) throughout its history, particularly demography and globalization.

 

One of Mr. Bardella's most active aides on the subject feeds off new-right thinking. Pierre-Romain Thionnet, an anti-liberal who has just become the head of the RN youth movement, is also a reader of the late Catholic integral environmental journal Limite and quotes the English conservative philosopher Roger Scruton. He believes that environmentalism must be conceived in the etymological sense, as "the protection of the home, from the Greek oikos," and that the protection of the environment has the "protection of the diversity of civilizations, peoples and cultures, a part left aside by the left wing's environmentalism."

 

Ms. Androuët, a political mentor for Mr. Bardella's, also has a "heritage-based vision of the environment." "An environmentalist," she said, "preserves the environment in which he was born, which has grown his entire chain of ancestors." By extension, the MEP believes that people are naturally made to "live, grow and work on the land on which they were born. It is an environmental tragedy and an aberration to tear people away from their natural environment to put them in towers here." She added this comparison: "It's like when you rip animals from their natural area, they're not right."

 

Clément Guillou

Sem comentários: